239 research outputs found

    Grounds of the Punia church of St James the Apostle

    No full text
    Punios piliakalnio su gyvenviete teritorijoje (UK 22621) bei vizualinės apsaugos zonos pozonyje (Alytaus r.) 2013 m. rudenį buvo numatyta kloti ryšių bei elektros kabelius, įrengiant vaizdo kamerų tinklą. Tinklų įrengimas, anot objekto valdytojų, reikalingas Šv. Apaštalo Jokūbo bažnyčios (UK 21700) ir Šv. Jurgio koplytėlės (UK 1307) apsaugos reikmėms, dėl kurių užsakyti archeologiniai tyrimai. 2013 m. pabaigoje atliktų žvalgomųjų tyrimų metu iškasti 8 šurfai. Bendrai ištirtas 17,7 m2 plotas. Priešais bažnyčią esančios aikštės teritorijoje ištyrus šurfus 1–2, fiksuotas 30−45 cm storio permaišytas sluoksnis su pavieniais XVII–XX a. buitinės keramikos bei stiklo dirbinių fragmentais. 60−90 cm gylyje nuo dabartinio paviršiaus šurfuose rastas 10−15 cm storio juodžemio arba permaišyto juodžemio su moliu sluoksnis, kuriame rastas dubeninio koklio sienelės fragmentas, stiklinio butelio kaklelis bei titnaginio dirbinio ruošinys su retušavimo žymėmis. Tikėtina, kad tai išlikęs kultūrinio sluoksnio horizontas, kurį galima priskirti Punios senamiesčio kultūriniam sluoksniui. [...]In autumn 2013, a field evaluation (eight test pits, a total of 17.7 m²) was conducted on the grounds of Punia hillfort and settlement and in the subzone of its visual protection zone, Punia village, Alytus district. In test pits 1–2, which were in the square opposite the church, a 10−15 cm thick layer with isolated finds, which can be ascribed to the Punia old town cultural layer, was discovered at a depth of 60−90 cm from the current ground’s surface. In test pit 6, below isolated human bones, part of an undisturbed grave was discovered at a depth of 40 cm. These remains can be ascribed to a 17th–18th centuries cemetery, which was located in the vicinity of the Punia’s former old church, now the chapel of St George. In the future, the boundaries of Punia old town need to be determined when bestowing the status of a cultural heritage object on it. The valuable qualities of the existing objects and the regime for protecting them need to be updated

