194,213 research outputs found
Book: The Nath Yogis in Contemporary India
No full textVéronique Bouillier, 2008, Itinérance et vie monastique. Les ascètes Nath Yogis en Inde contemporaine, Paris, Editions de la MSH, 310 p. In this book, Véronique Bouillier gives a description of an Indian Saivaite sect, the Nath Yogis. Through the example of this sect, the social anthropologist examines the main features of Hindu asceticism i.e. the interweaving of a tradition of personal spiritual and ascetic quest and a collective organisation. She suggests that this collective organisation ..
The development of supergravity grand unification: Circa 1982 1985
No full textThe development in the early eighties of supergravity grand unified models with gravity-mediated breaking of supersymmetry has led to a remarkable progress in the study of supersymmetry at colliders, in dark matter and in a variety of other experimental searches in the intervening years since that time. The purpose of this note is to review this development and describe our construction of this theory in the period 1982-1985. © 2012 World Scientific Publishing Company.Aad G, 2012, PHYS LETT B, V716, P1, DOI 10.1016-j.physletb.2012.08.020; Ahmed Z, 2010, SCIENCE, V327, P1619, DOI 10.1126-science.1186112; Ahmed Z, 2009, PHYS REV LETT, V102, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.102.011301; Akula S, 2012, PHYS REV D, V85, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.85.075001; ALVAREZGAUME L, 1983, NUCL PHYS B, V221, P495, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(83)90591-6; Aprile E., ARXIV11042549ASTROPH; ARNOWITT R, 1983, PHYS REV LETT, V50, P232, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.50.232; ARNOWITT R, 1985, PHYS LETT B, V156, P215, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(85)91512-6; ARNOWITT R, 1992, PHYS REV LETT, V69, P725, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.69.725; Arnowitt R., 1962, GRAVITATION INTRO CU; Arnowitt R, 2008, PHYS REV LETT, V100, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.100.231802; ARNOWITT R, 1975, PHYS LETT B, VB 56, P81, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(75)90504-3; Arnowitt R. L., 1983, WORKSH PROBL UN SUP; BAER H, 1994, PHYS REV D, V50, P2148, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.50.2148; BAER H, 1986, PHYS REV LETT, V57, P294, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.57.294; Baer H., 2006, WEAK SCALE SUPERSYMM; BAER H, 1985, PHYS LETT B, V155, P278, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(85)90654-9; BAER H, 1994, PHYS REV D, V50, P4508, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.50.4508; BARBIERI R, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V119, P343, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(82)90685-2; BARBIERI R, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V113, P219, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(82)90825-5; BARGER V, 1994, PHYS REV D, V49, P4908, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.49.4908; Bornhauser S, 2012, EUR PHYS J C, V72, DOI 10.1140-epjc-s10052-012-1887-3; Bouchet FR, 2007, MOD PHYS LETT A, V22, P1857, DOI 10.1142-S0217732307025078; Bueno A., 2007, JHEP, V0704, P041, DOI 10.1088-1126-6708-2007-04-041; CANDELAS P, 1985, NUCL PHYS B, V258, P46, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(85)90602-9; CHAMSEDDINE AH, 1981, PHYS REV D, V24, P3065, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.24.3065; CHAMSEDDINE AH, 1977, NUCL PHYS B, V129, P39, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(77)90018-9; CHAMSEDDINE AH, 1981, NUCL PHYS B, V185, P403, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(81)90326-6; CHAMSEDDINE AH, 1982, PHYS REV LETT, V49, P970, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.49.970; CHAMSEDDINE AH, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V129, P445, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90137-5; Chamseddine AH, 2001, NUCL PHYS B-PROC SUP, V101, P145, DOI 10.1016-S0920-5632(01)01501-8; Chatrchyan S, 2012, PHYS LETT B, V716, P30, DOI 10.1016-j.physletb.2012.08.021; CREMMER E, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V116, P231, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(82)90332-X; CREMMER E, 1983, NUCL PHYS B, V212, P413, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(83)90679-X; CREMMER E, 1979, NUCL PHYS B, V147, P105, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(79)90417-6; DESER S, 1976, PHYS LETT B, V62, P335, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(76)90089-7; DICUS DA, 1983, PHYS REV LETT, V51, P1030, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.51.1030; DICUS DA, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V129, P451, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90138-7; DIMOPOULOS S, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V112, P133, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(82)90313-6; DIMOPOULOS S, 1981, NUCL PHYS B, V193, P150, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(81)90522-8; DIMOPOULOS S, 1981, PHYS REV D, V24, P1681, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.24.1681; Drees M., 2004, SPARTICLES; ELIASSON E, 1984, PHYS LETT B, V147, P65, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(84)90593-8; Ellis J, ARXIV12023262HEPPH; ELLIS J, 1984, NUCL PHYS B, V247, P373, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(84)90555-8; ELLIS J, 1982, NUCL PHYS B, V202, P43, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(82)90220-6; ELLIS J, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V121, P123, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90900-0; ELLIS J, 1984, NUCL PHYS B, V238, P453, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(84)90461-9; FAYET P, 1975, NUCL PHYS B, VB 90, P104, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(75)90636-7; Feldman D, 2007, PHYS REV LETT, V99, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.99.251802; FERRARA S, 1978, PHYS LETT B, V76, P404, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(78)90893-6; FERRARA S, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V123, P214, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90425-2; FREEDMAN DZ, 1976, PHYS REV D, V13, P3214, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.13.3214; GIRARDELLO L, 1982, NUCL PHYS B, V194, P65, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(82)90512-0; GIUDICE GF, 1988, PHYS LETT B, V206, P480, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(88)91613-9; GOLDBERG H, 1983, PHYS REV LETT, V50, P1419, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.50.1419; GOLFAND YA, 1971, JETP LETT-USSR, V13, P323; HABER HE, 1985, PHYS REP, V117, P75, DOI 10.1016-0370-1573(85)90051-1; Hagiwara K, 2011, J PHYS G NUCL PARTIC, V38, DOI 10.1088-0954-3899-38-8-085003; HALL L, 1983, PHYS REV D, V27, P2359, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.27.2359; Heinemeyer S, 2004, NUCL PHYS B, V699, P103, DOI 10.1016-j.nuclphysb.2004.08.014; Herten G., COMMUNICATION; Hoecker A, 2011, NUCL PHYS B-PROC SUP, V218, P189, DOI 10.1016-j.nuclphysbps.2011.06.031; IBANEZ L, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V118, P73, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(82)90604-9; IBANEZ L, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V110, P215; IBANEZ LE, 1984, NUCL PHYS B, V233, P511, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(84)90581-9; IBANEZ LE, 1985, NUCL PHYS B, V256, P218, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(85)90393-1; IBANEZ LE, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V126, P54, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90015-1; INOUE K, 1982, PROG THEOR PHYS, V68, P927, DOI 10.1143-PTP.68.927; KANE GL, 1994, PHYS REV D, V49, P6173, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.49.6173; Komatsu E., 2007, ASTROPHYS J SUPPL SE, V170, P377; Komatsu E., 2003, ASTROPHYS J, V148, P175; Komatsu E, 2011, ASTROPHYS J SUPPL S, V192, DOI 10.1088-0067-0049-192-2-18; KOSOWER DA, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V133, P305, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90152-1; KRAUSS LM, 1983, NUCL PHYS B, V227, P556, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(83)90574-6; Martin S.P., 1998, PERSPECTIVES SUPERSY, P1; NATH P, 1985, PHYS REV D, V32, P2348, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.32.2348; NATH P, 1975, PHYS LETT B, VB 56, P177, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(75)90297-X; Nath P., 1983, 2588 NUB; Nath P., 1987, MOD PHYS LETT A, V2, P331, DOI 10.1142-S0217732387000446; NATH P, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V121, P33, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90196-X; Nath P., 1984, APPL N 1 SUPERGRAVIT; NATH P, 1983, NUCL PHYS B, V227, P121, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(83)90145-1; Nath P., 1984, SUPERSYMMETRY SUPERG, P113; NILLES HP, 1984, PHYS REP, V110, P1, DOI 10.1016-0370-1573(84)90008-5; NILLES HP, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V124, P337, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)91467-3; NILLES HP, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V120, P346, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90460-4; OVRUT BA, 1982, PHYS LETT B, V119, P105, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(82)90255-6; Polonyi J., 1977, FKI197793 U BUD; RAMOND P, 1971, PHYS REV D, V3, P2415, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.3.2415; ROSS GG, 1992, NUCL PHYS B, V377, P571, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(92)90302-R; Rubbia A, 2009, J PHYS CONF SER, V171, DOI 10.1088-1742-6596-171-1-012020; SAKAI N, 1981, Z PHYS C PART