1,354,262 research outputs found

    Lettres philosophiques, sur les physionomies.

    No full text
    Ascribed to Jacques Pernetti, and also to Guillaume Hyacinthe Bougeant. cf. A. de Backer, Bibl. de la Comp. de Jésus, nouv. éd., 1890.Mode of access: Internet

    Hgv collisions with steel road safety barriers: combined influence of position of center of mass and tire pavement friction

    No full text
    Abstract Vehicles colliding with highway safety features do not always produce the same effects. Each impacting vehicle will have a different outcome, depending greatly not only on its mass, velocity and impact angle, but also on the position of its center of mass and on the tire-pavement friction. This study analyzes in what way barrier and impacting vehicle behavior is affected by changes in the position of the center of mass and in the tire-pavement side friction, in order to identify the most dangerous loading systems. Towards this aim numerous simulations of a collision of a truck against a steel road safety barrier were carried out through non-linear dynamic finite element analysis. The results obtained demonstrate that the position of the center of mass is of greater consequence in collisions where impact energy is close to maximum barrier containment capacity and in friction-favoring conditions. The center of mass longitudinal position has a large impact on the risk of the vehicle passing over the barrier or rolling over. If it is in the back, the most common loading system, the risk of passing over the barrier is rather limited compared to rollover risk. As the position of the center of mass is pushed forward, on one hand rollover risk is reduced but, on the other hand, the risk of passing over the barrier increases. If the height of the center of mass increases, rollover risk is higher, but without significantly influencing displacement and the risk of passing over the barrier

    Vehicle Occupant Impact Severity in Relation to Real World Impact Condition

    No full text
    Longitudinal safety barriers are tested in order to assess the safety barriers containment capacity and the vehicle occupant impact severity. In the EN standards, the occupant impact severity is evaluated with the same test (TB11) for all the classes of barrier: a 900 kg car colliding with impact speed equal to 100 Km/h and impact angle equal to 20°. Considering that real world impact conditions may be substantially different, at least two questions arise: 1. Which is the distribution of passenger cars kinetic impact energy for different type of roads and which is the relative position of the conventional test? 2. Are the values of Acceleration Severity Index (ASI), Theoretical Head Impact Velocity (THIV) and Post-impact Head Deceleration (PHD) obtained in the conventional test TB11 representative for real world impact conditions? The “correct” answer to these questions requires a very expensive research program. This because a huge number of accident reports has to be collected and each accident events has to be reconstructed, furthermore many computer crash simulations have to be performed. In order to get a “preliminary” problem assessment, a study has been carried out performing an accident analysis and many crash simulation in different impacting conditions. The accident analysis has been carried out by the examination of 160 police run off the road accident reports on a rural dual carriageway road, integrated with the inspection of accident sites. Many accident parameters have been evaluated and distribution probabilities of impact velocity, impact angle and vehicle mass have been drawn. The real world impact conditions obtained have been used as input for the crash simulation of a passenger car against a longitudinal safety barrier. Impact simulations have been carried out by non-linear dynamic finite element analysis performed with the software LS-Dyna. The finite element model used for the vehicle is the result of an extensive modeling activity and is very capable to represent the crash dynamics and consequences. Collision outcomes in terms of THIV, PHD and ASI have been evaluated for each impact condition and, by combining the impact condition distributions with these results, the distributions of the impact severity indices have been assessed. The study carried out show that the probability of outcomes greater than the ones of the TB 11 are equal to 26% for ASI, and 34% for THIV and PHD. According to the results of the study, passenger cars crash test conditions more representative of real world impacts, on motorways and on rural dual carriageway roads, would be: Impact speed = 130 km/h; Impact angle = 20 degrees; Vehicle mass = 1500 kg. Such impact conditions would represent the ninetieth percentile of cars kinetic transversal impact energy. Moreover, with reference to the rigid wall fixed to the ground used in the simulations, they give rise to ASI, THIV and PHD values more severe than eighty-five percent of real world run off the road accidents. The previous results show that the conditions proposed by the standard could be not conservative in Italy. They have to be intended, however, as preliminaries and stressing the need of a more in depth research program

