1,720,984 research outputs found

    Supplemental Material - Verbalization of Rating Scales Taking Account of Their Polarity

    No full text
    Supplemental Material for Verbalization of Rating Scales Taking Account of Their Polarity by Natalja Menold in Field Methods</p

    Supplementary_Material - How Do Reverse-keyed Items in Inventories Affect Measurement Quality and Information Processing?

    No full text
    Supplementary_Material for How Do Reverse-keyed Items in Inventories Affect Measurement Quality and Information Processing? by Natalja Menold in Field Methods</p

    sj-pdf-1-smr-10.1177_00491241221077237 - Supplemental material for Do Different Devices Perform Equally Well with Different Numbers of Scale Points and Response Formats? A test of measurement invariance and reliability

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-smr-10.1177_00491241221077237 for Do Different Devices Perform Equally Well with Different Numbers of Scale Points and Response Formats? A test of measurement invariance and reliability by Natalja Menold and Vera Toepoel in Sociological Methods & Research</p

    sj-inp-3-smr-10.1177_00491241221077237 - Supplemental material for Do Different Devices Perform Equally Well with Different Numbers of Scale Points and Response Formats? A test of measurement invariance and reliability

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-inp-3-smr-10.1177_00491241221077237 for Do Different Devices Perform Equally Well with Different Numbers of Scale Points and Response Formats? A test of measurement invariance and reliability by Natalja Menold and Vera Toepoel in Sociological Methods & Research</p

    sj-sav-2-smr-10.1177_00491241221077237 - Supplemental material for Do Different Devices Perform Equally Well with Different Numbers of Scale Points and Response Formats? A test of measurement invariance and reliability

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-sav-2-smr-10.1177_00491241221077237 for Do Different Devices Perform Equally Well with Different Numbers of Scale Points and Response Formats? A test of measurement invariance and reliability by Natalja Menold and Vera Toepoel in Sociological Methods & Research</p

    sj-inp-4-smr-10.1177_00491241221077237 - Supplemental material for Do Different Devices Perform Equally Well with Different Numbers of Scale Points and Response Formats? A test of measurement invariance and reliability

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-inp-4-smr-10.1177_00491241221077237 for Do Different Devices Perform Equally Well with Different Numbers of Scale Points and Response Formats? A test of measurement invariance and reliability by Natalja Menold and Vera Toepoel in Sociological Methods & Research</p

    Revisiting the Asian Disease Problem

    No full text
    &lt;p&gt;Data and code for the tables and figures of the paper "Scientific Advice and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Revisiting the Asian Disease Problem" by Robert Neumann, Jasmin Kadel, Oliver Brust, Hagen von Hermanni and Natalja Menold&lt;/p&gt

    Rating-Scale Labeling in Online Surveys: An Experimental Comparison of Verbal and Numeric Rating Scales with Respect to Measurement Quality and Respondents’ Cognitive Processes

    No full text
    Unlike other data collection modes, the effect of labeling rating scales on reliability and validity, as relevant aspects of measurement quality, has seldom been addressed in online surveys. In this study, verbal and numeric rating scales were compared in split-ballot online survey experiments. In the first experiment, respondents’ cognitive processes were observed by means of eye tracking, that is, determining the respondent’s fixations in different areas of the screen. In the remaining experiments, data for reliability and validity analysis were collected from a German adult sample. The results show that respondents needed more fixations and more time to endorse a category when a rating scale had numeric labels. Cross-sectional reliability was lower and some hypotheses with respect to the criterion validity could not be supported when numeric rating scales were used. In conclusion, theoretical considerations and the empirical results contradict the current broad usage of numeric scales in online surveys. </jats:p
    corecore