FIELDS, V11, P153, DOI 10.1007-BF01573998; SAKAI N, 1982, NUCL PHYS B, V197, P533, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(82)90457-6; SEN A, 1984, PHYS REV D, V30, P2608, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.30.2608; SONI SK, 1983, PHYS LETT B, V126, P215, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(83)90593-2; STELLE KS, 1978, PHYS LETT B, V77, P376, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(78)90581-6; Tonelli G., COMMUNICATION; VOLKOV DV, 1972, JETP LETT+, V16, P438; WEINBERG S, 1982, PHYS REV D, V26, P287, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevD.26.287; WEINBERG S, 1976, PHYS LETT B, V62, P111, DOI 10.1016-0370-2693(76)90062-9; WEINBERG S, 1982, PHYS REV LETT, V48, P1776, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.48.1776; WEINBERG S, 1983, PHYS REV LETT, V50, P387, DOI 10.1103-PhysRevLett.50.387; WESS J, 1974, NUCL PHYS B, VB 70, P39, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(74)90355-1; WESS J, 1974, NUCL PHYS B, VB 78, P1, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(74)90112-6; WITTEN E, 1981, NUCL PHYS B, V188, P513, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(81)90006-7; WITTEN E, 1982, NUCL PHYS B, V202, P253, DOI 10.1016-0550-3213(82)90071-2; YUAN TC, 1984, Z PHYS C PART FIELDS, V26, P407, DOI 10.1007-BF0145256733
Pseudotrachypus ancistrodes V. Nath & Bansal 2010, comb. nov.
No full text<i>Pseudotrachypus ancistrodes</i> (Renauld & Cardot) V.Nath & Bansal, <i>comb. nov.</i> (Figs. 1–11) <p> <i>Meteorium ancistrodes</i> Renauld & Cardot, <i>Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg.</i> 34(2): 72 (1896); <i>Meteoriopsis ancistrodes</i> (Renauld & Cardot) Brotherus <i>in</i> Engler & Prantl, <i>Nat. Pflanzenfam.</i> 1(3): 826 (1906); <i>Meteoriopsis reclinata</i> (Müller Hal.) M.Fleischer <i>ex</i> Brotherus var. <i>ancistrodes</i> (Renauld & Cardot) Noguchi <i>J. Hattori Bot. Lab.</i> 41: 338 (1976); <i>Pseudobarbella ancistrodes</i> (Renauld & Cardot) Manuel, <i>Bryologist</i> 80: 596 (1977).</p> <p>Plants small, yellow-green, glossy. Secondary branches obtuse and acute at apex, pendulous, irregularly pinnately branched and densely foliate. Stems rounded or somewhat angular, but not dorsiventrally flattened; in section with an epidermis and a cortex of several layers of thick-walled, dark colored cells, with hyaline, parenchymatous cells towards the center of the stem, with a central strand of a few, small, thin-walled cells. Leaves dense, spreading at tips, ovate-lanceolate, canaliculate, gradually tapering to an elongate, subulate apex, 2.0–2.2 × 0.9–1.0 mm, recurved; margins sharply denticulate at tip; costa single, reaching mid–leaf; laminal cells linear to linear-rhomboidal, 2–3 papillose except at leaf apex and extreme base, 56–60 × 6–7 µm at apex and 40–48 × 5–6 µm in mid leaf, basal cells wider, alar cells differentiated, rectangular or subquadrate. Sporophytes not seen.</p> <p> <b>Specimens examined:</b> –– INDIA: Kerala: Wayanad District, Periya Ashram, 31 October 2006, <i>V</i> <i>. Nath, 229354A, 229357B, 229358B, 229359B, 229362D, 229363E, 229364A, 229365C, 229367D</i> (all LWG).</p> <p> Plants of <i>Pseudotrachypus ancistrodes</i> from South India closely approach those of <i>Meteoriopsis reclinata</i> in appearance, color, dense foliation, denticulate leaf apex, linear to rhomboidal leaf cells, etc., but differs in laminal cell size, number of papillae per leaf cell, etc. In <i>M. reclinata</i> laminal cells are linear to linear rhomboid with a thick–walled lumen, ± 38 × 4 µm at leaf apex, 35–45 × 3–4 µm at midleaf with a single papilla whereas in <i>P. ancistrodes</i> the laminal cells are linear–rhomboidal, 56–60 × 6–7 µm at the apex, 40–48 × 5–6 µm at midleaf with 2–3 small papillae. The specimens show some minor variation in the size of plants and leaves. The above variations could be ecological, attributable to the growth conditions of different populations.</p>Published as part of <i>Nath, Virendra & Bansal, Pooja, 2010, Pseudotrachypus ancistrodes, a new combination for Meteoriopsis ancistrodes (Meteoriaceae), pp. 43-46 in Phytotaxa 3</i> on page 44, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.3.1.6, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4891236">http://zenodo.org/record/4891236</a>
Book: The Nath Yogis in Contemporary India
No full textVéronique Bouillier, 2008, Itinérance et vie monastique. Les ascètes Nath Yogis en Inde contemporaine, Paris, Editions de la MSH, 310 p. In this book, Véronique Bouillier gives a description of an Indian Saivaite sect, the Nath Yogis. Through the example of this sect, the social anthropologist examines the main features of Hindu asceticism i.e. the interweaving of a tradition of personal spiritual and ascetic quest and a collective organisation. She suggests that this collective organisation ..
