78 research outputs found
Angiography‐derived fractional flow reserve : more or less physiology?
No full textEvidence robustly demonstrates that ischemia, rather than anatomy, is the optimal target for coronary revascularization. In the cardiac catheter laboratory, fractional flow reserve (FFR) and corresponding diastolic indices are regarded as the gold standard for physiological lesion assessment and ischemia detection (Table 1). Yet, despite a wealth of supporting data and indications in international guidelines, the use of FFR remains surprisingly low in the diagnostic assessment of coronary artery disease across the world.1, 2 To address this, multiple groups have developed methods for computing FFR from invasive angiography, without the need for passing a pressure wire or inducing hyperemia, thus removing the main barriers to uptake. Angiography‐derived FFR therefore has the potential to extend the benefits of physiological coronary lesion assessment to considerably more patients. Given the size of the interventional cardiology market, clinical and commercial motivation to deliver these tools as quickly as possible could hardly be greater. Several models are now approved as medical devices. Imminently, physicians and healthcare providers will have to decide whether to use these tools. But do they truly deliver physiology, and are they accurate enough? There are 3 particular areas of that deserve close scrutiny
High sensitivity troponin in the management of tachyarrhythmias
No full textBackground: The introduction of the highly sensitive troponin (hs-trop) assays into clinical practice has allowed for the more rapid diagnosis or exclusion of type 1 myocardial infarctions (T1MI) by clinicians, in addition type 2 myocardial infarctions (T2MI) are now more frequently detected. Tachyarrhythmias are one of the common causes of T2MI, the medium and long term outcome for this cohort of T2MI is yet to be clarified. Methods: Retrospective review of consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of either (a) non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or (b) tachyarrhythmia was performed. Data were collected on patient demographics and investigations. Patient mortality status was recorded through the Personal Demographics Service (PDS) via NHS Digital. Results: A total of 704 patients were eligible for inclusion to the study. 264 patients were included in the study with a final discharge diagnosis of NSTEMI and 440 patients with a final discharge diagnosis of tachyarrhythmia. There was a significantly higher peak troponin in NSTEMI patients compared to the tachyarrhythmia troponin positive group (4552. ng/L vs 571. ng/L, p <. 0.001). Mortality was significantly higher in the troponin positive tachyarrhythmia patients than the troponin negative patients (54 vs 34, 26.2% vs 14.5%, log rank p = 0.003), furthermore, the mortality of NSTEMI and troponin positive tachyarrhythmia patients was similar (55 vs 54, 20.8% vs 26.2%, log rank p = 0.416). Only one patient (0.14%) was given a formal diagnosis of T2MI. Conclusions: These data suggest that troponin positive tachyarrhythmia is not a benign diagnosis, and has a mortality rate similar to NSTEMI. Formal labeling as T2MI is rare in real life practice. More investigation into the detection and management of T2MI and troponin positive arrhythmia patients is now warranted.</p
How do we ensure that more patients receive stroke thrombectomy in the UK?
No full textStroke is the fourth leading cause of death in the UK and the largest cause of long-Term disability (Stroke Association, 2018). In approximately 10% of acute ischaemic strokes, there is occlusion of a large vessel. In these cases, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy is the most effective treatment since, unlike intravenous thrombolysis, it removes thrombus from the cerebral circulation to restore blood flow and thereby mitigates the extent of brain damage (Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, 2021). Despite the proven effectiveness of thrombectomy from multiple randomised controlled trials, only 2% of patients in the UK who have had an ischaemic stroke currently receive mechanical thrombectomy, which means that over 7000 eligible patients per year are unable to access this treatment (Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, 2021). This editorial explores the main barriers to provision of mechanical thrombectomy in the UK and potential mechanisms to overcome them.</p
Effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs surgical aortic valve replacement on all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis: a randomized clinical trial
No full textImportance: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a less invasive alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement and is the treatment of choice for patients at high operative risk. The role of TAVI in patients at lower risk is unclear. Objective: To determine whether TAVI is noninferior to surgery in patients at moderately increased operative risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized clinical trial conducted at 34 UK centers, 913 patients aged 70 years or older with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis and moderately increased operative risk due to age or comorbidity were enrolled between April 2014 and April 2018 and followed up through April 2019. Interventions: TAVI using any valve with a CE mark (indicating conformity of the valve with all legal and safety requirements for sale throughout the European Economic Area) and any access route (n = 458) or surgical aortic valve replacement (surgery; n = 455). