1,721,461 research outputs found
Oxysarcodexia ibera Dufek and Mulieri 2017
Oxysarcodexia ibera Dufek and Mulieri, 2017 Material examined. Argentina, Chaco, Villa Berthet, 26-VI-2015, Dufek leg (1♂) (CARTROUNNE). Distribution. Neotropical: Argentina. Distribution in the Humid Chaco ecoregion. Argentina (Chaco: Villa Berthet; Corrientes: Cambyretá, Galarza, San Nicolás; Formosa: Reserva El Bagual). Dufek and Mulieri (2017).Published as part of Dufek, Matias Ignacio, Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes & Mulieri, Pablo Ricardo, 2020, Inventory of Sarcophaginae (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) for the Humid Chaco, a poorly surveyed ecoregion of South America, pp. 367-403 in Journal of Natural History 54 (5 - 6) on page 384, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1764646, http://zenodo.org/record/460909
Malacophagomyia rivadavia Mulieri and Mello-Patiu 2013
Malacophagomyia rivadavia Mulieri and Mello-Patiu, 2013 Material examined. Argentina, Chaco, Villa Berthet, 25-V-2015, Dufek leg (16♂) (CARTROUNNE). Brazil, Mato Grosso do Sul, Porto Mutinho, XII-2012, Mello-Patiu leg (1♂) (MNRJ). Distribution. Neotropical: Argentina, Brazil. Distribution in the Humid Chaco ecoregion. Argentina (Chaco: Villa Berthet). Brazil (Mato Grosso do Sul: Porto Murtinho).Published as part of Dufek, Matias Ignacio, Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes & Mulieri, Pablo Ricardo, 2020, Inventory of Sarcophaginae (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) for the Humid Chaco, a poorly surveyed ecoregion of South America, pp. 367-403 in Journal of Natural History 54 (5 - 6) on page 380, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1764646, http://zenodo.org/record/460909
Lepidodexia (Notochaeta) adelina Mulieri, Schaefer, Dure and Gonzalez 2018
Lepidodexia (Notochaeta) adelina Mulieri, Schaefer, Duré and González, 2018 Distribution. Neotropical: Argentina. Distribution in the Humid Chaco ecoregion. Argentina (Corrientes: Corrientes City). Mulieri et al. (2018).Published as part of Dufek, Matias Ignacio, Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes & Mulieri, Pablo Ricardo, 2020, Inventory of Sarcophaginae (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) for the Humid Chaco, a poorly surveyed ecoregion of South America, pp. 367-403 in Journal of Natural History 54 (5 - 6) on page 378, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1764646, http://zenodo.org/record/460909
A Modern in Disguise? Leo Strauss on Marsilius of Padua
This article analyzes Leo Strauss’s interpretation of the political thinker Marsilius of Padua advanced in the only piece that he wrote on the Italian author. At first glance, Strauss appears to characterize Marsilius as possessing an anticlerical temperament. Yet, upon deeper analysis, Strauss’s account of Marsilius presents him as a more controversial figure. First, Strauss’s analysis suggests that Marsilius’s anticlericalism actually disguises an antitheological attitude, bringing him closer to Machiavelli. Second, Strauss claims that Marsilius has an unusual notion of contemplation and “lowers his sights” prior to Machiavelli. Reading between the lines, one can see that for Strauss, Marsilius ends up being the last classical philosopher while also setting the stage for Machiavelli’s modernity in a disguised manner
Austrophyto noa Mulieri, 2017, sp. nov.
