1,721,272 research outputs found
Patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary events: Are we any closer to coming out from the labyrinth of the various antithrombotic strategies?
Subclinical atrial fibrillation: when to give NAO?
Atrial fibrillation is defined as subclinical (SAF) when occurs without symptoms and is discovered only during the interrogation of permanent or temporary cardiac implant-able devices. The significant interest in this condition derives from the fact that could easily be otherwise undiagnosed, portending to a potential serious neurological and cardiovascular consequences. The diagnosis of SAF is important for both the primary form and for patients after a stroke, and an appropriate management of antithrombotic treatment becomes a central instrument of prevention. Atrial fibrillation carries a five times increase in the thromboembolic risk. The subclinical asymptomatic forms of atrial tachyarrhythmias and fibrillation, diagnosed by interrogation of implantable cardiac devices, foretell a non-irrelevant risk of stroke, significantly higher than the one for patients without rhythm disturbances. Regardless the cause, the long-lasting asymptomatic arrhythmias, in patients with a significant risk profile, predict more important consequences and can justify anticoagulant treatment, also in primary prevention settings
Prevention of ischaemic events in subjects with polydistrict vascular disease
The incidence of new cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary syndrome remains high, particularly in the presence of concomitant high thrombotic risk factors (diabetes mellitus, renal failure, multivessel coronary artery disease, multiple district atherosclerosis, recurrent events, heart failure). The risk of such recurrent events can be reduced by implementing various strategies, which include careful individual stratification of ischaemic and haemorrhagic risk and the choice of the most appropriate antithrombotic therapy for the individual patient, also by combining aspirin with a second antiplatelet agent/a low-dose anticoagulant, in order to achieve the maximum net clinical benefit
Early risk of mortality, cardiovascular events, and bleeding in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is independently associated with a 1.5- to 2.0-fold higher risk of all-cause death and increased morbidity, in particular for heart failure and stroke. Previous studies have shown that the annual rate of death in AF patients is 5%; however, emerging data indicate that the risk of death, but also of thromboembolic and bleeding complications, is highest early after the diagnosis, especially during the first month. In light of these observations, patients with newly diagnosed AF deserve close monitoring and may benefit from a comprehensive care targeting modifiable risk factors for death, such as heart failure, diabetes, renal impairment, and vascular disease. Aim of this report is to focus on timing and causes of death as well as on temporal trends of cardiovascular and bleeding complications in patients with newly diagnosed AF
Why can primary angioplastics be ineffective despite the precocity of the intervention?
Early coronary revascularization is a first choice therapeutic strategy in the case of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Despite an early coronary angioplasty, however, in some cases, there is a lower efficacy of revascularization, with less favourable clinical outcome in the short and long terms. Various elements participate in the distant prognosis after primary coronary angioplasty (PCI). Among the clinical risk factors that predispose to a recurrence of ischaemic cardiovascular events are advanced age, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation and the multiplicity of cardiovascular risk factors, which identify a higher baseline risk profile. The risk factors associated with the percutaneous interventional procedure include the presence of diffuse or complex coronary lesions, the use of small diameter stents or a suboptimal post procedural thrombolysis in MI flow. The occurrence of procedural complications, such as no-reflow, is in fact associated with an increase in the infarct area and a worse prognosis, as it favours negative ventricular remodelling. The presence of concomitant right ventricular dysfunction, the high ventricular arrhythmic burden in the acute phase, the presence of risk factors for thrombosis or intra-stent restenosis also affect the outcome after primary PCI
Indications, evidence, and controversy in the closure of the left atrial appendage
: Closure of the left atrial appendage (LAAO) represents a valid option for the prevention of cardio-embolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high bleeding risk. Previous studies had shown that the atrial appendage represents the site of atrial thrombus formation in about 90% of cases in the presence of non-valvular AF. In all patients with AF and higher thromboembolic risk (in particular with CHA2DS2VASc score ≥2 in women and ≥1 in men) there is an indication for thromboembolic prophylaxis with AOC (oral anti-coagulants). The main guidelines and international consensus documents place the indication for the LAAO in patients with the need for thromboembolic prophylaxis who have contraindications to oral anticoagulant therapy (class of recommendation IIb)
Primum non nocere does not justify clinical inertia for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation in the era of direct oral anticoagulants
Aggiornamenti in tema di terapia antitrombotica dopo chiusura percutanea dell’auricola sinistra
Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion is a novel therapeutic option for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindication to oral anticoagulant therapy. However, after left atrial appendage occlusion with the most commonly used devices, a short period of antithrombotic therapy is indicated to allow complete endothelialization of the device and to prevent device thrombosis. Post-procedure antithrombotic strategies are often performed empirically, because of the lack of clear evidence. The present article summarizes the main evidence and recommendations of the scientific societies about antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion, suggesting individualized antithrombotic strategies based on the patient's hemorrhagic and thrombotic risk
- …
