2,069 research outputs found
Benjamin R. Hulse; Cedar City, Iron County, Utah
No full textBenjamin R. Hulse; Cedar City, Iron County, UtahPhotograph
B-0025: Millville, Utah, Joseph R. Jensen/Delton Hulse residence. Lot 7-8 Block 8 Plat A, Built 1884
No full textB-0025: Millville, Utah, Joseph R. Jensen/Delton Hulse residence. Lot 7-8 Block 8 Plat A, Built 188
W R B executive summary
No full text"Alternative futures analysis is an environmental assessment approach for helping communities make decisions about land and water use. Its role is to provide a long-term, large-area perspective on the combined effects of the multiple policies and regulations affecting the quality of the environment and natural resources within a geographic area. The alternative futures process helps community members articulate and understand their different viewpoints, priorities, and goals. The product of the process is a suite of alternative 'visions' for the future expressed as maps of land use and land cover that reflect the likely outcomes of the options being advocated. Potential effects of these alternative futures are then evaluated for a wide array of ecological and socio-economic endpoints (i.e., things people care about). By capturing the essential elements of a complex debate in a fairly small number of alternative futures, and combining them with an objective evaluation of the consequences of each choice, this process can help groups move toward common understanding, and possible resolution and collective action. Here we summarize results from an alternative futures analysis conducted in the Willamette River Basin in western Oregon"--Page 1.conducted by the Pacific Northwest Ecosystem Research Consortium, consisting of scientists from EPA, Oregon State University, and the University of Oregon; Joan P. Baker, U.S. Environmental Research Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division; David Hulse, University of Oregon, Department of Landscape Architecture; Stan Gregory, Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife"EPA 600/R-02/045(a)"This archived document is maintained by the State Library of Oregon. It is for informational purposes and may not be suitable for legal purposesIncludes bibliographical reference (page 9)Funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Mode of access: Internet from the State Library of Oregon U.S. Government Publications CollectionText in Englis
Talking about a Christine Borland sculpture: effective empathy in contemporary anatomy art (and an emerging counterpart in medical training?)
No full textThis Introduction and interview discusses the poetical and empathic insights that are a key to the effectiveness of contemporary artist Christine Borland's practice and its relevance to the medical humanities, visual art research and medical students’ training. It takes place in a context of intensive interest in reciprocity and conversation as well as expert exchange between the fields of Medicine and Contemporary Arts. The interview develops an understanding of medical research and the application of its historical resources and contemporary practice-based research in contemporary art gallery exhibitions. Artists tend not to follow prescriptive programmes towards new historical knowledge, however, a desire to form productive relationships between history and contemporary art practice does reveal practical advantages. Borland's research also includes investigations in anatomy, medical practices and conservatio
OSM for sustainable transport planning
No full textTimaite, G., Hulse, J., & Lovelace, R. (2022). OSM for sustainable transport planning.