Austrophyto noa sp. nov. (Figs 1–3, 6, 9, 19–26, 29–32, 35) Diagnosis. Parafacial and lower half of fronto-orbital plate with golden microtomentum, upper half of frontoorbital plate with silvery microtomentum; postgena with pale setae on posterior part; dorsocentrals 4 + 4 (the posteriormost two larger); notopleuron with silvery-grey microtomentum; T5 with lateral spots of silvery microtomentum; T3 with a pair of median marginal setae; ST2–ST4 with short setulosity; syntergosternite 7+8 reddish-orange; cercal base with a rounded protuberance; cercus with rounded apex in dorsal view; vesica folded upward, with a microserrated surface. Description. Male. Body length 9.33–10.30 mm (n = 6). Head. Head length at antennal base 1.11–0.99x (n = 6) head length at level of vibrissa; frons at its narrowest point 0.19–0.24x (n = 6) head width. Parafacial and lower half of fronto-orbital plate with golden microtomentum, upper half of fronto-orbital plate with silvery microtomentum; postocular area with silvery microtomentum; postcranium with silvery-grey microtomentum; frontal vitta blackish; ocellar triangle black, with silvery microtomentum; genal groove and genal dilation with golden microtomentum; postgena face and facial ridge with silvery microtomentum; antenna brown, first flagellomere with grey microtomentum, 0.25–0.30x (n = 6) head height; arista short plumose on basal 0.5, the longest rays longer (2.00–3.60x) than maximum width of arista; palpus brown. Parafacial plate with a row of setulae close to eye, stronger in lower part; fronto-orbital plate with sparse setulae; postcranium with black setae on upper part and a few pale setae on lower part; eyes bare; 9–11 frontal setae, the rows of frontal setae diverging strongly anteriorly at level of pedicel; 1 reclinate orbital seta; inner vertical seta strong and reclinate, outer vertical setae 0.30–0.25x (n = 6) the inner verticals and divergent; ocellar triangle with 1 pair of divergent and proclinate ocellar setae and supplementary setulae; postocellar and paravertical setae present; gena with black setae, postgena with pale setae on posterior part; facial ridge with setae close to vibrissa and setulae on lower half; 10–12 subvibrissal setae; palpus with black setae on the apical 2/3. Thorax. Black, with silvery-grey microtomentum; prescutum and scutum with dorsal and lateral stripes of silvery-grey microtomentum and three black stripes; postpronotal lobe, notopleuron, katepisternum and anepimeron with spots of silvery-grey microtomentum; anepisternum with dense golden microtomentum; proepisternum silvery, bare. Chaetotaxy: 1 strong proepisternal seta plus one weaker and shorter supplementary seta; 1 proepimeral seta plus one or two weaker and shorter supplementary setae; katepisternals 3; postalar wall setulose; acrostichals 0 + 1 (prescutellar pair well developed), dorsocentrals 4 + 4 (the posteriormost two larger), intra-alars 1–2 + 2, supra-alars 2 + 3 (the middle one stronger), anterior postpronotals 1, basal postpronotals 2, postalars 2, notopleurals 4 (two larger and two smaller). Scutellum with 2 pairs of lateral setae, 1 pair of crossed apical setae and 1 pair of weak discal setae. Wing hyaline, tegula pale brown, basicosta whitish and veins brown; vein R1 bare; vein R4+5 setulose in proximal 0.4–0.5 of distance to crossvein R-M; costal spine differentiated; third costal sector without ventral setae; cell r4+5 open; lower calypter whitish. Legs: coxae, trochanters and femora with silvery-grey microtomentum, tibiae somewhat reddish; mid femur without a posteroventral ctenidium in its apical portion, with 4 anterior setae and 