13 research outputs found
PAHs detection in red wine central composite design to optimise the extraction procedure and GC-FID analyses
No full textThe impact of venture capital on the exit performance of firms with radical innovation : European evidence
No full textLAUREA MAGISTRALELa letteratura sul Venture Capital (VC) sostiene che gli investimenti di VC migliorano le exit performances delle imprese. Il VC, infatti, è capace di sostenere giovani aziende non solo da un punto di vista finanziario, ma anche fornendo loro competenze, supporto tecnico, pratiche ottimali, risorse ed una rete di contatti necessari per sviluppare e commercializzare la propria tecnologia ed aiutarle, pertanto, a raggiungere un’exit favorevole. Tuttavia nessuno studio esistente ha analizzato se l’impatto del VC sia differente a seconda del tipo di innovazione che le imprese stanno sviluppando, nello specifico innovazione incrementale o innovazione radicale. Aziende con innovazioni radicali posseggono tecnologie con un potenziale tale da rivoluzionare l’intero settore, ma allo stesso tempo sono caratterizzate da elevati investimenti in ricerca e sviluppo e da un forte livello di incertezza, condizioni che potrebbero far dubitare alcuni investitori riguardo il loro successo.
La domanda di ricerca a cui vogliamo rispondere è se il VC comporti un maggiore beneficio per aziende con innovazioni radicali rispetto ad altre meno innovative. Per far ciò, è indispensabile isolare l’impatto del VC sulle exit performances di imprese che sviluppano innovazioni radicali, distinguendo in base alle diverse tipologie di VC (IVC e captive VC) e tra investimenti singoli e sindacati. A tal fine abbiamo usato un campione composto da imprese finanziate da VC e imprese non finanziate da VC, operanti nei settori farmaceutico e biotecnologico ed in possesso di almeno un brevetto. Abbiamo controllato possibili distorsioni di endogeneità e selezione includendo diverse variabili di controllo e adottando un propensity score matching che ci ha permesso di formare 377 coppie, ognuna composta da un’azienda finanziata da VC ed un’altra non finanziata, simili in termini di nazionalità, età, settore, numero di invenzioni, e possesso di almeno un brevetto radicale. In questo modo, siamo riusciti ad isolare e stimare l’effetto di trattamento del VC sulle aziende finanziate. Tra i principali risultati, dalla nostra analisi si evince come un singolo fondo di VC non mostra evidenza di alcun contributo all’ottenimento di performance positive per imprese con innovazioni radicali. D’altro canto, un sindacato tra VC, indipendentemente dalla sua composizione, porta notevoli benefici a queste imprese, rivelandosi inoltre essere più vantaggioso per esse rispetto ad altre imprese che non posseggono innovazioni definibili tali. Questa tesi dimostra quindi come un sindacato tra VC sia in grado di liberare il potenziale dirompente di aziende radicalmente innovative, fornendo loro un misto di risorse e competenze, tempo e confidenza necessari per commercializzare un prodotto tecnologicamente avanzato, oltre che trasmettere un segnale positivo al mercato. Tutto ciò, in ultima analisi, si traduce in maggiore possibilità di ottenere un’exit favorevole.The venture capital (VC) literature claims that VC investments improve the exit performance of entrepreneurial firms. VC is indeed able to support young enterprises not only from a financial viewpoint but also providing them expertise, coaching functions, best practices, networking, and resources necessary to develop and commercialize their technology and therefore, helping them to reach a successful exit. However, no previous research has investigated if the impact of VC differs according to the type of innovation that VC-backed firms are developing, namely incremental or radical innovation. Radically innovative firms rely on a highly potential technology, able to revolutionize an entire industry, but at the same time they are characterized by huge R&D investments and a level of uncertainty which may threaten possible investors.
The research question we address is whether VCs are more beneficial to firms with a radical innovation with respect to less innovative ones. In doing so, we isolate the impact of VC investments on the exit performance of entrepreneurial firms with radical innovations, distinguishing according to the different VC types (captive VC or IVC) and between stand-alone and syndicated deals. For this purpose, we used a sample of VC-backed and non-VC-backed companies, operating in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries and endowed with at least a patent. We control for endogeneity and selections biases including several control variables and adopting a one-to-one propensity score matching which allowed us to form 377 pairs made by a VC-backed firm and a non-VC-backed one, similar in terms of nationality, age, industry, number of inventions and possession of at least a radical patent. In this way, we were able to isolate and estimate the treatment effect of VC on the firms it finances. From our analysis it emerges, among the main findings, that stand-alone VC does not show any evidence of a positive impact on the exit performance (IPO/Acquisition) of radically innovative firms. On the other hand, VC syndication, regardless of its composition, is extremely beneficial and it also proves to be more advantageous for radical firms with respect to non-radical ones. This work reveals how VC syndication is able to unleash the disruptive potential of radically innovative firms, providing them miscellaneous resources, expertise, and the time and confidence necessary to commercialize a cutting-edge product along with a positive signal conveyed to the market. All this, in ultimate analysis, translates into greater chances to obtain a successful exit
University of Utah at UC-San Diego; Feb. 23, 2024
