110,052 research outputs found
Nemastoma bidentatum subsp. gruberi Novak, Slana Novak, Kozel & Raspotnig 2021, ssp. nov.
No full textNemastoma bidentatum gruberi Novak, Slana Novak, Kozel & Raspotnig ssp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 17EA28A1-5F36-4DFC-9191-9C8680496FAC Figs 1A, C, 2– 3, 4E, 5E, 6E, 7E, 8E, 9E, 10E, 11E, 12E, 13D; Table 8 Nemastoma bidentatum sparsum – Novak et al. 2002: 136 [partim: Brežice, Črnomelj, Kočevje, Krško, Litija, Metlika, Novo mesto, Ribnica, Sevnica,Trebnje]. — Novak 2004b: 245 [partim: Buje, Karojba, Vižinada]; 2005b: 105. Diagnosis Relatively long-legged subspecies of Nemastoma bidentatum, with strait Ch ventral margin, and Pa-Fe with either 4 subequidistantly positioned spines or pointed tubercles or long setae on low protrusions, or their combination in the distal Pa-Fe half, or alternatively, with 2–3 distal stout thorns. Rec sem with one tubular and 12 elongated balloon-like vesicles. Etymology The subspecies name ʻ gruberi ʼ is dedicated to Jürgen Gruber (Vienna), our teacher, colleague and friend, who generously introduced us to the taxonomy of harvestmen and helped in identifying problematic specimens. Material examined Holotype SLOVENIA – WL18 • 1 ♂; Dolenje Laknice, Mokronog; 45.93° N, 15.21° E; 237 m a.s.l.; 26 Oct. 2013; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg.; mixed forest litter sift; PMSL-Opiliones-GR 4661. Paratypes SLOVENIA – WL18 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; PMSL-Opiliones-GR 4664 • 5 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; PMSL-Opiliones-GR4662, GR4666, GR4667, GR4669, GR4673, GR4676 to GR4679. Other material ITALY – VL05 • 1 ♀; Chiusa/Ricmanje; 29 Sep. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (275/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL15 • 1 ♀; Basovizza/Bazovica; 29 Sep. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (271/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL. CROATIA – UL92 • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀ (paratypes of N. b. sparsum); vicinity of Buje, and VL02, Vižinada; Sep. 1963; R. Sturany leg.; NHMW 4700. – VL01 • 1 ♂; Karojba; 28 Feb. 1990; F. Potočnik leg. (1307/1998, rev. 2018); PMSL. – VL13 • 1 ♀; Mlini; 30 Sep. 1990; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (32/1990, rev. 2015); PMSL. – XL90 • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Ponor Sušik, Drežnik; 8 Sep. 2009; A. Schönhofer leg. (Coll. ASc 334, ASc det., TN rev. 5/2012); PMSL. SLOVENIA – UL93 • 4 ♀♀, 1 juv.; Abrami; 19 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (148/1999, rev. 2018); PMSL • 2 ♀♀; ibid.; 20 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (188/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♀; Dragonja; 14 Sep. 2000; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (154/2001, rev. 2015); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; Dragonja valley; 26 Jun. 2015; T. Novak leg. (78/2015 = GR 5123−5130); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Ivankovec; 23 Sep. 1998; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1791/1998, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; Lucija–Seča – Debernardo; 22 Sep. 1998; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1817/1998, rev. 2019); PMSL • 1 ♂; Korte; 23 Sep. 1998; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1821/1998, rev. 2018); PMSL • 33 ♂♂, 30 ♀♀; Medljan, Korte; 21 Aug. 1999; T. Novak leg. (239/1999, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 juv.; ibid.; 22 Jun. 2000; B. Bertoncelj, B. Ogrizek and T. Novak leg. (217/2000, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (218/2000, TN rev. 2019); PMSL • 1 ♂; Padna; 19 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (168/1999, rev. 2017); PMSL • 2 ♀♀; Parecag; 23 Sep. 1998; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1788/1998, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; Seča; 10 Oct. 1998; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1844/1998, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; 24 Oct. 1998, L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1881/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 3 ♀♀; ibid.; 21 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (236/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 15 ♂♂, 21 ♀♀; ibid.; 21 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (231/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 6 ♀♀; Sečovlje; 1 Mar. 2009; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1/2015); PMSL • 1 ♂; Sv. Peter; 11 Oct. 1998; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (1850/1998, rev. 2015); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Sv. Sab, Padna; 19 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (151/1999, rev. 2009); PMSL • 1 ♀; Škrline, Dragonja; 20 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (194/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL03 • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Boršt; 14 Apr. 2011; T. Novak leg. (76/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL • 2 ♀♀; ibid.; (81/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL04 • 1 ♀; Ankaran; 29 Sep. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (276/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Kolombini, Spodnje Škofije; 26 Sep. 2007; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (94/2007, rev. 2018); PMSL • 5 ♂♂; Mlinarji – Osp; 26 Sep. 2007; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (97/2007, rev. 2017); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Rižana; 24 Sep. 2016; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (18/2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; Škocjanski zatok, Koper; 15 Oct. 2009; S. Polak leg. (PK 1/2015); NM • 4 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Zgornje Škofije – Tinjan; 26 Sep. 2007; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (88/2007); PMSL. – VL07 • 4 ♀♀; Hrastje, Šmarje; 17 Aug. 2000 (674/2000, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL13 • 1 ♂; Poletiči, Kubed; 4 Sep. 2016; T. Marinko leg. (27/2016); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Sočerga; 28 Sep. 1990; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (31/1990, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL14 • 4 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; Bezovica; 29 Sep. 1990; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (LSN 1/1990, TN rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; Hrpelje, Kozina; 2 Apr. 1993; S. Brelih leg. (651/1998, rev. 2018); PMSL • 2 ♂♂; Predloka; 29 Sep. 1990; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (35/1990, rev. 2015); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Rižana; 29 Sep. 1990; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (33/1990, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL15 • 1 ♀; Botač; 22 Mar. 1990; M. Černila, B. Horvat and I. Sivec leg. (1246/1997); PMSL. – VL16 • 1 ♂; Divača; 2 Apr. 1993; S. Brelih leg. (174/2001, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL17 • 1 ♂; Vrabče, Podnanos; 10 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (632/1998, rev. 2017); PMSL. – VL18 • 1 ♂; Uhanje; 3 Sep. 2001; T. Novak leg. (329/2001, rev. 2018); PMSL. – VL23 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Poljane pri Podgradu; 18 Aug. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (166/2012, rev. 2019); PMSL. – VL25 • 3 ♀♀; Buje; 10 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (163/2001, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Goriče pri Framljah; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (343/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (344/2011); PMSL. – VL28 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Podvrh, Raka; 18 Jul. 2012; P. Kozel, T. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (55/2012); PMSL • 9 ♂♂, 7 ♀♀; ibid.; (GR 3734–3746); PMSL • 3 ♀♀; ibid.; (GR 3791); PMSL. – VL29 • 6 ♂♂, 12 ♀♀; Dolnje Brezovo, Sevnica; 30 Jun. 2012; (GR 3670–3683); PMSL. – VL36 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Palčje – Mt. Javorniki; 1 Oct. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (361/2011, rev. 2019); PMSL. – VL45 • 1 ♀; Koritnice − Mašun; 2 Oct. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (329/2011, rev. 2014); PMSL. – VL47 • 1 ♀; Suha reber, Koritnice; 21 Jan. 2007; S. Polak leg. (107/2007); NM. – VL54 • 1 ♀; Sviščaki; 20 May 1989; T. Trilar leg. (271/2000, rev. 2017); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 25 May 1989; T. Trilar leg. (275/2000, rev. 2017); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 21 Jul. 2001; B. Bertoncelj, U. Bertoncelj and T. Novak leg. (29/2001, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (34/2001, rev. 2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀; Travni Dolci, Mt. Snežnik; 12 Aug. 2001; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (195a/2001, rev. 2020); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; Mt. Veliki Snežnik; 20 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (185a/1999, rev. 2020); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; 12 Sep. 2018; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (116/2018); PMSL. – VL36 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Palčje − Javorniki; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (361/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL66 • 1 ♀; Benete, Runarsko; 31 May 2004; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (33/2004, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL67 • 5 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Nova vas – Volčje; 26 Sep. 2006; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (25/2006, rev. 2019); PMSL • 1 ♂; Runarsko; 26 Sep. 2006; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (38/2006, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Veliki vrh, Runarsko; 26 Sep. 2006; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (36/2006, rev. 2015); PMSL • 7 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Volčje; 26 Sep. 2006; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (28/2006, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL69 • 1 ♂; Veliki vrh pri Šmarju; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (156/2011); PMSL. – VL74 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Mt. Goteniški Snežnik; 28 May 2000; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (247/2000, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♀; Strma reber, Zgornji Čačiči; 27 Sep. 1996; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (LSN 126/1996, TN rev. 2008); PMSL. – VL75 • 2 ♂♂; Draga; 17 Aug. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (94/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Mt. Goteniški Snežnik; 28 May 2000; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (253/2000, rev. 2007); PMSL. – VL76 • 1 ♂; Bukovica, Ribnica; Jul.1994; B. Oven leg. (LSN 25/1996, TN rev. 2009); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Lipovšica, Sodražica; 22 Aug. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (100/2011, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; Nova Štifta; 22 Aug. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (105/2011); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Ribnica; 6 Sep. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (828/2000, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; ibid.; (831/2000, rev. 2019); PMSL • 1 ♀; Mt. Turn; 27 Jun. 1980; B. Drovenik leg. (383/2002, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; 28 Aug. 1980; B. Drovenik leg. (394/2002, rev. 2009); PMSL. – VL77 • 1 ♂; Dolnje Retje; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (161/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; Rašica, Velike Lašče; 16 Jun. 1986 (261/2002, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Velike Poljane, Ortnek; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (142/2011, rev. 2019); PMSL. – VL78 • 1 ♂; Laporje; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (151/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; Zagradec pri Grosupljem; 7 Jul. 1986; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (500/2002, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL79 • 1 ♀; Veliki Lipoglav − Dobrinje; 8 Jul. 1986; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (467/2002, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL83 • 2 ♂♂; Vršič, Banjaloka; 24 Apr. 2001; S. Brelih leg. (121/2001, rev. 2019); PMSL. – VL84 • 1 ♂; Jelenja vas; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (137a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; (153/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂; Pleš, Borovec pri Kočevski Reki; 19 Sep. 2013; P. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (71/2013, rev. 2018); PMSL. – VL85 • 1 ♀; Grčarice; 18 Oct. 2013; T. Novak leg. (63/2013, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Grčarske Ravne; 18 Oct. 2013; T. Novak leg. (66/2013, TN rev. 2019); PMSL • 3 ♀♀; Kočevje; 6 Sep. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (822/2000, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (825/2000, rev. 2007); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Mt. Stojna, Kočevje; 25 Oct. 1996; S. Brelih leg. (92/2001, rev. 2008); PMSL. – VL86 • 1 ♀; Dolenja vas; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (110/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (154/2012, rev. 2018); PMSL. – VL87 • 1 ♂; Breg pri Zagradcu; 4 Nov. 1993; S. Brelih leg. (805/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL. – VL89 • 1 ♀; Potok, Stična; 4 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (658/1998, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL93 • 1 ♂; Brsnik, Fara; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (157/2011, rev. 2018); PMSL. – VL94 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Dolenja Žaga; 29 Apr. 2001; S. Brelih leg. (131/2001, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♀; Dolenja Žaga – Podstene; 26 Jun. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (90/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Gorenja Žaga; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (111a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (159/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; Ograja; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (109a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (121a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (144/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (148/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Ograja – Suhor − Morava; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (120a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (138a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (152/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂; Ograja – Zdihovo; 26 Jun. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (76/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 3 juvs; ibid.; 12 Jun. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (32/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 2 juvs; Podstene pri Kostelu; 12 Jun. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (24/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂; Rajndol; 21 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (821/1998, rev. 2008); PMSL • 5 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Srednji Potok, Banja Loka; 8 Oct. 2012; P. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (68/2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀, 2 juvs; Štalcerski preval; 12 Jun. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (33/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL. – VL95 • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Dolga vas; 17 Aug. 1985; T. Novak, M. Slana Novak and L. Slana Novak leg. (LSN 97/1986, TN rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Livold; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (123a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (158/2011); PMSL. – VL97 • 1 ♀; Dvor, Lašče; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (112/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Železno, Dobrnič; 4 Nov. 1993; S. Brelih leg. (812/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL. – VL99 • 3 ♀♀; Nova gora, Čatež; 15 Aug. 2007; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (61/2007, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VM80 • 1 ♂; Litija; 10 Sep. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (809/2000, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (834/2000, rev. 2015); PMSL. – WL03 • 2 ♂♂; Dolenje Kozice; 18 Apr.−13 May 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Gergeli leg. (509/2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; 18 Apr.−13 May 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Gergeli leg. (550/2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; 5 Jul. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Pirnat leg. (1135/2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 6 Aug. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Pirnat leg. (1090/2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 30 Sep. –28 Oct. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Gergeli leg. (PK 64/2012); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 25 Nov. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Pirnat leg. (270/2018); PMSL • 2 ♀♀; ibid.; 25 Nov. −23 Dec. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Gergeli leg. (1027/2018); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Srednji Radenci; 17 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (LSN 51/1986, rev. 2008); PMSL • 3 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; Stari trg ob Kolpi; 21 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (851/1998, rev. 2008); PMSL • 5 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Dolenji Radenci – Breg pri Sinjem vrhu; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (135a/2011); PMSL • 5 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; ibid.; (149/2011); PMSL. – WL05 • 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀, 1 juv.; Črmošnjice; 16 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (160/1997); PMSL • 1 ♀; Koprivnik, Kočevski Rog; 21 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (867/1998, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Mt. Mirna gora; 8 Oct. 2012; P. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (59/2015); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; ibid.; 8 Oct. 2012; P. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (66/2015); PMSL. – WL06 • 1 ♂; Cerovec − Selišče, Podturn pri Dolenjskih toplicah; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (145/2011, rev. 2017); PMSL. – WL07 • 1 ♂; Boršt pri Dvoru; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (113/2012); PMSL • 1 ♀; Prečna, Mirna; Jun. 2000; V. Jaćimović leg. (PK and TN 100/2020); PMSL. – WL08 • 1 ♂; Rdeči kal, Dobrnič; 4 Nov. 1993; S. Brelih leg. (872/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Trebnje; 29 Aug. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (787/2000, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; (787a/2000, rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (788/2000, rev. 2008); PMSL. – WL13 • 4 ♀♀; Balkovci, Vinica; 15 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (212/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Dolenji Radenci – Breg pri Sinjem vrhu; 3 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (146/2011); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Kot pri Dramlju; 16 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (207/1999, rev. 2015); PMSL • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Špeharji, Vinica; 16 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (201/1999, rev. 2006); PMSL • 6 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Vinica – Sinji vrh; 17 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (LSN 59/1986, TN rev. 2007); PMSL • 2 ♂♂; Vukovci; 18 Apr. 1996; S. Brelih leg. (764/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL. – WL14 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Bistrica, Črnomelj; 26 Jun. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (65/1999, rev. 2017); PMSL • 1 ♀; Črnomelj; 15 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (221/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 3 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀, 2 juvs; Desinec – Črnomelj; 17 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (385/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Tanča gora; 21 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (861/1998, rev. 2015); PMSL • 5 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Sinji vrh, Vinica; 16 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (205/1999, rev. 2007); PMSL. – WL15 • 1 ♀; Krupa spring; 10 Mar. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (808/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 6 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀, 3 juvs; Lokve, Črnomelj; 2 Jul. 1995; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (105/1997, rev. 2009); PMSL • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Mihelja vas; 18 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (LSN 55/1986, TN rev. 2017); PMSL • 1 ♀; Praprot; 6 Aug. 1997; T. Novak leg. (418/1998, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (432/1998, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 22 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (37/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (110/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Stranska vas; 22 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (108/1999, rev. 2007); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Vrčice; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (110/2012); PMSL • 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀; Vrčice – Semič; 8 Oct. 2012; P. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (64/2015); PMSL. – WL16 • 2 ♀♀; Laze, Uršna Sela; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (103/2012, rev. 2015); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (108/2012, rev. 2018); PMSL. – WL17 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Brod, Novo Mesto; 31 Aug. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (811/2000, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂; Novo mesto; Karaman leg. (87/1983 microscopic preparation, JH det., TN rev. 2011); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; Karaman leg. (108/1983 microscopic preparation, JH det., TN rev. 2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (814/2000); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; (153/2018 microscopic preparation, JH det., TN rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀, 1 ♀; ibid.; 31 Aug. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (811/2000, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Ratež; 29 Apr. 1995; S. Brelih leg. (750/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL. – WL18 • 6 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Dolenje Laknice; 26 Oct. 2013; T. Novak leg. (GR 4661, 4662, 4664, 4666, 4667, 4669, 4673, 4676, 4677−4679); PMSL. – WL19 • 1 ♀; Boštanj – Mokronog – Križ; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (70/2007, rev. 2011); PMSL • 1 ♂; Jelovec; 15 Aug. 2007; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (56/2007); PMSL. – WL23 • 1 ♂; Zilje; 18 Apr. 1996; S. Brelih leg. (767/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Zilje – Vinica; 17 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (364/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL. – WL24 • 5 ♂♂, 1 ♀, 1 juv.; Gorenjci pri Adlešičih; 15 Aug. 1999; M. Štangelj and T. Novak leg. (218/1999, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂; Dragoši, Griblje; 18 Apr. 1994; S. Brelih leg. (733/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Griblje − Desinec; 16 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (161/1997, rev. 2009); PMSL. – WL25 • 1 ♂; Bečka jama cave, Cad. No. 6275, Boldraž; 9 Jun. 2004; V. Germovšek, T. Tkavc, A. Kocuvan and T. Novak leg. (21/2004, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂; Božakovo; 3 May 2004; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (48/2004, rev. 2007); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Bušinja vas; 18 Apr. 1996; S. Brelih leg. (743/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂, 4 ♀♀; Kapljišče; 16 Aug. 1985; L. Slana Novak, M. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (LSN 113/1986, TN rev. 2007); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 1 juv.; ibid. (LSN 119/1986, TN rev. 2007); PMSL • 3 ♀♀; Metlika; 31 Aug. 2000; M. Mlakar leg. (816/2000, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; (818/2000, rev. 2015); PMSL • 7 ♂♂, 9 ♀♀; Trnovec, Metlika; 23 Jul. 1999; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (141/1999, rev. 2008); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Sv. Urban, Metlika; 18 Apr. 1996; S. Brelih leg. (784/1998, rev. 2007); PMSL. – WL26 • 1 ♂; Krašnji vrh; 9 Jun. 2004; V. Germovšek, T. Tkavc, A. Kocuvan and T. Novak leg. (37/2004, rev. 2007); PMSL • 1 ♂; Markučev Mlin, Krašnji vrh; 1 Jul. 2007; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (21/2007); PMSL • 4 &fema
Nemastoma bidentatum subsp. martensi Novak, Slana Novak & Raspotnig 2021, ssp. nov.
