1,106 research outputs found
Supplementary_material – Supplemental material for Validation of a Brief Self-Report Measure of Adolescent Bullying Perpetration and Victimization
No full textSupplemental material, Supplementary_material for Validation of a Brief Self-Report Measure of Adolescent Bullying Perpetration and Victimization by Aja Louise Murray, Manuel Eisner, Denis Ribeaud, Daniela Kaiser, Karen McKenzie and George Murray in Assessment</p
Evolving AJA
No full textWelcome to another year in which Australasian Journal on Ageing (AJA) is continuing to evolve. That evolution is in response to deliberate strategic planning for AJA, the changing publishing environment, and author and reader input. In fact, AJA has never stood still since its inception, as we will explore in the 30 Year Anniversary Special Issue to be launched in 2013. There are currently authors working oninvited papers for this issue, and soon we will be conducting a Delphi study to identify the seminal papers published by AJA in the last decades. We hope you will be involved when invited to participate in this study, as we need as many viewpoints as possible
JBD797004_supplementary_table_1 - A Practical Guide to the Analysis of Non-Response and Attrition in Longitudinal Research Using a Real Data Example
No full textJBD797004_supplementary_table_1 for A Practical Guide to the Analysis of Non-Response and Attrition in Longitudinal Research Using a Real Data Example by Nora L. Eisner, Aja L. Murray, Manuel Eisner, and Denis Ribeaud in International Journal of Behavioral Development</p
Supplemental Material - Does Prosociality in Early-to Mid-Adolescence Protect Against Later Development of Antisocial Behaviours?
No full textSupplemental Material for Does Prosociality in Early-to Mid-Adolescence Protect Against Later Development of Antisocial Behaviours? by Lydia Gabriela Speyer, Ingrid Obsuth, Manuel Eisner, Denis Ribeaud, and Aja Louise Murray in The Journal of Early Adolescence</p
ADHD_Out_Supplementary_Materials – Supplemental material for Outcomes of ADHD Symptoms in Late Adolescence: Are Developmental Subtypes Important?
No full textSupplemental material, ADHD_Out_Supplementary_Materials for Outcomes of ADHD Symptoms in Late Adolescence: Are Developmental Subtypes Important? by Aja Louise Murray, Tom Booth, Bonnie Auyeung, Manuel Eisner, Denis Ribeaud and Ingrid Obsuth in Journal of Attention Disorders</p
Supplemental Material - Does Prosociality in Early-to Mid-Adolescence Protect Against Later Development of Antisocial Behaviours?
No full textSupplemental Material for Does Prosociality in Early-to Mid-Adolescence Protect Against Later Development of Antisocial Behaviours? by Lydia Gabriela Speyer, Ingrid Obsuth, Manuel Eisner, Denis Ribeaud, and Aja Louise Murray in The Journal of Early Adolescence</p
supplementary_table_28correlation_29 – Supplemental material for Disaggregating Between- and Within-Classroom Variation in Student Behavior: A Multilevel Factor Analysis of Teacher Ratings of Student Prosociality and Aggression
No full textSupplemental material, supplementary_table_28correlation_29 for Disaggregating Between- and Within-Classroom Variation in Student Behavior: A Multilevel Factor Analysis of Teacher Ratings of Student Prosociality and Aggression by Aja Louise Murray, Ingrid Obsuth, Manuel Eisner and Denis Ribeaud in The Journal of Early Adolescence</p
The accuracy of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ) in classifying severity of impairment: A brief report
No full textBackground: Outcomes for people with an intellectual disability (ID) may differ depending on the severity of the condition. This study evaluated whether a tool used to screen for the presence of ID could also give an early indication of severity, in order to help inform future support needs.
Methods: Multicategory receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to examine how well the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ) could classify individuals (n = 238) in terms of severity of intellectual impairment.
Results: Mean LDSQ scores increased across diagnostic categories from “severe impairment” to “no ID” as expected. However, overall classification accuracy was inadequate to justify extending the use of the scale to placing individuals in severity categories (VUS = .58 and Youden Index = .49).
Conclusions: Although the LDSQ can accurately discriminate between those with and without ID, results indicated that it may not accurately classify individuals in terms of severity of intellectual impairment
sj-docx-2-cpx-10.1177_21677026231162814 – Supplemental material for Common Cause Versus Dynamic Mutualism: An Empirical Comparison of Two Theories of Psychopathology in Two Large Longitudinal Cohorts
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-2-cpx-10.1177_21677026231162814 for Common Cause Versus Dynamic Mutualism: An Empirical Comparison of Two Theories of Psychopathology in Two Large Longitudinal Cohorts by Michael E. Aristodemou, Rogier A. Kievit, Aja L. Murray, Manuel Eisner, Denis Ribeaud and Eiko I. Fried in Clinical Psychological Science</p
sj-docx-18-cpx-10.1177_21677026231162814 – Supplemental material for Common Cause Versus Dynamic Mutualism: An Empirical Comparison of Two Theories of Psychopathology in Two Large Longitudinal Cohorts
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-18-cpx-10.1177_21677026231162814 for Common Cause Versus Dynamic Mutualism: An Empirical Comparison of Two Theories of Psychopathology in Two Large Longitudinal Cohorts by Michael E. Aristodemou, Rogier A. Kievit, Aja L. Murray, Manuel Eisner, Denis Ribeaud and Eiko I. Fried in Clinical Psychological Science</p
- …