    Punia minima

    No full text
    Punia minima (Goding & Froggatt, 1904) (Figs 10–12, 28) Pauropsalta minima Goding & Froggatt, 1904: 628. Melampsalta minima: Burns, 1957: 658. Cicadetta minima: Moulds, 1990: 162–163, pl. 16, figs 3, 3a Punia minima Moulds, 2012: 195. (Fig. 180 labelled as this species in Moulds, 2012 is not this species but P. kolos.) Punia minima _KWW02 Owen et al., 2015: 261, 267–270. Punia noninfuscata_LVQ03 Owen et al., 2015: 263, 267-270 Punia “sp. brown” Owen et al. 2017: 572, 580. Punia “non-infuscated” Owen et al. 2017: 572, 580. Types. Three syntypes, all in SAM (examined): one male, in very poor condition, bearing five labels: (1) ‘TYPE’ red circular label; (2) ‘N.T. 1875 Tepper’ handwritten; (3) ‘18.22 Goding 12.7.04’ handwritten; (4) ‘ Melampsalta minima Godg. Type’ handwritten; (5) ‘SAMA Database No. 20-014639’ printed and recently added; and two further males in very poor condition (together on the same pin) bearing five labels: (1) ‘TYPE’ red square label; (2) ‘N.T. 1875 Tepper’; (3) ‘22(2) Goding 12.1.03’ handwritten; (4) ‘ Pauropsalta minima G & F’ printed and recently added; (5) ‘SAMA Database No. 20-014640’ printed and recently added. Lectotype designation. Goding and Froggatt (1904) state that they had three examples at the time of description and there is no reason to doubt that the three specimens labelled as types in SAM are the three in question. They are conspecific, and the specimen pinned singly is here designated as lectotype and the two mounted together on the same pin are designated paralectotypes. Only two of the three specimens retain their genitalia (the lectotype and the lower specimen of the two on the same pin) and examination of these confirm the identity of the species. The lectotype has only the right forewing and left hindwing still attached to the body and the left forewing and abdomen separated and mounted on a card. The upper specimen of the two on the same pin lacks most of its abdomen and much of the distal half of all wings, but its pigmented forewing vein M and unpigmented vein CuA imply it is conspecific with the specimens retaining their genitalia. The lower specimen comprises a body with wing stumps only. The data labels of the three specimens suggest they were collected together. Although the original description gives the type locality as ‘ Northern Territory, S.A.’ the species does not occur in South Australia; Goding and Froggatt’s reference to South Australia stems from the fact that the Northern Territory was at that time under the administration of South Australia. Material examined. Types as above and the following: WESTERN AUSTRALIA: 2 males (1 genitalia prep. PU31) (Simon Lab. vouchers 10.AU.WA. LVQ.03, 10.AU.WA. LVQ.04), 1 female, nr Broome, 13 km up Cape Leveque road, 17°46.210S 122°16.868E, 18 Jan. 2010, Hill, Marshall, Moulds (MSM). NORTHERN TERRI- TORY: 3 males, same data as holotype (AE). 3 males, same data as holotype (AM). 4 males, Smith Point, Coburg Pen., 11°07’S 132°08’E, 19–25.i., 3–21.ii.1977, R. C. Lewis (ANIC). 2 males, same data as holotype; 1 male, Savannah Way, ~ 57 km WSW of Borroloola nr Tawallah Stn, 16°16.976’S 135°49.093’E, 90m, 13.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall (DE). 3 males, same data as holotype (LP). 17 males (4 genitalia preps PAU20, PAU21, PAU24, PU17), same data as holotype; 1 male (genitalia prep. PU16) U.D.P. Falls, Waterfall Ck, ENE of Pine Creek, 1.i.1987, M.S. & B.J. Moulds; 2 males, Cullen R. x-ing, S of Pine Creek, 3.i.1992, M.S. & B.J. Moulds; 1 male, 80 km S of Larrimah, 24.i.1977, M.S. & B.J. Moulds; 1 male, NTR. KWW, 30 km W of Katherine, 125m, 14°40.8’S 132°05.1’E, 24.i.2004, Cooley, Hill, Marshall, Moulds; 6 males (1 genitalia prep. PU43) (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.NT. KWW.07), 3 females (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.NT. KWW.06), Victoria Hwy (Hwy 1), 30 km W of Katherine, 125m, 14°40.776’S 132°05.142’E, 30.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall; 10 males (2 genitalia preps PU32, PU38) (one Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.NT. MIK.01), ~ 4 km W of South Alligator R., Kakadu NP, Yurmikmik, on rd to Gunlom area, 82m, 13°31.124’S 132°27.166’E, 1.xii.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall; 2 males (1 genitalia prep. PU42) (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.NT. CHE.03), Cheon Ck xing on Roper Hwy, ~ 39 km W of Roper Bar, 57m, 14°45.363’S 134°13.207’E, 14.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall; 15 males (one genitalia prep. PU41), (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.NT. TAW.01), Savannah Way, ~ 57 km WSW of Borroloola nr Tawallah Stn, 16°16.976’S 135°49.093’E, 90m, 13.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall (MSM). 