56,424 research outputs found
Membranacea Qin & Zhang
Genus Membranacea Qin & Zhang Membranacea Qin & Zhang, 2011, Zootaxa, 2923: 48–58. Membranacea Yu & Yang, 2013, ZooKeys, 260: 77–83. For detailed generic diagnosis see Yu & Yang (2013). Distribution. China (Guizhou, Hubei, Hunan, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Guangxi).Published as part of Yu, Xiaofei & Yang, Maofa, 2014, Key to species of the leafhopper genus Membranacea Qin & Zhang (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Typhlocybinae, Empoascini), with a new species from China, pp. 97-100 in Zootaxa 3878 (1) on page 97, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3878.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/22492
Alebroides parafuscus Qin & Zhang 2011
A. parafuscus Qin & Zhang, 2011 Alebroides parafuscus Qin & Zhang, 2011: 33 Distribution. China (Yunnan, Gansu).Published as part of Yu, Xiaofei & Yang, Maofa, 2014, Four new species of Alebroides Matsumura (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae) from China, pp. 248-262 in Zootaxa 3780 (2) on page 252, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3780.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/23041
Chun gui he chu: (ju ben).
虞君質改編.「春歸何處」這個劇本是由「秋海棠」「秦瘦鷗原著」改編而成.Yu Junzhi gai bian."Chun gui he chu" zhe ge ju ben shi you "Qiu hai tang""Qin Shou'ou yuan zhu" gai bian er cheng
Yu Tang Chun 玉堂春
In the artist\u27s own claims on her work: In 1994, I made a sound installation \u27Yu Tang Chun\u27. It consisted of more than one hundred drying racks. On each of the racks, clothes were not placed but instead was rice paper. There were more than 600 speakers hidden between the rice paper. The output sounds from the speakers were a digitally processed excerpt from The Peking Opera \u27Yu Tang Chun\u27. The installation, according to Qin, forms a poetic connection between the East and the West, by an acute juxtaposition of their cultural emblems respectively -- rice paper vs. speaker, soundtracks from Yu Tang Chun vs. the soundtracks\u27 electronic reproductions. (秦玉芬 建造一座“珊瑚岛”, 2019, 99 Artnet 99艺术网, available on https://collection.sina.cn/yejie/2019-04-15/detail-ihvhiqax2717879.d.html?vt=4. The quotes cited were translated from Chinese) (Jerry Wu\u2723).https://digital.kenyon.edu/zhou/1207/thumbnail.jp
Tomocerus pseudospinulus Gong & Qin & Yu 2018, sp. nov.
<i>Tomocerus pseudospinulus</i> sp. nov. <p>Figs 1A, 2, 3</p> <p> <b>Type material.</b> Holotype: male on slide, near group of waterfalls, Tiantangzhai National Nature Reserve, Jinzhai County, Anhui Province, China, 115°46′40″E, 31°07′49″N (WGS84), alt. 995m, 27.iii.2016, leg. Daoyuan Yu and Chunyan Qin (16 TTZ10). Paratypes: 2 females and 1 male on slides, 4 in alcohol, same data as holotype. All types deposited in NJAU.</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> Body length 2.8–3.3 mm (average 3.0, 4 specimens). Background body colour light yellow. Ant. I and Ant. II antero-laterally with diffuse purple pigment; ground colour of Ant. III grey, basally and apically with purple pigment, gradually darker towards apex; Ant. IV dark purple. Eye patch black, small purple patch behind eye. Clypeus with diffuse light purple pigment. Tibiotarsi usually with purple pigment (Fig. 1A).</p> <p>Intact four-segmented antennae 0.6–0.75× length of body (average 0.72, 3 specimens). Length ratio of Ant I:II:III:IV = 1.0:1.2–1.4:6.9–7.5:1.3–1.4. Ant. III unscaled. Cephalic dorsal macrochaetotaxy: anterior area: 2 (A2), 4 (A3, A5); interocular area: 2 (M2), 7 (S0, S2, S5, S 5i); postocular area: 2+2 (Pa5, Pa6); posterior area: 3+3 (Pa2, Pp3, Pe3). Posterior margin of head with 30–40 chaetae on each side (Fig. 2A).</p> <p>Pattern of body chaetotaxy as in Fig. 2B. Number of macrochaetae or large mesochaetae in posterior row as 3 (p2, p3, p4), 3 (p1, p3, p5)/ 3 (m2, m3, m4), 3 (m2, m3, m4), 4 (p1, p3, p6, p7), 2 (p6, p7), 4 (m2, m3, m5, m6) from Th. II to Abd. V respectively. Th. II with macrochaetae a3, a4, a4a and a5a behind anterior marginal macrochaetae cluster; central macrochaetae a2, a5, m1, m2 and m3 arranged in triangle, m4 lateral to m2; Th. III with anterior macrochaeta a4; Abd. III with two anterior macrochaetae m3 and m6; Abd. IV with antero-lateral macrochaeta m6; Abd. VI with numerous chaetae of different sizes.