3–5 anteroventral setae; mid tibia with 1 anteroventral, 2 anterodorsal, 2 posterodorsal and 1 posterior setae; hind trochanter with a ventral pad of short and stout spines; hind femur with anterior, anterodorsal, anteroventral and posteroventral (in basal half) rows of setae; hind tibia with 1 anteroventral, 2–4 anterodorsal and 2 posterodorsal setae; mid and hind femora and hind tibia with long setulae; tarsi brown. Abdomen. Dark brown; sternites exposed; syntergite 1+2 to T5 each with dorsal and lateral spots of silvery microtomentum; syntergite 1+2 and T3 each with a pair of lateral marginal setae; T3 with a pair of median marginal setae; T4 and T5 with a complete row of marginal setae; T5 with long setulosity on posteroventral margin; ST2–ST4 with short setulosity and marginal setae. Terminalia. ST5 V-shaped, reddish (Fig. 24); arms of ST5 with rounded basal lobes, covered with pale micropubescence (velvet-like) on their inner surface; ventral surface of ST5 with setulae, with larger setae towards apex (Fig. 24); syntergosternite 7+8 reddish-orange, with intense golden microtomentum and with a marginal row of weak setae not differentiated from the few other setae present on its dorsal surface; epandrium reddish-orange, with long, hair-like setae; cercus short, with a long seta on cercal base; cercal base with a rounded protuberance in profile (Figs 20–21); cercal base 2.2–2.4x (n = 2) as long as cercal prong (Fig. 19); surstylus elongated, with a rounded tip (Fig. 21); pregonite curved (Figs 1, 23); postgonite curved distally, with 2 strong setae (Fig. 1); vesica (Figs 6, 9, 23, 25) short and poorly sclerotized, folded upward and with a microserrated surface; harpes (Figs 3, 6, 22, 26) heavily sclerotized, with projections visible in lateral view; juxta with membranous apico-lateral lobes; medial juxtal sclerite elongated and deeply hidden between juxtal lobes (Figs 3, 9); lateral styli and median stylus tubular and ventrally curved (Fig. 9). Female. Unknown. Type material. Holotype ♂ (IFML): “R. A. Catamarca / 6 km N. Belén / 1240 m [white label, printed]”; “ Willink, Terán / Stange (Malaise) / 1-15.II.1969 ” [white label, printed]; “ Entomofauna / Subandina ” [blue label with black frame, printed] “ Holotype [printed] ♂ / Austrophyto noa sp. nov. / Mulieri det. 2015” [red label, handwritten]. Holotype in good condition, with terminalia detached and glued to a piece of card pinned together with the rest of the specimen. Paratypes: 5 ♂♂, same data as holotype (1 in IFML, 4 in MACN); 1 ♂, Argentina, Tucumán, Burruyacú, La Mesada, 2.x.1947, Ares leg. (MACN); 2 ♂♂, Argentina, Salta, Departamento San Martín, 500–800 m, P. Wygodzinsky leg. (MNRJ). Distribution. Argentina (Catamarca, Salta, Tucumán) (Fig. 35). Etymology. The specific epithet is a noun in apposition and refers to the Spanish acronym used to designate the Argentinean region (“ NOA = Noroeste argentino”) where the species was discovered. Remarks. Austrophyto noa sp. nov. resembles A. cordobensis in some features of the terminalia, such as the shape of the cercal prong and vesica. However, these species can be easily separated by external characters given in the key.Published as part of Mulieri, Pablo Ricardo, 2017, Saying goodbye to monotypy in the poorly known genus Austrophyto Lopes, 1989 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae): new diagnosis and description of two new species, pp. 88-100 in Zootaxa 4268 (1) on pages 95-98, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4268.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/57992
Coenosia metalleg Patitucci & Couri & Mulieri 2021, sp. nov.
