645 research outputs found

    797146_Suppplemental_Appendix_F - Linking occupational therapy models and assessments to the ICF to enable standardized documentation of functioning

    No full text
    797146_Suppplemental_Appendix_F for Linking occupational therapy models and assessments to the ICF to enable standardized documentation of functioning by Roxanne Maritz, Sue Baptiste, Susan W. Darzins, Susan Magasi, Chelsey Weleschuk, and Birgit Prodinger in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy</p

    797146_Suppplemental_Appendices_A_to_E - Linking occupational therapy models and assessments to the ICF to enable standardized documentation of functioning

    No full text
    797146_Suppplemental_Appendices_A_to_E for Linking occupational therapy models and assessments to the ICF to enable standardized documentation of functioning by Roxanne Maritz, Sue Baptiste, Susan W. Darzins, Susan Magasi, Chelsey Weleschuk, and Birgit Prodinger in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy</p

    Measuring functioning in people with fibromyalgia (FM) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) - a psychometric analysis

    No full text
    Objectives: Instruments to assess functioning in patients with FM vary considerably in their content and are often symptom-specific. This study aimed to examine whether it is feasible to construct a psychometric-sound clinical instrument to measure functioning in FM based on the Brief ICF-Core-Set for chronic widespread pain (CWP).Methods: Two hundred and fifty six people with FM completed the Brief ICF-Core-Set. The Rasch model was used for analysis. Once ordering of response options of ICF categories was ensured, the following properties were studied: fit of the ICF categories to the Rasch model, the targeting between ICF categories and a person's abilities, unidimensionality, and reliability.Results: Six ICF categories were rescored due to disordered thresholds. Five ICF categories were removed due to high model-misfit and differential item functioning (DIF) for gender. Scores from 46 participants were excluded due to extreme scores. The ICF categories included display consistency with an underlying unidimensional construct, are free of DIF for age, disease duration and gender, display excellent overall reliability, and cover a range of functioning difficulties.Conclusions: This study illustrates that it is possible to measure functioning as a unidimensional construct based on selected ICF categories from the components body functions, as well as activities and participation of the Brief ICF-Core-Set for CWP in patients with FM

    Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information

    No full text
    Purpose: The content of and methods for collecting health information often vary across settings and challenge the comparability of health information across time, individuals or populations. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) contains an exhaustive set of categories of information which constitutes a unified and consistent language of human functioning suitable as a reference for comparing health information. Methods and results: In two earlier papers, we have proposed rules for linking existing health information to the ICF. Further refinements to these existing ICF Linking Rules are presented in this paper to enhance the transparency of the linking process. The refinements involve preparing information for linking, perspectives from which information is collected and the categorization of response options. Issues regarding the linking of information not covered or unspecified within the ICF are also revisited in this paper.Conclusion: The ICF Linking Rules are valuable for enhancing comparability of health information to ensure that information is available in a consistent manner to serve as a foundation for evidence-based decision-making across all levels of health systems. The refinements presented in this paper enhance transparency in, and ultimately reliability of the process of, linking health information to the ICF. Implications for Rehabilitation:The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) constitutes a unified and consistent language of human functioning suitable as a reference for comparing health information. Comparability of information is essential to ensure that the widest range of information is available in a consistent manner for any decision-maker at all levels of the health system. The refined ICF Linking Rules presented in this article outline the method to establish comparability of health information based on the ICF.<br/

    Creating a common metric based on existing activities of daily living tools to enable standardized reporting of functioning outcomes achieved during rehabilitation

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: Many different assessment tools are used to assess functioning in rehabilitation; this limits the comparability and aggregation of respective data. The aim of this study was to outline the development of an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-based interval-scaled common metric for 2 assessment tools assessing activities of daily living: the Functional Independence Measure (FIMTM) and the Extended Barthel Index (EBI), used in Swiss national rehabilitation quality reports. METHODS: The conceptual equivalence of the 2 tools was assessed through their linking to the ICF. The Rasch measurement model was then applied to create a common metric including FIMTM and EBI. SUBJECTS: Secondary analysis of a sample of 265 neurological patients from 5 Swiss clinics. RESULTS: ICF linking found conceptual coherency of the tools. An interval-scaled common metric, including FIMTM and EBI, could be established, given fit to the Rasch model in the related analyses. CONCLUSION: The ICF-based and interval-scaled common metric enables comparison of patients and clinics functioning outcomes when different activities of daily living tools are used. The common metric can be included in a Standardized Assessment and Reporting System for functioning information in order to enable data aggregation and comparability.+ ID der Publikation: unilu_51149 + Sprache: Englisch + Bemerkungen: 1651-2081 Maritz, Roxanne Tennant, Alan Fellinghauer, Carolina Stucki, Gerold Prodinger, Birgit Journal Article Sweden J Rehabil Med. 2020 Jul 31;52(7):jrm00085. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2711. + Letzte Aktualisierung: 2020-12-17 16:21:4

