164 research outputs found
Natural Area Weeds: Mexican Petunia (Ruellia tweediana)
No full textENH1155, an 8-page illustrated fact sheet by Karen V. S. Hupp, Alison M. Fox, Sandra B. Wilson, Emily L. Barnett, and Randall K. Stocker, describes this herbaceous perennial that is popular with consumers, landscapers, and growers — its preferred habitat, dispersal, hybridization, cultivars, invasive status and distribution in natural areas, IFAS Assessment, and control. Includes references. Published by the UF Department of Environmental Horticulture, December 2009.
ENH1155/EP415: Natural Area Weeds: Mexican Petunia (Ruellia simplex) (ufl.edu
Natural Area Weeds: Mexican Petunia (Ruellia tweediana)
No full textENH1155, an 8-page illustrated fact sheet by Karen V. S. Hupp, Alison M. Fox, Sandra B. Wilson, Emily L. Barnett, and Randall K. Stocker, describes this herbaceous perennial that is popular with consumers, landscapers, and growers — its preferred habitat, dispersal, hybridization, cultivars, invasive status and distribution in natural areas, IFAS Assessment, and control. Includes references. Published by the UF Department of Environmental Horticulture, December 2009.
ENH1155/EP415: Natural Area Weeds: Mexican Petunia (Ruellia simplex) (ufl.edu
Natural Area Weeds: Mexican Petunia (Ruellia tweediana)
No full textENH1155, an 8-page illustrated fact sheet by Karen V. S. Hupp, Alison M. Fox, Sandra B. Wilson, Emily L. Barnett, and Randall K. Stocker, describes this herbaceous perennial that is popular with consumers, landscapers, and growers — its preferred habitat, dispersal, hybridization, cultivars, invasive status and distribution in natural areas, IFAS Assessment, and control. Includes references. Published by the UF Department of Environmental Horticulture, December 2009.
ENH1155/EP415: Natural Area Weeds: Mexican Petunia (Ruellia simplex) (ufl.edu
IFAS Assessment of Non-native Plants in Florida's Natural Areas: Status Assessment
No full textRevised! SS-AGR-225, a 14-page publication by Alison M. Fox, Doria R. Gordon, Joan A. Dusky, Linda Tyson, Randall K. Stocker, Kenneth A. Langeland, and Aimee L. Cooper, is the component of the IFAS Assessment that provides evaluations of plants that currently occur within Florida. designed to identify those non-native plant species that are invasive in areas of Florida where designated management objectives include the conservation of native biodiversity. Includes references. Published by the UF Department of Agronomy, April 2009.
IFAS Assessment of Non-native Plants in Florida's Natural Areas: Status Assessment
No full textRevised! SS-AGR-225, a 14-page publication by Alison M. Fox, Doria R. Gordon, Joan A. Dusky, Linda Tyson, Randall K. Stocker, Kenneth A. Langeland, and Aimee L. Cooper, is the component of the IFAS Assessment that provides evaluations of plants that currently occur within Florida. designed to identify those non-native plant species that are invasive in areas of Florida where designated management objectives include the conservation of native biodiversity. Includes references. Published by the UF Department of Agronomy, April 2009.
The Story Behind the IFAS Assessment of Non-native Plants in Florida's Natural Areas
No full textRevised! SS-AGR-86, an 8-page fact sheet by A. M. Fox, D. R. Gordon, J. A. Dusky, L. Tyson, R. K. Stocker, K. A. Langeland, and A. L. Cooper, provides a history, justification, and summary of the IFAS Assessment of Non-Native Plants in Florida’s Natural Areas. Includes references. Published by the UF Department of Agronomy, November 2009
The Story Behind the IFAS Assessment of Non-native Plants in Florida's Natural Areas
No full textRevised! SS-AGR-86, an 8-page fact sheet by A. M. Fox, D. R. Gordon, J. A. Dusky, L. Tyson, R. K. Stocker, K. A. Langeland, and A. L. Cooper, provides a history, justification, and summary of the IFAS Assessment of Non-Native Plants in Florida’s Natural Areas. Includes references. Published by the UF Department of Agronomy, November 2009
The construction of Karen Karnak: The multi-author-function