1 male, Lake Bennett area, c. 25 km SE of Manton Dam, 29-30.xii.1979, M.B. Marlipatil; 1 male Mataranka, 29–31.xii.1994, G. R. Brown; 1 male, Katherine, Springvale H /S, 1-3.i.1995, G. R. Brown; 5 males, Katherine Experimental Farm, 12 ml. N of Katherine, 24.i.1973, T. Angeles & N. Forrester (NTM). Distribution and habitat (Fig. 28). Near Broome in Western Australia, and in the Northern Territory from Smith Point on Coburg Peninsula and Lake Bennett (some 60 km south of Darwin), south-east in a broad band through the central Top End to near Tawallah Stn (57 km WSW of Borroloola). The large gap between the single known locality in Western Australia (near Broome), and those from the Northern Territory suggests the species is far more widespread than known records suggest. There are records from mid November to early March. Adults can be found in dead or browning grass. Redescription of male (Figs 10–12). Head light yellowish brown sometimes with small darker brown patches beside ocelli or near supra-antennal plates; lora light yellowish brown or sometimes darker brown. Anteclypeus light yellowish brown or sometimes dark brown. Postclypeus with a broad central brown area (not always clearly defined) extended to dorsal surface but not encompassing most anterior part of midline. Rostrum light yellowish brown basally becoming dark brown to blackish distally; reaching apices of mid coxae. Antennae dark brown to black except sometimes for light yellowish brown scape. Thorax with pronotum light yellowish brown except usually for dark brown paramedian and lateral fissures. Mesonotum light yellowish brown; submedian sigilla ill-defined but lateral sigilla clearly defined dark brown to blackish unless teneral; scutal depressions indistinctly marked brown or blackish. Wings hyaline; forewing venation brown or blackish except for very pale or colourless C+Sc, CuA and sometimes CuP+1A; forewing veins near apex very weakly infuscated (those forming sides of apical cells and the ambient vein); forewing basal membrane whitish to very pale grey; hindwing usually with median vein and associated crossveins brown, others tending whitish; hindwing plaga following veins 2A and 3A whitish. Legs light yellowish brown, sometimes darker brown on distal tarsi. Meracantha light yellowish brown. Opercula light yellowish to whitish. Timbals with three long ribs spanning timbal membrane and fused dorsally. Abdomen light yellowish brown with tergites 3–6 predominantly translucent pale yellow laterally; dorsal midline pinkish red to dark brown to black variable between individuals, widest on tergites 2 and 3, tapering distally on tergite 3, narrower on tergites 4–7; tergites 6–8 also blackish sublaterally often extending to cover much of segments 7 and 8; tergites 2–7 narrowly edged pale yellow to pale light yellowish brown along posterior margin, tergite 8 less distinctly so. Sternites pale yellow to almost white except for sternites VI–VIII sometimes with dark brown or blackish suffusion. Genitalia (Figs 11–12). Pygofer dorsal beak not strongly developed, broad and tending confluent with pygofer margin; basal lobe large, in lateral view tending triangular and a small but well formed secondary basal lobe adjacent to its outer base; upper pygofer lobe broad, flat, with a well developed accessory tooth curving inwards and no longer than the length of the lobe. Uncus well developed and clearly projecting beyond anal tube, broad and gradually tapering to a broadly rounded apex. Claspers broad basally, claw-like, triangular in dorsal view, diverging, distally gently curved downwards to a bluntly pointed apex, concave below. Aedeagus with endotheca gently curved, sclerotized to apex, apically tapering ventrally to become sharply pointed; pseudoparameres slender, rounded in cross-section, usually lying partly above endotheca but sometimes entirely lateral, far longer than endotheca (at least a third as long again), gradually tapering throughout their length to a blunt point. Female. Similar to male but mostly with very little or no red abdominal markings, and without translucent sides to abdomen. Abdominal segment 9 similar in colour to other abdominal segments but usually slightly paler, without markings; ovipositor sheath light brown to nearly black, clearly extending beyond apex of abdomen. Measurements. Range and mean (in mm) for 10 males and 4 females (including largest and smallest of available specimens). Length of body: male 9.9–11.8 (11.1); female 9.9–11.2 (10.7). Length of forewing: male 10.3–12.7 (12.0); female 12.4–13.1 (12.9). Width of head (including eyes): male 2.7-3.2 (2.9); female 2.9–3.3 (3.1). Width of pronotum (across lateral angles): male 2.8–3.6 (3.2); female 3.0–3.4 (3.2). Distinguishing features. Distinguished from all other Punia species by having the stem of forewing vein M brown or blackish while vein CuA is very pale. Males often have a pinkish red dorsal midline to the abdomen, otherwise found only in some specimens of P. hyas. The male genitalia have a long uncus that protrudes well beyond the anal tube and the aedeagus is distinctive with its pseudoparameres that extend far beyond the apex of the endotheca, at least a third as long again.Published as part of Moulds, M. S., 2020, A revision of the Australian cicada genus Punia Moulds, 2012 (Cicadidae Cicadettinae: Cicadettini) with the description of four new species, pp. 101-115 in Zootaxa 4860 (1) on pages 102-105, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4860.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/441357

