1,720,997 research outputs found
Inframesocolic Approach for Robotic Enucleation of Branch-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas
No full textBackgroundThe inframesocolic approach to the uncinate process of the pancreas has been rarely described in literature. To the best of our knowledge, no robotic cases have been reported.MethodsThe case of a 74-year-old woman, with a 43-mm branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with worrisome features within the uncinate process of the pancreas, is described.ResultsAfter diagnostic work-up, due to the uncertain potential of malignancy and the strong motivation of the patient to undergo surgery, we performed a robotic enucleation through an inframesocolic approach. The neoplasm was more than 1 cm from the main pancreatic duct. Final pathological diagnosis revealed a low-grade dysplasia branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.ConclusionsThe inframesocolic approach could represent an easy way to access the uncinate process of the pancreas, allowing safe limited resection in selected cases such as small branch-duct IPMN or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
INTRAHEPATIC BILIARY STRICTURES WITH UNDERLYING PRE-MALIGNANT BILIARY LESIONS: IS IT TIME TO BUILD GUIDELINES ON DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT?
No full textBiliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN) is defined as a precursor lesion of invasive adenocarcinoma and it can develop both in intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. BilIN grossly presents as flat lesions but is usually macroscopically and radiologically unidentifiable 10 , 21 . Interestingly, in the last decades due to the spread of imaging techniques, focal intrahepatic biliary strictures (FIHS) are more commonly incidentally founded in clinical practice. It is currently unknown which is their correct management and in what percentage they can harbor pre-neoplastic alterations (as BilIN) or malignancy 20 . Due to the concomitant increase in western countries of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, it would be useful to understand the natural history of FIHS, as they can represent a radiological manifestation of underlying pre-malignant disease: in that perspective, the ideal treatment could be an early surgery to prevent cholangiocarcino
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: many meta-analyses, few certainties
Full text linkIn recent years, an increasing of the level of evidence occurred with a significant number of meta-analyses. A question remains open: can LDP be considered the “new gold standard” for benign and malignant body–tail pancreatic disease? A systematic literature search was conducted to identify all meta-analyses published up to 2016. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the clinical safety of LDP. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate: the length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission rate, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), overall postoperative morbidity and oncologic safety. Nine studies were found to be suitable for the analysis. Data regarding clinical safety were extractable in all meta-analyses but a “between study” homogeneity was available only in 7. The safety of LDP was sustained by six meta-analyses in benign/low grade of malignancy body–tail pancreatic lesions, by one in ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). LDP has a shorter LOS compared to open distal pancreatectomy (ODP), demonstrated by three meta-analyses. Readmission rate in LDP procedures was lower than in ODP; these data are sustained by one meta-analysis. LDP is not inferior to ODP regarding the occurrence of POPF (seven meta-analyses); overall morbidity rate was lower in LDP than ODP for benign or low-grade malignant tumor. The use of the LDP in PDAC is sustained from one study. In conclusion, LDP can be considered a safe alternative to ODP. LDP could have some advantages but the data do not permit to define this procedure as the first choice or as the new gold standard
A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
Full text linkPurpose: Two main techniques are commonly used during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in order to perform the ileocolic anastomosis: intracorporeal (IA) and extracorporeal (EA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the two techniques. Methods: A systematic review was carried out to identify studies comparing IA and EA. The primary endpoint was anastomotic leakage. The secondary endpoints were intra- and postoperative results. A meta-analysis was carried out using the random-effects model. Results: Fourteen studies matched the selection criteria, enrolling 1717 patients (50.3 % IA, 49.7 % EA). The anastomotic leakage was similar in the IA and the EA groups (3.4 vs. 4.6 %, respectively) with a risk difference (RD) of −0.01 (95 % CI = −0.03 to 0.01; P = 0.120). IA group had lower overall complication rate (27.6 vs. 38.4 %; RD = −0.15; 95 % CI = 0.27 to −0.04; P = 0.009) and wound infection rate (4.9 vs. 8.9 %; RD = 0.52; −0.03; 95 % CI = −0.06 to −0.01; P = 0.030). Time to first oral intake (weighted mean difference (WMD) = −1; 95 % CI = −1.59 to −0.41; P < 0.001), length of hospital stay (WMD = −1.13; 95 % CI = −1.90 to −0.35; P = 0.004) and minilaparotomy size (WMD = −26; 95 % CI = −38 to −13; P < 0.001) were shorter in IA patients. The incisional hernia rate was lower in the IA group (2.3 vs. 13.7 %) with an RD of −0.09 (95 % CI = −0.17 to −0.02; P = 0.020). There were no differences in operative time, blood loss, conversion, internal hernia, reoperation, mortality, time to first flatus and defecation, analgesic required, number of lymph nodes harvested and length of distal margin. Conclusions: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with IA is a safe alternative to EA. Additional well-structured, prospective randomised trials are needed to confirm all the advantages regarding postoperative results which were pointed out in our study
Implementation of a patient blood management in an Italian City Hospital: is it effective in reducing the use of red blood cells?