In: Minghini, M., Liu, P., Li, H., Grinberger, A.Y., & Juhász, L. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Academic Track at State of the Map 2022, Florence, Italy, 19-21 August 2022. Available at https://zenodo.org/communities/sotm-2
Recommended from our members
Confirmation bias ::inside Washington's war over the Supreme Court, from Scalia's death to Justice Kavanaugh /
No full text"From the chief Washington correspondent for the New York Times, a richly detailed, news-breaking look at the unprecedented political fight over Antonin Scalia's Supreme Court vacancy and the seemingly irreversible dysfunction it triggered across all three branches in the nation's capital--ultimately delivering us Trump, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh. The embodiment of American conservative thought and jurisprudence, Antonin Scalia cast an expansive shadow over the Supreme Court for three decades. His death at a Texas hunting resort in February 2016 created a dilemma for Republican leadership faced with the prospect of yet another Obama Supreme Court nominee, this time one who could tip the ideological balance of the court and alter the course of American history. In [this book], Carl Hulse tells an exclusive account of the rush of events following Scalia's death, including Mitch McConnell's extraordinary snap decision to deny President Obama's nominee so much as a hearing, let alone a vote. The author recounts the unsuccessful Democratic effort to break the Republican blockade on behalf of Merrick Garland, a failure that allowed Donald Trump to exploit the vacancy to entice evangelicals and other leery Republicans to rally support and deliver him the presidency. Newly empowered, Trump and his White House counsel Donald F. McGahn II moved quickly to install Neil Gorsuch on the court. The plan from the start was to have a second judge with a Republican pedigree--Brett Kavanaugh--join Gorsuch at the first opportunity in order to cement a majority conservative bloc. Aided by McConnell and the willingness of Republicans to bend Senate practices, the new administration set out to remake not only the Supreme Court, but the lower courts as well, further roiling the Senate and threatening public confidence in the federal judiciary. With unrivaled access to figures on both sides of the aisle, Hulse revisits the judicial wars of the past twenty years to show how those conflicts have led to our current polarization and resulted in not one but two Trump-nominated conservative justices who could be serving for decades. [This book] is a prodigious look inside the bitter judicial politics that have torn apart the Senate and transformed the modern Supreme Court from an institution that is supposed to rise above partisanship into one that is increasingly an extension of it. History will show, argues Hulse, that Scalia's death and the ugly battles fought in its wake represent an inflection point in American politics, changing the trajectory of three vital arms of our government--the Senate, the presidency, and the Supreme Court--in ways McConnell could not have envisioned that night in 2016"--Jacket
Choice, diversity and coordination: improving access to social housing
No full textAllocations systems lie at the core of social housing. They determine who is eligible for housing (and who is not), the order of providing assistance, and matching of households with specific properties, as well as affecting all aspects of housing providers’ operations including tenancy management, asset planning and management, rent revenue, and ultimately financial viability. This article raises some issues about allocations, which are central to discussions about the future of public housing in Australia. It reports, and reflects, on some of the findings of recent research (Hulse and Burke 2004) for the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI), although it should be emphasised that the views expressed are those of the author not AHURI Ltd
Group work experts share their favorite activities: A guide to choosing, planning, conducting, and processing -revised ed.
No full textDiana Hulse-Killacky is a contributing author, The names activity , pp. 52-53.
Book description: This revised edition is a compilation of over 50 group activities that represent a variety of types of groups from task and work to psychoeducational to counseling and therapy groups to training and supervision groups. Various populations, from children and adolescents to older adults are included. Members of the Association for Specialists in Group Work have shared many of their favorite group activities in this useful volume
Resilience and fragmentation in healthcare coalitions: The link between resource contributions and centrality in health-related interorganizational networks
No full textInterorganizational coalitions or collaboratives in healthcare are essential to address the health challenges of local communities, particularly during crises such as the Covid-19 pandemic. However, few studies use large-scale data to systematically assess the network structure of these collaboratives and understand their potential to be resilient or fragment in the face of structural changes. This paper analyzes data collected in 2009–2017 about 817 organizations (nodes) in 42 healthcare collaboratives (networks) throughout Florida, the third-largest U.S. state by population, including information about interorganizational ties and organizations’ resource contributions to their coalitions. Social network methods are used to characterize the resilience of these collaboratives, including identification of key players through various centrality metrics, analyses of fragmentation centrality and core/periphery structure, and Exponential Random Graph Models to examine how resource contributions facilitate interorganizational ties. Results show that the most significant resource contributions are made by key players identified through fragmentation centrality and by members of the network core. Departure or removal of these organizations would both strongly disrupt network structure and sever essential resource contributions, undermining the overall resilience of a collaborative. Furthermore, one-third of collaboratives are highly susceptible to disruption if any fragmentation-central organization is removed. More fragmented networks are also associated with poorer health-system outcomes in domains such as education, health policy, and services. ERGMs reveal that two types of resource contributions – community connections and in-kind resource sharing – are especially important to facilitate the formation of interorganizational ties in these coalitions
- …