    Punia hillfort and settlement

    No full text
    Nemuno kilpų regioninio parko direkcija 2021 m. balandžio–spalio mėnesiais atliko Punios piliakalnio su gyvenviete (UK 22621) (Alytaus r., Punios sen.) tvarkybos darbus. Jų metu demontuoti avarinės būklės laiptai, senos takų dangos, buvusios infrastruktūros ir naujose vietose įrengti laiptai, nauji pėsčiųjų takai, aikštelės ir kita. Prieš atliekant numatytus darbus grunto judinimo vietose KPIP atliko žvalgomuosius tyrimus, nuimant paviršinį augalinį sluoksnį vykdė žvalgymus. Punios piliakalnis, dar vadinamas Margio kalnu, yra Nemuno ir Punelės dešiniajame krante, jų santakos suformuotame kyšulyje. Piliakalnio aikštelė trikampė, pailga R–V kryptimi, maždaug 155 m ilgio ir 85 m pločio R gale. Dalis Š aikštelės dalies nuplauta Nemuno, o P šlaitai – Punelės. Aikštelės R krašte supiltas 75 m ilgio, 6 m aukščio, 30 m pločio pylimas, už kurio iškastas 60 m ilgio, 30 m pločio, 4 m gylio, 10 m pločio dugne griovys. Aikštelės V gale, 16 m žemiau jos yra 23x15 m dydžio terasa. Į R nuo piliakalnio 3 ha plote yra papėdės gyvenvietė. Pilis minima 1387 ir 1414 m., žinoma, jog jos apylinkes 1382 m. niokojo kryžiuočiai. Piliai sunykus aikštelėje XV–XVIII a. stovėjo Punios seniūno dvaro sodybos, privažiavimui XVII a. pylimas buvo per vidurį perkastas, o per griovį įrengtas tiltas. Aikštelėje sodybos stovėjo iki 1938 m., ji buvo ariama. [...]Prior to amelioration work at Punia Hillfort (Alytus District, S Lithuania), a field evaluation (the excavation of a total of 18 m2) was conducted at the earthwork locations and a field survey (using metal detectors and fieldwalking) was carried out in roughly 1428 m2 during the removal of the surface layer. Test pits 1, 2, and 12 yielded a 16th–18th-century cultural layer with contemporary finds: sherds of thrown pottery, while the survey isolated 17th–18th-century archaeological finds: several coins, a copper ring, a military jacket or coat button, etc

    Supplement_Figure_1 - Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Acute Symptomatic Seizure (ASyS) Versus Patients With Established Epilepsy

    No full text
    Supplement_Figure_1 for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Acute Symptomatic Seizure (ASyS) Versus Patients With Established Epilepsy by Christopher R. Newey, Nicolas R. Thompson, Pravin George, Vineet Punia, Stephen Hantus, Brittany Lapin, Joao Gomes and Irene Katzan in The Neurohospitalist</p

    Supplemental_Table - Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Acute Symptomatic Seizure (ASyS) Versus Patients With Established Epilepsy

    No full text
    Supplemental_Table for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Acute Symptomatic Seizure (ASyS) Versus Patients With Established Epilepsy by Christopher R. Newey, Nicolas R. Thompson, Pravin George, Vineet Punia, Stephen Hantus, Brittany Lapin, Joao Gomes and Irene Katzan in The Neurohospitalist</p

    Punia hyas Moulds 2020, sp. n.

