253,294 research outputs found

    Murray City Fire Department circa 1934-1935

    No full text
    Fire department posing for group photo in 1934-35. Art Peters, Gene Caldwell, Hyde Stauffer, Howard Housknecht, Ed larson, Jack Jewett, M. E. Jewett, Bill Caldwell, Leo Townsend, Alex Lindsey, Joe Geller, Ern Smith, George Doran (More names included with photo; illegible) Courtesy of A.J. and Rosa Peters

    Direct observation of dynamic shear jamming in dense suspensions

    No full text
    Dataset for: Peters, I., Majumdar, S. and Jaeger, H.M. (2016) Direct observation of dynamic shear jamming in dense suspensions. Nature, 1-8. (doi:10.1038/nature17167).</span

    Hagenulus morrisonae Peters and Alayo 1971

    No full text
    A.16. Hagenulus morrisonae Peters and Alayo, 1971 Figures 8, 44. Hagenulus morrisonae Peters and Alayo in Peters 1971:21 (male and female imagos, nymph); Kluge 1994:260. Holotype. Male imago, [Province Santiago de Cuba], Río Boniatico (San Luis), November 1964, P. Alayo. This species was described by Peters and Alayo (in Peters 1971) from Santiago de Cuba Province and other localities in the Eastern and Central region. It is easily distinguished from H. caligatus by the width of the labrum which, although broad, is narrower than the width of the head. Ecology. Nymphs prefer stony rivers and streams with little current and clean water and are usually found at a depth of 15−30 cm (Peters 1971). Alayo (in Peters 1971) found the subimagos throughout the day and found imagos in the evening (1700 to 1800 h) flying near the surface of the water in stony areas, the number of individuals increasing as it became darker. Nymphs of H. morrisonae show a clear preference for a riffle microhabitat (in one survey, 2035 individuals in riffles and 58 individuals in a lentic habitats). Aldana and Fonseca (2001) confirmed that the species prefers clear, cold, running waters at altitudes between 250 and 650 m; there, nymphs were found under stones at depths of 30−90 cm. Nymphs in collections are very abundant from lowland areas, with most (527) found in the Río Cautillo basin below 200 m (Rodríguez and Pérez 1998); numbers of individuals decrease as the altitude increases. Naranjo (1986) studied six rivers in the Sierra Maestra and found the species below 600 m; in other collection records, the species has been found up to 1750 m, but the majority of specimens are recorded below 500 m. Based on the presence of mature nymphs in the collections and their respective dates, there is no seasonal trend as they were collected in every month of the year. Geographic distribution. The species is very abundant (Fig. 8) and has been cited from the Central, Central-East and Eastern Regions in the Cuban archipelago (Peters 1971, Kluge 1994, Naranjo and Cañizares 1999). One population from Nipe-Sagua-Baracoa Massif has been confused with H. caligatus because of its broader labrum (Fig. 44c).Published as part of L, Carlos Naranjo, Peters, Janice G., del, Pedro López & Castillo, 2019, Ephemeroptera (Insecta) in Cuba, pp. 1-52 in Insecta Mundi 2019 (736) on page 12, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.517069

    Rhinolophus deckenii Peters 1868

    No full text
    Rhinolophus deckenii Peters Rhinolophus deckenii Peters, Monatsb. K. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., Berlin, for 1867, p. 705, 1868. Zanzibar coast.Published as part of Allen, Glover M., 1939, Family Rhinolophidae. Horseshoe Bats in Checklist of African Mammals, pp. 72-78 in Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 81 on page 74, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.375951

    Rhinolophus blasii Peters

    No full text
    Rhinolophus blasii Peters Rhinolophus blasii Peters, Monatsb. K. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., Berlin, for 1866, p. 17, 1867. Based on the R. clivosus of Blasius.Published as part of Allen, Glover M., 1939, Family Rhinolophidae. Horseshoe Bats in Checklist of African Mammals, pp. 72-78 in Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 81 on page 73, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.375951

