101 research outputs found
On cell-matrix interactions in mammary gland development and breast cancer
[No abstract available]Dbouk HA, 2009, CELL COMMUN SIGNAL, V7, DOI 10.1186-1478-811X-7-4; Lelievre SA, 2010, J MAMMARY GLAND BIOL, V15, P49, DOI 10.1007-s10911-010-9168-y; Muschler J, 2010, CSH PERSPECT BIOL, V2, DOI 10.1101-cshperspect.a003202; Naus CC, 2010, NAT REV CANCER, V10, P435, DOI 10.1038-nrc2841; Patel VN, 2007, DEVELOPMENT, V134, P4177, DOI 10.1242-dev.011171; Streuli CH, 2009, BIOCHEM J, V418, P491, DOI 10.1042-BJ20081948; Talhouk RS, 2008, EXP CELL RES, V314, P3275, DOI 10.1016-j.yexcr.2008.07.0300
Global solutions for the one-dimensional Boussinesq-Peregrine system under small bottom variation
The Boussinesq-Peregrine system is derived from the water waves system in
presence of topographic variation under the hypothesis of shallowness and small
amplitude regime. The system becomes significantly simpler (at least in the
mathematical sens) under the hypothesis of small topographic variation. In this
work we study the long time and global well-posedness of the
Boussinesq-Peregrine system. We start by showing the intermediate time
well-posedness in the case of general topography (i.e. the amplitude of the
bottom graph ). The novelty resides in the functional setting,
. Then we show our main result
establishing that the global existence result obtained in
Molinet-Talhouk-Zaiter in the flat bottom case is still valid for the
Boussinesq-Peregrine system under the hypothesis of small amplitude bottom
variation (i.e. ). More precisely we prove that this system is
unconditionally globally well-posed in the Sobolev spaces of type . Finally, we show the existence of a weak
global solution in the Schonbek sense, i.e. existence of low regularity
entropic solutions of the small bottom amplitude Boussinesq-Pelegrine equations
emanating from and in an Orlicz class as weak
limits of regular solutions
An improved result for the full justification of asymptotic models for the propagation of internal waves
We consider here asymptotic models that describe the propagation of one-dimensional internal waves at the interface between two layers of immiscible fluids of different densities, under the rigid lid assumption and with uneven bottoms. The aim of this paper is to show that the full justification result of the model obtained by Duchêne, Israwi and Talhouk [to appear in SIAM J. Math. Anal, (arXiv:1304.4554v2)], in the sense that it is consistent, well-posed, and that its solutions remain close to exact solutions of the full Euler system with corresponding initial data, can be improved in two directions. The first direction is taking into account medium amplitude topography variations and the second direction is allowing strong nonlinearity using a new pseudo-symmetrizer, thus canceling out the smallness assumption of the Camassa-Holm regime for the existence and uniqueness results
Study of a coupled Cahn-Hilliard/Allen-Cahn system in phase separation
Cette thèse est une étude théorique d’un système d’équations de Cahn-Hilliard/Allen-Cahn couplées qui représente un mélange binaire en séparation de phase. Le but principal de l’étude est le comportement asymptotique des solutions en termes d’attracteurs exponentiels/globaux. Pour cette raison, l’existence et l’unicité de la solution sont étudiées tout d’abord. Une des principales applications de ce modèle d’équations est la cristallographie.Dans la première partie de la thèse, on examine le modèle proposé avec des conditions de type Dirichlet sur le bord et une non linéarité régulière de type polynomial : on réussit à trouver un attracteur