    No full text
    Punia hyas sp. n. (Figs 6–7, 13–14, 26) Punia “nr hentyi” / hentyi MTE 09 Owen et al., 2015: 261, 267–270. Punia hentyi Owen et al. 2017: 572, 580. Nomen nudum. Punia “sp. grey” Owen et al. 2017: 572, 580. Types. Holotype male, 21 km W of Pentecost R. x-ing, Gibb R. road, Western Australia, 30.xii.1991, M.S. Moulds & B.J. Moulds (WAM). Paratypes as follows: WESTERN AUSTRALIA: 4 males, 1 female, same data as holotype (AE). 4 males, 1 female, same data as holotype (AM). 4 males, 1 female, same data as holotype; 8 males, 1 female, Ord River, 15°43’42”S 128°42’20”E, 14.xii.2019, S. Ong; 3 males, NAASRA creek, 15°45’54”S 128°17’13”E, 24.xii.2019, S. Ong (DE). 4 males, same data as holotype (JO). 4 males, 1 female, same data as holotype; 2 males, Ord River, 15°43’42”S 128°42’20”E, 14.xii.2019, S. Ong (LP). 4 males, Durack R. x-ing, Gibb R. Road, E. Kimberley, 29.xii.1991, M.S. & B.J. Moulds; 89 males (1 genitalia prep. CI103), 7 females, same data as holotype; 1 female, Zebedee Springs, El Questro Stn, E. Kimberley, 28.xii.1991, M.S. & B.J. Moulds; 7 males, 1 female, King R. x-ing, Gibb R. Road, 30.xii.1991, M.S. & B.J. Moulds; 56 males, 2 females, Kununurra, 6.i.1986, M.S & B.J. Moulds; 7 males, 2 females, Kununurra, 10.i.1986, 10.i.1986, 19.i.1987, 28.ii.1987, E.A. Henty; 3 males (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.WA. BAR.08), Barnett River xing on Gibb River Road, 433m, 16°42.589S 125°56.143E, 20.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall; 6 males (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.WA. ELL.01), 1 female, ~ 196 km W of Great Northern Hwy on Gibb River Rd, W of Ellenbrae Stn rd, 411m, 15°56.765S 126°50.061E, 19.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall; 8 males (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.WA. PCC.01), 2 females, ~ 57 km E of Great Northern Hwy on Parry Ck Rd, SE of Wyndham, 15°59.194S 128°40.138E, 32m, 28.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall (MSM). 4 males, 1 female, same data as holotype; 6 males (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.WA. ELL.01), 1 female, ~ 196 km W of Great Northern Hwy on Gibb River Rd, W of Ellenbrae Stn rd, 411m, 15°56.765S 126°50.061E, 19.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall (WAM). NORTHERN TERRITORY: 23 males, 2 females, Tindal, 14°31’S 132°22’E, 1–20.xii.1967, W. Vestjens; 1 male, 3 km SSW of Katherine, 14°30’S 132°15’E, 12.xi.1979, T. Weir (ANIC). 4 males, 1 female, 37 km E of Borroloola, 21.xii.1991, M.S. & B.J. Moulds (NTM). 1 male, Maud Ck, Katherine, 3.xii.1978, R. I. Storey; 1 male, Larrimah, 4.xii.1978, R. I. Storey (QDAF). 3 males, Gurrandalng camping area, Keep River Nat. Park, 15°52S 129°03E, 3.i.1993, G. & A. Daniels; 5 males, Keep River x-ing, Victoria Hwy, 7.i.1986, M.S. & B.J. Moulds; 1 male, Berry Springs, 29.x.1993, G.A. Husbana; 1 male (genitalia prep. PU15), 3 females, Springvale Stn, 12 km W of Katherine, 8.xii.1982, A. Walford-Huggins; 1 male (genitalia prep. PU13), Maud Ck, Katherine, 3.xii.1978, R. I. Storey; 2 males (genitalia preps PU11, PU14), Mainoru, ENE of Katherine, 14.xii.1982, A. Walford-Huggins; 5 males (1 genitalia prep. PU9), 2 females, Waterhouse River, Mataranka Hsd, 9.i.1986, 23,24. xii.1986, M.S. & B.J. Moulds; 1 male (genitalia prep. PU12), Larrimah, 4.xii.1978, R. I. Storey; 39 males (2 genitalic preps PU25, PU26), 5 females, 37 km E of Borroloola, 21.xii.1991, M.S. & B.J. Moulds; 14 males (1 genitalia prep. PU46) (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.NT. KWW.01), Victoria Hwy (Hwy 1), 30 km W of Katherine, 125m, 14°40.776’S 132°05.142’E, 30.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall; 34 males (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.NT. KRX.01), 2 females, 58 km SW of Katherine on Victoria Hwy, 127m, 14°49.762S 131°55.001E, 15.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall; 15 males, (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.NT. GPB.02), 3 females (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.NT. GPB.03), Bullita campground, Gregory NP, 46 km S of Vic. Hwy, 103m, 16°06.802S 130°25.406E, 16.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall; 8 males (1 Simon Lab voucher 06.AU.NT. MTE.09), 2 females, 76 km E of Mataranka, 14°54.888S 133°42.780E, 77m, 3.ii.2006, Hill, Marshall, Moulds (MSM). 14 males, Victoria Hwy (Hwy 1), 30 km W of Katherine, 125m, 14°40.776’S 132°05.142’E, 30.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall; 34 males, 1 female, AU.NT. KRX, 58 km SW of Katherine on Victoria Hwy, 127m, 14°49.762S 131°55.001E, 15.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall; 15 males, (1 Simon Lab. voucher 11.AU.NT. GPB.02), 2 females, Bullita campground, Gregory NP, 46 km S of Vic. Hwy, 103m, 16°06.802S 130°25.406E, 16.xi.2011, K. Hill, D. Marshall; 9 males, 1 female, AU.NT. MTE, 76 km E of Mataranka, 14°54.888S 133°42.780E, 77m, 3.ii.2006, Hill, Marshall, Moulds (NTM). 