</p> <p>Trochantero-femoral organ with 1, 1 slender chaetae subequal in length (Fig. 2C). Tibiotarsi I, II, III ventrally with 8–9, 8, 8 strong chaetae, 4–6, 6, 8 of them blunt (Fig. 2D). Tenent hair 1.0–1.2× length of inner edge of unguis (average 1.1, 2 specimens); accessory chaetae weaker than pretarsal chaetae; guard chaetae 0.8–0.9× length of tenent hair (average 0.85, 2 specimens). Unguis slender, with baso-internal ridges about 1/4 – 1/3 distance from base; lateral teeth pointed, of moderate size. Inner edge of unguis with basal tooth and 4–6 (average 5, 4 specimens) more distal teeth, sub-basal tooth larger. Unguiculus lanceolate, about 0.55–0.75× length of unguis (average 0.68, 4 specimens), its inner edge with one tooth (Fig. 2E).</p> <p> Ventral tube scaled on both faces. Anterior face with 25–36 (average 31, 4 specimens) chaetae on each side, posterior face with 75–106 (average 90, 4 specimens) chaetae, each lateral flap with 70–106 (average 82, 4 specimens) chaetae and occasionally 1–2 scales. Anterior face of tenaculum with 7–10 (average 8, 3 specimens) chaetae and without scales (Fig. 2F). Ratio manubrium:dens:mucro = 3.1–3.5:4.1–4.5:1.0. Manubrium ventrally scaled without chaetae; laterally with large round scales and 9–10 chaetae, proximal 1–2 chaetae slender, distal chaetae strong; each dorsal chaetal strip with 130–180 (average 153, 4 specimens) chaetae of different sizes, an irregular row of scales from base to 2/3 – 3/4 (average 7/10, 4 specimens) length of manubrium along inner edge, and 9–12 (average 10, 4 specimens) pseudopores on lateral side; without distinct prominent chaetae (Fig. 3A); external distal corner chaeta as large as small mesochaetae in chaetal strip (Fig. 3B). Dens basally with prominent blunt dorsal chaeta. Dental spine formula as 3–4/5–6, <b>1</b>, sizes of spines gradually increase on basal subsegment (Fig. 3C); small spines with large denticles at basal half and a few small to moderate-size denticles, large spines with numerous small to moderate-size denticles (Fig. 3D). Mucro with 2–5 (average 4, 4 specimens) intermediate teeth (Fig. 3E).</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> Combination of the Ancient Greek word <i>pseudḗs</i>: false, and the specific name of the similar species <i>T. spinulus</i>.</p> <p> <b>Habitat.</b> Living in moss on rocks.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> Of other species in the <i>T. ocreatus</i> group, <i>T. pseudospinulus</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> most resembles <i>T. spinulus</i> in having short antenna, a similar chaetotaxy and a single large distal dental spine, but differs from the latter mainly in absence of the distinct prominent chaetae on the manubrium, presence of a blunt prominent chaeta on the dens and larger denticles on the dental spines (Table 1). Also the body colour of the new species is bright yellow and, in some individuals, with very light greenish tinge, while <i>T. spinulus</i> is dirty greyish yellow in the adults and light yellow only in the subadults. The type localities of <i>T. pseudospinulus</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> and <i>T. spinulus</i> are about 250 km apart, one belonging to the Dabie Cordillera and the other the Yellow Mountain Cordillera, respectively, which are geographically divided by the Yangtze River.</p>Published as part of <i>Gong, Xin, Qin, Chunyan & Yu, Daoyuan, 2018, Two new species of Tomocerus ocreatus group with a single large distal dental spine (Collembola, Tomoceridae), pp. 273-282 in Zootaxa 4514 (2)</i> on pages 275-278, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4514.2.10, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/2607838">http://zenodo.org/record/2607838</a>
Tomocerus paraspinulus Gong & Qin & Yu 2018, sp. nov.