No full textThis thesis is situated within the comparatively recent developments of Web 2.0 and the emergence of interactive WikiMedia, and explores the mode of authorship within a Read/Write culture compared to that of a Read/Only tradition. The hypothesis of this study is that the role of the audience has become merged with the author, and as such, represents new functions and attributes, distinct from a more conventional concept of authorship, in which the roles of audience and author are more separate. Read/Write and participatory culture, as defined by this study, is focused on collaboration, and includes the influences of D.I.Y. culture, Open-Source practices and the production of text by multiple authors. Multi-authorship presents a re-thinking of several concepts which support the notion of the individual author, since the focus of multi-authorship is not on attribution and ownership of a finished text, but on the continued malleability of a text. Modes of multi-authorship, demonstrated in the use of the pseudonyms Alan Smithee and Karen Eliot, represent declarative authors whose names signify multiple origins, whilst concurrently indicating a distinct body of work. The function of these names form an important context to this study, since primary research involves the construction of an experimental mode of multi-authorship utilising WikiMedia technology and the interaction of thirty nine participants, who are invited to create a body of work under the collective pseudonym Karen Karnak. The data generated by this experiment is analysed using aspects of Michel Foucault's author-function to identify and determine power structures inherent in the WikiMedia context. The interplay of power structures, including concepts such as identity, ownership and the body of work, affect the resulting mode of authorship and contribute to the construction of Karen Karnak, suggesting further areas of research into the emerging multi-author
STOCKER CATTLE OWNERSHIP VS. CONTRACT GRAZING: A COMPARISON OF RISK-ADJUSTED RETURNS
No full textStocker cattle ownership is compared to contract grazing using stochastic simulation. Returns are evaluated for both cattle owners and caretakers in contract grazing agreements. For caretakers, contract grazing is significantly less risky than cattle ownership. For cattle owners, contracting reduces risk only slightly while significantly reducing expected returns.Livestock Production/Industries,
Reconsideración del elemento trilobulado en Mesoamérica: examen de los datos, interpretaciones sobre su continuidad y sugerencias para investigaciones futuras. 30. Arqueología
No full textArmillas, Pedro
1945. “Los dioses de Teotihuacan”, Anales del
Instituto de Etnografía Americana, núm. 6, Argentina,
Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza,
pp. 35-61.Berlo, J.
1989. “Early writing in Central Mexico: In Tlilli, In
Tlapalli before A.D. 1000”, en Richard A. Diehl y
J.C. Berlo (eds.), Mesoamerica After the Decline of
Teotihuacan A.D.700-900, Washington, D.C.,
Dumbarton Oaks, pp. 19-47.Berrin, K.
1988. Feathered Serpents and Flowering Trees,
San Francisco, The Fine Arts Museum.Bricker, V.
1981. The Indian Christ, the Indian King, Austin,
University of Texas Press.Caso, Alfonso
1959. “Glifos teotihuacanos”, Revista Mexicana de
Estudios Antropológicos, núm. 15, pp. 51-70.
1967. “Dioses y signos Teotihuacanos”, en
Teotihuacan, Onceava Mesa Redonda, México, D.F.,
Sociedad Mexicana de Antropología, pp. 249- 279.Charlton, C.
1990. “Los procesos de desarrollo de los estados
tempranos: el caso del estado azteca de
Otumba (1989-1990, gabiente)”, Consejo de
Arqueología, Boletín, México, D.F., Instituto
National de Antropología e Historia,
pp. 70-73.Códice Borbonicus
1974. Comentarios de Karl Anton Nowotny y
Jacqueline de Durand-Forest. Códices
Selecti, Graz, Austria.Códice Bodley
1964-1965. “Códice Bodley”, en José Corona
Núñez (ed.), Antigüedades de México, México,
Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público.Códice Borgia
1980. Códice Borgia, 3 vols., México, Fondo de
Cultura Económica.Códice Laud
1964-1965. “Códice Laud”, en José Corona Núñez
(ed.), Antigüedades de México, México,
Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público.Códice Nuttall
1975. The Codex Nuttall, Z. Nuttall (ed.) y A.G.
Miller (texto introductorio), New York, Dover
Publicaions.Coe, M.
1976. “Early Steps in the Evolution of Maya
Writing”, en H. B. Nicholson (ed.), Origins of
Religious Art and Iconography in Preclassic
Mesoamerica, UCLA Latin American Studies Series,
vol. 31, Los Angeles, The Ethnic Arts Council
of Los Angeles, pp. 123-140.Coggins, C.
1979. “Teotihuacan at Tikal in the Early Classic
Period”, en Actes du XLII Congrès
International des Americanistes 8, Paris, pp. 251-269.1990. “The Birth of the Baktun at Tikal and
Seibal”, en F. Clancy y P. Harrison (eds.), Vision
and Revision in Maya Studies, Albuquerque,
University of New Mexico Press,
pp. 79-97.D’Altroy, T.
1987. “Introduction to Special Issue: Inka
Ethnohistory”, Ethnohistory, 34 (1), pp. 1-13.Deely, J.