19 males, 1 female, Groote Eylandt, N.B. Tindale (SAM). Distribution and habitat (Fig. 26). The far north-east of Western Australia including the east Kimberley, and the Top End of Northern Territory south to Larrimah and west to Groote Eylandt and near Borroloola, but as yet unknown from Arnhem Land. There are records from late October to late February but most are for December. Adults inhabit eucalypts in open woodland. Male (Figs 6, 13–14). Head with vertex black except for small light brown patch on midline adjacent to posterior margin and light brown supra-antennal plates (latter tinged red on some specimens); lora dark brown to black. Postclypeus with a broad central brown or black area ventrally that sometimes extends to dorsal surface; the most anterior part of postclypeus light brown. Anteclypeus smoky light brown to dark brown. Rostrum reaching apices of mid coxae; light brown or brown basally, becoming black towards apex. Antennae light brown to black. Thorax with pronotum light brown, the pronotal collar and anterior margin always palest; paramedian and lateral fissures black and sometimes with irregular black markings between fissures, usually a black fascia either side of a pale dorsal midline not reaching to pronotal collar, a black spot on midline adjacent to pronotal collar, and a blackish patch on lateral angles of pronotal collar. Mesonotum light brown; submedian and lateral sigilla usually distinct, both dark brown or black; scutal depressions marked brown or black; the area between anterior arms of cruciform elevation usually partly brown or black and sometimes extending to encompass scutal depressions. Wings hyaline, forewing venation brown to black except often for pale yellowish costa; forewing basal membrane very pale greyish to pale orange. Hindwing venation brown to black; plaga following veins 2A and 3A white and indistinct. Legs light to dark brown, coxae, trochanters and femora sometimes with a dark longitudinal stripe; meracantha pale yellow tending whitish. Opercula pale yellow tending whitish with base brown to nearly black. Timbals with three long ribs spanning timbal membrane and fused dorsally. Abdomen light brown with tergites 3–6 predominantly translucent pale yellow laterally; dorsal midline dark brown to black variable between individuals often with variable patches of pinkish red or reddish orange; dorsal markings widest on tergites 1–3, tapering distally on tergite 3, narrowest on tergites 4–7; tergites 2–8 also blackish sublaterally including auditory capsule and often extending to cover the greater part of tergites 6–8; tergites 3–7 narrowly edged pale yellow to pale light yellowish brown along posterior margin, tergite 8 less distinctly so. Sternites pale yellow to almost white except for sternites V–VIII usually with dark brown or blackish suffusion. Genitalia (Figs 13–14). Pygofer dorsal beak variable, usually well formed but sometimes ill-defined; basal lobe large, in lateral view tending triangular, often a little elongated and gently upturned distally; upper pygofer lobe short but broad, flat, with a short accessory tooth variable in shape from sharply pointed to very blunt, about as long as the pygofer lobe. Uncus very short but broad, gradually tapering to a broadly rounded apex that barely projects beyond anal tube. Claspers small, broad basally, claw-like, tending triangular in dorsal view, diverging, distally gently curved downwards to a bluntly pointed apex, concave below. Aedeagus with endotheca strongly curved in an arc, its sclerotisation gradually reduced towards the apex, the apex a little sloping backwards towards the ventral surface; pseudoparameres about as long as or a little shorter than endotheca, more or less parallel, lying above endotheca, slender and not obviously flattened except a little before a downturned pointed apex. Female (Fig. 7). Similar to male but with much reduced dark markings and without translucent sides to abdomen. In some individuals prothorax with black or brown along median and lateral fissures and sometimes mesonotum with black or brown submedian and lateral sigilla; abdomen pale yellowish brown sometimes with irregular black or brown dorsal midline, and sometimes with a pinkish dorsal hue; abdominal segment 9 pale yellowish brown with an indistinct black or brown band either side of midline slightly turned outwards distally and not reaching distal margin, sometimes also with indistinct black or brown suffusion along anterior margin; ovipositor sheath yellowish brown to black, slightly protruding beyond apex of abdomen. Measurements. Range and mean (in mm) for 10 males and 10 females (includes largest and smallest of available specimens). Length of body: male 9.3–11.3 (10.5); female (including ovipositor) 10.5–12.2 (11.1). Length of forewing: male 10.4–12.4 (11.7); female 12.6–14.3 (13.3). Width of head (including eyes): male 2.7–3.1 (2.9); female 2.9–3.3 (3.1). Width of pronotum (across lateral angles): male 2.9–3.3 (3.1); female 3.1–3.6 (3.3). Etymology. From the Latin Hyas, one of the seven stars in the constellation Taurus, whose rising with the sun presaged rainy weather, and referring to the monsoonal climate that this species inhabits. Distinguishing features. Differs from all Punia species except P. queenslandica in having the entire forewing venation (excluding costa) brown or blackish. Differs from P. queenslandica in being slightly larger, the male forewing being more than 11 mm long (usually 11.2 or more), female 12.3 mm or more long (usually 12.6 or more) whereas that of P. queenslandica probably never reaches those lengths. Forewing shape is also different, most notable in being narrower and with a less swollen costa at the node (compare Figs 6 and 7 with 8 and 9). The male genitalia of P. hyas have the endotheca strongly curved in an arc, its sclerotisation gradually reduced ventrally toward the apex leaving only a narrow distal ridge of sclerotization that is pointed apically, and the pseudoparameres lie above the endotheca. The distributions of the two species are widely separated, P. hyas being found in Western Australia and the Northern Territory whereas P. queenslandica is found only in Queensland.Published as part of Moulds, M. S., 2020, A revision of the Australian cicada genus Punia Moulds, 2012 (Cicadidae Cicadettinae: Cicadettini) with the description of four new species, pp. 101-115 in Zootaxa 4860 (1) on pages 106-108, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4860.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/441357