Coenosia metalleg sp. nov. Male. Length. Body: 2.71–3.22 mm, wing: 3.03–3.19 mm. Head (Figure 5 (a-b)). Frons black, fronto-orbital plate, parafacial and gena black with silver-grey pollinosity. Frons longer than wide, without frontal triangle. Gena with strong black hairs, and with height greater than the width of the postpedicel. Arista with its longest microtrichia shorter than its basal diameter. Thorax (Figure 5 (c)). Black without vittae; postpronotal lobe and lateral plates black with white-grey pollinosity. Chaetotaxy: acrostichal setae long and strong, the anterior presutural pair as long as the eaDC; dorsocentrals 1 + 3, with an aDC seta that is less than one third of the eaDC; intra-alars 1 + 2, posterior postsutural seta shorter; supra-alars 1 + 1. Katepisternum without setula. Wing. Tegula black. Legs. Coxae black with grey pollinosity and black setae. Trochanters yellow with black setae. Femora and tibiae metallic black, apex of all tibiae yellow, tarsi dark brown. Mid femur with 3–4 ventral setae, and 2 preapical setae on posterodorsal to posterior surface; mid tibia with one anterodorsal and one posterodorsal median setae, anterodorsal seta shorter and positioned below of the posterodorsal seta. Hind femur with a complete row of anterodorsal, a row of strong anteroventral setae on basal half, and a row of strong posteroventral setae on basal half, with two preapical setae (anterodorsal and posterodorsal); some specimens a short dorsal preapical seta. Abdomen (Figure 5 (d)). Black with brown pollinosity, without spots or central line, tergite 6 and epandrium metallic black. Epandrium globular. Sternite 5 similar in width and lenght, basal margin convex, apical margin strongly concave (‘U’ shape), with a depressed area at the base; lobes with a membrane on apical margin; setae concentrated on the lobes and extended to basal margin (Figure 5 (e)). Terminalia. Cercus metallic black, longer than broad without a constriction on apical third, sclerotised, setulose only on basal third (hair-like seta), with apical margin concave with two strong and wide sclerotised teeth (Figure 5 (f-h)). Surstyli longer than broad, slightly curved towards at the distal tip towards cercus (Figure 5 (g, i)). Hypandrium tubular, longer than wide. Aedeagus with phallapodeme straight, strongly sclerotised, and longer than hypandrium in lateral view; pregonite developed, kidney-shaped, ventrally fused with the hypandrium; postgonite developed; epiphalus slightly sclerotised, and distiphallus tubular with hairs on ventral surface, and slightly sclerotised at base (Figure 5 (j-k)). Female (Figure 6 (a)). Length. Body: 3.75–4.0 mm, wing: 4.03–4.20 mm. Differs from male as follows: Legs. Femora and tibiae metallic black, the metallic colour in some specimens is not so evident. Mid femur with an anteroventral row of setae, 3–4 strong setae on anterior surface, and with 3–4 ventral setae on basal third. mid tibia with one anterodorsal and one posterodorsal median setae, anterodorsal seta longer and positioned below of the posterodorsal seta. Ovipositor: Segments longer than wide. Tergites 6, 7, and 8 with 2 long and parallel scletotized plates, plates on tergite 6 wider than in the others (Figure 6 (b)); epiproct triangular, with hair-like setae, cercus longer than epiproct (Figure 6 (d)). Sternites 6 and 7 as a long and rectangular plate; sternite 8 divided into 2 small and sclerotised plates each with 4–5 setae on distal margin (Figure 6 (c)); hypoproct