78 research outputs found
Strategies for Recognizing and Managing Intraoperative Venous Congestion in Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction
No full text
Commentary on: Medial Osteoectomy as a Routine Procedure in Rhinoplasty: Six-Year Experience with an Innovative Technique
No full textPrepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
No full textRecommended from our members
Oncoplastic breast surgery: current strategies.
No full textThe surgical management of breast cancer has dramatically evolved over the past 20 years, with oncoplastic surgery gaining increased popularity. This field of breast surgery allows for complete resection of tumor, preservation of normal parenchyma tissue, and the use of local or regional tissue for immediate breast reconstruction at the time of partial mastectomy. These techniques extend the options for breast conservation surgery, improve aesthetic outcomes, have high patient satisfaction and result in better control of tumor margins. This article will detail the approach to evaluating and treating patients undergoing oncoplastic reconstruction. Different oncoplastic approaches will be described and applied to an oncoplastic reconstructive algorithm. Surgical complications, oncologic outcomes and aesthetic outcomes are reviewed
Safety of Incision Placement with Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
No full textIn nipple-sparing mastectomy, adequate perfusion to the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) during reconstruction is paramount to avoiding unwanted outcomes. Previous studies have suggested that periareolar incisions may result in higher rates of NAC complications. However, studies to date have not specifically investigated this in prepectoral reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of incision location on NAC complications in patients undergoing prepectoral breast reconstruction. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent immediate two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy between 2015 and 2018 at a single institution. We identified two types of incisions utilized: superior periareolar or inframammary fold (IMF). Patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical details were compared between incision types, as were NAC complications. RESULTS: A total of 181 consecutive prepectoral breast reconstructions were included for analysis. A superior periareolar incision was used in 113 reconstructions (62%), and an IMF incision was used in 68 reconstructions (38%). There were 33 (18%) total NAC complications in our series. The periareolar incision group had a higher rate of any NAC complication (25% versus 7.4%; P < 0.01), as well as a higher rate of nipple necrosis requiring debridement (9.7% versus 1.5%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing immediate two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy, periareolar incisions are associated with an increased risk of NAC complications compared with IMF incisions. For patients who are candidates for either an IMF or periareolar incision, a periareolar incision should be avoided
Abstract 10. Evaluating the Safety of Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction Following Abdominal Surgery
No full textEvaluation of Pre-Pectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Post-Mastectomy Radiation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
No full textBackground: Immediate direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction is associated with high patient satisfaction and faster recovery. However, concerns remain for patients requiring post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). While PMRT improves overall survival for breast cancer patients, it has been associated with increased implant-specific complications such as capsular contracture, infection, and implant loss. As the impact of PMRT on pre-pectoral DTI specifically is not well understood, the goal of this systematic review was to evaluate the impact of PMRT on outcomes in this growing patient population. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically reviewed for articles published from 1 January 2000 to 23 December 2024 investigating outcomes after prepectoral DTI reconstruction with exposure to PMRT. Demographic, clinical, and post-operative variables were recorded for PMRT and non-PMRT cohorts, and primary outcomes included infection, capsular contracture, implant loss, and wound healing complications. Meta-analysis was performed for key outcomes using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Results: Of 472 initially identified records, seven studies met inclusion criteria with a combined total of 343 prepectoral DTI reconstructions exposed to PMRT and 1385 reconstructions not exposed to PMRT. PMRT significantly increased the odds of any complication (OR 2.11, p = 0.01), implant loss (OR 1.88, p = 0.02), infection (OR 2.76, p = 0.004), and capsular contracture (OR 8.88, p < 0.001). However, PMRT was not associated with significantly increased odds of wound healing complications (OR 1.5, p = 0.36). Conclusions: PMRT after pre-pectoral DTI reconstruction significantly increases odds of complications, including infection, capsular contracture, and reconstructive failure. Plastic surgeons should be mindful of the sequelae of PMRT with prepectoral DTI reconstruction to improve pre-operative counseling and shared decision-making
- …