    “Realitas” Kesadaran Spiritual Wajib Pajak Pemilik Usaha Kecil Dan Menengah Yang Menganut Prinsip Yadnya

    No full text
    Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap realitas kesadaran spiritual wajib pajak pemilik usaha kecil dan menengah (UKM) yang memiliki budaya menjalani kegiatan upacara ritual keagamaan berdasarkan prinsip yadnya. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada pemilik usaha kecil dan menengah (UKM) di Desa Tegal Tugu, Kecamatan Gianyar, Kabupaten Gianyar, Provinsi Bali. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan fenomenologi transendental, sesuai pemikiran Edmund Hussrel untuk mengungkap makna kesadaran spiritual dari pengalaman informan sebagai wajib pajak yang menjalani prinsip yadnya . Tehnik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara secara mendalam dan observasi. Tehnik ini digunakan sebagai strategi untuk mengungkap realitas informan melaksanakan upacara ritual dan sumbangan keagamaan sebagai pertanggungjawaban kepada agama, melakukan kegiatan usaha, dan kewajiban perpajakan sebagai pertanggungjawaban kepada negara. Hasil analisis atas realitas kesadaran sesuai pengalaman yang telah dilalui informan kunci menunjukkan beberapa temuan: Pertama, Pemilik UKM dalam melakukan kepatuhan pajak sebagai pertanggungjawaban kepada negara menunjukkan kesadaran untuk tujuan material. Kedua , Pemilik UKM yang menganut prinsip yadnya memiliki kesadaran matematis untuk tujuan bela rasa dijalankan dalam melakukan kegiatan usaha Ketiga , Kesadaran spiritual dimaknai oleh pemilik UKM dalam melakukan kewajiban dana punia dan upacara ritual agama , ketulusan dalam ber dana punia menjadi lampu pijar pemilik UKM sesuai prinsip yadnya dan keyakinannya terhadap darma untuk melakukan kewajiban pajak . Kesadaran spiritual pemilik UKM yang dimetaforakan sebagai lampu pijar memancarkan cahaya pada tahap kesadaran untuk disiplin melakukan dana punia dan kewajiban paja

