217,249 research outputs found
Possible Home of Will Neal
No full textPossible Home of Will Neal. This home is located on the NW junction of route 100 and Route 87 in Fountain Run. It was built in the 1920\u27s and was possibly the home of Will Neal at some point. Neal was a joint owner of the Cheed Neal Coffee Company and was one of the most financially successful people in Fountain Run and Monroe County.
MSS 203 B11 F3 #73https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/mc_bldgs/1017/thumbnail.jp
Letter from Bigelow Neal to Representative Burdick Regarding Grazing, Hunting and Fishing Rights, May 14, 1956
Get PDFThis letter, dated May 14, 1956, from Bigelow Neal of Sanish, North Dakota, to United States (US) Representative Usher Burdick reports on some calls that Neal made to follow up on the Three Affiliated Tribes\u27 hunting, fishing, and grazing rights on the land taken from them for construction of the Garrison Dam. Herman Jahnke informed Neal that tribal members can hunt on their reservation any time they wish. The Indian Agency did not have any opinion or information to provide. Neal spoke with Martin Cross and Neal told Cross that he would write Burdick a letter. Neal indicates that he has enclosed a letter that he hopes will be useful. This letter is not enclosed with this document, but it is likely the letter included in this collection entitled, Letter from Bigelow Neal to Representative Burdick Regarding the Terms of the Taking of Land for Construction of the Garrison Dam, May 14, 1956 which was filed next to this letter in Burdick\u27s papers.
See also:
Letter from Representative Burdick to Bigelow Neal Regarding US House Resolution 9324, April 27, 1956
Letter from Bigelow Neal to Representative Burdick Regarding the Terms of the Taking of Land for Construction of the Garrison Dam, May 14, 1956https://commons.und.edu/burdick-papers/1307/thumbnail.jp
Letter from Bigelow Neal to Representative Burdick Regarding Garrison Dam Pool Level, June 17, 1949
Get PDFThis letter, dated June 17, 1949, from Garrison, North Dakota resident Bigelow Neal to United States (US) Representative Usher Burdick concerns the operating pool level of Garrison Dam. In the letter Neal states he is concerned with how great of a difference in flooding there will be between 1,830 feet and 1,850 feet operating levels. He also suggests that the engineers in charge of valuing the flooded lands overlooked that residents of the area consider one acre of bottomland to be worth two to three acres of high prairie, meaning that the engineer\u27s number, 400,000 acres flooded, does not accurately capture the effects of the flooding. The letter concludes with a critique of how the dam was built bottom-side-up, resulting in a silt trap and also making the river unfit for navigation.
See also:
Letter from Representative Burdick to Bigelow Neal Regarding Garrison Dam Pool Level, June 20, 1949https://commons.und.edu/burdick-papers/1304/thumbnail.jp
Employment Recession and Recovery in the 50 States: A Further Update
No full textPrivate-sector Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth ratios and employment recovery rates following the Great Recession are calculated for the 50 states, as well as Census regions and divisions. GDP growth rates measure the ratio of state private sector GDP in 2012 to that in 2007. States with 2012 private-sector GDP levels above their 2007 levels have GDP growth ratios greater than one, while those with private-sector GDP lower than their 2007 levels have ratios below one. Employment recovery rates measure the percentage of each state’s private-sector job losses during the recession that have been recovered as of June 2013. The nation’s private-sector GDP growth ratio is 1.026, and its employment recovery rate is 81.7 percent.This is the third in a series of reports measuring how private-sector employment has changed in the 50 states during the Great Recession and the subsequent recovery.This report was published as Issue Paper Number 36, July 2013, in Rutgers Regional Report
Employment Recession and Recovery in the 50 States
No full textThe goal of this paper is to provide a report of record of the employment performance of the 50 states during the Great Recession and the ensuing recovery period. The analysis presented here uses U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data to consistently measure the changes in private-sector jobs over the course of the employment cycle from July 2003 through June 2011, a period covering economic expansion, recession, and recovery.The nation lost 8,838,000 private-sector jobs over the 25-month period from January 2008 to February 2010, a rate of loss of 7.6 percent. In the job-recovery period from February 2010 through June 2011, the nation regained 2,230,000 private-sector jobs, a rate of increase of 2.1 percent and a recovery of 25.2 percent of all the private-sector job losses of the recession.The first part of this report measures the private-sector employment performance of each of the states and regions of the country. It also measures the shares of each state and region of the national job losses and job gains during the various phases of the employment cycle.The second part of the report measures the duration of the employment recession, the number of private-sector jobs lost, and the rate of job decline for each state. It then measures the duration of the job-recovery period, the number of private-sector jobs gained, the rate of private-sector job gain, and the percentages of job losses that have been recovered for each state. These rates and durations of decline and recovery are compared with the analogous national rates.Rutgers Regional Report Issue Paper 28This report was published as Issue Paper Number 28, September 2011, in Rutgers Regional Report
Employment Recession and Recovery in the 50 States: An Update
No full textJob recovery rates are calculated for all 50 states. The rate measures the percentage of a state’s private-sector employment losses during and after the recession that have been recovered as of June 2012. As a benchmark for comparing individual states, the national private-sector job recovery rate is 49.3 percent.Public-sector employment (federal, state, and local) increased well into the national recession. It was affected by numerous factors (federal countercyclical spending, deep tax-revenue declines for state and local governments, and varying political responses at the state and local levels in terms of tax increases versus service reductions).This report was published as Issue Paper Number 30, August 2012, in Rutgers Regional Report
Neal Lane Memorandum for President Clinton
No full textA weekly report memorandum for President Clinton from Neal Lane, Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). Lane informs Clinton of new legislation that will fund his Information Technology Initiative, Warren Rudman's tesytimony before the House Science Committee on security problems at Department of Eregy (DOE) weapons labs, funding cuts for the global positioning system (GPS) modernization initiative, his meeting with British officials of the Ministry of Defense, and the publication of a new report on the climate changes impacts upon New York City
The economic and fiscal impacts of Hurricane Sandy in New Jersey, a macroeconomic analysis
No full textThis report estimates the macroeconomic and fiscal impacts of Hurricane Sandy on the economy of New Jersey using the R/ECON™ forecasting model of the state’s economy. The model consists of more than 250 quarterly time-series equations and 30 employment sectors.The analysis takes into account both the economic losses resulting from the hurricane and the offsetting positive economic impacts associated with recovery and reconstruction spending in the months and years following the storm.However, the estimates of impacts depend upon the restoration expenditures actually being made. If the funds for these restoration and recovery expenditures are not made available, the offsetting positive impacts to the economy will not occur and the New Jersey economy will be significantly damaged. See Section 3 for estimates of the negative impacts if restoration expenditures are not made.This report was published as Issue Paper Number 34, January 2013, in Rutgers Regional Report
Allen L. Burns and Neal Will, liberated POWs
No full textThis photograph shows Private First Class Allen L. Burns (left), U.S. Army, from Wilmington, Delaware, and Neal Will (right), both prisoners of war liberated and homeward bound aboard a Coast Guard Troop Transport. The are looking at a piece of clothing lined with wool. Will is wearing a M-1943 combat field uniform with the jacket, and Burns is wearing the same uniform without the jacket. Will is a member of the 104th Infantry Division, as signified by the wolf insignia on his left arm. Behind them are woolen blankets and cots
On Casebooks and Canons or Why Bob Jones University Will Never Be Part of the Constitutional Law Canon
Get PDFSymposium: The Canon(s) of Constitutional LawDevins, Neal. (2000). On Case books and Canons or Why Bob Jones University Will Never be Part of the Constitutional Law Canon. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/168059
- …