1990. Basics of Semiotics, Bloomington,
University of Indiana Press.Easby, E.
1970. Before Cortez: Sculpture of Middle America,
New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art.Edmonson, M.
1988. The Book of the Year: Middle American
Calendrical Systems, Salt Lake City, University of
Utah Press.Edwards, D. y T. Stocker
2001. “Co-variance of Postclassic Figurine Styles,
Settlement Patterns and Political Boundaries in
the Basin of Mexico”, en T. Stocker y C. O.
Charlton (eds.), New World Figurine Project,
vol. 2, Utah, Research Press, Provo,
pp. 55-87.Fash, W.
1991. Scribes, Warriors and Kings: The City of Copan
and the Ancient Maya, London, Thames and
Hudson.Fash, W. y B. Fash
2000. “Teotihuacan and the Maya: A Classic
Heritage”, en D. Carrasco, L. Jones y S. Sessions
(eds.), Mesoamerica’s Classic Heritage: From
Teotihuacan to the Aztecs, Boulder, University
Press of Colorado, pp. 433-463.Foncerrada de Molina, M.
1982. “Signos glíficos relacionados con Tláloc en
los murales de la batalla en Cacaxtla”, Anales del
Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, 50 (I), México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico,
pp. 23-34.Gallenkamp, C. y R. Johnson (eds.)
1985. Maya Treasures of an Ancient Civilization,
New York, Harry N. Abrams in association with
the Albuquerque Museum.Gann, T.
1900. “Mounds in Northern Honduras”, en
Nineteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American
Ethnology, 1897-98, part 2, Washington, D.C.,
pp. 655-692Gay, C.
1971. Chalcatzingo, Oregon, International Scholarly
Book Services, Portland.González Licón, E., L. Márquez Morfín,
y R. Matadamas Díaz
1991. “Exploraciones arqueológicas en Monte
Albán, Oaxaca, durante la temporada 1990-1991”,
Consejo de Arqueología, Boletín, México, Instituto
National de Antropología e Historia,
pp. 118-123.Grove, D.
1970. “The Olmec Paintings of Oxtotitlan Cave,
Guerrero, Mexico”, en Studies in Pre-Columbian Art
and Archaeology, núm. 6, Washington, D. C.,
Dumbarton Oaks.Hanks, W.
1989. “Word and Image in a Semiotic Perspective”,
en W. Hanks y D. Rice (eds.), Word and Image in
Maya Culture, Salt Lake City, University of Utah
Press, pp. 8-21.Hassig, R.
1985. Trade, Tribute and Transportation: The Sixteenth
Century Political Economy of the Valley of Mexico,
Norman, University of Oklahoma Press.
1988. Aztec Warfare, Norman, University
of Oklahoma Press.Healan, D.
1986. “Technological and Nontechnological
Aspects of an Obsidian Workshop Excavated at
Tula, Hidalgo”, en Barry Isaacs (ed.), Economic
Aspects of Prehispanic Highland Mexico, Greenwich,
Conn, JAI Press, pp. 133-152.Heyden, D.
1986. “Metaphors, Nahualtocaitl, and Other
‘Disguised’ Terms Among the Aztecs”, en G.
Gossen (ed.), Symbol and Meaning Beyond the Closed Community: Essays in Mesoamerican Ideas, Studies in Culture and Society, vol. 1, Albany, Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, University of Albany Press, State University of New York, pp. 35-43.Horcasitas, F., y D. Heyden (trad.)
1971. Book of the Gods and Rites and the Ancient
Calendar (by) Fray Diego Duran, Norman, University
of Oklahoma Press.Joralemon, P.
1976. “The Olmec Dragon: A Study in Pre-
Columbian Iconography”, en H. B. Nicholson
(ed.), Origins of Religious Art and Iconography in
Preclassic Mesoamerica, Los Angeles, UCLA Latin
American Studies Series vol. 31, The Ethnic Arts
Council of Los Angeles, pp. 27-72.Kubler, G.
1967. The Iconography of the Art of Teotihuacan,
Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology,
núm. 4, Washington, D.C., Dumbarton Oaks.Lamberg-Karlovsky, C.
1986. “The Emergence of Writing: Mesopotamia,
Egypt, and the Indus Civilizations”, Research
and Reflections in Archaeology, Middle American
Research Institute, Pub. 57, New Orleans, Tulane
University, pp. 149-158.Langley, J.
1982. “Blood, Rope and Finery at Cacaxtla”, en M.