No full textBaseball game statistics; game bookTony Gwynn Legacy; Attendance: 452; Head Coach Gary HendersonBaseballUtah 4; UC-San Diego 3 (11 inn.)2024 Utah Baseball Utah at UC San Diego Feb 23, 2024 at La Jolla,Calif. (Triton Ballpark) Utah 4 (4-1) UC San Diego 3 (3-2) Player Jackson, Core ss Roberts, Kai cf Clarkson, TJ rf Quinn, Tyler c Gurney, Cameron 1b Davinni, Michael 3b Carpenter, Kaden dh Frei, Landon ph/dh Bodily, Karson lf Duffalo, Dakota ph/lf Webster, Bruer 2b Jones, Merit p Hostert, Randon p Lugo-Canchola, E. p McAnelly, Colter p Ashman, Micah p Totals Score by Innings Utah UC San Diego ab r po a lob 5 4 5 3 4 4 1 3 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 10 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 4 6 2 4 7 33 13 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Player Costello, Nick rf Halbach, Matt 3b Rosengard, Benjamin 2b Kane, Doyle 1b Hackworth, Patrick dh Preap, Bradlee ph Gonzalez, Emiliano c Kleszcz, Brock lf Crossland, Michael cf Sudyka, Noah ss Lanier, Delshaun ph Forcucci, Ryan p Martinez, Izaak p Rissas, Ryan p Totals 10 11 0 0 1 0 R 4 3 H 6 7 ab r 4 4 5 4 3 1 4 5 4 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 37 3 7 3 4 10 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 po a lob 1 0 1 14 0 0 7 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 1 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 33 17 10 E 1 3 E - Davinni, M.(1); Halbach, M. 2(3); Forcucci, R.(1). DP - UCSD 1. LOB - UTAH 6; UCSD 10. 2B - Jackson, C.(2); Halbach, M.(2); Rosengard, B(1); Crossland, M(2). HBP - Costello, N.. SH - Gurney, C.(1); Hackworth, P; Sudyka, N. 2(2). SF - Quinn, T.(1); Gonzalez, E.(2). SB - Roberts, K.(3); Webster, B.(3); Costello, N.(2). CS Roberts, K.(1). Utah Jones, Merit Hostert, Randon Lugo-Canchola, E. McAnelly, Colter Ashman, Micah ip h r 4.2 4.0 0.2 0.2 1.0 4 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 er bb so ab 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 bf np UC San Diego 5 17 21 3 12 17 1 3 3 0 2 2 1 3 3 83 Forcucci, Ryan Martinez, Izaak Rissas, Ryan 51 11 12 10 Win - McAnelly, C. (1-0). Loss - Rissas, R. (1-1). Save - Ashman, M. (1). HBP - by Jones, M. (Costello, N.). Pitches/strikes: Jones, M. 83/51; Hostert, R. 51/33; LugoCanchola 11/7; McAnelly, C. 12/6; Ashman, M. 10/6; Forcucci, R. 76/49; Martinez, I. 93/61; Rissas, R. 20/11. Umpires - HP: Randy Sutton 1B: Mike Lusky 2B: Angel Campos 3B: Alex Ortiz Start: 6:05 pm Time: 3:20 Attendance: 452 Weather: Sunny and clear, 64 ip h r 4.0 6.0 1.0 4 2 0 3 0 1 er bb 1 0 0 2 1 1 so bf np 3 15 18 4 19 20 0 3 5 ab 76 93 2
Diel vertical migration of zooplankton and mesopelagic fish in the Arabian Sea
No full textAcoustic (153
kHz ADCP and 12
kHz hull-mounted transducers) data and MOCNESS (MOC01 and MOC10) net tow samples collected in the Arabian Sea during the Spring Intermonsoon (April/May) and Southwest Monsoon (August) in 1995 documented substantial diel migrations of fish and zooplankton despite the year-round presence of an oxygen minimum (<0.2
ml
l
−1 at 125–150
m). Fish and zooplankton layers were distinguished by comparing 12
kHz sonar and 153
kHz ADCP backscatter data, which indicated that the strongly migrating layers were predominantly composed of fishes. Fish vertical migration speeds were independently estimated from the slopes of the volume scattering layers and from the vertical velocity components of the ADCP, yielding average speeds of 4 and 3
cm
s
−1 and maximum speeds of 13 and 10
cm
s
−1, respectively. A few migrating zooplankton layers were identified with an average speed of about 2
cm
s
−1 and maximum speeds as high as 8
cm
s
−1. Migration depths for both zooplankton and fish differed somewhat amongst stations and appeared to be related to local hydrographic conditions (principally the vertical gradients in DO and water temperature). Zooplankton displacement volumes at individual sites suggested that zooplankton biomass during the Southwest Monsoon could be as much as fivefold greater than during the Spring Intermonsoon. This observation was confirmed for the region in general by first deriving a relationship between ADCP backscatter intensity and daytime zooplankton biomass and then comparing the latter between cruises using daytime ADCP data taken along a 1500
km transect that extended from the coast of Somalia to the center of the northern basin
Population-Dynamics of Juvenile Caribbean Spiny Lobster, Panulirus-Argus, in Florida Bay, Florida
No full textDespite a wealth of information on the growth and population dynamics of sub-adult and adult Caribbean spiny lobsters (Panulirus argus), there is far less information about younger juveniles under natural conditions. Here we describe growth and population dynamics of juvenile spiny lobsters (12-68 mm carapace length, CL) that we have studied for 14 months (October 1988-December 1989) using mark-recapture techniques in a hardbottom community in Florida Bay, Florida. We also monitored the supply of postlarvae into the region in 1988 and 1989 using Witham-type surface collectors in an effort to link peak periods of settlement of postlarvae with subsequent cohorts of juveniles. Field estimates of growth were the highest ever reported for this species, averaging 0.95 mm CL.wk-1 (range: 0.35-1.25 mm CL.wk-1 for individuals 20-25 mm CL and 40-45 mm CL, respectively). These results indicate that lobsters in some areas in Florida Bay can reach Florida\u27s legal harvestable size (76 mm CL) 1.5 years after settlement. Season and lobster size had significant effects on growth rates; slower growth occurred during the winter and among small individuals. Differences in growth among size classes resulted from changes in molt increment, whereas seasonal differences were a result of changes in intermolt interval. Using mark-recapture techniques, we estimate that the density of juvenile spiny lobsters \u3c45 mm CL in this prime nursery habitat was 454.ha-1, that the mean monthly probability of survival (reflecting actual mortality plus emigration) was 0.51, and that an average of 131 lobsters entered the population through recruitment and immigration each month. Recruitment of juveniles was significantly correlated (r = 0.83) with the supply of postlarvae to the region 8 months earlier. This relationship is stronger than was previously believed, and may only be manifested in areas with superior nursery habitat
Evaluation of the recreational marron fishery against environmental change and human interaction
No full textThe distribution of marron in the southwest of Australia has seen many changes since European settlement. Reconstructions of their range from historical records suggested that marron inhabited the waters between the Harvey River and Denmark River. Due to translocation, their range has expanded as far north as the Hutt River and as far east as Esperance. Although at present marron still exist in all the original rivers within the southwest, their distribution within these rivers has contracted. Poor water quality, salinity, low rainfall and environmental degradation in the upper and lower reaches have restricted marron populations.
