7,735 research outputs found
Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search
No full textDocument recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency–Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical research
Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search
No full textDocument recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical science
SHui open data research platform
No full textData collected and revised by individual instutions of the Shui-Consortium. Publication by the EU-China Consortium SHui.For each data-file, the author (institution) of the file is given as “operator”.-- At project end, June 30th, 2022.-- For each data-file, the author/data owner for citation is given as “operator” and “contact”.-- Plot data as .csv; catchment data ad libitum.Spatial situation data: Plot data and catchment data available; country, latitude, and longitude coordinates given.-- Temporal situation data: Long-term and single-season data available. Start and end date for each data file given.CC BY-SA. No embargo. The release on the Shui download site and CSIC repository implies expiration of any embargo delivered by the data owner.Project Co-ordinators: Dr. Jose Alfonso Gómez Calero (Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible (IAS-CISC), Dr. Weifeng Xu (Fujian Agriculture and Forest University, FAFU).This data set contains data from the SHui open-data platform for sharing long-term agricultural experiments aimed to optimizing yield and soil and water. Data and additional material are available under https://shui.boku.ac.at/shui/public/startAlphanumeric data measured at hydrologic and agronomical experiments (e.g., plant development, soil properties, hydrology, erosion, management).Further information on the data, project, partners, and publications under https://www.shui-eu.org/EU-China Consortium SHui: European Union Project 773903 and Chinese MOST.Peer reviewe
Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search
No full textFunding Information: Griffith University Gowonda HPC Cluster; Queensland Cyber Infrastructure FoundationPeer reviewe
Enrichment and characterization of a bacteria consortium capable of heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification at low temperature
No full textNitrogen removal in wastewater treatment plants is usually severely inhibited under cold temperature. The present study proposes bioaugmentation using psychrotolerant heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification consortium to enhance nitrogen removal at low temperature. A functional consortium has been successfully enriched by stepped increase in DO concentration. Using this consortium, the specific removal rates of ammonia and nitrate at 10 degrees C reached as high as 3.1 mg N/(g SS h) and 9.6 mg N/ (g SS h), respectively. PCR-DGGE and clone library analysis both indicated a significant reduction in bacterial diversity during enrichment. Phylogenetic analysis based on nearly full-length 16S rRNA genes showed that Alphaproteobacteria. Deltaproteobacteria and particularly Bacteroidetes declined while Gammaproteobacteria (all clustered into Pseudomonas sp.) and Betaproteobacteria (mainly Rhodoferax ferrireducens) became dominant in the enriched consortium. It is likely that Pseudomonas spp. played a major role in nitrification and denitrification, while R. ferrireducens and its relatives utilized nitrate as both electron acceptor and nitrogen source. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</p
Arabic Treebank : Part 2 v 3.1
No full textArabic Treebank: Part 2 (ATB2) v 3.1 , Linguistic Data Consortium (LDC) catalog number LDC2011T09 and isbn 1-58563-590-1, was developed at LDC. It consists of 501 newswire stories from Ummah Press with part-of-speech (POS), morphology, gloss and syntactic treebank annotation in accordance with the Penn Arabic Treebank (PATB) Guidelines developed in 2008 and 2009
Publisher Correction: Multiancestry genome-wide association study of 520,000 subjects identifies 32 loci associated with stroke and stroke subtypes (Nature Genetics, (2018), 50, 4, (524-537), 10.1038/s41588-018-0058-3)
No full textIn the HTML version of this article initially published, the author groups ‘AFGen Consortium’, ‘Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium’, ‘International Genomics of Blood Pressure (iGEN-BP) Consortium’, ‘INVENT Consortium’, ‘STARNET’, ‘BioBank Japan Cooperative Hospital Group’, ‘COMPASS Consortium’, ‘EPIC-CVD Consortium’, ‘EPIC-InterAct Consortium’, ‘International Stroke Genetics Consortium (ISGC)’, ‘METASTROKE Consortium’, ‘Neurology Working Group of the CHARGE Consortium’, ‘NINDS Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN)’, ‘UK Young Lacunar DNA Study’ and ‘MEGASTROKE Consortium’ appeared at the end of the author list but should have appeared earlier in the list. In addition, the author group ‘MEGASTROKE Consortium’ was duplicated, and its members were not displayed in the ‘Author information’ section. The errors have been corrected in the HTML version of the article
Large expert-curated database for benchmarking document similarity detection in biomedical literature search
No full textRELISH Consortium: et al.Document recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical research.Griffith University Gowonda HPC Cluster; Queensland Cyber Infrastructure Foundation.Peer reviewe
Author Correction: Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes
No full textOnline Correction for: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2493-4 | Erratum for https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21299In the version of this article initially published, two members of the ENCODE Project Consortium were missing from the author list. Rizi Ai (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA) and Shantao Li (Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA) are now included in the author list. These errors have been corrected in the online version of the article : 'Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes'.https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04226-3https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04226-
Author Correction: Perspectives on ENCODE (Nature, (2020), 583, 7818, (693-698), 10.1038/s41586-020-2449-8)
No full textThe Original Article (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2449-8) was published on 29 July 2020.Copyright © The Authors 2022. In this Article, the authors Rizi Ai (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA) and Shantao Li (Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA) were mistakenly omitted from the ENCODE Project Consortium author list. The original Article has been corrected online
- …
