1,721,040 research outputs found

    The Hidden Abode of Artificial Intelligence Production: Stretching the limits of AI ethics and critique

    No full text
    The present article aims to discuss the possibility of including the sphere of artificial intelligence production within the domain of artificial intelligence ethics and investigate its moral implications. In the first section, the role of human labour in the artificial intelligence production processes is considered, with particular reference to the distinction between high-skilled and low-skilled jobs, their differential distribution in the production process itself, and the labour conditions of ghost workers, in order to analyse the main ethical issues emerging within the field. In the second section, some aspects of the existing critical literature concerning artificial intelligence and labour are discussed, focusing on Marxist and decolonial scholarship and more precisely on its lack of consideration of the global value chain through which artificial intelligence AI production processes are structured. Finally, the possibility and limits of an ethics of artificial intelligence production are reconsidered by assuming the centrality of workers’ struggles and agency along artificial intelligence's global value chain

    Autistici laboriosi, autistici pericolosi. Neurodivergenze mostruose e dove trovarle

    No full text
    The last years have been characterised by increasingly systematic attempts to “integrate” autistic people into the labour market both in the U.S. and Europe. On a more general social level, such attempts have been preceded and accompanied by a positive reassessment of the “autistic traits” and by the emerging necessity to discipline the rising “autistic labour-power” to make it a productive force fully able to fulfil its role within the capitalist system. In the history of the primitive accumulation and of the disciplinary institutions between the Eighteenth and Nineteenth century, it is well-known that analogous phenomena brought to the construction of a division between “labouring classes” and “dangerous classes”, opposed along the cleavage between integration and marginalisation. The present article aims at arguing that analogous processes are affecting autistic people and autism as a cultural object today: at the intersection between the heritage of changeling stories, the production of psychiatric concepts such as “Criminal Autistic Psychopathy” associated with mass shootings in the U.S., and the attribution of “autistic traits” to 2 figures such as Putin and Hitler, beneath the façade of integration the construction of a monstrous and radically other neurodivergence appears

    Dalla menzogna politica al mito politico: per una genealogia coloniale della menzogna moderna a partire da Arendt e Derrida

    No full text
    In this article, the possibility of building a colonial genealogy for the Arendtian concept of modern lie is considered. For this purpose, the different forms and figures of the false proposed by Arendt and Derrida are discussed, with particular reference to traditional and modern lie, self-deception, counter-truth, ideology and political myth. Moreover, the hypothesis of a diachronic articulation between political lie and political myth is proposed under the name of “mythopoeic development of the political lie”. The hypothesis is then tested trough an examination of two historical cases: the first case is centred around Hernán Cortés’ political lies and their aftermath in connection with the myth of the conquest of America, while the second case concerns Cecil Rhodes’ political lies in relation with the construction of Rhodesia and the related “white mythologies”

    What we have in common: David Graeber and the anthropological critique of philosophy

    No full text
    The anthropological critique of philosophy has traditionally challenged conjectural histories and simplistic abstractions used by philosophers to define human nature. While this critique often leans toward cultural relativism, this paper argues that David Graeber's work exemplifies a distinctive, anti-relativist version of the anthropological critique. Grounded in ethnographic, historical and archaeological material, Graeber's approach contests Eurocentric assumptions not only about non-European societies but also about Western social institutions themselves. The paper situates Graeber's position within contemporary anthropological debates, contrasting it with prevailing forms of anti-relativism such as cognitive, ecological and ontological perspectives. It then reconstructs Graeber's anthropological critique through key examples from Debt and The Dawn of Everything, including his reinterpretation of freedom inspired by the Indigenous critique of European society. Ultimately, this paper proposes that Graeber's work models a form of concrete universalism that respects cultural differences while offering a plural, historically informed critique of dominant social theories. Unless otherwise indicated, all translations from Italian are mine

    A Materialist Conception of Knowledge: The Colonial Roots of Cognitive Capitalism

    No full text
    This book develops a materialist conception of knowledge by uncovering its entanglement with the history of colonial capitalism. Against accounts that frame cognitive capitalism and the knowledge economy as recent developments, it argues that these formations are rooted in long-standing processes of dispossession, extraction, and exploitation inaugurated during colonial modernity. Drawing on postcolonial critique, Marxian categories, and case studies from New Spain, it reframes concepts such as human capital, intellectual labour, and knowledge accumulation. The work highlights how colonial power structured hierarchies of knowledge through race, labour, and difference, and how these structures persist in contemporary capitalism. Attention is given to struggles over knowledge, from early colonial encounters to present-day resistance against its commodification. This book offers an original contribution to the critique of political economy, proposing a historically grounded account of knowledge as a site of both exploitation and struggle

    Portando Latour all’estremo: l’Occidente come «più di una cultura» e le origini coloniali della modernità come progetto