No full text<i>Nemastoma bidentatum martensi</i> Novak, Slana Novak & Raspotnig ssp. nov. <p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: CCDC54EF-D41A-4547-A4D4-50370212C243</p> <p>Figs 2–3, 4G, 5G, 6G, 7G, 8G, 9G, 10G, 11G, 12G, 13F; Table 10</p> Diagnosis <p> Subspecies of <i>Nemastoma bidentatum</i> with Ch basal article with a saw-like series of 1–3 μm high denticles on anterior margin of ventral hump, and a row of 5–11 denticles and tubercles in the distal half of Pa-Fe. Rec sem of 12–14 slightly elongated balloon-like vesicles.</p> Etymology <p> The subspecies name ʻ <i>martensi</i> ʼ is dedicated to Jochen Martens (Mainz), our teacher, colleague and friend, who provided the first modern revision of harvestmen in Slovenia.</p> Material examined <p> <b>Holotype</b> SLOVENIA – <b>VL23</b> • 1 ♂; Poljane pri Podgradu; 45.50° N, 14.10° E; 597 m a.s.l.; 25 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg.; thermophile scrub and mixed forest litter sift; PMSL-Opiliones-TN 287/2011. <b>Paratypes</b> SLOVENIA – <b>VL23</b> • 8 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; PMSL-Opiliones-TN 287/2011.</p> <p> <b>Other material</b></p> <p> SLOVENIA – <b>VL15</b> • 3 ♂♂, 8 ♀♀; Buje; 27 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (316/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL • 2 ♂♂; ibid.; (316a/2011); PMSL • 1 ♀; Mt. Ostrič; 29 Aug. 2014; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (32/2014); PMSL. – <b>VL23</b> • 4 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Poljane pri Podgradu; 15 May 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (40/2012); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; 18 Aug. 2011; (165/2012); PMSL • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; ibid.; 20 May 2012; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (GR 3597−3601, TN det.); PMSL • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; ibid.; 24 Oct. 2013; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (GR 6017, 6018, 6020, TN det.); PMSL • 2 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; ibid.; 28 Oct. 2013; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (GR 4651, 4653, 4654, 4656, 4657, 4659, TN det.); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Mt. Velika Medvižica; 18 Jul. 2014; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (15/2014); PMSL. – <b>VL24</b> • 1 ♂; Mala Plešivica, Golac; 20 Sep. 2012; T. Novak leg. (169/2012); PMSL • 1 ♂; ibid.; 5 Oct. 2012; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (PK 20/2012, TN rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 21 May 2014; P. Kozel and T. Novak leg. (PK 18/2014); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; (PK 18/2014); PMSL • 1 ♂; Mt. Mala Pleševica – Mt. Lipica; 19 Oct. 2014; T. Novak leg. (26/2015); PMSL • 1 ♂; Obrov – Golac; 19 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (253/2011); PMSL • 1 ♂; Mt. Velika Pleševica; 19 Oct. 2014; T. Novak leg. (14/2015); PMSL • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; ibid.; (16/2015); PMSL • 1 ♂; Velika vrata, Mt. Velika Pleševica; 6 Oct. 2012; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (186/2012); PMSL • 4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; ibid.; (PK 16/2012, TN rev. 2018); PMSL. – <b>VL25</b> • 1 ♀; Buje – Suhorje; 27 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (298/2011); PMSL. – <b>VL26</b> • 3 ♂♂; Fameljska loza, Senožeče; 1 Oct. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (351/2011); PMSL. – <b>VL33</b>; PMSL • 3 ♂♂; Starod; 25 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (269/2011); PMSL. – <b>VL34</b> • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Harije; 19 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (224a/2011); PMSL. – <b>VL43</b> • 2 ♀♀; Novokrajska jama cave, Cad. No. 810, Novokračine; 21 Jul. 2006; P. Trontelj and M. Zagmajster leg. (PK and TN 96/2020); PMSL • Novokračine; 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; 27 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (307/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL. – <b>VL44</b> • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Jablanica – Trpčane; 9 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (252/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL. – <b>VL53</b> • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Mt. Šešnovica; 27 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (300/2011); PMSL. – <b>VL54</b> • 1 ♀; Bezgovec, Zabiče; 13 Nov.–10 Dec. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Gergeli leg. (PK 50/2012; TN rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♀; ibid.; 16 Oct.–13 Nov. 2002; B. Drovenik and A. Gergeli leg. (PK 58/2012; TN rev. 2018); PMSL • 1 ♂; Mt. Snežnik; 12 Sep. 2018; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (116b/2018); PMSL. – <b>VL84</b> • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Pleš, Borovec pri Kočevski Reki; 19 Sep. 2013; T. Novak leg. (60/2013, rev. 2015); PMSL. – <b>VL87</b> • 1 ♂; Veliki Grintovec, Zagradec, Žužemberk; 10 May 2008; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (117/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL.</p> Description <p> <b>Male</b> (holotype)</p> <p>BODY. Length 1.63, width 1.26.</p> <p>CHELICERAE. Ch basal article (without Apo) length 0.57, 2.5 times as long as wide at Ch max width at dorsal hump, and with a saw-like series of 1–3 μm high denticles on anterior margin of ventral hump (not visible on Figs). Ch-Apo small, 0.31 times as high as basal article length, rounded-trapezoid, widest distally, highest posteriorly; Ch-Apo height 0.18, max width 0.15, min width 0.09 (at the base), frontal margin quarter moon-like. Secretion field medially. Distal article length 0.58, max width 0.19, movable finger length 0.23 (Figs 4G, 5G, 6G).</p> <p> PEDIPALPS. Pa-Tr oval-trapezoid, moderately high (Pa-Tr height:length <i>~</i> 0.6:1), Pa-Fe moderately robust (Pa-Fe min:max width ~1:3.0), with 7 subequidistant low, stout, irregularly shaped tubercles and denticles in the distal Pa-Fe half. Pa-Pt moderately robust (length: max width ~ 1:4.0) (Figs 5G, 6G). Pa article lengths in Table 10.</p> <p>PENIS. Pe length 1.44, base 0.45, glans 0.12, stylus 0.07 (Figs 7G, 8G).