9,880 research outputs found
Chapter 14: MD Anderson Publications and Publication Ethics
Dr. Goepfert has served on a number of editorial boards and is keenly interested in the educational dissemination of information critical to cancer research. In this section he talks about some of MD Anderson’s publications and also addresses some controversies with publication. He first raises the ethical issue of how authorship is assigned to a manuscript going out for publication. Today there are guidelines for assigning authorship, but twenty years ago, he explains, some department chairs at MD Anderson reviewed all manuscripts going for publication and insisted on being listed as first author of an article, whether they made any contribution to the research or not. Dr. Goepfert contrasts his own practice of putting his name on a paper only if he has contributed. Dr. Goepfert then shifts subjects and describes several MD Anderson educational publications, beginning with Cancer Bulletin, distributed free to all physicians across Texas.https://openworks.mdanderson.org/mchv_interviewchapters/2010/thumbnail.jp
Promise - Spring 2020
Rogers Award honors MD Anderson nursing assistant MD Anderson awards highest nursing honor Low-grade serous ovarian cancer survivor establishes research nonprofit Celebrity Chef Cooking Demo makes young cancer patients sous-chefs for a day Bob’s Encore: hope in the fight against pancreatic cancer Board of Visitors welcomes seven new members Board of Visitors awards highest distinction to longtime member A Conversation with a Living Legend raises 2 million for cancer research, education and prevention Get to know Advance Team’s Laura Nelson Cookbook author leaves her mark on gastric cancer researchhttps://openworks.mdanderson.org/promise/1001/thumbnail.jp
Chapter 09: Creating a New Way of Conducting Research and Caring for Patients in a Changing Environment
In this chapter, Dr. Dmitrovsky provides an overview of how MD Anderson must operate in the new environment of research and healthcare economics. He begins by explaining that scientific endeavors traditionally rely on decisive discoveries by individual investigators that also reveal opportunities to development treatments. Today, he says, this process moves ahead via team- and interdisciplinary science, and the institution must educate the next generations of researchers in this way of conducting research. At the same time, MD Anderson must operate in a context of a flat NIH budget while responding to the new economics of the Affordable Care Act. Next, he notes that MD Anderson is supporting the education of the next generation by making investments in junior faculty with the R. Lee Clark Fellowship Program. He explains the award (juried by experts outside of MD Anderson). Next Dr. Dmitrovsky notes that reductions are being made to the length and complexity of informed consent forms so faculty can spend less time on paperwork and more time for their primary activities. He then speaks briefly about faculty recruitment and retention efforts. Then Dr. Dmitrovsky talks about strategies used to encourage interdisciplinary investigation. He speaks in detail about finding ways to provide team members with proper recognition for their contributions (when contribution is traditionally measured by first or last author status) and linking credit to faculty promotion. He also talks about empowering team members to initiate investigations and provides some examples.https://openworks.mdanderson.org/mchv_interviewchapters/1641/thumbnail.jp
Chapter 09: Strengthening Biomedical Editing Nationwide and Within MD Anderson
In this Chapter, first briefly notes his involvement with the Southwest Chapter of the American Medical Writer’s Association and the Council of Biology Editors (with a 22-year membership). He then explains that he had his biggest impact while he served on the Board of Editors in the Life Sciences and in the late 80s worked on the Editorial Certification Examination Development Committee. He describes the examination he helped create to certify competence for editors of biomedical articles and explains the significance of certification. He notes that the Department of Scientific Publications at MD Anderson uses its own battery of tests to evaluate editors’ abilities for abstract reasoning, grammar, and other skills and talents.
Next, Mr. Pagel talks about his Department’s blog, “The Write Stuff,” and two significant projects: his role on the Historical Resources Center Steering Committee, and the development of panel discussions for the Department of Scientific Publications. To begin the discussion of the Steering Committee, he notes that Scientific Publications wrote The First Twenty Years, the first history of MD Anderson. Because of this association with the institution’s history, Mr. Pagel was asked to be part of the Steering Committee when the Historical Resources Center was formed and set as its first goal the publication of an updated institutional history. Mr. Pagel wanted the perspective to be broader than the first book, situating MD Anderson and cancer research in a larger context of other cancer institutions and the history of cancer research. Though not alone in holding this view, he says he had something to do with articulating it for the benefit of the Steering Committee. He describes how James Olsen was selected to be the author and notes other Steering Committee activities.https://openworks.mdanderson.org/mchv_interviewchapters/2275/thumbnail.jp
E. Harold Shryock, MD
A teacher of the ages, administrator, author, lecturer, ambidextrous artist, trick cyclist, Chair of the Department of Anatomy, and Dean of the School of Medicine of Loma Linda University.All descriptions are taken verbatim from: Portraits of Honored Faculty by S. Wesley Kime, MD. Editor Raymond Herber, MD. (Loma Linda, Calif.: Alumni Association of School of Medicine of Loma Linda University, 2005) and are thus not up-to-date as to positions held or contributions made to Loma Linda University Health
Chapter 09: Reflections on Dr. Clifton Mountain and Data Collection Roles at MD Anderson
Mrs. Hermes begins this chapter with memories of how much she enjoyed working for Dr. Mountain over the course of 25 years. He taught her how to think about data, she explains, and she was listed as an author on a number of publications on lung cancer [see examples below]. She explains that Dr. Mountain left MD Anderson in 1993, but she continued to work freelance for him. She recalls that he set up the first conference on mathematics at MD Anderson, early in his career sometime in the sixties.