Full text linkTo evaluate the effect of patient blood management (PBM) since its introduction, we analyzed the need for transfusion and the outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal surgery for different types of tumor pre- and post-PBM. Patients undergoing elective gastric, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal surgery between 2017 and 2020 were included. The implementation of the PBM program was completed on May 1, 2018. The patients were grouped as follows: those who underwent surgery before the implementation of the program (pre-PBM) versus after the implementation (post-PBM). A total of 1302 patients were included in the analysis (445 pre-PBM vs. 857 post-PBM). The number of transfused patients per year decreased significantly after the introduction of PBM. A strong tendency for a decreased incidence of transfusion was evident in gastric and pancreatic surgery and a similar decrease was statistically significant in liver surgery. With regard to gastric surgery, a single-unit transfusion scheme was used more frequently in the post-PBM group (7.7% vs. 55% after PBM; p = 0.049); this was similar in liver surgery (17.6% vs. 58.3% after PBM; p = 0.04). Within the subgroup of patients undergoing liver surgery, a significant reduction in the use of blood transfusion (20.5% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.002) and a decrease in the Hb trigger for transfusion (8.5, 8.2–9.5 vs. 8.2, 7.7–8.4 g/dl; p = 0.039) was reported after the PBM introduction. After the implementation of a PBM protocol, a significant reduction in the number of patients receiving blood transfusion was demonstrated, with a strong tendency to minimize the use of blood products for most types of oncologic surgery
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy in Benign or Premalignant Pancreatic Lesions: Is It Really More Cost-Effective than Open Approach?
No full textBACKGROUND:
Data regarding the quality of life in patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy are lacking and no studies have reported a real cost-effectiveness analysis of this surgical procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the quality of life and the cost-effectiveness of a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with respect to an open distal pancreatectomy.
METHODS:
Forty-one patients who underwent a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and 40 patients who underwent an open distal pancreatectomy were retrospectively studied as regards postoperative results, quality of life and cost-effectiveness analysis. The Italian neutral version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C-30, version 3.0, was used to rate the quality of life.
RESULTS:
Postoperative results were similar in the two groups; the only difference was that the first oral intake took place significantly earlier in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (P < 0.001). Regarding quality of life, the laparoscopic approach was able to ameliorate physical functioning (P = 0.049), role functioning (P = 0.044) and cognitive functioning (P = 0.030) and reduce the sleep disturbance scale (P = 0.050). The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the acceptability curve for a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy had a higher probability of being more cost-effective than an open distal pancreatectomy when a willingness to pay above 5400 Euros/quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was accepted.