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. The primary hypothesis was that TAVI was noninferior to surgery, with a noninferiority margin of 5% for the upper limit of the 1-sided 97.5% CI for the absolute between-group difference in mortality. There were 36 secondary outcomes (30 reported herein), including duration of hospital stay, major bleeding events, vascular complications, conduction disturbance requiring pacemaker implantation, and aortic regurgitation. Results: Among 913 patients randomized (median age, 81 years [IQR, 78 to 84 years]; 424 [46%] were female; median Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk score, 2.6% [IQR, 2.0% to 3.4%]), 912 (99.9%) completed follow-up and were included in the noninferiority analysis. At 1 year, there were 21 deaths (4.6%) in the TAVI group and 30 deaths (6.6%) in the surgery group, with an adjusted absolute risk difference of-2.0% (1-sided 97.5% CI,-∞ to 1.2%; P <.001 for noninferiority). Of 30 prespecified secondary outcomes reported herein, 24 showed no significant difference at 1 year. TAVI was associated with significantly shorter postprocedural hospitalization (median of 3 days [IQR, 2 to 5 days] vs 8 days [IQR, 6 to 13 days] in the surgery group). At 1 year, there were significantly fewer major bleeding events after TAVI compared with surgery (7.2% vs 20.2%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.33 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.45]) but significantly more vascular complications (10.3% vs 2.4%; adjusted HR, 4.42 [95% CI, 2.54 to 7.71]), conduction disturbances requiring pacemaker implantation (14.2% vs 7.3%; adjusted HR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.43 to 2.94]), and mild (38.3% vs 11.7%) or moderate (2.3% vs 0.6%) aortic regurgitation (adjusted odds ratio for mild, moderate, or severe [no instance of severe reported] aortic regurgitation combined vs none, 4.89 [95% CI, 3.08 to 7.75]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients aged 70 years or older with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis and moderately increased operative risk, TAVI was noninferior to surgery with respect to all-cause mortality at 1 year.</p
Percutaneous coronary intervention of ostial lesions
No full textThis is the first article in the EuroIntervention Tools & Techniques series and deals with the step-wise approach in the percutaneous treatment of coronary ostial disease. The following is an overview of its management and highlights the salient technical features to be covered in the online version. The complete, unabridged chapter with dynamic angiographic images can be viewed at www.eurointervention.org - See more at: http://www.pcronline.com/eurointervention/22nd_issue/81/#sthash.cwhk5cWe.dpu
Invasive management and in-hospital outcomes of myocardial infarction patients in rural versus urban hospitals in the United States
No full textObjectives: The variation in the management and outcome of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between rural and urban settings has been previously recognized, but there has previously been no nationwide data reported that is inclusive of the whole adult population. Methods: All discharge records between 2004 and 2018 with AMI diagnosis were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database and stratified by hospital location. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included (a) major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), (b) major bleeding, (c) acute ischemic stroke, the utilization of invasive management in the form of (d) coronary angiography (CA), and (e) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Results: 9,728,878 records with AMI were identified, of which 1,011,637 (10.4 %) discharges were from rural hospitals. Rural patients were older (median of 71 years vs. 67 years, p < 0.001) and had lower prevalence of the highest risk presentations of AMI than their urban counterparts. After multivariable adjustment, patients from rural hospitals had increased aOR of all-cause mortality (aOR 1.15 95 % CI 1.13–1.16) and MACCE (aOR 1.04 95 % CI 1.04–1.05), as well as the decreased aOR of coronary angiography (aOR 0.29, 95 % CI 0.29–0.29, p < 0.001) and PCI (aOR 0.40, 95 % CI 0.39–0.40, p < 0.001), compared to their urban counterparts. Conclusion: Between 2004 and 2018, the risk of in-hospital mortality and MACCE in AMI patients was significantly higher in rural hospitals, with considerably lower utilization of invasive angiography and revascularization.</p
Correspondence. Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and acute heart failure in tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy
No full textDesign and rationale of the RIPCORD 2 trial (does routine pressure wire assessment influence management strategy at coronary angiography for diagnosis of chest pain?): A randomized controlled trial to compare routine pressure wire assessment with conventional angiography in the management of patients with coronary artery disease