Next she comments on how the unique openness of Houston culture fit well with the bold visions that both R. Lee Clark and Eleanor MacDonald held for oncology. She says that her most important work was on Dr. Mountain’s staging system for lung cancer and she explains why staging the disease presented challenges.
She confirms that she was always interested in the implications of basic research for clinical findings. She credits Eleanor MacDonald for helping her to develop her curiosity and questioning style.https://openworks.mdanderson.org/mchv_interviewchapters/2036/thumbnail.jp
Physician Forum - Allergy and Asthma
Welcome to BID-Needham “For Your Health Physician Forum”. My name is Weihong Zheng, MD, an allergist and immunologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham. Here I am going to talk about allergies and asthma, what you should know about them, what they are and how you can improve your symptoms
Library News December 2025
Reducing Barriers to Learning: MD Anderson\u27s OER Initiative How to Navigate Author Instructions (part 1) Best and Worst Books of 2025 A Noteworthy Article about Notable, Noteworthy, and Noticeablehttps://openworks.mdanderson.org/rmlnews25/1011/thumbnail.jp
Joel Glaser, MD: A Scholar\u27s Scholar
Joel Glaser, MD is considered one of the great scholars of neuro-ophthalmology. His published contributions touch nearly every aspect of the field. The principal author of the highly respected textbook Neuro-Ophthalmology, he has trained over 50 fellows who occupy important academic positions across the planet.curriculum_fellow; IC-H1-history-of-neuro-ophthalmolog
Tumeochrysa indica Needham 1909
Tumeochrysa indica Needham, 1909 (Figs 12–14, 54) Tumeochrysa indica Needham, 1909: 204. Type locality: India. Diagnosis and notes It is hard to determine Tumeochrysa indica without examining the male genitalia, but the photographs provided by Needham (1909) for the right fore- and hindwings, and the female genitalia by Ghosh (1991) for T. indica are almost identical to our examined specimens from Pakistan. Therefore, we follow Needham (1909) and Ghosh (1991) and identified our Tumeochrysa specimens to be T. indica. Unfortunately, the male genitalia of the examined specimen was damaged. It is necessary to find the male specimen of T. indica in Pakistan for further verification of our identification. Redescription Measurements (♂ n=1?, ♀ n=1). Forewing: length ♀ 24.0 mm, width 5.7 mm; hindwing: length ♀ 21.5 mm, width 5.1 mm; body length: ♂ 12.0 mm, ♀ 11.8 mm. Head (Figs 13A–H). Vertex yellow, unmarked. Postorbital sclerite yellow, unmarked. Frons, clypeus, genae, and labrum yellow, unmarked. Maxillary and labial palpi yellow, covered with short black setae. Antennal toruli yellow. Antennae shorter than forewing (length 13.7–16.9 mm), yellow, unmarked, covered with short black setae. Scape yellow, more prominent and narrowly separated in males. Thorax (Fig. 13E). Pronotum slightly wider than long (length ♂ 0.90 mm, ♀ 0.94 mm, width ♂ 1.56 mm, ♀ 1.66 mm), yellow, with an indistinct brownish spot laterally, covered with short dark brown setae (Fig. 13G). Meso- and metanotum yellow, sparsely covered with short dark brown setae. Legs (Figs 13A, D). Pale yellow, unmarked, covered with short brownish setae. Pretarsal claws with distinct basal dilation, quadrate at base (Fig. 13I). Wings (Fig. 12). Veins pale green, covered with short brownish setae. Forewing: Costal area relatively narrow at both ends, slightly wider at the longest subcostal veinlets (4–16). Subcostal area with seven crossveins below pterostigma. Pterostigma white. 20 radial cells (r cell); a few radial crossveins at subdistal margin oblique. Three Banksian cells (b cell); nine lower Banksian cells (b’ cell). Basal crossvein between Rs and M (r-m 1) oblique, meets at subdistal margin of im cell. Three series of gradates, outer gradates meet psm; 18 inner gradates (ig), 10 middle gradates (md) and 12 outer gradates (og). Two intramedian cells; first intramedian cell (im1) ovate. Second (m2) and third (m3) median cells of similar size. Three intracubital cells (two closed); first cubital crossvein proximal to second mediocubital crossvein (m-cu2); first (icu1), second (icu2) and third (icu3) intracubital cells of similar size. Hindwing: Veins pale green. Costal area narrow. Subcostal area with seven crossveins below pterostigma. Pterostigma white. 19 radial cells (r cell); radial branches oblique. Three Banksian cells (b cell); eight lower Banksian cells (b’ cell). Three series of gradates, outer gradates meet psm; 15 inner gradates, seven middle gradates (md) and nine outer gradates. Abdomen (Figs 13D–E). Tergum pale yellow, with lateral margins narrowly dark brown stripes, covered with short brown setae. Sternum pale yellow, covered with short brown setae. Female genitalia (Figs 14A–E). Tergum 8 (T8) subtrapezoidal in lateral view. T9+ect quadrate in lateral view. Sternum 7 (S7) quadrate in ventral view. Gonaphophyses lateralis (gl) oblong in lateral view. Callus cerci (cc) oblong, with 36–39 trichobothria. Subgenitale (sg) broad, quadrate, bilobed distally, heavily sclerotized. Spermatheca (sm) small, rounded, doughnut-shaped, with distinct median rounded invagination (inv) in lateral view. Spermathecal duct (sd) long, cylindrical, attached to bursa copulatrix (bc).Published as part of Hassan, Muhammad Asghar & Liu, Xingyue, 2022, The green lacewings of Pakistan (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): a faunal review with new records of genera and species, pp. 1-83 in Zootaxa 5180 (1) on pages 20-21, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5180.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/704082
- …
