892 research outputs found
Williams v. Illinois and the Confrontation Clause: Does Testimony by a Surrogate Witness Violate the Confrontation Clause?
This article comprises a four-part debate between Paul Rothstein, Professor of Law at Georgetown Law Center, and Ronald J. Coleman, who works in the litigation practice group at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Williams v. Illinois, a Supreme Court case that involves the Confrontation Clause, which entitles a criminal defendant to confront an accusing witness in court. The issue at hand is whether said clause is infringed when a report not introduced into evidence at trial is used by an expert to testify about the results of testing that has been conducted by a non-testifying third party.
The debate includes the following parts: Part 1: Ronald J. Coleman:Dexter’s Dilemma: Rule 703 Does Not Violate the Confrontation Clause Part 2: Paul Rothstein: Surrogate Witnesses Just Won’t Cut It: A Response to Ronald Coleman Part 3: Ronald J. Coleman: More on Williams v. Illinois: A Response to Paul Rothstein Part 4: Paul Rothstein: Williams v. Illinois: Responses to Coleman’s Argument
An Evidence Code: The American Experience
Professor Paul Rothstien\u27s opening address at the Conference on Current Trends in Evidence, Dalhousie University, 26th November 1976.
Rothstein discusses the American Evidence Code, the American experience with it, and compares it to a proposed Code that Canada is considering
Profile: Marilyn Simon Rothstein
Marilyn Simon Rothstein is the author of Lift and Separate, winner of the Star Award presented by the Women\u27s Fiction Writers Association for Outstanding Debut. It\u27s currently an Amazon Best Seller in Fiction Satire
JUST ACTION: HOW TO CHALLENGE SEGREGATION ENACTED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW
Remarks given by Author Richard Rothstein ahead of Western New England Law Review\u27s symposium The Color of Law: The Intersection of Race and the Law, which discussed his 2017 book, The Color of Law
Glimpses of the Priest as Dean, Legislator, and Friend
Professor Rothstein offers details on how he crossed paths with Father Drinan and how they became good friends and professional colleagues
Teaching Evidence
This article was published as part of the 2006 teaching issue of the Saint Louis University Law Journal. The teaching series was created as a forum for scholars, judges, and students to discuss methods for the effective teaching and learning of particular law school courses. In this essay, Professor Rothstein describes his philosophy and methods for teaching evidence
The Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence
The Supreme Court has approved a uniform code of evidence for all federal courts. Amendments to the Supreme Court\u27s rules are now pending in the House of Representatives. From the point of view of a specialist in the law of evidence, Professor Rothstein analyzes the differences between the Supreme Court\u27s proposals and the House amendments and suggests solutions to these conflicts
Student Sorting and Bias in Value Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables
Non-random assignment of students to teachers can bias value added estimates of teachers’ causal effects. Rothstein (2008) shows that typical value added models indicate large counter-factual effects of 5th grade teachers on students’ 4th grade learning, implying that assignments do not satisfy the imposed assumptions. This paper quantifies the resulting biases in estimates of 5th grade teachers’ causal effects from several value added models, under varying assumptions about the assignment process. Under selection on observables, models for gain scores without controls or with only a single lagged score control are subject to important bias, but models with controls for the full test score history are nearly free of bias. I consider several scenarios for selection on unobservables, using the across-classroom variance of observed variables to calibrate each. Results indicate that even well-controlled models may be substantially biased, with the magnitude of the bias depending on the amount of information available for use in classroom assignments.
But Is He Genetically Diseased?
In this case study, Mr. X, a recovering alcoholic, asks his physician
to determine whether there is a genetic component to his alcoholism. His
employer has learned of his condition and has told Mr. X that he will be
dismissed immediately should he display any signs of alcoholic behavior. Mr. X
believes that if he can make a strong enough case that his alcoholism is
genetic, he may be able to forestall dismissal. How should his physician
counsel him? Commenting on the case are Paul Billings, chief of a medical
center's genetic medicine division; Mark A. Rothstein, director of a health
law and policy institute; and Abby Lippmann, a professor of epidemiology and
biostatistics. (KIE abstract
Journeys Beyond the Horizon
Jules M Rothstein, clinician, researcher, educator, author, and speaker, entered into the field of physical therapy in 1975 following graduation from the Department of Physical Therapy at New York University. He completed his Master of Arts Degree in Kinesiology in 1979 and his Doctor of Philosophy in Physical Therapy in 1983, also at New York University. During his training, he worked as Staff Physical Therapist at Peninsula Hospital Center in Queens, as Research Fellow with the Arthritis Foundation, and in private practice in Cedarhurst, New York.
From 1977 to 1980, Dr Rothstein was Adjunct Instructor in the Department of Physical Therapy at New York University. From 1980 to 1983, he was Instructor and Coordinator of Clinical Research and Training Programs at Washington University School of Medicine, and from 1984 to 1990, he was Associate Professor at the Medical College of Virginia. A tenured professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago since 1990, Dr Rothstein also served as Head of the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of Illinois at Chicago and as Chief of Physical Therapy Services at the University of Illinois Hospital in Chicago until 1999. During that period, the department obtained more than $6 million in research funding and received APTA's 1997 Minority Initiative Award for consistently recruiting and maintaining ethnic and racial diversity among its students. He continues to serve as Professor in the Department of Physical Therapy and remains active in all areas of physical therapy, practice, research, and service.
Dr Rothstein's expertise in measurement and research design has been used by many professionals—across disciplines—in the allied health community. He is in great demand as an invited guest speaker, having given professional presentations and keynote speeches on the topic of rehabilitation sciences at numerous national and international forums, including Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, Japan, and Saudi Arabia. He has also served as a consultant and visiting professor in South Africa, the Netherlands, and Poland.
Dr Rothstein has made extensive contributions to the physical therapy profession's body of knowledge, including the publication of more than 60 refereed articles and abstracts. In 1985, he edited the text Measurement in Physical Therapy. He chaired the APTA Task Force on Standards for Measurement in Physical Therapy that produced the first APTA Standards for Tests and Measurements in Physical Therapy Practice in 1993. As part of that task force, he co-authored the Primer on Measurement: An Introductory Guide to Measurements Issues. Since 1989, Dr Rothstein has served as Editor of Physical Therapy and has been appointed to that position for three 5-year terms by the APTA Board of Directors.
Dr Rothstein is a Catherine Worthingham Fellow of the American Physical Therapy Association. He is the recipient of numerous awards, including the Golden Pen Award, the Outstanding Service Award for Research, the Outstanding Service Award for Continuing Education, and the Outstanding Therapist Award in the State of Illinois.
[Rothstein JM. Thirty-Second Mary McMillan Lecture: Journeys beyond the horizon. Phys Ther. 2001;81:1817–1829.]</jats:p
- …