Historically, management decisions in the Recreational Marron Fishery have been based on fishery-dependent CPUE data collected using a logbook survey and phone survey. A critical assumption has been that the fisheries-dependent CPUE values were proportional to abundance. However, raw or nominal fisheries-dependent CPUE effort data are seldom proportional to abundance and relative abundances indices based on nominal and even standardised CPUE data are notoriously problematic and often provide little useful guidance for management. Although, the fishery-dependent programs provide high quality data on changes in the fishery, in isolation, these data provided limited information on the effects of fishing and the impact of fishery regulations on marron abundance. Standardising the fishery-dependent CPUE data for just one (introduction of snare-only areas during the 1990s) of the numerous management changes illustrated the significant bias in raw, nominal CPUE data. The use of biased fisherydependent data as measures for Recreational Marron Fishery productivity was probably one of the contributing factors limiting the success of developing predictive models using non-fishery variables (e.g. rainfall, river flow).
After a thorough review of (historical) sampling methods, a new fishery-independent annual research program using inexpensive box traps was implemented in 2006. Trapping allowed technical staff to sample several sites (2-4) simultaneously instead of just one site per night. More importantly, traps were set late afternoon and retrieved the following morning, removing the serious occupational health and safety issues associated with the historical late night (18:00- 1:00) sampling trips using drop nets and scoop nets. Furthermore, trapping removed the high level of subjectivity (e.g. operator skill level) associated with the traditional methods, especially scoop netting. Trap data appeared to be the most suitable as an index of relative abundance of marron. Interestingly, comparing trap catches with density data obtained through visual surveys using scuba revealed that at least over soft substrate in dams, trap catches can be used as both a measure of relative and absolute (#/m2) abundance.
There were large differences in the fishing mortality and rates of exploitation of the two key indicator stocks, Wellington Dam and the Warren River. Fishing mortality and subsequent rates of exploitation were much greater in the habitat poor dam stock relative to the relatively pristine river stock. This was attributable to the differences in habitat and food availability between these systems. Marron are also susceptible to teleost fish predation during the juvenile part of their life history. For example, small (20 cm Standard Length, SL) consumed by far the most marron throughout the year. Small trout feed predominantly on insects with larger individuals (>30cm SL) shifting towards fish and crayfish, including marron. The highest marron densities were found in water bodies with 2 Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 211, 2010 complex hide habitat despite large numbers of introduced predatory fish like redfin perch, rainbow and brown trout; highlighting the importance of complex habitat in reducing intra and interspecific predation and maintaining recruitment to the fishery. As such, no evidence was found to support the hypothesis that marron stocks are significantly (recruitment) limited due to predation in systems with complex habitat.
The Recreational Marron Fishery has targeted (adult) marron since the introduction of a minimum legal size of 57 mm OCL in 1952. The reduction of the fishing season from 135 days (~500,000 marron) in the 1970s and 1980s, to 16 days (~50,000 marron) in the early 2000s, has significantly reduced the impact of fishing mortality.
Marron densities and population structure were strongly influenced by habitat type. Both trapping and visual surveys using scuba, clearly demonstrated that complex habitat sustained higher densities of marron over a wide size range, while fewer, but mainly larger marron, occurred over soft, flat substrate.
The key indicator populations studied in the Warren River and Wellington Dam had the highest densities of marron of all the surveyed water bodies but the population dynamics in each dam were strikingly different. In both water bodies, juveniles initially grow at roughly the same rate but the population in Wellington Dam is stunted, very few animals larger than 60 mm OCL. While in the Warren River animals between 60-90 mm OCL were common and continued to grow, tagging data showed that in Wellington Dam adult marron would moult but not increase in size. The study demonstrated that the Wellington Dam stock was effectively fully exploited and had very low productivity. By contrast, the Warren River stock had relatively low fishing exploitation and a high productivity driven by higher growth rates of trappable individuals coupled with higher densities. The differences in densities and growth of larger individuals were attributed to differences in habitat quality and food resources. The differences in exploitation rates were attributed to the greater fisher accessibility in the dam relative to the river. These differences are likely to be similar in other dam and river stocks (with the exception of Harvey Dam) and thus have direct implications for the management of the two sectors of the fishery.
A key finding of the study is that water quality (salinity) and the quality and availability of complex habitat (intact riparian vegetation providing woody debris in rivers and a lack of complex habitat in dams) are the critical bottlenecks restricting marron distribution and abundance in the southwest of WA.
Little temporal and spatial variation was observed in both ovarian (potential) and pleopodal (effective) fecundity among a dozen marron populations. Size-at-maturity showed little temporal but considerable spatial variation ranging from 30-70 mm OCL. Preliminary results indicated that at present the minimum legal size in the Margaret, Blackwood and Moore Rivers might be insufficient to protect the female breeding stock. Furthermore, it appeared that in some populations (e.g. Shannon River), females were not reproductively active every year and may trade-off growth for reproduction. Alternating between growth and reproduction has been demonstrated for Tasmanian and Victorian freshwater crayfish populations where low water temperatures restrict the growing/breeding season.