exponentiel et par conséquence un attracteur global de dimension finie. Une non linéarité singulière de type logarithmique est ensuite prise dans la deuxième partie, cette fonction étant approchée par une suite de fonctions régulières et l’existence d’un attracteur global est démontrée sous des conditions au bord de type Dirichlet.Enfin, dans la dernière partie, le système est couplé avec une équation pour la température: suivant la loi de Fourrier premièrement, puis la loi de type III de la thermo-élasticité. Dans les deux cas, la dynamique de l’équation est étudiée et un attracteur exponentiel est trouvé malgré la difficulté créée par l’équation hyperbolique dans le deuxième cas.This thesis is a theoretical study of a coupled system of equations of Cahn-Hilliard and Allen-Cahn that represents phase separation of binary alloys. The main goal of this study is to investigate the asymptotic behavior of the solution in terms of exponential/global attractors. For this reason, the existence and unicity of the solution are first studied. One of the most important applications of this proposed model of equations is crystallography. In the first part of the thesis, the system is studied with boundary conditions of Dirichlet type and a regular nonlinearity (a polynomial). There, we prove the existence of an exponential attractor that leads to the existence of a global attractor of finite dimension. Then, a singular nonlinearity (a logarithmic potential) is considered in the second part. This function is approximated by a sequence of regular ones and a global attractor is found.At the end, the system of equations is coupled with temperature: with the Fourrier law in the first case, then with the type III law (in the context of thermoelasticity) in the second case. The dynamics of the equations are studied and the existence of an exponential attractor is obtained
Mathematical study of viscoelastic fluid flows in singular domains
Cette thèse est consacrée à l’analyse mathématique de trois problèmes d’écoulements de fluides viscoélastiques de type Oldroyd. Tout d’abord, nous étudions des écoulements stationnaires faiblement compressibles dans un domaine borné avec des conditions au bord de type "rentrante-sortante". Nous étudions aussi le problème d’écoulements stationnaires faiblement compressibles dans un coin convexe. En utilisant une méthode de point fixe (premier et deuxième problèmes) et une décomposition de Helmoltz (deuxième problème), nous montrons des résultats d’existence et d’unicité des solutions. Nous étudions également le cas d’un écoulement non stationnaire. Nous montrons un résultat d’existence locale et un résultat d’existence globale, avec des conditions initiales suffisamment petites, pour des fluides compressibles. Nous démontrons aussi la convergence du modèle d’écoulement viscoélastique compressible à faible nombre de Mach vers le modèle incompressible lorsque les données initiales sont "bien préparées"In this PHD thesis, we study three problems for viscoelastic flows of Oldroyd type. First, we study steady flows of slightly compressible in a bounded domain with non-zero velocities on the boundary ; the pressure and the extra-stress tensor are prescribed on the part of the boundary corresponding to entering velocity. This causes a weak singularity in the solution at the junction of incoming and outgoing flows. We also study the problem of steady flows of slightly compressible fluids with zero boundary conditions in a domain with an isolated corner point. Using a method of fixed point (first and second problems) and a Helmoltz decomposition (second problem), we show some results of existence and uniqueness of solutions. In the last part, we study the case of a non-steady flow : we show some results of local and of global existence, with sufficiently small initial data, for compressible flows. The zero-Mach number limit is also establishe