</p> <p>LEGS. Pseudoarticle leg-Fe formula I−IV: 0−1−1−2. Tarsomere leg-Fe formula I−IV: 8−17−8−9. Leg article lengths in Table 10.</p> <p> <b>Female</b></p> <p>BODY. Length 2.23, width 1.60.</p> <p>CHELICERAE. Ch basal article length 0.60, 2.9 times as long as wide at dorsal hump, with slightly, evenly arched dorsal margin in front dorsal indentation, and medial straight portion in middle of slightly concave ventral margin (Fig. 13F). Distal article length 0.63, max width 0.20, movable finger length 0.23.</p> <p>PEDIPALPS. Pa-Tr with moderately high, arched, with straight posterior portion of dorsal margin, Pa-Fe slightly widened distally; Pa-Pt, Pa-Ti and Pa-Ta elongated (Fig. 13F). Pa article lengths in Table 10.</p> <p>OVIPOSITOR. Ovipositor length 0.94, Rec sem of 12–14 slightly elongated vesicles (Fig. 11G).</p> <p>LEGS. Leg article lengths in Table 10.</p> Distribution <p>Croatia, Slovenia. Vertical distribution in Slovenia: 320−1030 m a.s.l. Type locality: Poljane pri Podgradu (45.50° N, 14.10° E, 597 m a.s.l.), Slovenia.</p> Ecology <p> <i>Nemastoma b. martensi</i> ssp. nov. is native to lowland to submontane habitats with thermophile scrub and <i>Quercetalia pubescenti–petraeae</i> and <i>Tilia platyphyllos</i> Scop. forest communities, with partly substantial admixture of <i>Fagus sylvatica</i> and <i>Corylus avellana</i> L. in southwestern Slovenia. Phenology: adults probably eurychronous.</p>Published as part of <i>Novak, Tone, Novak, Ljuba Slana, Kozel, Peter, Schaider, Miriam Gudrun, Komposch, Christian, Lipovšek, Saška, Podlesnik, Jan, Paušič, Igor & Raspotnig, Günther, 2021, Hidden diversity within the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae) Part I: Morphological evidence, pp. 1-67 in European Journal of Taxonomy 777</i> on pages 28-30, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.777.1561, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5637112">http://zenodo.org/record/5637112</a>
Nemastoma bidentatum subsp. martensi Novak & Novak & Kozel & Schaider & Komposch & Lipovšek & Podlesnik & Paušič & Raspotnig 2021, ssp. nov.
No full textNemastoma bidentatum martensi ssp. nov. × N. bidentatum schmidti ssp. nov. Figs 3, 9O Nemastoma (Stridulostoma) seliskari Hadži, 1973a: 48, figs 33c, 37a−e. Nemastoma bidentatum bidentatum – Martens 1978: 107 [partim: Nemastoma (Stridulostoma) seliskari Hadži, 1973]. Nemastoma bidentatum bidentatum × N. bidentatum sparsum – Novak & Gruber 2000: 286 [partim: Novo mesto, Mt. Mirna gora]. Nemastoma bidentatum pluridentatum – Schönhofer 2013: 36 [partim: Nemastoma (Stridulostoma) seliskari Hadži, 1973, and Nemastoma seliskari Hadži, 1973]. Diagnosis Typical male hybrids with Ch basal article with large hump in front of dorsal indentation, Ch-Apo with knee-like frontal flexion and narrowly drawn out upper portion, Pa-Fe club-shaped, but thinner than in N. b. schmidti ssp. nov., with four simple, equidistant ventral spines in distal Pa-Fe half, and Pa-Ti with minute hump. Material examined SLOVENIA – VL15 • 1 ♂; Prelože pri Lokvi; 27 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (310/2011); PMSL. – VL35 • 3 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Ribnica – Ostrožno Brdo; 27 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (324/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL. – VL53 • 1 ♂; Zabiče; 27 Sep. 2011; L. Slana Novak and T. Novak leg. (301/2011, rev. 2015); PMSL. – WL05 • 1 ♂; Mt. Mirna gora; 28 Jul. 1948; A. Seliškar leg; PMSL. – WL17 • 1 ♂; Novo Mesto; Karaman leg. (107/1983 microscopic preparation, JH det., TN rev. 2017); PMSL. Remarks In Hadži’s original preparation, labelled “ Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer pulli”, with two cover glasses on the same microscope slide, there are two males and a female. One male corresponds to the type specimen of Nemastoma (Stridulostoma) seliskari Hadži, 1973 (Hadži 1973a). For this species, Hadži (ibid.) founded a new subgenus Stridulostoma based on the existence of an alleged “stridulatory organ” on the Fe III (Hadži 1973a: figs 37č–d). Gruber (1976: 797) explained that the stridulatory organ alone does not justify establishing of a new subgenus, especially because this new species differs from N. (Lugubrostoma) triste pluridentatum Hadži, 1973 exclusively by possession of this organ, and accordingly, synonymized Stridulostoma with Nemastoma. Following these remarks, Schönhofer (2013: 36) synonymized N. seliskari with N. b. pluridentatum. We found that the portion of the Fe III, identified by Hadži (1973a) as a stridulatory organ in the type specimen, is in fact a depression-damage, caused by desiccation. Moreover, such damage is present in nearly all (sic!) the other femora of this freshly moulted specimen, but nothing resembles the fine lamellated structure shown in Hadži’s drawing (1973a: figs 37č–d). No similar structure was found in the specimens of Nemastoma collected later on Mt. Mirna gora. One might imagine that a careless inspection under a microscope at low magnification could result in the illusion of a ʻstridulatory organʼ. However, the drawing of its lamellae cannot be considered anything but a pure fabrication. Moreover, Pa-Fe in Hadži (1973a: fig. 33c), being under the same cover glass in the preparation, belongs to the same specimen, although Hadži (ibid.) ascribed it to N. (Lugubrostoma) triste pluridentatum. See remark under N. pluridentatum stat. nov.Published as part of Novak, Tone, Novak, Ljuba Slana, Kozel, Peter, Schaider, Miriam Gudrun, Komposch, Christian, Lipovšek, Saška, Podlesnik, Jan, Paušič, Igor & Raspotnig, Günther, 2021, Hidden diversity within the Nemastoma bidentatum Roewer, 1914 complex (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae) Part I: Morphological evidence, pp. 1-67 in European Journal of Taxonomy 777 on pages 45-46, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.777.1561, http://zenodo.org/record/563711
Thomas Novak named Charles T. Holland Professor
No full textThomas Novak, of Blacksburg, professor and head of the Department of Mining and Minerals Engineering in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech, has been named the Charles T. Holland Professor of Mining and Minerals Engineering by the Virginia Tech Board of Visitors at its quarterly meeting Monday, Nov 8
Hadzinia ferrani Novak & Kozel 2014, sp. n.