Limited information is available on the early phases of juvenile marron in the field. Visual surveys demonstrated that in dams juvenile abundance is highly correlated with the presence of complex, hard substrate. Several designs of ‘habitat traps’ were successfully tested in Wellington Dam and Warren River to capture juvenile marron. However, the design of the ‘habitat trap’ will need some further adjustment and testing, before this method can be used as a reliable recruitment abundance index.
Tagging juvenile marron with small (<1mm), internal coded micro wire tags was highly successful and proved to be a potentially powerful tool to study juvenile biology in the field. Laboratory experiments showed that tagging had no effect on mortality or growth of small juvenile marron and tag retention was high.
The degradation (salinisation, reduced surface and groundwater inflow) of the rivers in the southwest is a threat to both the recreational marron fisheries and the marron populations upon which it is based and has resulted in reduction of the inland range of the species. The exclusion of recreational fishing from public dams (e.g. Stirling Dam and possible Logue Brook Dam and Wellington Dam in the near future) reduces the size of the marron fishery but simultaneously creates unofficial protected areas for marron and other native aquatic fauna.
The major threat to the ongoing sustainability of the fishery is the decline in the health of the freshwater systems in which it currently occurs. As such, a key recommendation is to promote inter-agency cooperation in addressing the decline of river health; particularly with regard to water quality and riparian vegetation.
The future of the recreational marron fishery lies in also promoting it as a skilful, exciting, inexpensive and fun outdoor activity that can be enjoyed by the whole family.
As such, creation of a snare-only, ‘Trophy’ marron fishery with conservative bag and possession limits throughout the whole fishery would greatly simplify research, compliance and management. More importantly, such an approach would allow for a considerable increase in season length that will allow more people to participate or organise multiple trips, enhancing visitation to the southwest region and further contributing to regional economies
University of Utah at Pepperdine University; Feb. 16, 2024
No full textBaseball game statistics; game bookAttendance: 270; Head Coach Gary HendersonBaseballPepperdine 1; Utah 02024 Utah Baseball Utah at Pepperdine Feb 16, 2024 at Malibu, Calif. (Eddy D. Field) Utah 0 (0-1) Pepperdine 1 (1-1) Player Jackson, Core ss Roberts, Kai cf Quinn, Tyler 3b Clarkson, TJ rf Gurney, Cameron 1b Frei, Landon ph Flaharty, Matt dh Carpenter, Kaden lf Bodily, Karson pr/lf Antillon, Hunter c Webster, Bruer 2b Van Sickle, Bryson p Hostert, Randon p Totals Score by Innings Utah Pepperdine ab r po a lob 4 4 3 2 3 1 2 3 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 11 0 0 0 0 7 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 27 0 2 0 3 6 24 10 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 X Player Upstill,Nick lf Rubin,Justin ss Bradshaw,Connor cf Walsh,Connor dh Renck,Brady 3b Pemberton,Luke rf Sheehan,Cole 1b Nunez,Julian 2b Savage,Andrew c Bonn,Nick p Nichols p Totals R 0 1 H 2 7 ab r po a lob 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 h rbi 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 6 0 3 0 1 1 6 4 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 32 1 7 1 1 7 27 7 9 E 4 0 E - Jackson, C.; Quinn, T.; Webster, B.; Hostert, R.. DP - PEPP 1. LOB - Utah 5; PEPP 9. 2B - Nunez. 3B Nunez. HBP - Clarkson, TJ; Webster, B.. SH - Upstill. SB - Flaharty, M.; Bradshaw. Utah Van Sickle, Bryson Hostert, Randon ip h r 4.0 4.0 6 1 0 1 er bb so ab 0 1 0 1 bf np Pepperdine ip h r 3 19 19 4 13 15 79 Bonn,Nick Nichols 5.0 4.0 0 2 0 0 50 Win - Gunnar (1-0). Loss - Hostert, R. (0-1). Save - None. WP - Van Sickle. HBP - by Bonn (Clarkson, TJ); by Bonn (Webster, B.). Pitches/strikes: Van Sickle 79/55; Hostert, R. 50/30; Bonn 68/40; Gunnar 61/36. Umpires - HP: Scott Jones 1B: Joseph Finley 3B: Bud Dunklin Start: 1:40 PM Time: 2:30 Attendance: 270 Weather: 62 Degrees er bb 0 0 1 2 so bf np 3 14 17 3 13 15 ab 68 61 2024 Utah Baseball California Baptist vs Utah Feb 17, 2024 at Malibu, CALIF. (Eddy D. Field) California Baptist 4 (1-1) Player Julian Alvarez cf Garret Ostrander 2b Michael Carpentier c Mitch Simon 3b Cole Howarth rf Gunner Antillion ss Josiah Chavez dh Ryan Kim ph/dh Nick Dumesnil lf Shayne Simpson 1b Josiah Bryant ph Jake Skipworth 1b Jacob Wilson p Brandon Downer p Jared Villalobos p Andrew Rudd p Totals Score by Innings California Baptist Utah Utah 9 (1-1) ab