triangular, setulose, with several strong setae on distal margin (Figure 6 (e)). Three spermathecae, ovoid shape. Type material examined. Holotype male, pinned, labels: ‘Arg. Neuquén, P.N. Lanín / (Malaise open Bandurrias) 800m /40°08,728¨’ S, 71°30,826 ʹ W / 21-II-2011 Mulieri & Patitucci leg.’ print. on white paper; ‘MACN-En/34717’ print. on white paper. Paratypes: male, pinned, labels: ‘Arg. Neuquén, P.N. Lanín / Quillen 993 m (Malaise 2)/39°31 ʹ 40’ S, 71°13 ʹ 13” W / I-2013 Olea, Mulieri & Patitucci leg.” print. on white paper; ‘MACN-En/34718’ print. on white paper; 2 females, pinned, labels: ‘ Arg. Neuquén, P.N. Lanín / Quillen 993 m (Malaise 2)/39°31 ʹ 40’ S, 71°13 ʹ 13” W / I-2013 Olea, Mulieri & Patitucci leg.” print. on white paper; ‘MACN-En/34719-20’ print. on white paper. Two males, pinned, labels: ‘ Arg. Neuquén, Lagunas de/ Epulaufquen / 1502 m. a. s. l. transecta/ -36.815642, −71,064096 / 12-II -2018 Patitucci leg’. (IFML). Two females and one male, pinned, labels: ‘ Arg. Neuquén, P.N. Lanín / Seccional Bandurrias II-2011 / -40.144240, −71.342986 / Mulieri & Patitucci leg’. print. on white paper (MLP). Other specimens examined. ARGENTINA: Chubut: PNLA: 2 females, 3 males, Cab. La Cascada, II-2013, −42.888499, −71.592376, Mulieri, Patitucci & Olea leg. (MACN); 1 female, Lag. Futalaufquen, II-2013, −42.840982, −71.632934, Patitucci & Olea leg. (MACN). Neuquén: ABM: 1 male, I-2013, −38.845457, −71.093002, Patitucci leg. (MACN), Cerrro Chapelco, 103 females, 15 males, 1983, −40.197050, −71.298453, Gentili leg. (IFML); ALE: 26 females, 3 males, 12-II-2018, −36.815.642, −71.084.096, Mulieri & Patitucci leg. (MACN); PNL: 3 females, 2 males, Quillen, 11-I-2013, −39.3613, −71.2188, Mulieri, Patitucci & Olea leg. (MACN); Villa Pehuenia: 5 females, 10/ 11-II-2018, −38.884503, −71.166194, Mulieri & Patitucci leg. (MACN). Río Negro: PNNH: 3 females, Mallín, Playa Negra, II-2009,-41357809, −71571683, Garré & Montes de Ocaleg. (MLP). Distribution (Figure 3 (c)). ARGENTINA: Chubut, Neuquén, Río Negro. Etymology. The name refers to the striking black metallic colour of the legs. Remarks. Coenosia metalleg sp. nov. is distinguished from its congeners by the following combination of characters: thorax and abdomen black without vittae or spots, coxae black, trochanters yellow, and femora and tibiae metallic black, mid tibia with one anterodorsal and one posterodorsal median setae, anterodorsal seta shorter and positioned below the posterodorsal seta, cercus metallic black, longer than broad with hair-like seta, and distiphallus with hairs on ventral surface In Stein’s key (Stein 1911), C. metalleg runs to C. setiventris. These two species are distinguished by differences in the male terminalia of C. setiventris (Couri and Pont 2020), and their general colouration, particularly the colour of the legs. In Malloch´key (Malloch 1934), C. metalleg runs to C. inaequalis, but the metallic black colour of the femora can separate it from C. inaequalis.Published as part of Patitucci, Luciano Damián, Couri, Marcia Souto & Mulieri, Pablo Ricardo, 2021, The killer flies Coenosia Meigen (Diptera: Muscidae) of southern South America: the Coenosia chaetosa species group with two new species, and notes on male terminalia patterns, pp. 1499-1519 in Journal of Natural History 55 (23 - 24) on pages 1510-1513, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2021.1954711, http://zenodo.org/record/546986
Austrophyto mariluisi Mulieri, 2017, sp. nov.
