1,720,985 research outputs found

    Semicontinuity and supremal representation in the Calculus of Variations.

    No full text
    We study the weak* lower semicontinuity properties of functionals of the form F(u)=\supess_{x \in \Og} f(x,Du (x)) where \Og is a bounded open set of RN\R^N and uW1,(Ω).u \in W^{1,\infty}(\Omega). Without a continuity assumption on f(,ξ)f( \cdot,\xi) we show that the {\sl supremal} functional FF is weakly* lower semicontinuous if and only if it is a level convex functional (i.e. it has convex sub-levels). In particular if FF is weakly* lower semicontinuous, then it can be represented through a level convex function. Finally a counterexample shows that in general it is not possible to represent FF through the level convex envelope of ff

    Relaxation and gamma-convergence of supremal functionals

    No full text
    We prove that the Gamma-limit in L^1_μ of a sequence of supremal functionals of the form F_k(u) = μ-ess sup f_k(x, u) is itself a supremal functional. We show by a counterexample that, in general, the function which represents the Gamma- lim F(·,B) of a sequence of functionals F_k(u,B) = μ-ess sup_B f_k(x, u) can depend on the set B and we give a necessary and sufficient condition to represent F in the supremal form F(u,B) = μ-ess sup_B f(x, u). As a corollary, if f represents a supremal functional, then the level convex envelope of f represents its weak* lower semicontinuous envelope

    "Supremal Representation of L^{infty} Functionals"

    No full text
    We study the weak* lower semicontinuity properties of functionals of the form F(u)=\supess_{x \in \Og} f(x,Du (x)) where \Og is a bounded open set of RN\R^N and uW1,(Ω).u \in W^{1,\infty}(\Omega). Without a continuity assumption on f(,ξ)f( \cdot,\xi) we show that the {\sl supremal} functional FF is weakly* lower semicontinuous if and only if it is a level convex functional (i.e. it has convex sub-levels). In particular if FF is weakly* lower semicontinuous, then it can be represented through a level convex function. Finally a counterexample shows that in general it is not possible to represent FF through the level convex envelope of ff

    Standing waves for a class of nonlinear Schr"odinger equations with potentials in LinftyL^infty.

    No full text
    We prove the existence of standing waves to the following family of nonlinear Sch\"odinger equations: itψ=2Δψ+V(x)ψψψp2, (t,x)R×Rn{\bf i}\hbar \partial_t \psi= - \hbar^2 \Delta \psi + V(x) \psi - \psi|\psi|^{p-2}, \hbox{ } (t, x)\in {\mathbf R} \times {\mathbf R}^n provided that >0\hbar>0 is small, 2<p<2nn22<p<\frac{2n}{n-2} when n3n\geq 3, 2<p<2<p<\infty when n=1,2n=1,2 and V(x)L(Rn)V(x)\in L^\infty({\mathbf R}^n) is assumed to have a sublevel with positive and finite measure

    On a Minimization Problem Involving the Critical Sobolev Exponent.

    No full text
    We study the following minimization problem: infuD1,2(Ω){0}Ω(u2+a(x)u2) dxuL22, ΩRn\inf_{u\in {\mathcal D}^{1,2}(\Omega)\setminus \{0\}} \frac{\int_{\Omega} (|\nabla u|^2 + a(x) |u|^2) \hbox{ } dx}{\|u\|_{L^{2^*}}^2}, \hbox{ } \Omega \subset {\mathbf R}^n in any dimension n4n\geq 4 and under suitable assumptions on a(x)a(x). \noindent Mainly we assume that a(x)a(x) belongs to the Lorentz space Ln2,d(Ω)L^{\frac n2, d}(\Omega) and the set N{xΩa(x)<0}{\mathcal N}\equiv \{x\in \Omega|a(x)<0\} has positive Lebesgue measure. Notice that this last condition is satisfied when the set N\mathcal N has a nontrivial interior part (in fact this is the typical assumption imposed in the literature on the set N\mathcal N)

    On the lower semicontinuity and approximation of LinftyL^infty functionals

    No full text
    In this paper we show that if the supremal functional F(V,B) = ess sup x∈B f(x, DV (x)) is sequentially weak* lower semicontinuous on W1,∞(B, Rd) for every open set B ⊆ Ω (where Ω is a fixed open set of RN ), then f(x, ·) is rank-one level convex for a.e x ∈ Ω. Next, we provide an example of a weak Morrey quasiconvex function which is not strong Morrey quasiconvex. Finally we discuss the Lp-approximation of a supremal functional F via Γ-convergence when f is a non-negative and coercive Carath ́eodory function

    Semicontinuity and relaxation of LinftyL^{infty}-functionals

    No full text
    Fixed a bounded open set \Og of RN\R^N, we completely characterize the weak* lower semicontinuity of functionals of the form F(u,A)=\supess_{x \in A} f(x,u(x),Du (x)) defined for every uW1,(Ω)u \in W^{1,\infty}(\Omega) and for every open subset A\subset \Om. Without a continuity assumption on f(,u,ξ)f( \cdot,u,\xi) we show that the {\sl supremal} functional FF is weakly* lower semicontinuous if and only if it can be represented through a {\sl level convex} function. Then we study the properties of the lower semicontinuous envelope F\overline F of FF. A complete relaxation theorem is shown in the case where ff is a continuous function. In the case f=f(x,ξ)f=f(x,\xi) is only a Carath\'eodory function, we show that F\overline F coincides with the level convex envelope of FF

    The role of intrinsic distances in the relaxation of L∞-functionals

    No full text
    We consider a supremal functional of the form F(u) = ess sup x∈Ω f(x,Du(x)) where Ω ⊆ RN is a regular bounded open set, u ∈ W1,∞(Ω) and f is a Borel function. Assuming that the intrinsic distances dλ F (x, y) := sup { u(x) − u(y) : F(u) ≤ λ } are locally equivalent to the euclidean one for every λ &gt; infW1,∞(Ω) F, we give a description of the sublevel sets of the weak∗-lower semicontinuous envelope of F in terms of the sub-level sets of the difference quotient functionals RdλF(u) := supx̸=yu(x)−u(y)dλF (x,y) . As a consequence we prove that the relaxed functional of positive 1-homogeneous supremal functionals coincides with Rd1F. Moreover, for a more general supremal functional F (a priori non coercive), we prove that the sublevel sets of its relaxed functionals with respect to the weak∗ topology, the weak∗ convergence and the uniform convergence are convex. The proof of these results relies both on a deep analysis of the intrinsic distances associated to F and on a careful use of variational tools such as Γ-convergence

    On the lower semicontinuity of supremal functional under differential constraint

    Full text link
    We study the weak* lower semicontinuity of supremal functionals under a differential constraint that is described by a constant-rank partial differential operator A. The notion of A-Young quasiconvexity, which is introduced here, provides a sufficient condition when the supremand function is only lower semicontinuous. We also establish necessary conditions for weak* lower semicontinuity. Finally, we discuss the divergence and curl-free cases and, as an application, we characterise the strength set in the context of electrical resistivity

    The class of functionals which can be represented by a supremum.

    No full text
    We give a characterization of all lower semicontinuous functionals on L^\infty_\mu which can be represented in the form \mu - sup \{ f(x; u) : x \in A\}. We also show by a counterexample that the representation above may fail if the lower semicontinuity condition is dropped
    corecore