No full textHadzinia ferrani sp. n. Figs 1–25. Material examined. Holotype: ♂, the Ferranova buža cave, the Cave Cadastre No. 8085, N 45°58´35˝, E 14°15´07˝, Mt. Ulovka (801 m), Zaplana, Vrhnika, Slovenia, 29.XII.2012, the cave section of Hamex, - 75 m, on a flowstone concretion named Animal Planet, M. Ferran leg.: 1 ♂ and a ♂ chitinous remains−exuvium? (TN 1/2013; TN = Coll. T. Novak, finally in the Nat. Hist. Mus. of Slovenia, Ljubljana); 06.VIII.2005, the cave section of Stotka, - 100 m, on a wet wall, M. Ferran leg.: 1 juvenile (paratype) (TN 67/2013); 26.I.2013, Stotka, on a wet wall: 1 ♀ (allotype) (TN 2/2013), T. Novak leg.; 16.II.2013, Stotka: 1 ♀ (TN 2/2013) and Animal Planet: 1 ♀ (paratypes) (TN 68/2013), T. Novak, N. Matijević leg.; 11.IV.2014, Hodnik, - 170m, T. Delić, T. Šuštar, F. Gabrovšek leg.: 1 ♂ (in present courtesy of T. Delić). In addition, two observations are available: 30.IV.2005, Animal Planet, M. Ferran (photo): 1 ex., and 21.−22.IV.2012, - 170 m, A. Bizjak, M. Staut (observation): 1 ex. Diagnosis. Very small (1.1−1.4), highly specialized eyeless troglobiotic Hadzinia, characterized by its low ocular tubercle and long, thin appendages: basal cheliceral article 2/3 as long, and pedipalp 6-times as long as body. Pedipalp tarsus strongly bent ventrally. Glans with sparse, long, rod-like minute spines and a few conical minute spines. As far as has been established, H. ferrani sp. n. is endemic to the karst of Mt. Ulovka (801 m) in central Slovenia. Etymology. The species name ferrani is dedicated in honor of Milan Ferran (Ljubljana), who started the investigations within the Ferranova buža cave, and who discovered and collected the first specimen of this species. Description. Male, holotype: Body length 1.11, body tender, with scutum magnum. Color of body light beige (Figs 1, 2). Dorsum weakly sclerotized, with dense, short (up to 5 µm) mucronate, cuticular microtubercles (microtrichia) covering most of the cephalothorax and abdomen, gradually changing from microtrichia at the cephalothorax edges into dense tuberculate microgranula (Fig. 3). Ocular tubercle low but well pronounced, wider than long, starting half its length behind the anterior edge of the dorsal scutum. Cuticle of cephalothorax thicker in the center and thinner towards the edges, with scattered oval and irregularly shaped spots of thiner parts (Fig. 4). Eyes completely reduced, but former position indicated by round cuticular spots, where probably the reduced optical nerves emerged (seen under fluorescence; Fig. 4). Supracheliceral lamellae large, with straight frontal margin and mammillary tubercles, similar to those in female (Fig. 20) and H. karamani (Karaman, 2013, fig. 15). Coxae and ventral side of the body with sparse long setae in a transverse row close to the posterior border of each sternite (Figs 2, 21). Setae longest on pedipalp coxae. Chelicerae intense reddish-brown, long and slender (Figs 7, 9, 10), without apophysis and gland openings, resembling those of Nemaspela species. Lengths of basal article, distal article and movable finger, 0.78, 0.92 and 0.37, respectively. Basal segment basally and terminally widened, without apophysis and glandular pores, with an antero-superior group of three long bristles. Distal segment slender, elongated, frontally evenly set with long bristles, the longest ones as long as the article diameter. Fixed finger with two large black teeth and a series of 14 diaphanous teeth at the base; movable finger with six large teeth, becoming lower and longer towards the apex of the finger, and a series of 13 diaphanous teeth. Pedipalps light reddish-brown, without secondary sexual differences (Figs 6, 12), very long, slender, with scattered, very densely set clavate glandular setae on all articles, except trochanter, diminishing in size from femur till tarsus, and giving a voluminous appearance in living animals. Femur subterminally crooked ventrally, with a few dense short setae disto-dorsally. Patella as long as femur, distally slightly bent, with a group of short setae proximally and one long bristle distally. Tibia distally gradually narrowing. Tarsus long, slightly club-like and ventrally conspicuously bent at an angle of ca. 45°, with two long bristles. For lengths of articles, see Table 1. Legs (Fig. 5; Table 1) beige with darker article endings, very long and thin (L body: L leg II = 1: 22.7), with up to 22 pseudoarticulations (in metatarsus II). Claws simple, straight in preserved specimens (Fig. 5). Leg articles cylindrical, with dense cover of fine bristles, interspersed by few long ones (Fig. 5). Penis (Figs 8, 11; 21, here pay attention to protruding glans) longer than body (possibly caused by body shrinkage in alcohol), 1.22 long, glans 0.13, basis 0.20. Truncus dorsally bent, with nearly parallel margins, narrowest in the middle, slightly dorso-ventrally flattened. Basis straight, oval elongated, incised for about half its length. Glans brownish, elongated barrel-like and slightly wider than truncus, terminally truncated with a pair of conspicuous lateral humps encompassing medial furrow, with sparse long rod-like minute spines and few conical minute spines. Stylus emerging subapically, on the ventral side in the middle of terminal glans furrow between lateral humps (dorsal view). Female: Body length 1.40, whitish to slightly reddish-brown (Figs 14, 15, 22, 23, 24). Chelicerae as in male, somewhat more robust (Figs 16, 17). Lengths of basal article, distal article and movable finger 0.80, 0.98 and 0.42, respectively. Pedipalps (Fig. 13) as in male, lengths of articles see Table 1. Legs (Table 1; Figs 23, 24, distal tarsomerae Fig. 18) as in male, but relatively shorter. Claws as in male. Ovipositor (Fig. 19) ca. 0.45 long, receptacula seminis apparently monovesicular, less than 10 µm, either undeveloped in examined specimens (n=2) or very difficult to see. Relationships. Presently, H. ferrani sp. n. is the only other species described from the genus Hadzinia. Hadzinia ferrani sp. n. can be distinguished from H. karamani especially by its overall slender segments: relatively very long and slender chelicerae in H. ferrani sp. n. vs. relatively short and robust in H. karamani, straight and subterminally crooked vs. sinusoidally curved pedipalp femur, slender vs. thick patella, elongated barrel-shaped vs. truncated cone-like glans, and by long rod-like minute spines besides a few conical ones in H. ferrani sp. n. vs. only conical spines in H. karamani. Distribution. Hadzinia