    Rhinolophus aethiops Peters

    No full text
    Rhinolophus aethiops Peters Rhinolophus aethiops Peters, Monatsb. K. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., Berlin, p. 637, 1868 = Otjimbingue, Southwest Africa. (1869?).Published as part of Allen, Glover M., 1939, Family Rhinolophidae. Horseshoe Bats in Checklist of African Mammals, pp. 72-78 in Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 81 on page 76, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.375951

    Tetramorium snellingi Hita Garcia, Fischer & Peters 2010

    No full text
    &lt;i&gt;Tetramorium snellingi&lt;/i&gt; Hita Garcia, Fischer &amp; Peters 2010 &lt;p&gt;(Figures 15B, 16A, 91, 92, 93)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;Tetramorium snellingi&lt;/i&gt; Hita Garcia, Fischer &amp; Peters 2010:142. Holotype worker, KENYA: Western Province, Kakamega Forest, Salazar, 00&deg; 19' 36'' N, 34&deg; 52' 14.6'' E, 1650 m, Transect 6, Kakamega survey 2007, primary rain forest, leaf litter, pitfall trap, 17.VIII.2007, leg. M. Peters (NMK: ZFMK_HYM_2009_3105) [examined]. Paratypes, 35 workers and 2 queens from several sub-localities of the Kakamega forest (CASC: 4 workers CASENT0217052, CASENT0217055, CASENT0217056, CASENT0217057; BMNH: 4 workers ZFMK_HYM_2009_6186, ZFMK_HYM_2009_6187, ZFMK_HYM_2009_6188, ZFMK_HYM_2009_6189; LACM: 4 workers; MHNG: 4 workers; NMK: 4 workers; ZFMK: 15 workers and 2 queens ZFMK_HYM_2009_3003, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3089, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3090, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3091, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3092, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3093, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3094, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3095, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3096, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3097, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3098, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3099, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3100, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3101, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3103, ZFMK_HYM_2009_3104, ZFMK_HYM_2009_6174) [examined].&lt;/p&gt;Published as part of &lt;i&gt;Garcia, Francisco Hita, Fischer, Georg &amp; Peters, Marcell K., 2010, Taxonomy of the Tetramorium weitzeckeri species group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Afrotropical zoogeographical region 2704, pp. 1-90 in Zootaxa 2704&lt;/i&gt; on page 8

    Farrodes bimaculatus Peters and Alayo 1971

    No full text
    A.14. &lt;i&gt;Farrodes bimaculatus&lt;/i&gt; Peters and Alayo, 1971 &lt;p&gt;Figures 7, 40.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;Farrodes bimaculatus&lt;/i&gt; Peters and Alayo in Peters 1971:8 (male and female imagos); Kluge 1994:252 (nymph, egg).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Holotype.&lt;/b&gt; Male imago, [Province Mayabeque], R&iacute;o G&uuml;ines, March 1966, P. Alayo.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;Farrodes bimaculatus&lt;/i&gt; was originally described from an adult from Mayabeque Province (Peters and Alayo in Peters 1971). The nymph was described by Kluge (1994) from localities in the provinces of Pinar del R&iacute;o, Sancti Sp&iacute;ritus, Guant&aacute;namo, and Santiago de Cuba. It is most easily recognized by the large subapical denticle on the claws.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Ecology.&lt;/b&gt; According to the literature, nymphs of this species prefer rocky-bottomed or muddy-rocky rivers and actively seek refuge under stones. The species is abundant at all altitudes but mostly between 100 and 750 m and especially above 500 m. In the collections are 353 specimens collected from diverse habitats from backwaters to rapids, with a preference for rapids. Nymphs have been collected throughout the year, indicating a non-seasonal life cycle.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Geographic distribution.&lt;/b&gt; Based on data of Peters (1971), Kluge (1994), and the review of the collections used for this work, the species is widespread throughout the Cuban Archipelago and has been collected from all four regions of Cuba (Fig. 7).&lt;/p&gt;Published as part of &lt;i&gt;L, Carlos Naranjo, Peters, Janice G., del, Pedro López &amp; Castillo, 2019, Ephemeroptera (Insecta) in Cuba, pp. 1-52 in Insecta Mundi 2019 (736)&lt;/i&gt; on page 11, DOI: &lt;a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5170691"&gt;10.5281/zenodo.5170691&lt;/a&gt
    corecore