r 4 4 5 5 5 3 3 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 po a lob 1 0 2 3 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 6 1 1 3 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11 4 3 5 24 7 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 0 2 1 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 X Player Jackson, Core ss Roberts, Kai cf Clarkson, TJ rf Quinn, Tyler 3b Carpenter, Kaden lf Davinni, Michael dh Bodily, Karson ph/dh Gurney, Cameron 1b Digiorno, Drake ph/1b Antillon, Hunter c Webster, Bruer 2b Jones, Merit p Kuehl, Bransen p Lugo-Canchola, E. p Ashman, Micah p Totals R 4 9 H 11 12 ab r 5 4 5 5 4 3 1 3 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 po a lob 0 3 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 bb so 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 5 1 1 0 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 2 0 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 12 9 4 6 27 15 11 E 2 0 E - M Simon; G Antillion. DP - Utah 1. LOB - CBU 10; Utah 11. 2B - G Antillion; Roberts, K. 2; Carpenter, K; Davinni, M.. 3B - S Simpson. HR - M Carpentier; Quinn, T.; Carpenter, K. HBP - G Antillion; Carpenter, K; Antillon, H.. SB - J Alvarez; Roberts, K.; Webster, B.. California Baptist Jacob Wilson Brandon Downer Jared Villalobos Andrew Rudd ip h r 2.1 1.1 2.1 2.0 5 2 3 2 5 2 2 0 er bb so ab 2 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 bf np Utah 4 14 16 1 6 8 0 9 10 1 9 10 60 Jones, Merit Kuehl, Bransen Lugo-Canchola, E. Ashman, Micah 26 24 37 ip h r 4.0 3.1 0.2 1.0 6 3 1 1 3 1 0 0 Win - Kuehl, B. (1-0). Loss - J Wilson (0-1). Save - None. WP - A Rudd; Jones, M.. HBP - by Jones, M. (G Antillion); by J Wilson (Carpenter, K); by J Villalobos (Antillon, H.). PB - M Carpentier 2. Pitches/strikes: J Wilson 60/38; B Downer 26/14; J Villalobos 24/17; A Rudd 37/20; Jones, M. 74/45; Kuehl, B. 45/28; LugoCanchola 22/13; Ashman, M. 18/11. Umpires - HP: Joseph Finley 1B: Bud Dunklin 3B: Scott Jones Start: 10 AM Time: 2:52 Attendance: 175 Weather: 53 Degrees Jones, M. faced 1 batter in the 5th. er bb 3 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 so bf np 3 18 20 1 12 13 1 3 4 0 4 4 ab 74 45 22 18 2024 Utah Baseball Utah at Pepperdine Feb 17, 2024 at Malibu, CALIF. (Eddy D. Field) Utah 9 (2-1) Pepperdine 4 (1-2) Player Jackson, Core ss Roberts, Kai cf Clarkson, TJ rf Quinn, Tyler c Carpenter, Kaden lf Duffalo, Dakota lf Davinni, Michael 3b Gurney, Cameron 1b Digiorno, Drake ph Flaharty, Matt pr Thomas, Ethan 1b Bodily, Karson dh Webster, Bruer 2b Porthan, Brett p Riske, Payton p Totals Score by Innings Utah Pepperdine ab r 5 5 5 5 4 1 5 3 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 38 h rbi bb so 2 1 0 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 9 11 7 3 7 po a lob 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 8 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 11 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 Player Upstill,Nick lf Rubin,Justin ss Bradshaw,Connor cf Walsh,Connor dh Masino,Charles rf Renck,Brady 3b Pemberton,Luke 1b Sheehan,Cole c Nunez,Julian 2b Boyer,Matthew p MacCallum,Dylan p Grossman,Jacob p Totals R 9 4 H 11 7 ab r 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 h rbi 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 bb so 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 32 4 7 4 3 2 po a lob 2 1 3 0 2 0 9 7 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 27 10 5 E 1 2 E - Jackson, C.; Upstill; Boyer. DP - Utah 1. LOB - Utah 6; PEPP 5. 2B - Jackson, C.; Roberts, K.; Quinn, T.; Carpenter, K; Bodily, K.; Bradshaw; Masino. HR - Jackson, C.. SF - Bodily, K.; Bradshaw. SB - Flaharty, M.; Bodily, K.; Webster, B.. Utah Porthan, Brett Riske, Payton ip h r 7.0 2.0 4 3 1 3 er bb so ab 1 3 1 2 bf np Pepperdine 1 23 25 1 9 11 83 Boyer,Matthew MacCallum,Dylan Grossman,Jacob 36 ip h r 5.0 2.0 2.0 7 2 2 7 1 1 Win - Porthan, B. (1-0). Loss - Boyer (0-1). Save - None. WP - MacCallum; Grossman. PB - Sheehan 2. Pitches/strikes: Porthan, B. 83/57; Riske, P. 36/23; Boyer 76/48; MacCallum 51/26; Grossman 29/20. Umpires - HP: Bud Dunklin 1B: Scott Jones 3B: Joseph Finley Start: 2:05 PM Time: 2:20 Attendance: 370 Weather: 60 Degrees MacCallum faced 2 batters in the 8th. er bb 6 1 1 0 3 0 so bf np 2 22 23 2 8 11 3 8 8 ab 76 51 29 2024 Utah Baseball Utah at California Baptist Feb 18, 2024 at Riverside, CA (Totman Stadium) Utah 7 (3-1) California Baptist 1 (1-2) Player Jackson, Core ss Roberts, Kai cf Quinn, Tyler 3b Clarkson, TJ rf Davinni, Michael dh Digiorno, Drake 2b Carpenter, Kaden lf Duffalo, Dakota ph/lf Thomas, Ethan 1b Bodily, Karson pr Gurney, Cameron 1b Frei, Landon ph/1b Antillon, Hunter c Harris, Jaden