Jansen and T. Leynaar (eds.), The Indians of Mexico
in Pre-Columbian and Modern Times, Leiden,
Rijksmuseum voor Volkenkunde, pp. 29-49.
1986. Symbolic Notation of Teotihuacan: Elements of Writing in a Mesoamerican Culture of the Classic Period, BAR International Series, 313, Oxford.Lischka, J.
1978. “A Functional Analysis of Middle Classic
Ceramics at Kaminaljuyu”, en R. Wetherington
(ed.), The Ceramics of Kaminaljuyu, Guatemala,
Pennsylvania State University Press Monograph Series on Kaminaljuyu, pp. 223-278.Longyear, J.
1952. Copan Ceramics; A Study of Southeastern Maya
Pottery, Carnegie Institution of Washington Pub.
597, Washington D.C., Carnegie Institution.Marcus, J.
1976. “The Iconography of Militarism at Monte
Alban and Neighboring Sites in the Valleys of
Oaxaca”, en H. B. Nicholson (ed.), Origins of
Religious Art and Iconography in Preclassic
Mesoamerica, UCLA Latin American Studies Series,
vol. 31. Los Angeles, The Ethnic Arts Council
of Los Angeles, pp. 123-140.Marcus, J., K. Flannery, y R. Spores
1983. “The Cultural Legacy of the Oaxacan
Preceramic”, en K. Flannery y J. Marcus (eds.),
The Cloud People: Divergent Evolution of the Zapotec
and Mixtec Civilizations, New York, Academic Press,
pp. 36-39.Matos Moctezuma, E.
1965. “El adoratorio decorado de las calles de
Argentina”, Anales del Instituto Nacional de
Antropología e Historia, tomo XVII, México, INAH,
pp. 127-38.Miller, Arthur G.
1973. The Mural Painting of Teotihuacan, Washington D. C., Dumbarton Oaks.Millon, C.
1973. “Painting, Writing, and Polity in
Teotihuacan, Mexico”, American Antiquity,
núm. 38, pp. 294-313.1988. “A Reexamination of the Teotihuacan Tassel
Headdress Insignia”, en K. Berrin (ed.), Feathered
Serpents and Flowering Trees, San Francisco,
The Fine Arts Museum, pp. 114-134.Nicholson, H. B. (ed.)
1976. Origins of Religious Art and Iconography in
Preclassic Mesoamerica, UCLA Latin American
Study Series, vol. 31, Los Angeles, The Ethnic
Arts Council of Los Angeles.1976a. “Preclassic Mesoamerican Iconography from
the Perspective of the Postclassic: Problems in
Interpretational Analysis”, en H. B. Nicholson
(ed.), Origins of Religious Art and Iconography
in Preclassic Mesoamerica, UCLA Latin American
Study Series, vol. 31, Los Angeles, The Ethnic
Arts Council of Los Angeles, pp. 123-140.Norr, L.
1987. “Postclassic Artifacts from Tetla”, en D.
Grove (ed.), Ancient Chalcatzingo, Austin,
University of Texas Press, pp. 525-546.Offner, J.
1983. Law and Politics in Aztec Texcoco, New York,
Cambridge University Press.Pasztory, E.
1976. The Murals of Tepantitla, Teotihuacan,
New York, Garland.
1983. Aztec Art, Harry N. Abrams, New York.1988. “A Reinterpretation of Teotihuacan and Its
Mural Painting Tradition”, en K. Berrin (ed.),
Feathered Serpents and Flowering Trees, San Francisco, The Fine Arts Museum, pp. 5-77.Plunket, P. y G. Uruñuela
s.f. “La iconografía del poder: la Triple Alianza
en el occidente de Puebla”, mecanoescrito.Quirarte, J.
1976. “The Relationship of Izapan-Style AA to
Olmec and Maya Art: A Review”, en H. B.
Nicholson (ed.), Origins of Religious Art and
Iconography in Preclassic Mesoamerica, UCLA Latin
American Study Series, vol. 31, Los Angeles, The
Ethnic Arts Council of Los Angeles, pp. 73-86.Reyes-Valerio, C.
1978. Arte Indocristiano, Mexico, Instituto Nacional
de Antropología e Historia.Rice, P.
1983. “Serpents and Styles in Peten Postclassic
Pottery”, American Anthropologist, núm. 85,
pp. 866-880.Robicsek, F.
1972. Copan Home of the Mayan Gods, New York, Heye Foundation.Sahagún, B.
1954. “Kings and Lords, Book 8”, The Florentine
Codex: General History of the Things of New Spain, A. J. O. Anderson y C. Dibble (trad.), 14 vols., Santa
Fe, New Mexico, Monographs of the School of
American Research and the University of Utah.1970. “The Gods, Book 1”, The Florentine Codex:
General History of the Things of New Spain, A. J. O.
