1,721,010 research outputs found
sj-docx-1-psp-10.1177_01461672231202756 – Supplemental material for Why Do People Think Individuals in Poverty Are Less Vulnerable to Harm?: Testing the Role of Intuitions About Adaptation
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-psp-10.1177_01461672231202756 for Why Do People Think Individuals in Poverty Are Less Vulnerable to Harm?: Testing the Role of Intuitions About Adaptation by Nathan N. Cheek and Jackson Murray in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p
sj-docx-3-psp-10.1177_01461672231202756 – Supplemental material for Why Do People Think Individuals in Poverty Are Less Vulnerable to Harm?: Testing the Role of Intuitions About Adaptation
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-3-psp-10.1177_01461672231202756 for Why Do People Think Individuals in Poverty Are Less Vulnerable to Harm?: Testing the Role of Intuitions About Adaptation by Nathan N. Cheek and Jackson Murray in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p
sj-docx-2-psp-10.1177_01461672231202756 – Supplemental material for Why Do People Think Individuals in Poverty Are Less Vulnerable to Harm?: Testing the Role of Intuitions About Adaptation
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-2-psp-10.1177_01461672231202756 for Why Do People Think Individuals in Poverty Are Less Vulnerable to Harm?: Testing the Role of Intuitions About Adaptation by Nathan N. Cheek and Jackson Murray in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p
sj-docx-1-psp-10.1177_01461672211064112 – Supplemental material for Choice Set Size Shapes Self-Expression
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-psp-10.1177_01461672211064112 for Choice Set Size Shapes Self-Expression by Nathan N. Cheek, Barry Schwartz and Eldar Shafir in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p
Supplemental Material, spps_Cheek_supplementalmaterial - Are Big Five Traits and Facets Associated With Anchoring Susceptibility?
No full textSupplemental Material, spps_Cheek_supplementalmaterial for Are Big Five Traits and Facets Associated With Anchoring Susceptibility? by Nathan N. Cheek and Julie K. Norem in Social Psychological and Personality Science</p
sj-pdf-1-jig-10.1177_1069031X211073821 - Supplemental material for Choice Deprivation, Choice Overload, and Satisfaction with Choices Across Six Nations
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jig-10.1177_1069031X211073821 for Choice Deprivation, Choice Overload, and Satisfaction with Choices Across Six Nations by Elena Reutskaja, Nathan N. Cheek, Sheena Iyengar and Barry Schwartz in Journal of International Marketing</p
Scholarly Merit in a Global Context: The Nation Gap in Psychological Science
No full textPsychologists from the U.S. are extremely prominent in psychological science, publishing more articles and receiving more citations than researchers from other nations. In this brief article, I review some previous research on this “nation gap” in psychology and highlight relevant data from journals published by the Association for Psychological Science. I then discuss some possible explanations for the nation gap and touch on some of its implications for thinking about scholarly merit and scientific eminence. I hope that the research and data discussed here will stimulate further consideration of the role of author nationality for both judgments of scholarly merit and psychological science more generally
Scholarly Merit in a Global Context: The Nation Gap in Psychological Science
No full textPsychologists from the United States are extremely prominent in psychological science, publishing more articles and receiving more citations than researchers from other nations. In this brief article, I review some previous research on this “nation gap” in psychology and highlight relevant data from journals published by the Association for Psychological Science. I then discuss some possible explanations for the nation gap and touch on some of its implications for thinking about scholarly merit and scientific eminence. I hope that the research and data discussed here will stimulate further consideration of the role of author nationality for both judgments of scholarly merit and psychological science more generally.</jats:p
Face-ism and Objectification in Mainstream and LGBT Magazines.
No full textIn visual media, men are often shown with more facial prominence than women, a manifestation of sexism that has been labeled face-ism. The present research extended the study of facial prominence and gender representation in media to include magazines aimed at lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) audiences for the first time, and also examined whether overall gender differences in facial prominence can still be found in mainstream magazines. Face-ism emerged in Newsweek, but not in Time, The Advocate, or Out. Although there were no overall differences in facial prominence between mainstream and LGBT magazines, there were differences in the facial prominence of men and women among the four magazines included in the present study. These results suggest that face-ism is still a problem, but that it may be restricted to certain magazines. Furthermore, future research may benefit from considering individual magazine titles rather than broader categories of magazines, given that the present study found few similarities between different magazines in the same media category--indeed, Out and Time were more similar to each other than they were to the other magazine in their respective categories
- …