p Elder, Jackson p McAnelly, Colter p Ashman, Micah p Totals Score by Innings Utah California Baptist ab r 4 3 5 3 3 3 3 1 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 7 7 5 4 5 po a lob 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 1 4 0 4 3 9 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 11 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Player Garret Ostrander 2b Matt Chavez 2b Michael Carpentier c Josiah Bryant c Mitch Simon 3b/ss Cole Howarth rf Gunner Antillion ss/3b Jake Brown lf Ryan Kim dh Nick Dumesnil cf Jake Skipworth 1b Cody New p Luis Becerra p Ryan Hernandez p Ryne Palmer p Totals R 7 1 H 7 4 ab r po a lob 4 0 3 0 4 4 4 3 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 1 3 4 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 1 4 1 3 9 27 7 6 E 1 1 E - Quinn, T.; G Antillion. DP - Utah 2; CBU 3. LOB - Utah 6; CBU 6. HR - Clarkson, TJ; J Brown. HBP - Jackson, C.; Roberts, K. 2; Clarkson, TJ; Thomas, E.; J Brown. SB - Jackson, C.; Roberts, K.; Clarkson, TJ; Antillon, H.. CS - Digiorno, D.. Utah Harris, Jaden Elder, Jackson McAnelly, Colter Ashman, Micah ip h r 4.1 2.2 1.2 0.1 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 er bb so ab 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 bf np California Baptist 7 14 17 2 9 9 0 6 7 0 1 1 75 Cody New Luis Becerra Ryan Hernandez Ryne Palmer 26 15 6 ip h r 2.0 2.1 3.2 1.0 2 2 3 0 3 4 0 0 Win - Elder, J. (1-0). Loss - C New (0-1). Save - None. WP - Harris, J.. HBP - by C New (Roberts, K.); by C New (Thomas, E.); by C New (Roberts, K.); by C New (Clarkson, TJ); by L Becerra (Jackson, C.); by Harris, J. (J Brown). PB - M Carpentier 2. Pitches/strikes: Harris, J. 75/43; Elder, J. 26/18; McAnelly, C. 15/9; Ashman, M. 6/4; C New 46/23; L Becerra 47/28; R Hernandez 56/40; R Palmer 10/6. Umpires Start: 12:00 PM Time: 2:42 Attendance: 827 Weather: Cloudy C New faced 3 batters in the 3rd. er bb 3 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 so bf np 1 7 13 3 9 12 1 12 12 0 3 3 ab 46 47 56 10 2024 Utah Baseball Utah at UC San Diego Feb 23, 2024 at La Jolla,Calif. (Triton Ballpark) Utah 4 (4-1) UC San Diego 3 (3-2) Player Jackson, Core ss Roberts, Kai cf Clarkson, TJ rf Quinn, Tyler c Gurney, Cameron 1b Davinni, Michael 3b Carpenter, Kaden dh Frei, Landon ph/dh Bodily, Karson lf Duffalo, Dakota ph/lf Webster, Bruer 2b Jones, Merit p Hostert, Randon p Lugo-Canchola, E. p McAnelly, Colter p Ashman, Micah p Totals Score by Innings Utah UC San Diego ab r po a lob 5 4 5 3 4 4 1 3 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 10 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 4 6 2 4 7 33 13 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Player Costello, Nick rf Halbach, Matt 3b Rosengard, Benjamin 2b Kane, Doyle 1b Hackworth, Patrick dh Preap, Bradlee ph Gonzalez, Emiliano c Kleszcz, Brock lf Crossland, Michael cf Sudyka, Noah ss Lanier, Delshaun ph Forcucci, Ryan p Martinez, Izaak p Rissas, Ryan p Totals 10 11 0 0 1 0 R 4 3 H 6 7 ab r 4 4 5 4 3 1 4 5 4 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 37 3 7 3 4 10 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 po a lob 1 0 1 14 0 0 7 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 1 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 33 17 10 E 1 3 E - Davinni, M.(1); Halbach, M. 2(3); Forcucci, R.(1). DP - UCSD 1. LOB - UTAH 6; UCSD 10. 2B - Jackson, C.(2); Halbach, M.(2); Rosengard, B(1); Crossland, M(2). HBP - Costello, N.. SH - Gurney, C.(1); Hackworth, P; Sudyka, N. 2(2). SF - Quinn, T.(1); Gonzalez, E.(2). SB - Roberts, K.(3); Webster, B.(3); Costello, N.(2). CS Roberts, K.(1). Utah Jones, Merit Hostert, Randon Lugo-Canchola, E. McAnelly, Colter Ashman, Micah ip h r 4.2 4.0 0.2 0.2 1.0 4 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 er bb so ab 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 bf np UC San Diego 5 17 21 3 12 17 1 3 3 0 2 2 1 3 3 83 Forcucci, Ryan Martinez, Izaak Rissas, Ryan 51 11 12 10 Win - McAnelly, C. (1-0). Loss - Rissas, R. (1-1). Save - Ashman, M. (1). HBP - by Jones, M. (Costello, N.). Pitches/strikes: Jones, M. 83/51; Hostert, R. 51/33; LugoCanchola 11/7; McAnelly, C. 12/6; Ashman, M. 10/6; Forcucci, R. 76/49; Martinez, I. 93/61; Rissas, R. 20/11. Umpires - HP: Randy Sutton 1B: Mike Lusky 2B: Angel Campos 3B: Alex Ortiz Start: 6:05 pm Time: 3:20 Attendance: 452 Weather: Sunny and clear, 64 ip h r 4.0 6.0 1.0 4 2 0 3 0 1 er bb 1 0 0 2 1 1 so bf np 3 15 18 4 19 20 0 3 5 ab 76 93 20 2024 Utah Baseball Loyola Marymount vs Utah Feb 24, 2024 at San Diego, Calif. (Tony Gwynn Stadium) Loyola Marymount 5 (4-2) Player Khadim Diaw rf Sam Biller cf Daalen Adderley lf Robbie Ayers c Joe Reid dh Connor Blough pr/dh Brendan