Tomocerus paraspinulus sp. nov. Figs. 1B, 4, 5 Type material. Holotype: male on slide, near entrance of Baixiong Valley, Wanglang National Nature Reserve, Pingwu County, Sichuan Province, China, 104°1′12″E, 33°0′8″N (WGS84), alt. 2845m, 29.vii.2017, leg. Daoyuan Yu and Qibao Yan (17SC9). Paratypes: 5 females on slides, 11 in alcohol, same data as holotype. All types deposited in NJAU. Description. Body length 3.2–4.1 mm (average 3.7, 4 specimens). Background body colour light yellow. Ant. I antero-laterally with small purple patches, Ant. II distally with diffuse purple pigment, Ant. III and Ant. IV purple. Antennal base with purple ring. Eye patch black, diffuse light purple pigment around eye and on clypeus. Antero-lateral side of subcoxae and coxa I with purple pigment. Tibiotarsi with light purple pigment (Fig. 1B). Intact four-segmented antennae 0.9–1.0× length of body (average 0.95, 3 specimens). Length ratio of Ant I:II:III:IV = 1.0:1.2–1.4:9.5–10.2:1.1–1.2. Ant. III unscaled or with 1–2 basal scales. Cephalic dorsal macrochaetotaxy: anterior area: 2 (A2), 4 (A3, A5); interocular area: 2 (M2), 7 (S0, S2, S5, S 5i); postocular area: 2+2 (Pa5, Pa6); posterior area: 3+3 (Pa2, Pp3, Pe3). Posterior margin of head with 25–30 chaetae on each side (Fig. 4A). Pattern of body chaetotaxy as in Fig. 4B. Number of macrochaetae or large mesochaetae in posterior row as 3 (p2, p3, p4), 3 (p1, p3, p5)/ 3 (m2, m3, m4), 3 (m2, m3, m4), 4 (p1, p3, p6, p7), 2 (p6, p7), 4 (m2, m3, m5, m6) from Th. II to Abd. V. Th. II with macrochaetae a3, a4, a4a and a5a behind anterior marginal macrochaetae cluster; central macrochaetae a2, a5, m1, m2 and m3 arranged in triangle, m4 lateral to m2; m3 and m4 occasionally absent. Th. III with anterior macrochaeta a4; Abd. III with two anterior macrochaetae m3 and m6; Abd. IV with antero-lateral macrochaeta m6; Abd. VI with numerous chaetae of different sizes. Trochantero-femoral organ with 1, 1 slender chaetae, femoral chaeta longer (Fig. 4C). Tibiotarsi I, II, III ventrally with 7–8, 7–9, 8–9 strong chaetae, 4–7, 6–8, 6–9 of them blunt (Fig. 4D). Tenent hair 1.0–1.2× length of inner edge of unguis (average 1.1, 3 specimens); anterior accessory chaeta weaker than pretarsal chaetae, posterior accessory chaeta stronger than pretarsal chaetae; guard chaetae 0.9× length of tenent hair. Unguis slender, with baso-internal ridges about 1/4 – 1/3 distance from base; lateral teeth pointed, of moderate size. Inner edge of unguis with basal tooth and 4–6 (average 5, 6 specimens) more distal teeth, sub-basal tooth larger. Unguiculus lanceolate, about 0.55–0.75× length of unguis (average 0.67, 4 specimens), its inner edge with one tooth (Fig. 4E). Ventral tube scaled on both faces. Anterior face with 35–50 (average 41, 4 specimens) chaetae on each side, posterior face with 85–100 (average 93, 4 specimens) chaetae, each lateral flap with 100–136 (average 120, 4 specimens) chaetae, without scale. Anterior face of tenaculum with 14–18 (average 16, 6 specimens) chaetae and without scales (Fig. 4F). Ratio manubrium:dens:mucro = 2.8–3.3:3.2–4.1:1.0. Manubrium ventrally scaled without chaetae; laterally with large round scales and 9–10 chaetae, proximal 1–2 chaetae slender, distal chaetae strong; each dorsal chaetal strip with 160–240 (average 185, 5 specimens) chaetae of different sizes, an irregular row of scales from base to 2/3 – 3/4 (average 7/10, 6 specimens) length of manubrium along inner edge, and 9–13 (average 11, 6 specimens) pseudopores on lateral side; prominent chaetae 1+1, blunt, at about 2/3 – 3/4 (average 7/ 10, 6 specimens) length from base of manubrium (Fig. 5A); external distal corner chaeta as large as small mesochaetae in chaetal strip (Fig. 5B). Dens basally with prominent blunt dorsal chaeta. Dental spine formula as 3– 5/5–8, 1, sizes of spines