Je suis une intouchable
No full textNath . Je suis une intouchable. In: Marie Pas Claire, n°3, 1993. Libération, mes soeurs !... p. 20
Thakur Harsha Nath — Population Projection for Nepal 1955-1975
No full textVoranger Jacques. Thakur Harsha Nath — Population Projection for Nepal 1955-1975. In: Population, 21ᵉ année, n°6, 1966. p. 1226
AERIAL ROBOTICS WITH ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE, DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS
No full text<p>First of All I want to express my heart full thanks to Supervisor of my Ph.D. research work Dr. GARG, Calorx Teacher’s University, Ahmedabad. He helped me in every stage of my research work and sincerely guides me about all the issue and new dimensions of research work. I am thankful to all faculty members of department of computer science & electronics engineering.</p>
<p>I am dedicating this thesis to my parents, P B Venu Nath, R Sivakumari and my brother Vinu V Nath.</p>
Validation of a smart textile ECG device for use in racehorses during strenuous exercise
No full textA Kapusniak, L Nath, P Hitchens, S Bailey, P McCrae, S Frankli
A little Higgs model with exact dark matter parity
No full textWe present a little Higgs model where a dark matter parity is implemented such that it is not violated by WZW terms present in strongly coupled UV-completions. We show how to consistently implement fermions into this setup and determine the low energy spectrum of the model. The lightest parity odd state is stable and a viable dark matter candidate. We briefly discuss experimental constraints on the model
Is EC class predictable from reaction mechanism?
No full textWe thank the Scottish Universities Life Sciences Alliance (SULSA) and the Scottish Overseas Research Student Awards Scheme of the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) for financial support.Background: We investigate the relationships between the EC (Enzyme Commission) class, the associated chemical reaction, and the reaction mechanism by building predictive models using Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and k-Nearest Neighbours (kNN). We consider two ways of encoding the reaction mechanism in descriptors, and also three approaches that encode only the overall chemical reaction. Both cross-validation and also an external test set are used. Results: The three descriptor sets encoding overall chemical transformation perform better than the two descriptions of mechanism. SVM and RF models perform comparably well; kNN is less successful. Oxidoreductases and hydrolases are relatively well predicted by all types of descriptor; isomerases are well predicted by overall reaction descriptors but not by mechanistic ones. Conclusions: Our results suggest that pairs of similar enzyme reactions tend to proceed by different mechanisms. Oxidoreductases, hydrolases, and to some extent isomerases and ligases, have clear chemical signatures, making them easier to predict than transferases and lyases. We find evidence that isomerases as a class are notably mechanistically diverse and that their one shared property, of substrate and product being isomers, can arise in various unrelated ways. The performance of the different machine learning algorithms is in line with many cheminformatics applications, with SVM and RF being roughly equally effective. kNN is less successful, given the role that non-local information plays in successful classification. We note also that, despite a lack of clarity in the literature, EC number prediction is not a single problem; the challenge of predicting protein function from available sequence data is quite different from assigning an EC classification from a cheminformatics representation of a reaction.Peer reviewe
- …