    In-depth Investigation of Run-off-the-Road Crashes on the Motorway Naples-Candela

    No full text
    In the paper, results from in-depth investigation of 1,092 run off the road (ROR) crashes on the motorway A16 (Italy) are presented. The research is aimed at pointing out risk factors that can address highway agencies and designers toward the selection of safety countermeasures aimed at reducing ROR crashes frequency and severity. Crash data were collected trough the analysis of police crash reports and relate to the period 2001-2005. Basing on police and hospital reports, each crash was categorized in six injury levels. To determine whether a specific crash pattern of the analysis group was significantly different from that of the control group, the Chi Squared (χ2) test with Yates’ correction was performed. Severity of motorcycle crashes was significantly higher than severity of other vehicle types. In adverse environmental conditions (night time and wet pavement), crash severity was lower than in favourable conditions. Crashes against ditches, walls, foreslopes, and backslopes were more severe than crashes against roadside steel safety barriers. Comparison between severity of crashes against longitudinal safety barriers and their blunt end terminals showed a dramatic increase in crash severity against the terminals. Thrie-beam roadside barriers that meet EN 1317 performance criteria showed a smaller crash severity and a better performance compared to older W-beam roadside barriers. Median New Jersey concrete barriers, compared to median steel safety barriers, showed greater crash severity and greater proportion of rollovers, not counterbalanced by a significant better behaviour in relation to penetration and override.run-off-the-road crashes, injury levels, concrete New Jersey safety barriers, steel safety barriers, blunt end terminal

    A Microsimulation Traffic Model to Estimate Accidents due to Reduced Sight Distance

    No full text
    The sight distance available on existing roads is very often lower than the stopping sight distance needed to avoid the collision with standing obstacles in the travelled way. When this occurs many rear-end crashes can happen because each follower could not see his/her leader. The investments needed to increase the sight distance to the value arising from the actual speed of the vehicles are usually very high. Due to budget constraints road agencies have to select the road segments to improve by estimating their safety performance. This activity is not an easy task. The most useful approach to address this type of problem is to use a microsimulation traffic model, which has to consider roadway configuration, sight distance, roadway surface condition, braking lights, human behaviour, etc. With this type of tool it would be possible to define the number of collisions or loosing control vehicles, their corresponding speed, the number of vehicle at collision “risk” in the queue, etc. In this paper the structure of a microsimulation model tacking into account most of the influencing factors is presented. It has been conceived with the aim to reproduce what happens in situations where the sight distance is reduced. The first part of the paper concerns the description of the modules in which the model is organized. The second part presents an application to a road segment where a standing obstacle exists in a curve and the sight distance is limited by a retaining wall. This situation has been compared with a similar road segment where the sight distance complies with the Italian Standard. The results obtained show the higher is the flow rate the lower are the rear-end crashes and loosing control vehicles. This is due to the fact that for high flow rate the vehicles are slower and a very high interaction exists among them, so that the braking lights of the leaders suggest to the followers to adopt a prudential behaviour

    On the influence of several parameters in energy model calibration: The case of a historical building

    No full text
    The aim of this work is to investigate the extent to which several different variables (e.g. climate conditions, infiltration rates and envelope characteristics) could affect the calibration process and, consequently, the reliability of the simulation outcomes. In this regard, in this paper the calibration phases of a dynamic hourly energy model for an existing building are presented. The test case is a historical construction built at the end of the nineteenth century in northern Italy. The building, originally designed for tobacco processing, has a massive envelope and it has no HVAC system. Therefore, the simulation model is calibrated using the actual air and wall surface temperature as control variables. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is carried out in order to assess the incidence of different inputs in building thermal behaviour and to identify which parameters have to be refined with the aim of optimizing the model calibration
    corecore