ferrani sp. n. has been found only in the Ferranova buža cave. The species is thus likely endemic to the western Dinaric karst, and probably restricted to the karstic region of Mt. Ulovka (801 m) in central Slovenia. Ecology. In the Ferranova buža cave, all records were taken from a depth of over 70 m beneath the surface where temperatures yielded 7.6 to over 10°C. Individuals were found on bare wet limestone walls beside trickling and seeping water, sometimes showered by water droplets, and on wet flowstone concretions and walls. Their relatively long appendages suggest adaptation to spacious habitats, while their movable, pointed claws enable efficient clinging in slippery and water-drenched sites. This indicates that H. ferrani sp. n. probably prefers terrestrial phreatic habitat sensu Jeannel (1926), i. e., habitats consisting of tiny water trickles in aerated channels inaccessible to humans. These channels originate in the epikarst and pass into the deep karstic massifs (Novak et al. 2012).Published as part of Novak, Tone & Kozel, Peter, 2014, Hadzinia ferrani, sp. n. (Opiliones: Nemastomatidae), a highly specialized troglobiotic harvestman from Slovenia, pp. 135-145 in Zootaxa 3841 (1) on pages 136-137, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3841.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/492830
MODELING AND DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE T BEAMS
No full textNosilec predstavlja osnovni konstrukcijski element v gradbenih konstrukcijah. Z monolitno izvedbo nosilca in plošče dobimo ugoden T prerez z veliko tlačno cono in majhno natezno površino. V moderni dobi gradbenega projektiranja je elektronska obdelava podatkov spremenila način dela, zato je ob vsej količini podatkov in kompleksnosti modelov nujno poznavanje delovanja programov. V diplomskem delu je podana primerjava ustreznosti različnih računalniških modelov, ugotavlja se natančnost, ki je potrebna za vsakdanjo inženirsko prakso. Podana je tudi analitična kontrola nekaterih rezultatov.Beam represents a basic structural element in buildings. With monolithic construction of beam and slab together an advantageous T section with large compression and small tension zone is created. In a modern age of civil engineering design electronic data processing changed a way of work, therefore of all data quantity and model complexity, knowledge how program functions is necessary. A comparison of suitability of various computer models is given in this diploma. Accuracy needed for everyday engineering practice is being found. Analytical control of some results is also given
Prometno-varnostna analiza krožnih križišč na državnem cestnem omrežju : diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa
No full textDetermination of measurement uncertainty of sampling and preparation of the digestate based on measurements of heavy metals, total nitrogen and organic matter content
No full textAnaerobna digestija (AD) je biološki proces, ki preoblikuje začetni substrat (ingestat) v želeni produkt (bioplin) in v trdni tekoči stranski produkt (digestat oziroma pregnito blato). Je široko uporabljena in fleksibilna tehnologija. Zaradi njene fleksibilnosti so za surovino pri postopku primerne različne vrste organskih snovi. Za surovino lahko zato uporabimo organske komunalne odpadke, blato pri čiščenju odpadnih voda, odpadke iz živilskopredelovalne industrije in kmetijske odpadke, kot so gnoj in ostanki rastlin. Digestat z bioplinom predstavlja končne izdelke anaerobne digestije (AD). Digestat je snov, bogata s hranili in se lahko uporablja kot gnojilo. Digestat ni kompost, čeprav ima nekaj podobnih značilnosti, razlika med njima je ta, da kompost proizvajajo aerobni mikroorganizmi, kar pomeni, da je za proces potreben kisik. Z uporabo digestata, namesto sintetičnih gnojil, ki so pridobljena iz zemeljskega plina, lahko prihranimo energijo, zmanjšamo porabo fosilnih goriv in ogljični odtis. V digestatu so vedno prisotni dušik, fosfor in kalij, teh pa v bioplinu ne najdemo. Glavna pomanjkljivost digestata je, da je mešanica hranil vedno vnaprej določena in je ni mogoče spremeniti.
Namen magistrske naloge je bil določiti vsebnost težkih kovin, skupnega dušika in organske snovi v digestatu ter njihove merilne negotovosti.
Merilna negotovost pomeni dvom v meritve, ki so bile izvedene. Je parameter, ki označuje območje razpršenih vrednosti in jih je mogoče smiselno pripisati merjeni veličini. V območju razpršenosti se nahaja prava vrednost rezultata.
V teoretičnem delu so podrobneje opisane značilnosti anaerobne digestije in digestata ter merilne negotovosti. V eksperimentalnem delu pa so prikazane metode in rezultati določevanja merilne negotovosti vzorčenja in priprave v digestatu na podlagi meritev vsebnosti naših parametrov.Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a biological process that transforms the starting substrate (ingestate) into the desired product (biogas) and into a solid liquid by-product digestate. It is a widely used and flexible technology. Due to its flexibility, different types of organic matter are suitable for the raw material of the process. Organic municipal waste, sewage sludge, waste from the food processing industry and agricultural waste such as manure and plant residues can therefore be used as raw material. Digestate with biogas represents the end products of anaerobic digestion (AD). Digestate is a nutrient-rich substance that can be used as a fertilizer. Digestate is not compost, although it has some similar characteristics, the difference between them is that compost is produced by aerobic microorganisms, which means that oxygen is required for the process. Using digestate instead of synthetic fertilizers derived from natural gas can save energy, reduce fossil fuel consumption and carbon footprint. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium are always present in the digestate and are not found in biogas. The main disadvantage of digestate is that the nutrient mix is always pre-determined and cannot be changed.
The purpose of the master\u27s thesis was to determine the content of heavy metals, total nitrogen and organic matter in the digestate and their measurement uncertainty.
Measurement uncertainty implies doubts about the measurements that have been made. It is a parameter that indicates the range of scattered values that can be reasonably attributed to the measured magnitude. The true value of the result is found in the dispersion zone.