Existence locale et unicité d'écoulements de fluides viscoélastiques dans des domaines non bornés
Résultats d'existence pour les écoulements réguliers de fluides viscoélastiques incompressibles à loi différentielle de type White–Metzner en dimension 3
Polarity proteins as regulators of cell junction complexes: Implications for breast cancer
The epithelium of multicellular organisms possesses a well-defined architecture, referred to as polarity that coordinates the regulation of essential cell features. Polarity proteins are intimately linked to the protein complexes that make the tight, adherens and gap junctions; they contribute to the proper localization and assembly of these cell-cell junctions within cells and consequently to functional tissue organization. The establishment of cell-cell junctions and polarity are both implicated in the regulation of epithelial modifications in normal and cancer situations. Uncovering the mechanisms through which cell-cell junctions and epithelial polarization are established and how their interaction with the microenvironment directs cell and tissue organization has opened new venues for the development of cancer therapies. In this review, we focus on the breast epithelium to highlight how polarity and cell-cell junction proteins interact together in normal and cancerous contexts to regulate major cellular mechanisms such as migration. The impact of these proteins on epigenetic mechanisms responsible for resetting cells toward oncogenesis is discussed in light of increasing evidence that tissue polarity modulates chromatin function. Finally, we give an overview of recent breast cancer therapies that target proteins involved in cell-cell junctions. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.Adamsky K, 2003, J CELL SCI, V116, P1279, DOI 10.1242-jcs.00302; Al Moustafa AE, 2002, ONCOGENE, V21, P2634, DOI 10.1038-sj-onc-1205351; Barrios-Rodiles M, 2005, SCIENCE, V307, P1621, DOI 10.1126-science.1105776; Betschinger J, 2003, NATURE, V422, P326, DOI 10.1038-nature01486; Bradfield PF, 2007, ARTERIOSCL THROM VAS, V27, P2104, DOI 10.1161-ATVBAHA.107.147694; Bravo-Cordero JJ, 2012, CURR OPIN CELL BIOL, V24, P277, DOI 10.1016-j.ceb.2011.12.004; Breen N, 2011, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V117, P2209, DOI 10.1002-cncr.25679; Butkevich E, 2004, CURR BIOL, V14, P650, DOI 10.1016-j.cub.2004.03.063; Caldeira JRF, 2006, BMC CANCER, V6, DOI 10.1186-1471-2407-6-48; Capaldo CT, 2007, MOL BIOL CELL, V18, P189, DOI 10.1091-mbc.E06-05-0471; Carmona-Fontaine C, 2008, NATURE, V456, P957, DOI 10.1038-nature07441; Chandramouly G, 2007, J CELL SCI, V120, P1596, DOI 10.1242-jcs.03439; Chiba H, 2008, BBA-BIOMEMBRANES, V1778, P588, DOI 10.1016-j.bbamem.2007.08.017; Chlenski A, 2000, BBA-GENE STRUCT EXPR, V1493, P319, DOI 10.1016-S0167-4781(00)00185-8; Cowin P, 2005, CURR OPIN CELL BIOL, V17, P499, DOI 10.1016-j.ceb.2005.08.014; Dbouk HA, 2009, CELL COMMUN SIGNAL, V7, DOI 10.1186-1478-811X-7-4; Dickinson DJ, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P1336, DOI 10.1126-science.1199633; Dow LE, 2008, ONCOGENE, V27, P5988, DOI 10.1038-onc.2008.219; Dunn KL, 2005, BIOCHEM CELL BIOL, V83, P1, DOI 10.1139-O04-121; Ebnet K, 2008, HISTOCHEM CELL BIOL, V130, P1, DOI 10.1007-s00418-008-0418-7; Ebnet K, 2004, J CELL SCI, V117, P19, DOI 10.1242-jcs.00930; Eder