CONCLUSION:
Despite the limitations of the study, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy can be considered not only safe and feasible but also permits a better quality of life and is acceptable in terms of cost-effectiveness to Italian and European health care services
Impact of surgery and surveillance in the management of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas according to Fukuoka guidelines: the Bologna experience
No full textThe objective of the study was to evaluate the Fukuoka guidelines in indicating the proper management for recognising the risk factors of malignancy. Data of patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms who underwent pancreatic resection or surveillance according to the Fukuoka risk parameters were collected in a prospective database. The clinical outcome (development of pancreatic cancer, overall and disease-specific survival) and pathological results were evaluated in all patients and in resected cases, respectively. The data of 197 patients were collected: 23 primarily resected and 174 primarily followed. Of the latter, 16 were secondarily resected. Among the patients resected, 21 (53.9%) showed diagnosis of in situ or invasive carcinoma and only contrast-enhancing mural nodules were significantly related to malignancy (P = 0.002), with a DOR of 3.3 and an LH+ of 2.2. Development of pancreatic cancer was shown in ten (5.7%) of the patients primarily followed. The overall survival and disease-specific survival were similar between patients primarily followed and primarily resected. It seems reasonable to suggest that a branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm should be treated as a benign and indolent disease that is rarely malignant. Enhancing mural nodules represent the best indicator for surgery
Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: What is the Best “Choice”? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Non-randomized Comparative Studies
No full textBackground: Many mini-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) techniques have been reported, but their advantages with respect to an open technique (OPD) and with respect to each other are unclear. Method: A systematic literature search of studies comparing different types of MIPD was carried out: laparoscopic-assisted (LAPD), totally robotic (TRPD), totally laparoscopic (TLPD) or totally laparoscopicârobotic assisted (TLPD-RA) to OPD. The primary endpoint was postoperative mortality. The secondary endpoints were intraoperative, postoperative and oncological outcomes. A network meta-analysis was designed to generate direct, indirect and mixed estimate effects, between different approaches, for each variable. The effects were reported as pairwise comparisons and hierarchical ranking as to each approach could be the best or the worst for each outcome, expressed by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Results: Twenty studies were identified, involving 2759 patients: 1813 OPDs, 81 LAPDs, 505 TRPDs, 224 TLPDs and 136 TLPD-RAs. No differences regarding postoperative mortality were found in pairwise comparison. The LAPD technique had a high probability of being the worst approach, while TRPD had a high probability of being one of the best. Regarding the secondary endpoints, OPD was the best regarding operative time and postoperative bleeding, but the worst regarding blood loss and wound infection. The TRPD or TLPD-RA techniques seemed to be the best for delayed gastric emptying, length of hospital stay, harvested lymph nodes and postoperative morbidity. The TLPD technique was often the worst approach, especially for overall and major complications, postoperative bleeding and biliary leak. Conclusion: The safest MIPDs are those involving a robotic system which seems to have a promising role in ameliorating the outcomes of OPD, especially when compared to a laparoscopic approach
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: which factors are related to open conversion? Lessons learned from 68 consecutive procedures in a high-volume pancreatic center
No full textBackground: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy represents a difficult surgical procedure with an high conversion rate to open procedure. The factors related to its difficulty and conversion to open distal pancreatectomy were rarely reported. The aim of the present study was to identify which factors are related to conversion from laparoscopic to open distal pancreatectomy. Methods: A retrospective study of a prospective database of 68 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was conducted at a high-volume center by pancreatic surgeons experienced with laparoscopic surgery. Pre-intra and postoperative data were collected. Patients who completed a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy were compared with those who needed a conversion to the open approach as regard demographic, clinical, radiological, and surgical data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. Results: Univariate analysis suggested that the site of the lesion, the extension of pancreatic resection, and the requirement for an extended procedure to adjacent organs were significantly associated with the risk of conversion to the open approach. Multivariate analysis showed that only the extension of the pancreatic resection (subtotal pancreatectomy) was significantly related to the odds of conversion [odds ratio (OR) 19.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–32.3; P = 0.038]. Preoperative suspicion of malignancy differed between the two groups; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.078). Conclusions: Despite the limitations of the study, only the extension of pancreatic resection seemed to be the main factor related to conversion during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
Is pancreaticogastrostomy safer than pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A meta-regression analysis of randomized clinical trials
No full textObjective To evaluate the clinically relevant POPF rate between Pancreatogastrostomy (PG) and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). To evaluate the confounding factors affecting meta-analytic results. Methods A systematic literature search of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing PG to PJ with an International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat or harm (NNT and NNH) were used. Fixed and random-effect models were applied. Impact of confounding covariates on the meta-analytic results was evaluated using meta-regression analysis, reporting Î2 coefficient ± standard error (SE). Results Seven RCTs were identified involving 1184 patients: 603 PG and 581 PJ. RD in the fixed model of clinically relevant POPFs suggested that PG was superior to PJ (RD-0.07; 95% CI: â0.11 to â0.03) with an NNT of 14 (95% CI: 9 to 33). In random model, PG was not superior to PJ (RD-0.06; 95% CI: â0.13 to 0.01) with an NNT of 17 and a possibility of harm in some cases (NNH = 100). Meta-regression suggested that the increase in the proportion of âsoft pancreasâ in the PG arm corresponded to a more positive value of RD (Î2 = 0.47 ± 0.19; P value: 0.045 ± 0.003). Conclusion A PG could be slightly superior to PJ in the prevention of clinically relevant POPF. The presence of high risk pancreatic remnant remains the main limitation of PG
- …
