166 research outputs found
Gazera heliconioides subsp. micha H. Druce 1896
No full textGazera heliconioides micha (H. Druce, 1896) (Fig. 13) Castnia micha (H. Druce, 1896) Taxonomic history. Described in the genus Castnia by Druce (1896) but later included in the genus Cabirus by Houlbert (1918). Talbot (1919) mentions that micha “can only be considered as a race and not as a distinct species”. Distribution. This subspecies is known from Bolivia, Paraguay and South East Brazil (Miller 1986; Lamas 1995; Rothschild 1919). Jörgensen (1930) states that it is common in all the Eastern region of Paraguay. It is, apparently, together with Castnia invaria penelope, the commonest castniid species in Paraguay. Jörgensen (1930) mentions that it flies in forested areas, near bromeliads (Bromelia sp. and Ananas sp.). It is frequently found perching close to the ground at the base of leaves or grasses and the way the moth rests and its wing and body coloration (Fig. 20 b) allows it to “disappear” in the surroundings. The first author observed individuals flying in urban places of Asunción, the capital city of Paraguay. He also observed them flying in Sapucay, Paraguarí Department and in Cerro Corá, Amambay Department. Ulf Drechsel (pers. comm.) collected and observed specimens in Sapucay, Paraguarí Department, and in Areguá, Central Department; while Contreras (2009) collected them in Ñeembucú Department. Biology and behavior. Like all taxa in the genus, they have a close resemblance to members of Lycorea Doubleday (Nymphalidae: Danainae), Thyridia Hübner and Methona Doubleday (Nymphalidae: Danainae, Ithomiini), and to Notophyson heliconides (Swainson) (Erebidae: Arctiinae, Pericopini) (Miller 1986; Lamas 1973). Two males were observed by the first author in Paraguarí and Amambay Departments, while flying low and slowly, along paths surrounded with Bromelia balansae Mez, which allowed for easy collection. They also perched close to the ground (Fig. 21). These observations clearly contrast with those made by Contreras (2009) in more disturbed habitats, where specimens were found flying fast, strongly and very high (7–8 m above ground).The host plant is unknown, but we suspect that the larvae feed on Bromelia spp. and/or Ananas spp. Contreras (2009) mentions that Orchidaceae could also be hosts of this species. Material examined. 13, Castnia micha Druce, 494, Paraguay (SMNH). CORDILLERA: Caacupé, 22.IX. 1969 (FCA/ DE); 1 Ƥ, Atyrá, X. 2002, Coll. C.Aguilar (MNHNPY). GUAIRÁ: 233,1 Ƥ, “ Paraguay, Independencia”, A. Breyer Collection (MLP); 13, 1 Ƥ, Carlos Pfannl, Paraguay, no date (TPC). CAAGUAZÚ: Coronel Oviedo, 25.X. 1972 (FCA/ DE); 13, “ Paraguay, Caa-Guazú”, XII- 1948, Coll. F.H. Schade, A. Breyer Collection (MLP);. PARAGUARÍ: 13, Sapucay. 8. X. 2008. Coll. S.Ríos (MNHNPY); 13, Sapucay, Paraguay 8.XI. 1997. Coll. U. Drechsel (MNHNPY); 13, Sapucay, Oct. 24, [1] 900 (NHMUM). CENTRAL: San Lorenzo, 23.X. 1985 Coll. J.Estigarribia (FCA/ DE). ÑEEMBUCÚ: 13, Distrito Humaitá, Arroyo Franco Cué, 15.XI. 2006 (IBIS, 1719) (IBIS-UNP); 13, Distrito Isla Umbú, Arroyo Hondo, paraje Itá Cajón, 13.XII. 2006 (IBIS, 2109) (IBIS-UNP). AMAMBAY: 13, Parque Nacional Cerro Corá, 25.X. 2009 Coll. S.Ríos (MNHNPY).Published as part of Ríos, Sergio D. & González, Jorge M., 2011, A synopsis of the Castniidae (Lepidoptera) of Paraguay, pp. 43-61 in Zootaxa 3055 on pages 53-54, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27891
Micha Ullman: specific and general
No full textTento text si klade za cíl předvést důležitou edukační interpretační praxi,která souvisí s analýzou edukovaného díla, totiž s budováním zdůvodněnéhokontextu pro vybranou strategii. V první části textu Micha Ullman: sochyna rozhraní nebe – země prozkoumáme dílo autora, který začal tvořit v se-dmdesátých letech a jeho tvorba je kontinuálně vystavována.V druhé části Strategie a její variace: nalezení shodného při vědomí odliš-ností teoreticky zakotvíme odlišnost mezi konkrétní praxí autora a strategiíjako objevenou obecninou. Objevovat strategie, umět je chápat ve spojitostis určitou dobou, znamená, že při významných shodách zároveň zazname-náváme odlišnosti a vsazujeme jev do adekvátního kontextu. Je to jednakvelmi účinná edukativní možnost, jak chápat dějiny oboru v souvislostecha trsech a neutápět se v jednotlivých případech autorských řešení, ale takémožnost, jak pro jednotlivé autory získat výkladový rámec porovnáváníma vyhledáváním shod při podstatných odlišnostech s jinými.This text aims to demonstrate an important educational interpretation prac-tice that is related to the analysis of the educated work, namely to buildinga justified context for the chosen strategy. In the first part of the text MichaUllman: sculptures at the interface of heaven and earth, we will explore thework of the author, who started creating in the seventies and whose workis continuously exhibited.In the second part, Strategy and its variations: finding the same whilebeing aware of differences, we theoretically anchor the difference betweenthe specific practice of the author and strategy as a discovered generality.Discovering strategies, being able to understand them in connection witha certain time, means that in case of significant similarities, we simultaneou-sly note differences and place the phenomenon in an adequate context. It is,on the one hand, a very effective educational opportunity to understand thehistory of the field in contexts and clusters and not to get bogged down inindividual cases of authorial solutions, but also an opportunity to obtain aninterpretive framework for individual authors by comparing and searchingfor similarities in substantial differences with others
The Transreal: Political Aesthetics of Crossing Realities
No full textAuthor of the book: Micha Cardena
Recommended Judaica Reference Works, 1991–1992
No full textThe purpose of this column is to recommend current Judaica reference sources, both general and specialized. It is intended to serve as a guide to new tools for schoIarly research as well as to more popular, but reliable works. The annotations describe the scope and use of each work
Recommended Judaica Reference Works, 1992-1995
No full textThe purpose of this column is to recommend current Judaica reference sources, both general and specialized. It is intended to serve as a guide to new tools for scholarly research as well as to more popular, but reliable works. The annotations describe the scope and use of each work.
This column lists selected reference materials that appeared from 1992 to 1995. Works published in 1990 and 1991 that were not reviewed in prior columns are included as well. Hebrew reference works are starred, and Hebrew bibliographic data corresponding to the Romanized entry appears at the end of the list
- …