<i>Austrophyto mariluisi</i> sp. nov. <p>(Figs 5, 8, 14–18, 33–35)</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> Parafacial and fronto-orbital plates with silvery microtomentum; genal dilation with silvery microtomentum; postgena with dark setae only; dorsocentrals 2–3 + 3; notopleuron with golden microtomentum; T5 with lateral spots of golden microtomentum; T3 without median marginal setae; ST2–ST4 with long setulosity; syntergosternite 7+8 shiny black or dark brown; cercal base flattened in profile; cercus with a pointed apex in dorsal view; vesica short and membranous, with two pointed lobes.</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> <i>Male.</i> Body length 6.27–8.72 mm (<i>n</i> = 6).</p> <p> Head. Head length at antennal base 1.01–1.10x (<i>n</i> = 3) head length at level of vibrissa; frons at its narrowest point 0.24–0.25x (<i>n</i> = 3) head width. Parafacial and fronto-orbital plates with silvery microtomentum; frontal vitta blackish; postocular area with silvery microtomentum; postcranium with silvery-grey microtomentum; ocellar triangle black, with silvery microtomentum; genal groove, genal dilation, postgena, face and facial ridge with silvery microtomentum; antenna black; first flagellomere with brown microtomentum, 0.28–0.33x (<i>n</i> = 3) head height; arista short plumose on basal 0.5, with longest rays longer (3.12–4.76x) than maximum width of arista; palpus blackish. Parafacial plate with a row of setulae close to eye, stronger in lower part; fronto-orbital plate with sparse setulae; postcranium with black setae on upper part and a few pale setae on lower part; eye bare; 7–10 frontal setae, the rows of frontal setae diverging strongly anteriorly at level of pedicel; 1 reclinate orbital seta; inner vertical seta strong and reclinate, outer vertical setae 0.5x the inner verticals and divergent; ocellar triangle with 1 pair of divergent and proclinate ocellar setae and supplementary setulae; postocellar and paravertical setae present; gena with black setae, postgena with dark setae; facial ridge with setae close to vibrissa and setulae reaching the lower half; 4–8 subvibrissal setae; palpus with black setae on apical half.</p> <p>Thorax. Black, with silvery microtomentum; prescutum and scutum with dorsal and lateral stripes of silvery microtomentum and three black stripes; postpronotal lobe, katepisternum and anepimeron with spots of silvery microtomentum; notopleuron and anepisternum with spots of golden microtomentum; proepisternum silvery, bare. Chaetotaxy: 1 strong proepisternal seta plus one or two weaker and shorter supplementary setae; 1 proepimeral seta plus one or two weaker and shorter supplementary setae; katepisternals 3; postalar wall setulose; acrostichals 0 + 1 (prescutellar pair well developed), dorsocentrals 2–3 + 3, intra-alars 1 + 2, supra-alars 2 + 3 (the middle one stronger), anterior postpronotals 1, basal postpronotals 2, postalars 2, notopleurals 4 (two larger and two smaller). Scutellum with 2 pairs of lateral setae, 1 pair of crossed apical setae, and 1 pair of discal setae. Wing hyaline, tegula dark brown, basicosta whitish and veins pale brown; vein R1 bare; vein R4+5 setulose in proximal 0.4–0.5 of distance to crossvein R-M; costal spine not differentiated; third costal sector without ventral setae; cell r4+5 open; lower calypter whitish, with a central brown spot in some specimens. Legs: coxae, trochanters and femora with silvery-grey microtomentum; mid trochanter with a ventral pad of short and stout spines; mid femur without a posteroventral ctenidium in its apical portion, and with anterior and anteroventral rows of setae; mid tibia with 1 anteroventral, 2–3 anterodorsal, 3–4 posterodorsal and 1 posterior setae; hind trochanter with a ventral pad of short and stout spines; hind femur with anterior, anterodorsal and anteroventral rows of setae; hind tibia with 1 anteroventral, 2–3 anterodorsal and 2 posterodorsal setae; mid and hind femora and hind tibia with long setulae; tarsi blackish.</p> <p>Abdomen. Black; sternites exposed; syntergite 1+2 to T4 each with dorsal and lateral spots of silvery microtomentum; T5 with dorsal spots of silvery microtomentum and lateral spots of golden microtomentum; syntergite 1+2 and T3 each with a pair of lateral marginal setae; T3 without median marginal setae; T4 and T5 with a complete row of marginal setae; T5 with long setulosity on posteroventral margin; ST2–ST4 with long setulosity.