The theoretical part describes in more detail the characteristics of anaerobic digestion and digestate and the measurement uncertainty. In the experimental part the methods and results of determining the uncertainty of sampling and preparation in the digestate are presented on the basis of measurements of the content of our parameters
Application of a Mobile Phone in Primary School Education
No full textZa vnos sprememb v pouk, način in dinamiko dela ima učitelj na voljo različne didaktične strategije, ki so se razvijale skozi zgodovino razvoja pedagogike. Uporaba le-teh znotraj pouka učencem nudi razvoj sposobnosti in spretnosti, ki jih učenci dosegajo preko lastne miselne aktivnosti in dela. Z vključitvijo mobilnega telefona k didaktičnim strategijam se motivacija, splošno zanimanje in načini za odkrivanje novega znanja še dodatno povečajo.
Namen magistrske naloge je bil izdelati model uporabe mobilnega telefona pri pouku, ki smo ga naredili na podlagi teoretičnih izhodišč in rezultatov anketnega vprašalnika.
V teoretičnem delu naloge smo se osredotočili na didaktične strategije, ki jih učitelji lahko uporabljajo pri pouku, pri čemer smo vključili tudi uporabo mobilnega telefona in navedli njegove prednosti pri delu v šoli. V raziskavi, ki smo jo naredili z anketnim vprašalnikom, je sodelovalo 21 predmetnih učiteljev iz različnih osnovnih šol. V raziskavi nas je zanimalo, ali učitelji v pouk vključujejo mobilni telefon in katere didaktične strategije znotraj pouka uporabljajo. Rezultati so pokazali, da uporaba mobilnega telefona pri učiteljih še ni tako razširjena, pri tistih, ki ga pa uporabljajo, pa je uporaba omejena na posamezne teme, ki jih učitelji izberejo. Pri pouku učitelji najpogosteje uporabljajo timski, projektni in problemski pouk, v okviru katerih mobilni telefon vključujejo občasno, in sicer le ob določenih temah.To make changes in teaching, in the manner and dynamics of work, the teacher has various didactic strategies at his disposal, that have advanced throughout the history of the development of pedagogy. The use of these strategies within the classroom allows pupils to develop abilities and skills through their own mental activity and work. With the inclusion of the mobile phone in didactic strategies the motivation, general interest and ways of discovering new knowledge increase even more. The purpose of our master\u27s thesis was to create a model of mobile phone use in the classroom, which was made on the basis of theoretical starting points and the results of the questionnaire. In the theoretical part of the thesis, we focused on the didactic strategies that teachers can use in class, including the use of a mobile phone and listing its advantages in school work. The research conducted with a questionnaire involved 21 subject teachers from different primary schools. In the research we were interested in whether teachers include a mobile phone in their classes and what didactic strategies they use within the lectures. The results showed that the use of mobile phones by teachers is not yet so widespread, and for those who use it, the use is limited to individual topics that teachers choose. In class, teachers often use team, project and problem-based lessons, in which they turn on their mobile phones occasionally, only on certain topics
Regional geography of the country Senegal/Africa with an emphasis on the possibilities of cooperation with Slovenia
No full textV magistrskem delu smo proučevali državo Senegal s poudarkom na naravnih in družbenih podatkih. V teoretičnem delu smo predstavili naravnogeografske in družbenogeografske značilnosti Senegala ter izpostavili najpogostejše okoljske probleme. V nadaljevanju smo ugotavljali, kakšno je gospodarsko sodelovanje med Senegalom in Slovenijo ter ugotovili, da med državama ne potekajo večji projekti z izjemo projekta za zagotavljanje samooskrbe v sodelovanju Mednarodnega centra za ekoremediacije in Zavoda Most – povezava Evrope in Afrike. V empiričnem delu smo opravljali intervju z direktorjem Afriških naložb o Senegalu na področju politike, zdravstva, vodne oskrbe, izobraževanja, kmetijstva in turizma. Rezultate smo analizirali z metodo kodiranja in jih prikazali z njeno zadnjo fazo, tj. z formuliranjem teorije. Senegal ima ugodno geografsko lego, saj leži na križišču večjih prometnih poti. Ker je to ravninska država, se ljudje v večini ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom, ki je najpomembnejša gospodarska dejavnost, vendar je kmetijska produktivnost v zadnjih letih slabša zaradi dezertifikacije in deforestacije. Poleg teh so bile v rezultatih izpostavljene klimatske spremembe, ki povzročajo spreminjanje pokrajine, kar se kaže v dvigovanju morske gladine in degradaciji ekosistemov. Polovica vsega prebivalstva je revnega in izpostavljenega lakoti ter pomanjkanju osnovne zdravstvene oskrbe. V državi prevladuje mlado prebivalstvo, ki pa zaradi slabše dostopnosti do izobraževalnih ustanov nima enakih možnosti za izobraževanje. Pomanjkanje ustreznega cestnega in železniškega prometa v državi se kaže tudi v slabši turistični razvitosti. Na podlagi podrobnega poznavanja države Senegal, njenih potencialov in potreb smo oblikovali dva projekta kot možnost sodelovanja med Slovenijo ter Senegalom na področju razvoja trajnostnega turizma in zagotavljanja kakovostnega izobraževanja ter lokalne samooskrbe.In the master\u27s thesis we studied the country of Senegal with an emphasis on natural and social data. In the theoretical part, we presented the natural-geographical and socio-geographical characteristics of Senegal and highlighted the most common environmental problems. In addition, we determined the economic cooperation between Senegal and Slovenia and found that no major projects are underway between the two countries, with the exception of the project for ensuring self-sufficiency, in cooperation with the International Center for Eco remediation and the Most Institute - Connecting Europe and Africa. In the empirical part, we conducted an interview with the director for African Investment of Senegal in the fields of politics, healthcare, water supply, education, agriculture and tourism. The results were analyzed by the coding method and presented with its last phase - the formulation of the theory. Senegal has a favorable geographical location, as it lies at the crossroads of major traffic routes. Because it is a flat country, most people are engaged in agriculture, which is the most important economic activity, but agricultural productivity has deteriorated in recent years due to desertification and deforestation. In addition to these, the results highlighted climate change, which is causing landscape change, which is reflected in rising sea levels and the degradation of ecosystems. Half of the total population is poor, starving and lacks basic health care. The country has a predominantly young population, who do not have equal opportunities for education due to poor access to educational institutions. The lack of adequate road and railway transport in the country is also reflected in poorer tourism development. Based on the detailed knowledge of the country of Senegal, its potentials and needs, we designed two projects as an opportunity for cooperation between Slovenia and Senegal in the field of sustainable tourism development, provision of quality education and local self-sufficiency
- …
