1,720,966 research outputs found

    Auditory evoked potentials for monitoring during anaesthesia: a study of data quality

    No full text
    The auditory evoked potential termed the middle latency response (MLR) has been suggested as an indicator of adequacy of anaesthesia during surgery. However, the response is small and must be extracted from high levels of background noise. A key consideration in using the MLR for clinical monitoring is whether data quality is sufficient to detect small changes. The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of the MLR recorded during anaesthesia, as a rigorous analysis of data quality is lacking in many studies. MLR recordings from patients sedated in intensive care after cardiac surgery were compared to recordings from a reference group of young volunteers with normal hearing. Data quality was measured with the Fsp parameter. A bootstrap analysis was used to measure statistical response presence and to detect within-subject changes during clinical anaesthesia. Noise levels were high in the normative group probably due to myogenic and EEG activity. With 5 Hz click stimulation, MLR presence in the normative group was below 30%. Response presence improved using stimulation paradigms with chirps or maximum length sequences and reached 100% with a combination of maximum length sequences and chirps. Fsp values generally improved during anaesthesia as noise levels reduced and MLR presence was 100% for MLS click stimulation. Changes in the MLR amplitude with propofol infusion rate were small. Some within-subject changes in MLR amplitude were detected using the bootstrap analysis, but 100% detection was not possible. Conclusion: Obtaining good quality MLR data in awake subjects is challenging. Data quality improves during clinical anaesthesia and with advanced stimulation methods, but reliable detection of changes in the MLR for clinical monitoring remains a challenge

    Optimal nonlinear filter to remove random impulses from Gaussian noise

    No full text
    This paper investigates the problem of removing random impulse noise from a white signal of Gaussian distribution. A nonlinear polynomial filter is used, whose coefficients are optimised using an exact least squares method. The method relies on exploiting the differing probability distributions of the impulsive noise and the Gaussian signal. The paper then looks at the effect of both the polynomial order and the normalised spike amplitude on the mean squared error and signal to noise ratio. The results are compared to the results found using a simple clipping filter. The results show that the optimal filter gives a much improved performance over the simple clipping filter in reducing the mean square error

    Applying bootstrap techniques to detect differences in auditory evoked potentials: possible use in anaesthesia monitoring

    No full text
    This paper extends the use of the bootstrap method to detect significant differences between Auditory Evoked Potentials with the potential application of detecting changes due to anaesthesia. Monte-Carlo simulation confirmed the expected false positive rate for the technique. Recordings were made from normal hearing volunteers and patients undergoing anaesthesia using a number of stimulation paradigms. Although small differences in Evoked Potentials appear to the eye, these were not always found to be statistically significant which depends on both the magnitude of the difference and the quality of the recordings. Preliminary effects during anaesthesia are described

    Validation and application of a computational model for wrist and hand movements using surface markers

    Full text link
    A kinematic model is presented based on surface marker placement generating wrist, metacarpal arch, fingers and thumb movements. Standard calculations are used throughout the model and then applied to the specified marker placement. A static trial involving eight unimpaired participants was carried out to assess inter-rater reliability. The standard deviations across the data were comparable to manual goniometers. In addition, a test retest trial of ten unimpaired participants is also reported to illustrate the variability of movement at the wrist joint, metacarpal arch, and index finger as an example of model output when repeating the same task many times. Light and heavyweight versions of the tasks are assessed and characteristics of individual movement strategies presented. The participant trial showed moderate correlation in radial/ulnar deviation of the wrist ( = 0 65), and strong correlation in both metacarpal arch joints ( = 075 and = 085), the MCP ( = 079), and PIP ( = 087) joints of the index finger. The results indicate that individuals use repeated strategies of movement when lifting light and heavyweight versions of the same object, but showed no obvious repeated pattern of movement across the population
    corecore