Anderson y C. Dibble (trad.), 14 vols., Santa Fe,
New Mexico, Monographs of the School of
American Research and the University of Utah.1979. “The Soothsayers, Book 4”, en The Florentine
Codex: General History of the Things of New Spain, A. J. O. Anderson y C. Dibble (trad.), 14 vols.,
Santa Fe, New Mexico, Monographs of
the School of American Research and the
University of Utah.Schele, L. y M. Miller
1986. The Blood of Kings: Dynasty and Ritual in Maya
Art, Fort Worth, Texas, Kimbell Art Museum.Séjourné, L.
1959. Un Palacio en la Ciudad de los Dioses, México,
Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Soustelle, J.
1970. Daily Life of the Aztecs on the Eve of the Spanish Conquest, Stanford, California, Stanford
University Press.Steward, M. y T. Stocker
1992. “Referents in Olmec Art”, Semiotics 1990,
New York, University Press of America.Stuart, D.
2000. “The Arrival of Strangers: Teotihuacan and
Tollan in Classic Maya History”, en D. Carrasco,
L. Jones, y S. Sessions (eds.), Mesoamerica’s Classic
Heritage: From Teotihuacan to the Aztecs, Boulder,
University Press of Colorado, pp. 465-513.Stirling, M.
1955. “Stone Monuments of Rio Chiquito,
Veracruz, Mexico”, Bureau of American Ethnology,
Bulletin 157, Washington, D. C., Smithsonian
Institution.Stocker, T.
1983. “Clay Figurines from Tula, Hidalgo,
Mexico”, tesis doctoral de la Universidad
de Illinois.1987. “Conquest, Tribute and the Rise of the
State”, en L. Manzanilla (ed.), Studies in the
Neolithic and Urban Revolutions, Oxford, BAR
International Series 349, pp. 65-376.1990. “A Dilemma for Mexican Archaeology”,
Mexicon, núm. 7, pp. 44-46.1991. “Discussion: Empire Formation, Figurine
Function, and Figurine Distribution”, en
T. Stocker (ed.), The New World Figurine Project,
vol. 1, Utah, Research Press, Provo, pp. 145-165.2000. “Ethnohistorical Input for the
Mesoamerican Obsidian Industry”, Nahua
Newsletter, núm. 30, pp. 27-31.2001. “Nexos iconográficos entre las columnas
de Tula y los discos de oro de Chichén Itzá”,
Arqueología, núm. 26, México, INAH,
pp. 71-87. s.f. “Teotihuacan as the Center of a Territorial Empire”, mecanoescrito.Stocker, T., G. Dodge y T. Prewitt
s.f. “Comments on the Possibility of Pictorial
Graphemes at Teotihuacan”, mecanoescrito.Stocker, T. y B. Jackson
s.f. “The Gulf Coast Shell and The Highland
Sword”, ponencia presentada en 48th Annual
Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology,
Pittsburgh, 1983.Stocker, T. y D. James
1988. Semiotic Analysis of Prehistoric Texts:
Monument II at Chalcatzingo, Morelos, Mexico,
en J. Deely (ed.), Semiotics 1987, Lawhorn,
Maryland, University Press of America,
pp. 183-192Stocker, T. y S. Lamb
1985. “Mysteries of the Mexican Códices”,
Explorers Journal, núm. 63, pp. 2-7.1991. “The Need for a Central Data Bank of
Figurine Data”, en T. Stocker (ed.), The New World
Figurine Project, vol. 1, Utah, Research Press, Provo,
pp. 139-143.Stocker, T. y M. Spence
1973. “Trilobal Eccentrics at Teotihuacan and
Tula”, American Antiquity, núm. 38, pp. 195-199.Tozzer, Alfred M.
1941. “Landa’s Relación de las cosas de Yucatán”,
Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and
Ethnology, 18, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard
University Press.Villagra Caleti, A.
1971. “Mural Painting in Central Mexico”, en R.
Wauchope (ed.), Handbook of Middle American
Indians, vol. 10, Austin, Texas, University of Texas
Press, pp. 135-156.Von Winning, Hasso
1947. “A sign for dripping water in the
Teotihuacan culture”, El México Antiguo, núm. 6,
pp. 333- 341.1984. “Insignias de oficio en la iconografía de
Teotihuacan”, Pantoc, núm. 8, México,
Publicaciones Antropológicas de Occidente,
Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara,
pp. 5-54
- …
