1,720,980 research outputs found
Reasoning about memory management in resource-bounded agents
In intelligent agents, memory has a very important and decisive role for the choice of future behaviors, since it is progressively formed through the agent’s interactions with the external environment. Previous works exist in the logic concerning the formalization of the reasoning on the formation of beliefs in non-omniscient agents. We extend this work by inserting the concept of time through a particular function that assigns a “timing” to beliefs, inferences and modal operators
Memory Management in Resource-Bounded Agents
In intelligent agents, memory has a very important and decisive role for the choice of future behaviors, since it is progressively formed through the agent’s interactions with the external environment. Previous work exists in the logic concerning the formalization of the reasoning on the formation of beliefs and the interaction with the background knowledge in non-omniscient agents. We extend this work by inserting the concept of time through a particular function that assigns a “timing” to beliefs and inferences
Cognitive Aspects in Epistemic Logic L-DINF
In this paper, we report about a line of work aimed to formally model via a logical framework -the Logic of "Inferable"L-DINF- (aspects of) the group dynamics of cooperative agents. We outline, in particular, the cognitive aspects built within our logic, that consist in features allowing a designer to model real-world situations encompassing joint intentions and plans with roles, preferences and costs concerning action execution, and involving aspects of a Theory of Mind, i.e., the ability to reason about beliefs of others
Modelling Agents Roles in the Epistemic Logic L-DINF
In this paper, we further advance a line of work aimed to formally model via epistemic logic (aspects of) the group dynamics of cooperative agents. In fact, we have previously proposed and here extend a particular logical framework (the Logic of "Inferable"L-DINF), where a group of cooperative agents can jointly perform actions. I.e., at least one agent of the group can perform the action, either with the approval of the group or on behalf of the group. In this paper, we introduce agents' roles within a group. We choose to model roles in terms of the actions that each agent is enabled by its group to perform. We extend the semantics and the proof of strong completeness of our logic, and we show the usefulness of the new extension via a significant example
Temporalizing Epistemic Logic L-DINF
Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are a technology that has many fields of application, which extend also to human sciences and where Computational Logic has been widely applied. In this paper, we join together two of our long-lasting lines of work in this field. In particular, we introduce time and time intervals into the epistemic logic L-DINF, that copes with group dynamics in MAS
An epistemic logic for formalizing group dynamics of agents
In the multi-agent setting, it is relevant to model group dynamics of agents, and logic has proved a good tool to do so. We propose an epistemic logic, L-DINF-E, that allows one to formalize what are the beliefs formed by a group of agents, where several groups exist and agents can pass from a group to another one. We introduce a new modality which allows an agent to reason about the beliefs of other agents. This allows us to model aspects of the “Theory of Mind”, understood as the set of social-cognitive skills involving the ability to attribute and reason about mental states, desires, beliefs, and knowledge of agents. In this paper, we present the logic L-DINF-E and illustrate how it can be used to solve “false-belief tasks”, i.e., tests in which an agent should understand that some other agent may develop, under some circumstances, false beliefs
A logic of inferable in multi-agent systems with budget and costs
In AI, Multi-Agent Systems are able to model many kind of collective behavior and have therefore a wide range of application. In this paper, we propose a logical framework (Logic of "Inferable") which enable reasoning about whether a group of agents can perform an action, highlighting the concepts of cost of actions and of budget that agents have available to perform actions. The focus is on modeling the group dynamics of cooperative agents
An epistemic logic for formalizing group dynamics of agents
In the multi-agent setting, it is relevant to model group dynamics of agents, and logic has proved a good tool to do so. We propose an epistemic logic, L-DINF-E, that allows one to formalize what are the beliefs formed by a group of agents, where several groups exist and agents can pass from a group to another one. We introduce a new modality which allows an agent to reason about the beliefs of other agents. This allows us to model aspects of the "Theory of Mind", understood as the set of social-cognitive skills involving the ability to attribute and reason about mental states, desires, beliefs, and knowledge of agents. In this paper, we present the logic L-DINF-E and illustrate how it can be used to solve "false-belief tasks", i.e., tests in which an agent should understand that some other agent may develop, under some circumstances, false beliefs
Towards humanized ethical intelligent agents: The role of reflection and introspection
Methods for implementing Automated Reasoning in a fashion that is at least reminiscent of human cognition and behavior must refer (also) to Intelligent Agents. In fact, agent-based systems nowadays implement many important autonomous applications in critical contexts. Sometimes, life and welfare of living beings may depend upon these applications. In order to interact in a proper way with human beings and human environments, agents operating in critical contexts should be to some extent 'humanized': i.e., they should do what is expected of them, but perhaps more importantly they should not behave in improper/unethical ways. Ensuring ethical reliability can also help to improve the 'relationship' between humans and robots: in fact, despite the promise of immensely improving the quality of life, humans take an ambivalent stance in regard to autonomous systems, because we fear that autonomous systems may abuse of their power to take decisions not aligned with human values. To this aim, we propose techniques for introspective self-monitoring and checking
Preference Management in Epistemic Logic L-DINF
The Logic of “Inferable” L-DINF has been recently proposed as a declarative framework to formally model via epistemic logic the group dynamics of cooperative agents. In this paper, we extend the framework by introducing the possibility to have costs for execution of physical action. Such costs may require the consumption of multiple resources of various types, to be drawn from agents' budgets. Also, we emphasize that all aspects of Multi-Agent Systems specified in L-DINF can be formalized in a modular way. In particular, concerning the execution of physical actions, dedicated modules allow the specification of a notion of equivalence for actions and a notion of agents' preference, be used to affect action execution
- …