No full textBackground: Investigation of anginal chest pain has traditionally involved either assessment of the coronary anatomy by angiography or noninvasive testing for reversible ischemia. Invasive pressure wire assessment at the time of angiography offers information on both anatomy and physiology. Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with lower resource utilization and improved clinical outcome compared with angiographic guidance alone. However, the value of routine fractional flow reserve of all major coronary vessels at the time of diagnostic angiography has not been established in a randomized trial despite persuasive observational data. A change in practice to routine fractional flow reserve assessment of all major vessels during diagnostic angiography would require evidence not just of clinical benefit but also of cost effectiveness. This randomized trial aims to test that strategy. Methods and Results: RIPCORD 2 (Does Routine Pressure Wire Assessment Influence Management Strategy at Coronary Angiography for Diagnosis of Chest Pain?) is an 1100 patient prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Participants are randomized, after initial coronary angiography, and in equal proportion, to assessment and management according to (1) conventional angiography only or (2) additional routine pressure wire assessment in all epicardial vessels of sufficient size to be amenable to revascularization. The primary economic outcome measure will be a comparison of healthcare costs at 1 year. The primary quality-of-life outcome measure analysis will compare patient-reported quality-of-life scores at 1 year. Secondary outcome measures include clinical events at 1 year, management strategy (optimal medical therapy with or without revascularization), and angina status at 1 year according to Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina grade. Conclusions: The aim of the RIPCORD 2 trial is to assess whether a strategy of routine fractional flow reserve-guided assessment and management of all major coronary arteries will be associated with more effective resource utilization, improved quality of life, and better clinical outcome, compared with angiographic guidance alone.</p
Relation of frailty to outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention
No full textThere is growing awareness that frailty may be an important marker of adverse outcomes in PCI but there is no literature from national cohorts. This study examines a national cohort of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) regarding the prevalence of frailty, changes over time, and associated outcomes. The National Inpatients Sample was used to identify adults who underwent PCI procedures between 2004 and 2014. Frailty risk was measured using a validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) using the cutoffs <5, 5-15 and >15 for low, intermediate and high HFRS. From 7,306,007 admissions, a total of 94.58% of admissions were for patients who had a low HFRS(<5), 5.39% had an intermediate HFRS(5-15) and 0.03% had a high HFRS(>15). The prevalence of intermediate or high frailty risk patients has increased over time from 1.9% in 2004 to 11.7% in 2014. The incidence of in-hospital death increased from 1.0% with low HFRS to 13.9% with high HFRS. Mean length of stay also increased from 2.9 days to 17.1 days from low to high HFRS. High frailty risk was independently associated with an OR 9.91 95%CI 7.17-13.71 for in-hospital death, OR 4.99 95%CI 3.82-6.51 for bleeding and OR 3.96 95%CI 3.00-5.23 for vascular injury as compared to patients with low risk of HFRS. While rare in frequency overall, frailty is increasing in prevalence in recent years and intermediate and high HFRS associated with increased odds of mortality compared to low risk of frailty.</p
Does the routine availability of CT–Derived FFR influence management of patients with stable chest pain compared to CT angiography alone? The FFRCT RIPCORD Study.
No full textOBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the effect of adding computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) data to computed tomography angiographic (CTA) data alone for assessment of lesion severity and patient management in 200 patients with chest pain.BACKGROUND: Invasive and noninvasive tests used in the assessment of patients with angina all have disadvantages. The ideal screening test for patients presenting for the first time with chest pain would describe both coronary anatomy and the presence of ischemia and would be readily accessible, low cost, and noninvasive.METHODS: Two hundred patients with stable chest pain underwent CTA for clinical reasons, and FFRCT was calculated. Three experienced interventional cardiologists assessed the CTA result for each patient and by consensus developed a management plan (optimal medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or more information required). FFRCT data for each vessel were then revealed, and the interventional cardiologists made a second plan by consensus, using the same 4 options. The primary endpoint for the study was the difference between the 2 strategies.RESULTS: Overall, after disclosure of FFRCT data there was a change in the allocated management category on the basis of CTA alone in 72 cases (36%). This difference is explained by a discordance between the CTA- and FFRCT-derived assessments of lesion severity. For example, FFRCT was >0.80 in 13 of 44 vessels (29.5%) graded as having a stenosis>90%. In contrast, FFRCT was #0.80 in 17 of 366 vessels (4.6%) graded as having stenosis #50%.CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates proof of concept that the availability of FFRCT results has a substantial effect on the labeling of significant coronary artery disease and therefore on the management of patients compared to CTA alone. Further studies are needed to determine whether FFRCT has potential as a noninvasive diagnostic and management screening tool for patients with stable chest pain
- …
