1,721,329 research outputs found

    Knowledge Management and Innovation. Being Dual

    No full text
    Duality – i.e. firms’ capacity to concentrate on the needs of today’s customers and the anticipation of those of tomorrow - requires managing a tension connected with the necessity to be excellent in both exploitation and exploration of their capabilities. A number of leading firms today seem to be able to handle duality quite well, revealing good operational and innovation performance over time. At the same time, the bulk of management theory still approaches this problem with a trade-off perspective, implying that these aspects of business are analyzed separately. Drawing on system theory and innovation management, this chapter tries to understand how firms can evolve dual capabilities. Empirical evidence is based on the Alfa case study and its historical involvement in radar technology

    Knowledge Management e Innovazione di Prodotto. Parte I: Origini, Sviluppi ed Evoluzione

    No full text
    L’innovazione di prodotto rappresenta una delle aree più promettenti nelle quali il Knowledge Management è oggi studiato ed applicato. Ma cosa è stato scritto fino ad ora? L’articolo fornisce una griglia interpretativa per orientarsi tra i vari contributi e capirne l’evoluzion

    Il Miglioramento e l’Innovazione Continua in Italia. Parte I: A che Punto Siamo

    No full text
    Il Miglioramento Continuo nasce negli USA e si diffonde poi in Giappone per rispondere ai forti cambiamenti presenti a livello di mercati, competizione e società: ma che cosa sta succedendo nel resto del mondo? In Europa e in particolare in Italia che cosa si sta facendo? Per rispondere a queste domande è stata creata la rete di ricerca CINet (The Continuous Innovation Network) che, con un nodo anche in Italia, raccoglie a livello internazionale ricercatori e manager che lavorano nel campo del Miglioramento e dell’Innovazione Continua. Questo articolo presenta i risultati di una survey che, coinvolgendo 60 imprese italiane sulle 440 casualmente contattate ( tasso di risposta del 13,6%), ha lo scopo di capire lo status quo del Miglioramento Continuo in Italia

    Knowledge Management e Innovazione di Prodotto. Parte II: Una Mappa Interpretativa per le PMI Italiane

    No full text
    Frutto di una ricerca empirica triennale che ha coinvolto le piccolo-medie imprese italiane, il modello interpretativo presentato nell’articolo è stato sviluppato al fine di supportare il management nel processo di selezione degli strumenti organizzativo-manageriali e tecnologici più coerenti per la creazione di un appropriato sistema di K

    Which Intranet for Healthcare? Models and Trends from a Case-Based Approach

    No full text
    This article is based on evidence from empirical research conducted by the Observatory of Intranet during 2006. Results refer to 19 case studies carried out in the Italian healthcare sector through direct interviews with the management. The article focuses on the following questions: (1) what are the intranet models (functionalities, services, processes and performance)? and (2) what are the evolutive paths towards those models? That is: what barriers and levers

    Il Miglioramento e l’Innovazione Continua in Italia. Parte II: Dove Stanno Andando le Imprese”

    No full text
    Sulla base dei risultati della survey condotta dalla rete CINet, questo articolo si pone l’obiettivo di stimare il livello di maturità raggiunto dalle imprese italiane impegnate nel Miglioramento Continuo e di suggerire le specifiche abilità da sviluppare per progredire verso il livello successivo

    Barriers and Levers Towards Knowledge Management Configurations. A Case Study Approach

    No full text
    Purpose – Seeks to discuss barriers/drivers to the selection and implementation of different knowledge management configurations in the process of product innovation. Design/methodology/approach – Building on literature and the previous survey-based research results, this study compares on a longitudinal perspective the approaches of two companies with similar conditions but adopting different choices in terms of ICT and organisational tools to support the knowledge management process. Findings – Case studies highlight how firms adopting a KMC that differ from the one indicated by the previous survey-based research model show an intention to align to it in the near future. Hence, it seems that a match exists between the configuration expected from the model and the intended configuration planned by the company. Using longitudinal case studies the paper analyses the barriers that hamper the transition of firms toward the approach that better suits their contingent situation. These barriers are mainly at the level of industry trend, lack of culture from users and loss of champions. This paper also analyses the enablers, which strengthen the alignment between the configuration expected from the model and the intended configuration the company planned. These are the social interaction between employees, the pressures from headquarters, the internal commitment from top managers, the technological development and the ICT maturity. Originality/value – The paper validates two hypotheses. H1: there is a match between the configuration expected from the research model (driven by contingencies) and the intended configuration planned by the company: the contingent approaches which disagree with the model represent different stages of maturity within an evolutionary path which drives toward the configuration expected from the model. H2: there are barriers/enablers, which hamper/foster the transition toward the intended configuration. It also analyses the barriers

    An explorative study on family firms and open innovation breadth: Do non-family managers make the difference?

    No full text
    The degree of openness in innovation is a key strategic decision of family firms (FFs). Although there is an increased interest in studies on FFs and open innovation (OI), the existing knowledge is rather limited. This study explores the determinants of OI in FFs. We focus on two distinctive types of FFs: those held and managed by family members and FFs where ownership and management are disjointed, leading to non-family managers being involved in strategic decision-making. Our study shows that FFs managed by non-family managers are motivated by an innovation strategy that is more aggressive, more oriented towards technological excellence and radical innovation as compared to FFs managed by family managers. And they are more likely to search for a broader set of external sources in embracing OI. We argue that the presence of non-family managers is what makes the difference in shaping firm behaviour in terms of OI breadth
    corecore