952 research outputs found
Calabresi, "law and economics" and the Coase theorem
In this paper, we show that, in 1961 and before he had read "The Problem of Social Cost", Calabresi reached exactly the same conclusions as the one reached by Coase and summarized by Stigler as the "Coase theorem" but he believed that this result was valid only in the theoretical world of the economists. We also analyze how Calabresi's thought evolved, in particular including transaction costs in his reasoning, but nonetheless remained faithful to his conclusions about the practical validity of the Coase theorem. Calabresi's conclusions remained ignored by economists and by most of legal scholars until the early 1970s. It was only when scholars started to emphasize the unrealistic assumptions upon which rest the Coase theorem that they also started to pay attention to Calabresi. His works were quoted and essentially used to emphasize the limits of the Coase theorem. Calabresi and Coase were then put on the same footing; the works of the former presented as more complete and more practical than the works of the later.Calabresi, economic analysis of law, Coase theorem, invariance, problem of social cost.
Teaching Images in Headache: Thrombosis of Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm
From the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences,
University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (M. Romoli); Neurology
Clinic, University of Perugia, S. Maria della Misericordia
Hospital, Perugia, Italy (M. Romoli, P. Sarchielli, G. Cardaioli,
and P. Calabresi); Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital
of Perugia, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia,
Italy (A. Fiacca, R. Pantaleoni, and M. Hamam); IRCCS
Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy (P. Calabresi).
Address all correspondence to Michele Romoli, MD, Neurology
Clinic, University Hospital of Perugia, Piazzale Menghini 1,
Perugia, 06132, Italy, email: [email protected]
Accepted for publication August 29, 2018
Equality in the American Constitution
On March 24, 2004, the Honorable Guido Calabresi, United States Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Sterling Professor Emeritus of Law and Professorial Lecturer in Law, Yale Law School, delivered the Georgetown Law Center’s twenty-fourth Annual Philip A. Hart Memorial Lecture: Equality in the American Constitution.
Judge Calabresi was appointed United States Circuit Judge in July 1994, and entered into duty on September 16, 1994. Prior to his appointment, he was Dean and Sterling Professor at Yale Law School, where he began teaching in 1959, and is now Sterling Professor Emeritus and Professorial Lecturer in Law. Judge Calabresi received his B.S. degree, summa cum laude, from Yale College in 1953, a B.A. degree with First Class Honors from Magdalene College, Oxford University, in 1955, an LL.B. degree, magna cum laude, in 1958 from Yale Law School, and an M.A. in Politics, Philosophy and Economics from Oxford University in 1959. A Rhodes Scholar and member of Phi Beta Kappa and Order of the Coif, Judge Calabresi served as the Note Editor of The Yale Law Journal, 1957-58, while graduating first in his law school class. Following graduation, Judge Calabresi clerked for Justice Hugo Black of the United States Supreme Court. He has been awarded some forty honorary degrees from universities in the United States and abroad, and is the author of four books and more than one hundred articles on law and related subjects
Equality in the American Constitution
Judge Guido Calabresi of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit delivered Duke Law\u27s annual Brainerd Currie Memorial Lecture, entitled Equality in the American Constitution. Prior to his appointment to the bench in 1994, Judge Calabresi was Dean and Sterling Professor at Yale Law School, where he began teaching in 1959, and is now Sterling Professor Emeritus and Professorial Lecturer in Law. He has been awarded some fifty honorary degrees from universities in the United States and abroad, and is the author of seven books and more than one hundred articles on law and related subjects
Costos de transacción, asignación de recursos y reglas de responsabilidad
En el presente trabajo, el autor nos brinda una brillante perspectiva de los costos transaccionales y la problemática que los rodea en cuanto a la asignación de recursos y las reglas de responsabilidad que tenemos en nuestros ordenamientos legales. Con el motivo de dejar claro su planteamiento, el renombrado profesor Calabresi usa ejemplos empíricos para mostrar de qué manera se da la intervención gubernamental en la economía, cuando esta parece no poder regularse por sí misma. In the present paper, the author gives us a brighter perspective of transaction costs and the problems around them in terms of resource allocation and liability rules that we have in our legal systems. With the occasion to clarify its approach, the renowned Professor Calabresi uses empirical examples that show how government intervention in the economy occurs when this does not seem to regulate for itself
Costos de transacción, asignación de recursos y reglas de responsabilidad
En el presente trabajo, el autor nos brinda una brillante perspectiva de los costos transaccionales y la problemática que los rodea en cuanto a la asignación de recursos y las reglas de responsabilidad que tenemos en nuestros ordenamientos legales. Con el motivo de dejar claro su planteamiento, el renombrado profesor Calabresi usa ejemplos empíricos para mostrar de qué manera se da la intervención gubernamental en la economía, cuando esta parece no poder regularse por sí misma. In the present paper, the author gives us a brighter perspective of transaction costs and the problems around them in terms of resource allocation and liability rules that we have in our legal systems. With the occasion to clarify its approach, the renowned Professor Calabresi uses empirical examples that show how government intervention in the economy occurs when this does not seem to regulate for itself
Still against design: a response to Steven Calabresi, Sanford Levinson, and Vernon Smith
Our argument in Against Design may seem new, challenging, or even bizarre. One commenter, Levinson, questions whether we really mean what we say: “I presume that the authors cannot really be arguing that all design is impossible.”1 Given our admittedly unorthodox and perhaps radical challenge to common notions of design, we appreciate the thoughtful attention to our views given by our commenters Vernon Smith, Sanford Levinson and Steven G. Calabresi. Even when disagreeing with us, they have responded to Against Design with open minds
Transient Clouding of a Sutureless Scleral Fixated Hydrophilic Intraocular Lens with Spontaneous Resolution: A Case Report and in vitro Experimental Test
A 83-year-old woman underwent phacoemulsification in the left eye, complicated by posterior capsular rupture and dislocation of nuclear fragments in the vitreous cavity. She was left aphakic and referred to the Clinica Oculistica, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy. After 2 days, she underwent pars plana vitrectomy, with removal of the nuclear fragments, and secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. The lens used was a sutureless scleral fixation Carlevale lens (I71 FIL SSF Carlevale lensTM. Soleko IOL Division), which was delivered to the operating theatre on the morning of the operation. During the implantation, it appeared opaque, without any deposit on its surfaces. The lens was not removed. On the next day, the lens was transparent, and it remained clear at the following control visits. An in vitro experimental test demonstrated that 25% hydrophilic polymers are vulnerable to thermal shock, developing an opacification which resolves after temperature stabilization of the lens
Nonlinear 3-D Finite Element Analysis of the Effects of Additional Weights on the Actual Stability Conditions of the Tower of Pisa
La placca aterosclerotica : basi biologiche, metodi di valutazione e controllo farmacologico
- …
