1,721,122 research outputs found
Einleitung
Si tratta dell'introduzione a un volume dedicato a Emil Lask, filosofo che ha esercitato un'influenza significativa su alcuni tra i principali snodi teoretici della filosofia del Novecento
L’emergenza della questione antropologica nell'ultimo Rickert
he emergence of the anthropological question in the late Rickert. This paper traces the emergence of the anthropological question in the philosophy of Heinrich Rickert by examining the role played by anthropological philosophy in the latter developments of Rickert ́s system of thought. In pursuing this goal, we point to a set of works written in the 1930s as the turning point in Rickert ́s inquiry, where the inner articulation of his philosophical system was redefined by designating a broad space for the anthropological issues. By focusing on such issues this paper also wishes to lay out a thorough introduction to the first Italian translation of Rickert ́s essay Thesen zum System der Philosophie and to a part of the unpublished notes the philosopher used in delivering the 1932 lectures on Sozialphilosophie. According to the herein hermeneutic thesis, these works – together – are indeed the locus where we should recognise the earliest emergence of the anthropological question in Rickert ́s philosophy
Dal soggetto trascendentale al vivente umano. Corpo e artefatti in Helmuth Plessner
The aim of this paper is to reconsider the relationship between living body and artefacts in the perspective of Helmuth Plessner’s aesthesiology. According to the outcomes of Plessner’s aesthesiology, I present two main theses: 1) artefacts are not created, but rather discovered (entdeckt) and expressed by human agency, and 2) the bodily dimension of the human being is the condition of the “discovery” of material and symbolic artefacts. To argue these theses I highlight a) the process of “somatisation” that engages the Kantian transcendental model of subject in Plessner’s philosophical anthropology, b) Plessner’s rejection of the Kantian profile of Uexküll’s theory of Umwelt as an application of this transcendental model of subjectivity in the biological field, and c) the development in Plessner of a type of transcendental aesthetics, which can be linked with S. Crowell’s recent theory of perception
L’antropologia filosofica di Helmuth Plessner: interdisciplinarietà, corporeità e ontologia continuista del vivente
La crescente specializzazione dei saperi ha restituito un’immagine sempre più frammentaria dell’essere umano, ridotto, a seconda delle diverse prospettive d’indagine, alle sue proprietà fisiche, chimiche o neurologiche, secondo il paradigma dominante delle scienze naturali. Questo riduzionismo, che si nutre di esponenziali progressi tecnologici, ha come effetto una radicale parcellizzazione della nozione di essere umano e della sua poliedrica natura psicofisica, depauperata della sua complessità e presentata dalle diverse scienze a partire da prospettive unilaterali. In questo scenario, dominato in larga parte da un’ontologia fisicalista, si avverte di nuovo l’urgenza di riformulare la Menschenfrage a partire da una prospettiva onnicomprensiva, che abbandoni le infinite micrologie dell’umano, ovvero da un’antropologia filosofica, capace di interagire in modo fecondo con le scienze. Tale genuina istanza di confronto e integrazione tra i risultati delle scienze umane e naturali è incarnata dall’antropologia filosofica di Helmuth Plessner. Di tale antropologia il presente articolo intende lumeggiare gli esiti più fecondi e attuali: l’interdisciplinarietà che informa il procedere dell’indagine plessneriana, la centralità assunta dalla nozione di corporeità e la conseguente ontologia continuista dell’organico proposta dal filosofo
Dall’intenzionalità alla preterintenzionalità. Una riflessione sui sistemi intelligenti
In the debate about the moral standing of artificial intelligence, the question of whether or not technical artefacts have some form of intentionality that would allow them to be considered part of the moral world (or excluded from it) plays a crucial role. The problem of intentionality in fact constitutes a cornerstone in the construction of the notion of moral agency, as demonstrated, among other things, by the fact that technological objects have so far been excluded from the field of ethics because they lack intentionality. In contrast to this exclusion, there is now a trend in the opposite direction, which increasingly attributes some form of intentionality and moral status to AI systems. This paper addresses the clarification of the notion of technological intentionality in artificial intelligence, and especially in generative AI. To this end, it analyses a number of paradigmatic positions in this debate, highlighting their merits and shortcomings. Finally, it proposes replacing the notion of intentionality with the notion of preter-intentionality, which better expresses – according to the thesis put forward – the human-artificial intelligence relationship
- …
