1,720,968 research outputs found
Proprioceptive errors in the localization of hand landmarks: What can be learnt about the hand metric representation?
Full text linkProprioception acquires a crucial role in estimating the configuration of our body segments in space when visual information is not available. Proprioceptive accuracy is assessed by asking participants to match the perceived position of an unseen body landmark through reaching movements. This task was also adopted to study the perceived hand structure by computing the relative distances between averaged proprioceptive judgments (hand Localization Task). However, the pattern of proprioceptive errors leading to the misperceived hand structure is unexplored. Here, we aimed to characterize this pattern across different hand landmarks, having different anatomo-physiological properties and cortical representations. Furthermore, we sought to describe the error consistency and its stability over time. To this purpose, we analyzed the proprioceptive errors of 43 healthy participants during the hand Localization Task. We found larger but more consistent errors for the fingertips compared to the knuckles, possibly due to poorer proprioceptive signal, compensated by other sources of spatial information. Furthermore, we found a shift (overlap effect) and a temporal drift of the hand perceived position towards the shoulder of origin, which was consistent within and between subjects. The overlap effect had a greater influence on lateral compared to medial landmarks, leading to the hand width overestimation. Our results are compatible with domain-general and body-specific spatial biases affecting the proprioceptive localization of the hand landmarks, thus the apparent hand structure misperception
Visual and somatosensory information contribute to distortions of the body model
Full text linkDistorted representations of the body are observed in healthy individuals as well as in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Distortions of the body model have been attributed to the somatotopic cerebral representation. Recently, it has been demonstrated that visual biases also contribute to those distortions. To better understand the sources of such distortions, we compared the metric representations across five body parts affording different degrees of tactile sensitivity and visual accessibility. We evaluated their perceived dimensions using a Line Length Judgment task. We found that most body parts were underestimated in their dimensions. The estimation error relative to their length was predicted by their tactile acuity, supporting the influence of the cortical somatotopy on the body model. However, tactile acuity did not explain the distortions observed for the width. Visual accessibility in turn does appear to mediate body distortions, as we observed that the dimensions of the dorsal portion of the neck were the only ones accurately perceived. Coherent with the multisensory nature of body representations, we argue that the perceived dimensions of body parts are estimated by integrating visual and somatosensory information, each weighted differently, based on their availability for a given body part and a given spatial dimension
The motor system (partially) deceives body representation biases in absence of visual correcting cues
No full textThe internal models of our body dimensions are prone to bias, but little evidence exists to explain how the motor system achieves fine-grained control despite these distortions. Previous work showed that the hand representation, assessed in a dynamic task (Proprioceptive Matching Task), was less distorted compared to that measured through a static body representation task (Localization Task), suggesting that either the hand representation was updated or the motor trajectory was adjusted during movement. The present study set out to shed light on this phenomenon by administering the Localization Task before and after either the Proprioceptive Matching Task or a control condition in a within-subjects design. Our results showed that hand map biases decreased during the Proprioceptive Matching Task, but that this increase in accuracy did not carry over to the Localization Task. In other words, more accurate performance in the dynamic body representation task does not reflect a change in how the hand is represented. Rather, it likely reflects a refinement of the motor trajectory, due to the integration of multisensory information, providing interesting insights into how the motor system partially overcomes biases in body representations
Accounting for ethnic-cultural and linguistic diversity in neuropsychological assessment of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a retrospective study
No full textExploring the Interaction Between Handedness and Body Parts Ownership by Means of the Implicit Association Test
No full textThe experience of owning a body is built upon the integration of exteroceptive, interoceptive, and proprioceptive signals. Recently, it has been suggested that motor signals could be particularly important in producing the feeling of body part ownership. One thus may hypothesize that the strength of this feeling may not be spatially uniform; rather, it could vary as a function of the degree by which different body parts are involved in motor behavior. Given that our dominant hand plays a leading role in our motor behavior, we hypothesized that it could be more strongly associated with one’s self compared to its non-dominant counterpart. To explore whether this possible asymmetry manifests as a stronger implicit association of the right hand (vs left hand) with the self, we administered the Implicit Association Test to a group of 70 healthy individuals. To control whether this asymmetric association is human-body specific, we further tested whether a similar asymmetry characterizes the association between a right (vs left) animal body part with the concept of self, in an independent sample of subjects (N = 70, 140 subjects total). Our results revealed a linear relationship between the magnitude of the implicit association between the right hand with the self and the subject’s handedness. In detail, the strength of this association increased as a function of hand preference. Critically, the handedness score did not predict the association of the right-animal body part with the self. These findings suggest that, in healthy individuals, the dominant and non-dominant hands are differently perceived at an implicit level as belonging to the self. We argue that such asymmetry may stem from the different roles that the two hands play in our adaptive motor behavior
Metric biases in body representation extend to objects
No full textWe typically misestimate the dimensions of our body e.g., we perceive our fingers as shorter, and our torso as more elongated, than they actually are. It stands to reason that those metric biases may also extend to objects that we interact with, to facilitate attunement with the environment. To explore this hypothesis, we compared the metric representations of seven objects and the subjects' own hand using the Line Length Judgment task, in six experiments involving 152 healthy subjects. We evaluated the size estimation errors made for each target (hand or previously observed objects) by asking subjects to compare the vertical or horizontal dimension of a specific target against the length of a vertical or horizontal line. As expected, we showed that the hand is misperceived in its dimensions. Interestingly, we found that metric biases are also present for daily-life objects, such as a mobile phone and a coffee mug, and are not affected by familiarity with the objects. In contrast, objects that are less likely to be manipulated, either because they are potentially harmful or disgusting, were differently represented. Furthermore, the propensity to interact with an object, rated by an independent sample of subjects, best predicted the pattern of metric biases associated with that object. Taken together, these findings support the hypothesis that biases affecting the hand representation extend to objects that elicit action-oriented behavior, highlighting the importance of studying the body as integrated and active in the environment
Let's cut it short: Italian standardization of the MMSPE (Mini-Mental State Pediatric Examination), a brief cognitive screening tool for school-age children
No full textMini-Mental State Pediatric Examination (MMSPE) standardization and normative data on Italian children aged 36 to 72 months
No full textThe MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination), which is broadly used as a cognitive screening test for adults, has been successfully adapted and standardized for children of different nationalities. In the Italian clinical settings, the Mini-Mental State Pediatric Examination (MMSPE) is being more and more used as cognitive screening tool for children. However, the Italian norms for the MMSPE are available for the school age only. The current study was aimed at providing clinicians with the Italian normative data of the MMSPE for preschool age. Here, we therefore adapted the MMSE to the preschool age. The MMSPE for preschoolers assesses spatial and temporal orientation, verbal and visual memory, reading prerequisites, numerical knowledge, praxis, body representation, and executive functions through 16 items in a short period of time. It was administered to 305 Italian children aged 36 to 72 months. A Generalized Linear Model was fitted to explore predictors' effects on the MMSPE total score. Raw scores were adjusted for critical variables (child's age and parental mean education) and the 5th percentile cut-offs were obtained. With this study, we extended the Italian normative data of the MMSPE, formerly available for school age only, to preschool age population
- …