AM, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P12519, DOI 10.1073-pnas.0505641102; Ehrlich JS, 2002, DEV CELL, V3, P259, DOI 10.1016-S1534-5807(02)00216-2; El-Sabban ME, 2003, J MAMMARY GLAND BIOL, V8, P463, DOI 10.1023-B:JOMG.0000017432.04930.76; El-Saghir JA, 2011, INT J DEV BIOL, V55, P773, DOI 10.1387-ijdb.113372je; Erin N, 2009, INT J CANCER, V124, P1503, DOI 10.1002-ijc.24131; FIDLER IJ, 1973, EUR J CANCER, V9, P223, DOI 10.1016-S0014-2964(73)80022-2; Fogg VC, 2005, J CELL SCI, V118, P2859, DOI 10.1242-jcs.02412; Foley J, 2001, DEVELOPMENT, V128, P513; Friedl P, 2012, NAT CELL BIOL, V14, P777, DOI 10.1038-ncb2548; Friedl P, 2003, NAT REV CANCER, V3, P362, DOI 10.1038-nrc1075; Friedl P, 2004, CURR OPIN CELL BIOL, V16, P14, DOI 10.1016-j.ceb.2003.11.001; Friedl P, 2004, INT J DEV BIOL, V48, P441, DOI 10.1387-ijdb.041821pf; Friedl P, 2009, NAT REV MOL CELL BIO, V10, P445, DOI 10.1038-nrm2720; Gakhar G, 2010, ANTI-CANCER DRUG, V21, P77, DOI 10.1097-CAD.0b013e328333d557; Garcia-Rodriguez L, 2011, GENE THER, V18, P73, DOI 10.1038-gt.2010.114; Giepmans BNG, 1998, CURR BIOL, V8, P931, DOI 10.1016-S0960-9822(07)00375-2; Giepmans BNG, 2009, BBA-BIOMEMBRANES, V1788, P820, DOI 10.1016-j.bbamem.2008.07.015; Graeber SHM, 1998, EXP CELL RES, V243, P142, DOI 10.1006-excr.1998.4130; Grifoni D, 2004, ONCOGENE, V23, P8688, DOI 10.1038-sj.onc.1208023; Guarino M, 2007, INT J BIOCHEM CELL B, V39, P2153, DOI 10.1016-j.biocel.2007.07.011; Guo BQ, 2006, MOL CELL BIOL, V26, P4529, DOI 10.1128-MCB.01667-05; Guttman JA, 2009, BBA-BIOMEMBRANES, V1788, P832, DOI 10.1016-j.bbamem.2008.10.028; Hamdan R., 2012, GAP JUNCTIONS BRAIN, p[31, 301]; Hansen RK, 2000, ENDOCR-RELAT CANCER, V7, P95, DOI 10.1677-erc.0.0070095; Hens JR, 2005, BREAST CANCER RES, V7, P220, DOI 10.1186-bcr1306; Herve JC, 2004, BBA-BIOMEMBRANES, V1662, P22, DOI 10.1016-j.bbamem.2003.10.022; Hidalgo-Carcedo C, 2011, NAT CELL BIOL, V13, P49, DOI 10.1038-ncb2133; Hoevel T, 2004, INT J CANCER, V108, P374, DOI 10.1002-ijc.11571; Huerta M, 2007, MOL BIOL CELL, V18, P4826, DOI 10.1091-mbc.E07-02-0109; Humbert PO, 2006, TRENDS CELL BIOL, V16, P622, DOI 10.1016-j.tcb.2006.10.005; Ishidate T, 2000, ONCOGENE, V19, P365, DOI 10.1038-sj.onc.1203309; Ito A, 2000, J CLIN INVEST, V105, P1189, DOI 10.1172-JCI8257; Katto J, 2011, CARCINOGENESIS, V32, P1414, DOI 10.1093-carcin-bgr120; Kausalya PJ, 2001, FEBS LETT, V505, P92, DOI 10.1016-S0014-5793(01)02786-7; Kojima T, 2002, EXP CELL RES, V276, P40, DOI 10.1006-excr.2002.5511; Kominsky SL, 2004, AM J PATHOL, V164, P1627, DOI 10.1016-S0002-9440(10)63721-2; Kortekaas R, 2005, ANN NEUROL, V57, P176, DOI 10.1002-ana.20369; Kostin S, 2007, J CELL MOL MED, V11, P892, DOI 10.1111-j.1582-4934.2007.00063.x; Laing JG, 2007, CARDIOVASC PATHOL, V16, P159, DOI 10.1016-j.carpath.2007.01.004; LAIRD DW, 1995, J CELL BIOL, V131, P1193, DOI 10.1083-jcb.131.5.1193; Lanigan F, 2009, INT J CANCER, V124, P2088, DOI 10.1002-ijc.24159; Laprise P, 2004, J BIOL CHEM, V279, P10157, DOI 10.1074-jbc.M309843200; Lelievre S. A., 2010, CHEMISTRY, V279, P10157; Li X, 2004, NEUROSCIENCE, V126, P611, DOI 10.1016-j.neuroscience.2004.03.063; Li XB, 2004, EUR J NEUROSCI, V19, P2132, DOI 10.1111-j.1460-9568.2004.03283.x; Macara IG, 2004, NAT REV MOL CELL BIO, V5, P220, DOI 10.1038-nrm1332; Mandell KJ, 2005, J BIOL CHEM, V280, P11665, DOI 10.1074-jbc.M412650200; Mark K. S., 2002, AM J PHYSIOL-HEART C, V282, P1485; Martin TA, 2004, EUR J CANCER, V40, P2717, DOI 10.1016-j.ejca.2004.08.008; Martin TA, 2009, BBA-BIOMEMBRANES, V1788, P872, DOI 10.1016-j.bbamem.2008.11.005; McLachlan E, 2007, J MEMBRANE BIOL, V218, P107, DOI 10.1007-s00232-007-9052-x; Minagar A, 2003, MULT