    Prof. Jono Kazlausko gimtinės apylinkių vietovardžiai XVII a. metrikuose

    No full text
    Straipsnyje aptariami profesoriaus Jono Kazlausko gimtinės apylinkių vietovardžiai XVII amžiaus metrikuose. Pažymima, kad J.Kazlausko gimtasis kaimas Matiešionys XVII a. priklausė Punios parapijai, kuri šiame amžiuje apėmė gana didelę teritoriją. Jai priklausė nemažai ir tų vietų, kurios vėliau buvo priskirtos naujai sukurtoms Birštono, Butrimonių, Nemajūnų, Pivašiūnų, Alytaus, Rumbonių parapijoms. Išlikusiuose XVII a. antrosios pusės Punios parapijos santuokų ir krikšto metrikų knygose Matiešionių kaimas užfiksuotas 6 kartus. Pažymima, kad čia jis pavartotas suslavintomis formomis: Matieszany, Matiaszancy, Mateszancy, Matieszancy. Autorius teigia, kad kaimo pavadinimas Matiešionys yra asmenvardinė kilmės: atsiradęs iš suslavintos (sulenkintos) biblinio vardo formos Matiasz „Matijošius, Motiejus" . Pažymima, kad asmenvardinės kilmės yra nemažai ir J. Kazlausko gimtinės aplinkinių, ir kiek tolimesnių kaimų pavadinimų , išlikusių ligi mūsų laikų. Tai Dzingeliškės, esančios į vakarus nuo Matiešionių, bet metrikų knygoje neužfiksuotos, ir Žemaitkiemis, užfiksuotas jose 5 kartus. Pažymima, kad šiedu kaimai betarpiškai ribojasi su J. Kazlausko gimtuoju kaimu. Pirmasis yra pavardinės kilmės, o antrasis, esantis į šiaurę nuo Matiešionių, siejamas su pavarde „Žemaitis“ ir bendriniu žodžiu „kiemas“. Autorius teigia, kad tolimesnių, nuo Matiešionių Siponių miško atskirtų, kaimų pavadinimų yra gerokai daugiau. Autorius toliau straipsnyje ir vardija visus tuos kaimus bei aiškina jų pavadinimų etimologiją. Reikšminiai žodžiai: Jonas Kazlauskas; Gimtinė; Matiešionys; Punios parapija; Jonas Kazlauskas; Motherland; Matiešionys; Punia parishThe article discusses names of places in the surroundings of professor Jonas Kazlauskas’ used in chronicles of the 17th century. In the 17th century Jonas Kazlauskas’ native village Matiešionys belonged to the Punia Parish, which currently covers a rather large territory. A great many of places once belonging to the Punia Parish were later incorporated into newly established parishes of Birštonas, Butrimonys, Nemajūnai, Pivašiūnai, Alytus and Rumbonys. The Matiešionys village is mentioned 6 times in the Punia Parish chronicles of marriages and christenings of the second half of the 17th century. These chronicles use the Slavic form of the name of the village: Matieszany, Matiaszancy, Mateszancy, Matieszancy. The author claims that the name of the Matiešionys village originates from a personal name: the biblical form of a Slavic (polonised) name Matiasz “Matijošius, Motiejus”. The author notes that names of many villages in the surroundings of Jonas Kazlauskas’ motherland and more remote villages originate from personal names. For example, Dzigeliškės, located westwards from Matiešionys. It is not mentioned in the chronicle. The other village is Žemaitkiemis, which is mentioned in the chronicle 5 times. These two villages border with Jonas Kazlauskas’ native village. The name of the first one originates from a surname, and the second one located northwards from Matiešionys originates from the surname Žemaitis and the common word “kiemas”. The author claims that there are much more villages located farther from Matiešionys. The author names them all in the article and explains the etymology of their names

    Optimalisasi Pemanfaatan Lahan Pekarangan Sebagai Penyangga Ketahanan Pangan Keluarga

    No full text
    Ketahanan pangan merupakan salah satu masalah nasional yang harus ditangani bersama. Masalah ini tidak hanya ditangani oleh pemerintah, namun harus didukung aktif oleh masyarakat. Lingkungan Kelurahan Punia mempunyai tingkat kepadatan penduduk cukup tinggi dan lahan pekarangan yang sebagian besar sempit. Program Rumah Pangan Lestari (RPL) berguna dalam pengoptimalan lahan pekarangan untuk menyangga ketersedian pangan keluarga. Penulisan artikel ini disajikan secara deskriptif untuk memperoleh gambaran mengenai berbagai metode budidaya tanaman yang bermanfaat bagi masyarakat Kelurahan Punia. Berbagai program kerja yang dilakukan bertujuan untuk membuat kawasan percontohan bagi masyarakat di Kelurahan Punia agar mampu memanfaatkan lahan pekarang secara optimal untuk menjaga ketahanan pangan keluarga. Kawasan percontohan RPL bertempat di Jalan Airlangga Gang Arpom 4. Metode yang digunakan yaitu pendekatan sosial, kaji terap partisipatif, praktik demonstrasi plot. Sosialisasi RPL juga dilakukan melalui media sosial yaitu Instagram yang dilakukan mulai tanggal 11 Januari 2021 sampai dengan 24 Februari 2021. Berdasarkan hasil observasi dan kegiatan selama penerapan RPL menunjukkan masyarakat Kelurahan Punia antusias dengan program-program yang diterapkan dalam RPL. Kesimpulan yang dapat diambil dari kegiatan ini adalah program RPL berjalan dengan baik dan dapat menjadi solusi pemanfaatan lahan pekarangan untuk menyangga ketahanan pangan keluarga
    corecore