    No full text
    L’articolo mira ad analizzare il rapporto fra la modernità come progetto, la scienza e l’Occidente attraverso una riconsiderazione della critica della modernità di Bruno Latour. In particolare, si sostiene che quest’ultima, così come altre teorie critiche, riproduce involontariamente le tesi eccezionaliste relative all’Occidente. Considerando casi tratti dalla storia coloniale della conoscenza e il ruolo degli intellettuali indigeni in essa, l’articolo riafferma il carattere globale della scienza moderna, indagando come questo sia stato misconosciuto attraverso le relazioni coloniali di potere e come questo abbia generato l’autorappresentazione dell’Occidente come «non meramente una cultura». Infine, l’articolo propone un’origine coloniale per la modernità come progetto, leggendola come logica culturale dell’impresa coloniale stessa.The article aims at analysing the relationship between modernity as a project, science, and the West through a reassessment of Latour’s critique of modernity. In particular, it is argued that this latter, as well as other critical theories, inadvertently reproduces Western exceptionalist theses. Considering cases taken from the colonial history of knowledge and the role of Indigenous intellectuals in it, the article restates the global character of modern science, investigating how it has been misrecognised through colonial relations of power and how this has generated the self-representation of the West as «not merely a culture». Finally, it proposes a colonial origin for modernity as a project, reading it as the cultural logic of the colonial enterprise itself

    René Girard, Settler Colonialism and the Mimetic Theory. Crisis of Distinctions, Racism, and White Supremacy between Rhodesia and the Global Present

    No full text
    Questo articolo esplora l’intersezione tra la “razza”, il colonialismo e la teoria mimetica di René Girard. Sebbene Girard si sia occupato marginalmente di questi temi, seguendo l’analisi di Julia Robinson Moore dei conflitti mimetici e della violenza razziale nel Sud degli Stati Uniti, si sostiene che la teoria mimetica potrebbe offrire utili prospettive anche sui fenomeni del colonialismo di insediamento, della costruzione sociale della differenza razziale e della costituzione della soggettività dei coloni. Si analizzano inoltre le moderne teorie del complotto sulla “sostituzione etnica” come il risultato della paura di un rovesciamento mimetico dei rapporti di potere coloniali e delle gerarchie razziali. L’ipotesi viene messa alla prova attraverso il caso di studio della società coloniale rhodesiana, analizzata come un sistema di differenze che costituisce un vero e proprio ordine sacrificale, mentre la soggettività dei coloni come basata su due desideri mimetici distinti: verso la terra colonizzata, attraverso la mediazione misconosciuta degli indigeni, e verso la “bianchezza”, con la mediazione della metropoli imperiale. Vengono inoltre messi in luce il misconoscimento della violenza coloniale e l’uso come capri espiatori delle persone razzializzate come strategie per risolvere le tensioni tra bianchi e allontanare lo spettro della “vendetta” dei colonizzati. Infine, i meccanismi della mitopoiesi coloniale vengono a loro volta analizzati alla luce della teoria mimetica.This paper explores the intersection of race, colonialism, and René Girard’s mimetic theory. While Girard’s work has marginally addressed colonialism and race, following Julia Robinson Moore’s analysis concerning mimetic conflicts and racial violence in the U.S. South, this study argues that the mimetic theory could also provide valuable insights into the phenomena of settler colonialism, the social construction of racial difference, and the constitution of settlers’ subjectivity. It furthermore argues that modern conspiracy theories of the ethnic substitution can be understood as the result of the fear of a mimetic reversal of colonial power relations and racial hierarchies. The hypothesis is then substantiated through a case study analysis of Rhodesian colonial history. Rhodesian colonial society is thus analysed as a system of distinctions, constituting a full-fledged sacrificial order whereas the very subjectivity of the settlers is built upon two distinct mimetic desires: towards the colonised land, through the misrecognised mediation of Indigenous people, and towards whiteness conceived as synonymic with civilisation, with the mediation of the imperial metropolis. The misrecognition of colonial violence and the scapegoating of racialised people are highlighted as strategies to address tensions among white people and to ward off the spectre of the “vengeance” of the colonised. Finally, mechanisms of colonial mythopoeia are also analysed in light of the mimetic theory

    Democratic Confederalism and the Theory of History: Historical Ontologies of Political Alternative in Bookchin, Öcalan, and Graeber

    Full text link
    This paper aims to discuss the "historical ontology of political alternative" emerging from the work of Abdullah Öcalan by comparing it to the ones of two other authors: Murray Bookchin, who has notoriously influenced his thought, and David Graeber, whose interest for the Kurdish movement and the thought of Öcalan has been significantly overlooked so far. The analysis delves into how the three authors frame the conditions of possibility for the historical emergence of radical political alternatives. Special attention is given to the contrasts between Bookchin and Öcalan in this respect, with special attention to the couple continuity/discontinuity and archaic/modern, to their distinctive views of dialectics and of the articulation between the dialectical poles, and to the roles of consciousness and knowledge in their political and historical reflections. Additionally, it investigates the theoretical and political convergence between Öcalan and Graeber, focusing on the notions, respectively, of democratic civilisation and baseline communism
    corecore