424 research outputs found
Less surgery, improved survival from stage IV colorectal cancer?
Letter to the EditorTimothy J. Price, Niall Tebbutt, Amanda R. Townsen
Schreiben des HerrnJohn Tebbutt, Directors der Sternwarte zu Windsor, an den Herausgeber
n/
Schreiben des HerrnJohn Tebbutt jun., Astronomen der Sternw. zu Windsor, an den Herausgeber
n/
The role of biological therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line treatment: a meta-analysis of randomised trials
PURPOSE: Biologic agents have achieved variable results in relapsed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Systematic meta-analysis was undertaken to determine the efficacy of biological therapy. METHODS: Major databases were searched for randomised studies of mCRC after first-line treatment comparing (1) standard treatment plus biologic agent with standard treatment or (2) standard treatment with biologic agent with the same treatment with different biologic agent(s). Data were extracted on study design, participants, interventions and outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the MERGE criteria. Comparable data were pooled for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty eligible studies with 8225 patients were identified. The use of any biologic therapy improved overall survival with hazard ratio (HR) 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.91, P<0.00001), progression-free survival (PFS) with HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.67-0.74, P<0.0001) and overall response rate (ORR) with odds ratio (OR) 2.38 (95% CI 2.03-2.78, P<0.00001). Grade 3/4 toxicity was increased with OR 2.34. Considering by subgroups, EGFR inhibitors (EGFR-I) in the second-line setting and anti-angiogenic therapies (both in second-line and third-line and beyond settings) all improved overall survival, PFS and ORR. EGFR-I in third-line settings improved PFS and ORR but not OS. CONCLUSIONS: The use of biologic agents in mCRC after first-line treatment is associated with improved outcomes but increased toxicity.E Segelov, D Chan, J Shapiro, T J Price, C S Karapetis, N C Tebbutt and N Pavlaki
- …