    Arthritis-related Occupational Therapy: Making invisible ruling relations visible using institutional ethnography

    No full text
    Introduction: Occupational therapists&apos; intention of enabling women with rheumatoid arthritis to participate in everyday life is fraught with challenges in everyday practice.Method: Inspired by institutional ethnography, this paper aims to make explicit how the work of occupational therapists in an outpatient rheumatology hospital setting is governed within invisible, ruling relations. An analytical description of the first author&apos;s clinical experience was a standpoint from which to explicate how occupational therapy is coordinated to the ruling relations of the Austrian health care system.Findings: Occupational therapy practice and research are ruled within a positivist, body-focused, medical apparatus, which renders largely invisible occupational therapists&apos; knowledge of enabling people to engage in occupations that are meaningful to them.Conclusion: Occupational therapists have professional power that can be asserted by strategically using occupational therapy specific knowledge and language in textually mediated practices, from assessments and case files to media images, to give greater visibility and influence to the profession&apos;s work of enabling occupation.Source type: Electronic(1

    Setting up a cohort study of functioning: From classification to measurement

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: Cohort studies are an appropriate method for the collection of population-based longitudinal data to track people's health and functioning over time. However, describing and understanding functioning in its complexity with all its determinants is one of the biggest challenges faced by clinicians and researchers.DESIGN: This paper focuses on the development of a cohort study on functioning, outlining the relevant steps and related methods, and illustrating these with reference to the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study (SwiSCI).METHODS AND RESULTS: In setting up a cohort study the initial step is to specify which variables are to be included, i.e. what to assess. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is valuable in this process. The second step is to identify how to assess the specified ICF categories. Existing instruments and assessments can then be linked to the ICF.CONCLUSION: The methods outlined here enable the development of a cohort study to be based on a comprehensive perspective of health, operationalized through functioning as conceptualized and classified in the ICF, yet to remain efficient and feasible to administer.<br/

    Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Generic-30 Set for the characterization of outpatients: Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine Residents Section Project

    No full text
    The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Generic-30 Set (previously referred to as Rehabilitation Set) is a minimal set of ICF categories for reporting and assessing functioning and disability in clinical populations with different health conditions along the continuum of care. Recently, the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER) developed an Italian modification of the simple and intuitive descriptions (SID) of these categories. This study was the first one to implement the use of the SID in practice

    The influence and added value of a Standardized Assessment and Reporting System for functioning outcomes upon national rehabilitation quality reports

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the influence and added value of a Standardized Assessment and Reporting System (StARS) upon the reporting of functioning outcomes for national rehabilitation quality reports. A StARS builds upon an ICF-based (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) and interval-scaled common metric. DESIGN: Comparison of current ordinal-scaled Swiss national rehabilitation outcome reports including an expert-consensus-based transformation scale with StARS-based reports through descriptive statistical methods and content exploration of further development areas of the reports with relevant ICF Core Sets. SETTING: Swiss national public rehabilitation outcome quality reports on the clinic level. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 29 Swiss rehabilitation clinics provided their quality report datasets including 18 047 patients. INTERVENTIONS: Neurological or musculoskeletal rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional Independence Measure™ or Extended Barthel Index. RESULTS: Outcomes reported with a StARS tended to be smaller but more precise than in the current ordinal-scaled reports, indicating an overestimation of achieved outcomes in the latter. The comparison of the common metric's content with ICF Core Sets suggests to include 'energy and drive functions' or 'maintaining a basic body position' to enhance the content of functioning as an indicator. CONCLUSIONS: A StARS supports the comparison of outcomes assessed with different measures on the same interval-scaled ICF-based common metric. Careful consideration is needed whether an ordinal-scaled or interval-scaled reporting system is applied as the magnitude and precision of reported outcomes is influenced. The StARS' ICF basis brings an added value by informing further development of functioning as a relevant indicator for national outcome quality reports in rehabilitation.+ ID der Publikation: unilu_51150 + Sprache: Englisch + Bemerkungen: 1464-3677 Maritz, Roxanne Ehrmann, Cristina Prodinger, Birgit Tennant, Alan Stucki, Gerold Journal Article Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jul 20;32(6):379-387. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa058. + Letzte Aktualisierung: 2020-12-17 14:58:3

    Institutional Ethnography

    No full text
    corecore