gradually increase on basal subsegment (Fig. 5C); spines with almost evenly distributed numerous small denticles (Fig. 5D). Mucro with 4–7 (average 5, 6 specimens) intermediate teeth (Fig. 5E). Etymology. Combination of the Ancient Greek word pará: beside, near, and the specific name of T. spinulus. Habitat. Living in mosses and lichens on trunks of fir tree. Remarks. Tomocerus paraspinulus sp. nov. resembles T. spinulus in having a single large distal spine on the dens and almost evenly distributed small denticles on the dental spines, but differs from the latter mainly in having longer intact antenna, more chaetae on the tenaculum and blunt prominent chaetae on the manubrium and dens (Table 1). In addition, in the new species two accessory chaetae of the tenent hair are unequal in size, and the prominent manubrial chaeta is more distally positioned than in T. spinulus. Tomocerus paraspinulus sp. nov. is also similar to T. pseudospinulus sp. nov., but differs mainly in having longer intact antenna, prominent blunt manubrial chaeta and smaller denticles on the dental spines (Table 1). The type locality of Tomocerus paraspinulus sp. nov. is at the eastern edge of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, more than 1100 km away from those of T. pseudospinulus sp. nov. and T. spinulus, with about 2000 m altitudinal difference.Published as part of Gong, Xin, Qin, Chunyan & Yu, Daoyuan, 2018, Two new species of Tomocerus ocreatus group with a single large distal dental spine (Collembola, Tomoceridae), pp. 273-282 in Zootaxa 4514 (2) on pages 278-281, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4514.2.10, http://zenodo.org/record/260783
Figures 1-18 from: Yu X, Yang M (2013) Two new species of Membranacea Qin & Zhang from China (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Typhlocybinae, Empoascini). ZooKeys 260: 77-83. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.260.4560
Figures 1-18 - 1–16 Membranacea hubeiensis Yu & Yang,sp. n., 1 head and thorax, dorsal view 2 face 3 head and thorax, lateral view 4 forewing 5 hindwing 6 male terminalia, lateral view 7 male abdominal apodemes 8 male pygofer, dorsal view 9 male pygofer, lateral view 10 subgenital plate, ventral view 11 aedeagus, ventral view 12 aedeagus, lateral view 13 aedeagus, lateroventral view 14 paramere, dorsal view 15 male anal tube, ventral view 16 connective 17–18 Membranacea spinata Qin & Zhang 17 aedeagus, lateral view 18 aedeagus, ventral view. Figs 17 and 18 from Qin, Liu & Zhang, 201
Key to species of the leafhopper genus Membranacea Qin & Zhang (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Typhlocybinae, Empoascini), with a new species from China
Yu, Xiaofei, Yang, Maofa (2014): Key to species of the leafhopper genus Membranacea Qin & Zhang (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Typhlocybinae, Empoascini), with a new species from China. Zootaxa 3878 (1): 97-100, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3878.1.
Figures 1-18 from: Yu X, Yang M (2013) Two new species of Membranacea Qin & Zhang from China (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Typhlocybinae, Empoascini). ZooKeys 260: 77-83. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.260.4560
Figures 1-18 - 1–16 Membranacea hubeiensis Yu & Yang,sp. n., 1 head and thorax, dorsal view 2 face 3 head and thorax, lateral view 4 forewing 5 hindwing 6 male terminalia, lateral view 7 male abdominal apodemes 8 male pygofer, dorsal view 9 male pygofer, lateral view 10 subgenital plate, ventral view 11 aedeagus, ventral view 12 aedeagus, lateral view 13 aedeagus, lateroventral view 14 paramere, dorsal view 15 male anal tube, ventral view 16 connective 17–18 Membranacea spinata Qin & Zhang 17 aedeagus, lateral view 18 aedeagus, ventral view. Figs 17 and 18 from Qin, Liu & Zhang, 201
- …