SCLER, V9, P540, DOI 10.1191-1352458503ms965oa; Morita H, 2004, EXP CELL RES, V298, P1, DOI 10.1016-j.yexcr.2004.03.046; Nakagawa M, 2001, J CELL SCI, V114, P1829; Navarro C, 2005, ONCOGENE, V24, P4330, DOI 10.1038-sj.onc.1208632; Nelson WJ, 2003, NATURE, V422, P766, DOI 10.1038-nature01602; Nielsen PA, 2002, J BIOL CHEM, V277, P38272, DOI 10.1074-jbc.M205348200; Nielsen PA, 2003, MOL BIOL CELL, V14, P2470, DOI 10.1091-mbc.E02-10-0637; Nielsen PA, 2001, CELL COMMUN ADHES, V8, P213, DOI 10.3109-15419060109080726; Nojima H., 2010, CURR DRUG SAF, V2, P204; Nolan ME, 2008, CANCER RES, V68, P8201, DOI 10.1158-0008-5472.CAN-07-6567; Nusrat A, 2005, MOL BIOL CELL, V16, P1725, DOI 10.1091-mcb.E04-06-0465; Offner S, 2005, CANCER IMMUNOL IMMUN, V54, P431, DOI 10.1007-s00262-004-0613-x; Onder TT, 2008, CANCER RES, V68, P3645, DOI 10.1158-0008-5472.CAN-07-2938; Osanai M, 2007, CANCER SCI, V98, P1557, DOI 10.1111-j.1349-7006.2007.00569.x; Pece S, 2000, J BIOL CHEM, V275, P41227, DOI 10.1074-jbc.M006578200; Petit M. M., 2000, MOL BIOL CELL, V11, P17; Pinheiro EM, 2004, DEVELOPMENT, V131, P5243, DOI 10.1242-dev.01412; Polette M, 2005, CANCER RES, V65, P7691, DOI 10.1158-0008-5472.CAN-04-4230; Qin H, 2002, J BIOL CHEM, V277, P29132, DOI 10.1074-jbc.M200797200; Qin Y, 2005, J CELL BIOL, V171, P1061, DOI 10.1083-jcb.200506094; Regala RP, 2005, CANCER RES, V65, P8905, DOI 10.1158-0008-5472.CAN-05-2372; Ridley AJ, 2003, SCIENCE, V302, P1704, DOI 10.1126-science.1092053; Saez CG, 2003, J CELL BIOCHEM, V89, P450, DOI 10.1002-jcb.10519; Sauer T, 2005, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V16, P193, DOI 10.1111-j.1365-2303.2005.00257.x; Scheel C, 2012, SEMIN CANCER BIOL, V22, P396, DOI 10.1016-j.semcancer.2012.04.001; Sharp JA, 2008, MOL CANCER, V7, DOI 10.1186-1476-4598-7-1; Shin K, 2006, ANNU REV CELL DEV BI, V22, P207, DOI 10.1146-annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104219; Soini Y, 2005, HISTOPATHOLOGY, V46, P551, DOI 10.1111-j.1365-2559.2005.02127.x; Sourisseau T, 2006, MOL CELL BIOL, V26, P2387, DOI 10.1128-MCB.26.6.2387-2398.2006; Suzuki M, 2009, CANCER SCI, V100, P1623, DOI 10.1111-j.1349-7006.2009.01239.x; Talhouk RS, 2008, EXP CELL RES, V314, P3275, DOI 10.1016-j.yexcr.2008.07.030; Talhouk RS, 2005, CELL TISSUE RES, V319, P49, DOI 10.1007-s00441-004-0915-5; Teddy JM, 2004, DEVELOPMENT, V131, P6141, DOI 10.1242-dev.01534; Tobioka H, 2004, HUM PATHOL, V35, P159, DOI 10.1016-j.humpath.2003.09.013; Tokunaga Y, 2004, HISTOPATHOLOGY, V44, P247, DOI 10.1111-j.0309-0167.2003.01807.x; Tsuruo T, 2003, CANCER SCI, V94, P15, DOI 10.1111-j.1349-7006.2003.tb01345.x; Utepbergenov DI, 2006, J BIOL CHEM, V281, P24671, DOI 10.1074-jbc.M512820200; Viloria-Petit AM, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P14028, DOI 10.1073-pnas.0906796106; Visvader JE, 2011, EMBO J, V30, P4858, DOI 10.1038-emboj.2011.415; VLEMINCKX K, 1991, CELL, V66, P107, DOI 10.1016-0092-8674(91)90143-M; Wang Q, 2007, MOL BIOL CELL, V18, P874, DOI 10.1091-mbc.E06-07-0651; Watson CJ, 2008, DEVELOPMENT, V135, P995, DOI 10.1242-dev.005439; Weber C, 2007, NAT REV IMMUNOL, V7, P467, DOI 10.1038-nri2096; Wijnhoven BPL, 2000, BRIT J SURG, V87, P992, DOI 10.1046-j.1365-2168.2000.01513.x; Wilting RH, 2012, DRUG RESIST UPDATE, V15, P21, DOI 10.1016-j.drup.2012.01.008; Wodarz A, 2005, CURR OPIN CELL BIOL, V17, P475, DOI 10.1016-j.ceb.2005.08.005; Wu HJ, 1998, J CELL SCI, V111, P2365; Yamanaka T, 2003, CURR BIOL, V13, P734, DOI 10.1016-S0960-9822(03)00244-6; Zhan LX, 2008, CELL, V135, P865, DOI 10.1016-j.cell.2008.09.045; Zipser BD, 2007, NEUROBIOL AGING, V28, P977, DOI 10.1016-j.neurobiolaging.2006.05.01665
- …