Bobo 1b Benny Casillas ss Trey Becker 3b Christian Dicochea 2b Ryan Towers p Cole Stucky p Cole Chimenti p Austin Schroeder p Seamus Barrett p Jake Geis p Ryan Mullan p Totals Score by Innings Loyola Marymount Utah Utah 9 (5-1) ab r 4 4 4 4 2 1 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 5 6 5 2 10 1 1 1 0 2 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 po a lob 2 4 2 3 0 0 11 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 14 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 6 0 1 0 X Player Jackson, Core ss Roberts, Kai cf Quinn, Tyler c Clarkson, TJ rf Davinni, Michael 3b Digiorno, Drake 1b/2b Carpenter, Kaden lf McAnelly, Colter dh Bodily, Karson ph/dh Webster, Bruer 2b Gurney, Cameron ph/1b Van Sickle, Bryson p Kuehl, Bransen p Riske, Payton p Ashman, Micah p Totals R 5 9 H 6 13 ab r 3 5 4 3 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 po a lob 1 2 1 1 2 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 1 0 0 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 9 3 0 6 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 13 8 3 4 27 9 7 E 1 1 E - D. Adderley(1); Digiorno, D.(1). DP - Utah 1. LOB - LMU 5; Utah 7. 2B - McAnelly, C.(1). HR - S. Biller(4); R. Ayers(1); Roberts, K.(1); Digiorno, D.(1); Bodily, K.(1). HBP - K. Diaw; B. Bobo; Jackson, C.; Clarkson, TJ. SF - B. Casillas(1); T. Becker(1). SB - S. Biller(1); B. Bobo(4); Jackson, C.(2); Digiorno, D.(1). CS - K. Diaw(1); Jackson, C.(1); Webster, B.(1). Loyola Marymount ip h r Ryan Towers Cole Stucky Cole Chimenti Austin Schroeder Seamus Barrett Jake Geis Ryan Mullan 4.1 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 6 0 1 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 3 2 2 0 er bb so ab 2 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 bf np Utah 1 18 19 0 2 4 0 4 4 1 3 4 1 3 3 0 3 4 1 2 2 76 Van Sickle, Bryson Kuehl, Bransen Riske, Payton Ashman, Micah 10 14 20 ip h r 5.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4 1 1 0 3 2 0 0 8 19 11 Win - Riske, P. (1-0). Loss - S. Barrett (0-1). Save - None. WP - R. Towers(1). HBP - by R. Towers (Jackson, C.); by Van Sickle (K. Diaw); by C. Stucky (Clarkson, TJ); by Kuehl, B. (B. Bobo). Pitches/strikes: R. Towers 76/54; C. Stucky 10/6; C. Chimenti 14/10; A. Schroeder 20/10; S. Barrett 8/6; J. Geis 19/9; R. Mullan 11/7; Van Sickle 76/51; Kuehl, B. 17/9; Riske, P. 33/21; Ashman, M. 18/13. Umpires - HP: Ruben Candelaria 1B: Jeffrey Macias 2B: Adam Rogers 3B: Tyler Schmidt Start: 2:07 pm Time: 2:56 Attendance: 223 Weather: High clouds, 72 F, wind SW 7 er bb 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 so bf np 4 20 21 0 2 6 3 6 6 3 3 4 ab 76 17 33 18 2024 Utah Baseball Cal St. Bakersfield vs Utah Feb 25, 2024 at La Jolla, Calif. (Triton Ballpark) Cal St. Bakersfield 5 (0-8) Player Shields rf Gutierrez ph Stancato cf/p Villegas p Reynolds p Perryman p Alvarez dh BujandaMcCon cf Kurata c Palmeira 1b Watson lf Leon 3b Pollard cf Hendriks ph/rf Salas 2b Pelayo ss O\u27Connor p McDonnell p Totals Score by Innings Cal St. Bakersfield Utah Utah 6 (6-1) ab r po a lob 3 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 4 4 4 5 2 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 h rbi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 10 1 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 39 5 8 5 3 5 30 12 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 Player Jackson, Core ss Roberts, Kai cf Quinn, Tyler c Clarkson, TJ rf Duffalo, Dakota rf Davinni, Michael 3b Bodily, Karson lf Digiorno, Drake 1b Carpenter, Kaden dh Antillon, Hunter ph Gurney, Cameron ph/dh Webster, Bruer 2b Porthan, Brett p Elder, Jackson p Ashman, Micah p McAnelly, Colter p Totals 10 11 0 0 1 2 R 5 6 H 8 9 ab r 5 5 5 3 0 4 3 4 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 37 6 9 6 9 11 1 3 1 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 po a lob 0 2 5 1 0 1 2 15 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 33 16 14 E 1 0 Note: None out, 3 runners LOB when the game ended. E - Kurata(1). LOB - CSUB 5; UTAH 14. 2B - Palmeira(1); Quinn, T.(2); Bodily, K.(2). HR - Watson(1); Digiorno, D.(1). HBP - Davinni, M.; Digiorno, D.. SH - Palmeira(1); Bodily, K.(1); Webster, B.(1). SB - Hendriks(1); Jackson, C. 2(3); Roberts, K. 2(5); Bodily, K.(2). CS - BujandaMcCon(1). Cal St. Bakersfield O\u27Connor McDonnell Stancato Villegas Reynolds Perryman ip h r 7.0 0.1 0.2 2.0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 1 1 0 er bb so ab 4 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4 2 1 bf np Utah 8 27 29 0 1 3 0 2 2 3 6 12 0 0 2 0 1 2 98 Porthan, Brett Elder, Jackson Ashman, Micah McAnelly, Colter 11 9 51 ip h r 8.