1,721,022 research outputs found
Follow-up of 161 unselected consecutive patients treated laparoscopically for common bile duct stones
No full textLong-term results of patients with pT2 rectal cancer treated with radiotherapy and transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision
No full textAnterior resection and abdomino-perineal resection are the surgical techniques used most frequently in the treatment of rectal cancer. Local recurrence rates of 10% to 14% are described after these conventional procedures. Preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy reduces local failure. Because local excision techniques can be applied to treat early rectal cancer in selected patients, we evaluated the results of preoperative high-dose radiotherapy and transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision (TEM) in patients with T2 rectal cancer. All patients underwent preoperative irradiation with 5,040 cGy, divided over 5 weeks. Forty days after completion of radiotherapy, the patients underwent complete full-thickness local excision of the rectal lesion including adjacent perirectal fat by TEM. The patients were followed for up to 8 years. Thirty-five patients, with pT2 rectal cancer as determined by pathological examination of the surgical specimen were enrolled in the present study. The tumors were responsive to preoperative radiotherapy in 82.8% of cases. No intraoperative complications and no conversion to open surgery were observed. No major complications and no mortality occurred during the 60-day postoperative period. Minor postoperative complications were observed in 5 patients (14.3%). The median follow-up of the patients was 38 months (range 24 to 96 months). One local recurrence (2.85%) was noted. The probability of surviving at 96 months after completion of treatment was 83%. Local excision by TEM combined with preoperative high-dose radiotherapy can achieve results similar to those observed after conventional surgery in patients with pT2 rectal cancer
When can local excision be considered adequate for treatment of non advanced low rectal cancer (NALRC)?
No full textLaparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration are safe for older patients
No full textBACKGROUND:
Laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration is a well-established treatment option in dedicated centers. However, few data are available on the results in elderly patients.
METHODS:
The outcome after laparoscopic CBD exploration in elderly patients (age <70 years) was compared with that in a concurrent control group of younger patients (age, <70 years).
RESULTS:
There were 77 elderly patients in group A and 207 younger patients in group B. American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) III and IV patients and prior abdominal operations were more frequent in group A (p <0.001). Two patients from each group underwent conversion to open surgery. There was no significant difference frequency of use between the transcystic and choledochotomy approaches, although the latter tended to be more frequent in the group A because of larger stones, (group A 53.4%; group B, 37.6%). Minor and major morbidity (group A, 12%; group B, 13.6%), rate of recurrent stones (group A, 1.3%; group B, 1.9%), and mortality (group A, 1.3%; group B, 0%) were not significantly different between the two groups. The single death in group A involved a patient with acute toxic cholangitis who underwent emergency surgery after multiple failed attempts at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/endoscopic sphincterotomy performed elsewhere. No CBD stenosis was observed at follow-up assessment.
CONCLUSIONS:
Elective laparoscopic CBD exploration is safe and effective. It may become the standard of care in both elderly and younger patients
Spleen preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for treatment of pancreatic lesions
No full textAIM:
Aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic approach in the treatment of distal pancreas tumors, from prospectively collected data.
MATERIAL OF STUDY:
From January 2003 to July 2013, 20 patients were treated by laparoscopic approach for distal pancreatic lesions. Nine patients underwent laparoscopic pancreatic tumorectomy (LPT) (Group A) for insulinoma (mean lesion diameter 1.2 cm, range, 0.5-2) and 11 patients underwent spleen preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (SP-LDP) (Group B) for ductal adenocarcinoma (pT1N0R0) (1), cystic mucinous neoplasm (5), serous cystadenoma (4) and lymphoepithelial cysts (1).
RESULTS:
Mean operative time was 94.3 minutes (range 80-110) for Group A and 164 minutes (range 90-240) for Group B. Intraoperative bleeding occurred in 4 cases (20%) and was easily controlled by laparoscopy. Conversion to open surgery was not required in any case. Morbidity was observed in 2 patients (18%) in Group A: pancreatic fistula (1) and peritoneal fluid collection (1); and a peritoneal fluid collection occurred in one patients (11%) in Group B. Mean hospital stay was 6.8 days (range 3-11) in Group A and 6.5 days (range 3-10) in Group B. Mortality was nil. At a mean follow-up of 82 months (range 15-141) local recurrence and distant metastases were not observed.
DISCUSSION:
LDP is a valid treatment showing the same rate of complication to open surgery but allowing the advantages of a minimally invasive procedure.CONCLUSIONS: SP-LDP is feasible and safe for benign and malignant pancreatic lesions
- …
