1,721,403 research outputs found
Current status of drug-eluting stents
No full textFirst-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) with controlled release of sirolimus or paclitaxel from durable polymers compared with bare-metal stents have been consistently shown to reduce the risk of repeat revascularization procedures due to restenosis. The superior efficacy was found across a wide range of patients and lesion subsets and persisted up to 5 years whereas similar outcomes have been observed in terms of death and myocardial infarction. Newer generation DES have been developed with the goal to further improve upon the safety profile of first-generation DES while maintaining efficacy. These platforms include DES with improved and more biocompatible durable polymers, DES using bioabsorbable polymers for drug release, DES with polymer-free drug release, and fully bioabsorbable DES. Newer generation DES with durable polymers such as zotarolimus-eluting or everolimus-eluting XIENCE V stents have been directly compared with first-generation DES. Most recent results of large scale clinical trials are encouraging in terms of similar or increased efficacy while improving safety by reducing the rates of myocardial infarctions and stent thrombosis. DES using biodegradable polymers for drug release represent the next technological modification and preliminary results are favorable and demonstrate similar angiographic and clinical efficacy as first-generation DES, but only longer term follow-up and investigation in larger patient cohorts will determine whether their use is associated with improved long-term safety. Fully bioabsorbable stents represent another innovative approach. Whether this innovative concept will enter into clinical routine remains yet to be determined
Optimising cardiovascular outcomes using optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary interventions
No full textIntravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary interventions: an ongoing odyssey?
Full text linkPrognostic Impact of Stent Expansion Indices Following IVUS-Guided PCI: When Lumen Is Not Enough.
No full textUnderstanding the Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Achilles Heel: Insights From ABSORB Japan Serial Intracoronary Imaging.
No full textFrequency and outcomes of periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients with chronic coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
No full textPURPOSE OF REVIEW
Various definitions of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) have been proposed by academic groups and professional societies differing in terms of biomarker thresholds and ancillary criteria for myocardial ischemia. The incidence and clinical significance of periprocedural MI substantially varies according to the definitions applied. In this review, we summarize available clinical data on the frequency and outcomes of periprocedural MI according to various MI definitions in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
RECENT FINDINGS
Numerous clinical studies and meta-analyses have investigated the incidence and prognostic relevance of periprocedural MI following PCI. The incidence of periprocedural MI was higher when defined by universal definition of myocardial infarction (UDMI), which applies a lower biomarker threshold with broader ancillary criteria compared with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) and academic research consortium (ARC)-2. The prognostic impact of periprocedural MI defined by SCAI and ARC-2 on mortality was consistently greater compared with the UDMI definition.
SUMMARY
Among chronic coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI, the frequency and prognostic value of periprocedural MI varies considerably based on definitions. Periprocedural MI defined by the ARC-2 and SCAI occurred 3-6 times less frequently and were prognostically more relevant as compared with the UDMI. Clinically relevant definitions should be used in daily practice and clinical trials
Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.
No full textPseudoaneurysm Repair With a Septal Occluder
Full text linkIntroduction: New treatment options, like endovascular aortic repair, reduced the mortality rate of patients suffering from complications after an acute type A aortic dissection repair. Nevertheless, initial successful treatment of an aortic dissection does not fully eliminate the risk of later adverse aortic events like anastomotic pseudoaneurysm. Pseudoaneurysm of the
anastomosis between the ascending and the arch graft could initiate complications like peripheral embolization, dysphagia or compression of mediastinum organs. Re-operation via re-sternotomy bears enormous morbidity and mortality for these patients. There is a high unmet need for percutaneous therapeutic options to treat pseudoaneurysms.
Case Presentation: A 59-year-old-man treated 15 years ago for type A aortic dissection, was hospitalized due to intermittent abdominal pain. A detailed examination revealed 2 pseudoaneurysms: 1 symptomatic at the level of the reimplanted celiac trunk and 1 asymptomatic at the anastomosis between the brachiocephalic trunk and the aortic arch graft. Due to multiple co-morbidities and previous operations, the risk for surgery was considered too high. Both pseudoaneurysm were treated percutaneously, the symptomatic 1 with covered stent and the asymptomatic with Amplatzer septal-occluder.
Discussion: We present an alternative percutaneous therapy approach for treatment of pseudoaneurysm using a septaloccluder. A follow-up computed tomography 3 months later showed successfully excluded pseudoaneurysm
- …