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3 0 2 3 2 2 0 1 10 7 Win - McAnelly, C. (2-0). Loss - Perryman (0-2). Save - None. HBP - by McDonnell (Davinni, M.); by Villegas (Digiorno, D.). Pitches/strikes: O\u27Connor 98/68; McDonnell 11/3; Stancato 9/5; Villegas 51/27; Reynolds 10/3; Perryman 7/2; Porthan, B. 102/69; Elder, J. 9/1; Ashman, M. 15/10; McAnelly, C. 28/20. Umpires - HP: Randy Sutton 1B: Mike Lusky 2B: Angel Campos 3B: Alex Ortiz Start: 12:00 pm Time: 3:20 Attendance: 352 Weather: 63 degrees, cloudy Elder, J. faced 2 batters in the 9th. er bb 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 so bf np 4 27 28 0 0 2 0 4 5 1 8 8 ab 102 9 15 28 2024 Utah Baseball Utah at San Diego State Feb 25, 2024 at San Diego, Calif. (Tony Gwynn Stadium) Utah 11 (7-1) San Diego State 5 (3-4) Player Jackson, Core ss Roberts, Kai cf Clarkson, TJ rf Quinn, Tyler c Davinni, Michael 3b Bodily, Karson lf Digiorno, Drake 1b Carpenter, Kaden dh Flaharty, Matt 2b Frei, Landon ph Webster, Bruer 2b Harris, Jaden p Elder, Jackson p Nielson, Cameron p Lugo-Canchola, E. p Totals Score by Innings Utah San Diego State ab r po a lob 3 5 4 3 5 5 4 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h rbi 2 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 2 11 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 11 8 9 5 9 27 12 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 Player BATES, Finley 2b MONTOYA, Shaun rf JACKSON, Jake lf RUTTER, Drew dh KAHLER, Sammy ph WEEMS, Irvin cf TURNER, Colby 3b LAVOIE, Brady 1b WHITTLE, David c GONZALEZ, Xavier ss CHAPMAN, Manoah ph CARDENAS, Xavier p RUSSELL, Aidan p RUMARY, Garvey p Totals R 11 5 H 8 7 ab r 4 4 4 3 0 2 4 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 32 5 7 5 6 10 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 po a lob 2 0 0 0 0 4 1 10 8 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 4 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 27 14 6 E 1 3 E - Flaharty, M.(1); WHITTLE, D.; GONZALEZ, X.(1); RUSSELL, A.(1). DP - UTAH 2; SDSU 1. LOB - UTAH 4; SDSU 6. 2B - Quinn, T.(3); MONTOYA, S.(2); TURNER, C.(2). 3B - Roberts, K.(1); Clarkson, TJ(1); Carpenter, K(1); WEEMS, I.(1). HBP - Clarkson, TJ; Flaharty, M.. SH - Flaharty, M.(1). CS - Quinn, T.(1); WEEMS, I.(1). Utah Harris, Jaden Elder, Jackson Nielson, Cameron Lugo-Canchola, E. ip h r 3.0 2.1 0.2 3.0 6 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 er bb so ab 5 0 0 0 3 1 0 2 bf np San Diego State 2 14 17 4 7 8 1 3 3 3 8 10 58 CARDENAS, Xavier RUSSELL, Aidan RUMARY, Garvey 37 12 ip h r 5.0 1.2 2.1 2 3 3 5 5 1 44 Win - Nielson, C. (1-0). Loss - RUSSELL, A. (0-1). Save - None. WP - LugoCanchola(1); CARDENAS, X.(2). HBP - by CARDENAS, X. (Flaharty, M.); by CARDENAS, X. (Clarkson, TJ). Pitches/strikes: Harris, J. 58/33; Elder, J. 37/24; Nielson, C. 12/7; LugoCanchola 44/24; CARDENAS, X. 85/48; RUSSELL, A. 27/18; RUMARY, G. 33/24. Umpires - HP: Neil Turner 1B: Roger Rangel 2B: Joseph Finley 3B: Scott Jones Start: 6:04 pm Time: 2:55 Attendance: 956 Weather: Cloudy, 61 F, wind W 5 mph Nielson, C. faced 1 batter in the 7th. er bb 4 3 1 4 1 0 so bf np 6 16 22 0 8 10 3 10 10 ab 85 27 33 2024 Utah Baseball Utah at Cal Poly Mar 02, 2024 at San Luis Obispo, CA (Baggett Stadium) Utah 12 (8-1) Cal Poly 2 (2-6) Player Jackson, Core ss Flaharty, Matt ss Roberts, Kai cf Quinn, Tyler 3b Clarkson, TJ rf Davinni, Michael dh Digiorno, Drake 1b Gurney, Cameron ph/1b Duffalo, Dakota lf Webster, Bruer 2b Antillon, Hunter c Jones, Merit p Hostert, Randon p Wall, Carter p Totals Score by Innings Utah Cal Poly ab r 3 0 3 5 5 4 5 1 3 2 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 h rbi po a lob 3 0 3 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 5 14 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 34 12 11 11 7 9 27 8 12 2 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 bb so 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 3 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 Player Steels, Jake cf King, Wyatt cf Stafford, Ryan c Higuchi, Mack c Fenn, Ryan 2b Brown, Kemet 2b Yorke, Joe 1b Casillas, Aaron ss Garza, Alejandro ph/3b Cloyd, Evan dh Shimao, Tate ph/dh Kordic, Dylan lf Murray, Casey rf MacDonald, Liam 3b Hoiland, Cam ph Daudet, Zach 3b/ss Wright, Jakob p Torres, Jaccob p Pearlman, Caden p Montgomery, Paul p Rodriguez, Freddy p Larkin, Noah p Marmie, Ethan p Totals R 12 2 H 11 8 ab r 2 1 4 1 4 0 2 3 1 3 1 4 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h rbi 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bb so 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 2 8 2 2 13 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 po a lob 2 0 8 1 2 0 7 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 11 9 E 0
