157,302 research outputs found

    Arthur C. Perry to John D. Feerick

    No full text
    Letter from Arthur C. Perry, Assistant to the President, to John D. Feerick, extending the thanks of President Johnson to Feerick for his scholarly article.https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/twentyfifth_amendment_correspondence/1043/thumbnail.jp

    Perry, D. C., 1844- : Confederate Service Record, 1915.

    No full text
    This service record is an account of military actions during the American Civil War by veteran D. C. Perry (1844- ), dated from 1915.1 leaf ; 2 pdf pages.All descriptive lists and service records in this United Confederate (Civil War) Veterans manuscript collection believed to be based out of Robert E. Lee Camp #158 of the United Confederate Veterans (Fort Worth, Tex.). United Confederate Veterans. R.E. Lee Camp No. 158 (Fort Worth, Tex.)The Southwest Collection Manuscript Record can be accessed at the following URL: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/taro/ttusw/00119/tsw-00119.htm

    Perry L. Adkisson Letter to Frederick D. McClure

    No full text
    A letter by Dr. Perry L. Adkisson, Chancellor of Texas A&M University to Frederick D. McClure, Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs, regarding his recommendations for the post of the Science Advisor to the Presiden

    Myron D. Perry

    No full text
    Myron D. Perry is the son of Charles A. and Asenath Perry. He married Mary Belle Batty in Setember 1921. He died June 10, 1987

    Dr. Jennah Perry, Participant

    No full text
    Jennah Perry is an Associate Professor of Air Traffic Management in the College of Aviation at ERAU. Professor Perry currently holds a Ph. D. in Educational Leadership, a M.A.S degree in Aeronautical Science with specializations in Human Factors in Aviation Systems and Education Technology, and a B.S. in Air Traffic Management. Additionally, she holds a Private Pilot Certificate as well as an Instrument Rating. Prior to her career with ERAU, Professor Perry spent 8 years working for Lockheed Martin Corporation as a certified Air Traffic Control Specialist where she earned FAA Certificates of Authority for Pilot Weather Briefing and En-Route Flight Advisory Services, after becoming a Full Performance Level Air Traffic Control Specialist and certified Training Instructor. In 2013 Professor Perry began her career with Embry‑Riddle, and in her eleven-year tenure with the College of Aviation, Professor Perry has served as an Associate Professor, Chair of the Air Traffic Management Program, Department Chair of Applied Aviation Sciences and most recently as the Interim Dean of the College of Aviation. In recent years, Professor Perry’s research areas have included aviation stress management, unmanned traffic management, UAS, flight training, teaching, and learning.https://commons.erau.edu/avcysecworkshop-bios-2024/1039/thumbnail.jp

    Analyzing Social Experiments as Implemented: A Reexamination of the Evidence from the HighScope Perry Preschool Program

    No full text
    Social experiments are powerful sources of information about the effectiveness of interventions. In practice, initial randomization plans are almost always compromised. Multiple hypotheses are frequently tested. "Significant" effects are often reported with p-values that do not account for preliminary screening from a large candidate pool of possible effects. This paper develops tools for analyzing data from experiments as they are actually implemented. We apply these tools to analyze the influential HighScope Perry Preschool Program. The Perry program was a social experiment that provided preschool education and home visits to disadvantaged children during their preschool years. It was evaluated by the method of random assignment. Both treatments and controls have been followed from age 3 through age 40. Previous analyses of the Perry data assume that the planned randomization protocol was implemented. In fact, as in many social experiments, the intended randomization protocol was compromised. Accounting for compromised randomization, multiple-hypothesis testing, and small sample sizes, we find statistically significant and economically important program effects for both males and females. We also examine the representativeness of the Perry study.social experiment, compromised randomization, early childhood intervention, multiple-hypothesis testing

    Analyzing social experiments as implemented: evidence from the HighScope Perry Preschool Program

    No full text
    Social experiments are powerful sources of information about the effectiveness of interventions. In practice, initial randomization plans are almost always compromised. Multiple hypotheses are frequently tested. "Significant" effects are often reported with p-values that do not account for preliminary screening from a large candidate pool of possible effects. This paper develops tools for analyzing data from experiments as they are actually implemented. We apply these tools to analyze the influential HighScope Perry Preschool Program. The Perry program was a social experiment that provided preschool education and home visits to disadvantaged children during their preschool years. It was evaluated by the method of random assignment. Both treatments and controls have been followed from age 3 through age 40. Previous analyses of the Perry data assume that the planned randomization protocol was implemented. In fact, as in many social experiments, the intended randomization protocol was compromised. Accounting for compromised randomization, multiple-hypothesis testing, and small sample sizes, we find statistically significant and economically important program effects for both males and females. We also examine the representativeness of the Perry study. Download appendix

    Analyzing Social Experiments as Implemented: A Reexamination of the Evidence From the HighScope Perry Preschool Program

    No full text
    Social experiments are powerful sources of information about the effectiveness of interventions. In practice, initial randomization plans are almost always compromised. Multiple hypotheses are frequently tested. "Significant" effects are often reported with p-values that do not account for preliminary screening from a large candidate pool of possible effects. This paper develops tools for analyzing data from experiments as they are actually implemented. We apply these tools to analyze the influential HighScope Perry Preschool Program. The Perry program was a social experiment that provided preschool education and home visits to disadvantaged children during their preschool years. It was evaluated by the method of random assignment. Both treatments and controls have been followed from age 3 through age 40. Previous analyses of the Perry data assume that the planned randomization protocol was implemented. In fact, as in many social experiments, the intended randomization protocol was compromised. Accounting for compromised randomization, multiple-hypothesis testing, and small sample sizes, we find statistically significant and economically important program effects for both males and females. We also examine the representativeness of the Perry study.

    Analyzing Social Experiments as Implemented: A Reexamination of the Evidence From the HighScope Perry Preschool Program

    No full text
    Social experiments are powerful sources of information about the effectiveness of interventions. In practice, initial randomization plans are almost always compromised. Multiple hypotheses are frequently tested. "Signicant" effects are often reported with p-values that do not account for preliminary screening from a large candidate pool of possible effects. This paper develops tools for analyzing data from experiments as they are actually implemented. We apply these tools to analyze the influential HighScope Perry Preschool Program. The Perry program was a social experiment that provided preschool education and home visits to disadvantaged children during their preschool years. It was evaluated by the method of random assignment. Both treatments and controls have been followed from age 3 through age 40. Previous analyses of the Perry data assume that the planned randomization protocol was implemented. In fact, as in many social experiments, the intended randomization protocol was compromised. Accounting for compromised randomization, multiple-hypothesis testing, and small sample sizes, we find statistically significant and economically important program effects for both males and females. We also examine the representativeness of the Perry study.early childhood intervention; compromised randomization; social experiment; multiple-hypothesis testing
    corecore