</p> <p>Terminalia. ST5 V-shaped, brown; arms of ST5 with rounded basal lobes, covered with velvet-like micropubescence on their inner surface (Fig. 18); ventral surface of ST5 with setulae, with larger setae towards apex (Fig. 18); syntergosternite 7+8 shiny black basally, dark brown on apical 1/3, with a median spot of golden microtomentum and a marginal row of weak setae almost not differentiated from the few other setae present on its dorsal surface (Fig. 33); epandrium reddish-orange, with hair-like setae; cercal prong about half as long as cercal base; cercal base with long setulosity (Fig. 15–16); cercus, in profile, sligthly curved ventrally and with a pointed apex (Fig. 16); surstylus narrow, with 1 apical hair-like seta (Figs 15–16); pregonite curved (Fig. 17); postgonite curved distally, with 2 strong setae (Fig. 17); vesica (Figs 5, 8, 14) membranous and short, with two pointed lobes; harpes (Figs 5, 8, 17) heavily sclerotized, with projections with a rough surface; juxta with small apico-lateral lobes with a microtrichose surface (Figs 5, 8); medial juxtal sclerite elongated and exposed between juxtal lobes (Figs 5, 8); lateral styli and median stylus tubular and ventrally curved (Fig. 8).</p> <p> <i>Female</i>. Unknown.</p> <p> <b>Type material.</b> Holotype ♂ (MACN): “ Arg [entina], Salta, Alturas / de Amblayo 3600 m [m a.s.l.] / 12/[19]86 Mariluis col.” [white label, handwritten]; “ Holotype [printed] ♂ / Austrophyto / mariluisi sp. nov. / Mulieri det. 2015” [red label, handwritten]. Holotype in good condition, with terminalia detached and glued to a piece of card pinned together with the rest of the specimen. Paratypes (MACN): 2 ♂♂, same data as holotype.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Argentina (Salta) (Fig. 35).</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The specific epithet is given in recognition of the work of the Argentinean dipterist Juan Carlos Mariluis.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> This species is easily distinguished from its congeners by the black and dark brown syntergosternite 7+8.</p>Published as part of <i>Mulieri, Pablo Ricardo, 2017, Saying goodbye to monotypy in the poorly known genus Austrophyto Lopes, 1989 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae): new diagnosis and description of two new species, pp. 88-100 in Zootaxa 4268 (1)</i> on pages 93-95, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4268.1.5, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/579924">http://zenodo.org/record/579924</a>
Il pensiero di Pandora. Donne e politica dall'antichità al Settecento.
Siamo abituati a pensare che la storia delle grandi idee politiche del passato sia stata scritta soltanto da uomini, molti dei quali particolarmente critici nei confronti delle donne e dell’eguaglianza di genere. Ma è davvero così? Il libro offre uno sguardo diverso sull’avvicendarsi delle teorie e ideologie politiche pre-ottocentesche, in cui a fare da protagonisti sono invece alcuni pensatori e pensatrici distintisi per la loro concezione innovativa sui rapporti tra i generi e sulla condizione femminile. Da Aspasia a Averroè e Christine de Pizan, da Cornelio Agrippa a Mario Equicola e Lucrezia Marinella, da Margaret Cavendish a Thomas Hobbes, Mary Astell e Olympe de Gouges, il testo mette in risalto filosofi, filosofe e scrittrici che dall’antichità al Settecento hanno utilizzato i linguaggi politici del mondo precedente all’età contemporanea per affrontare, spesso in modo del tutto originale, il tema complesso del rapporto tra i generi. Ne risulta un’indagine in cui dalle filosofe di Platone si passa attraverso le imama di Averroè, fino agli umanisti e alle scrittrici rinascimentali che teorizzavano la superiorità del genere femminile su quello maschile per concludere con alcune protagoniste delle rivoluzioni politiche del Seicento e del Settecento
The Language of Democracy between Aristotle and Machiavelli
What was it like to speak of and think about democracy in Machiavelli’s
time? This paper first reconstructs the pre-modern language of democracy in late Medieval and humanist political thought (from the translation of Aristotle’s Politics in the thirteenth century to Machiavelli’s context) discussing its conceptual implications. Second, it analyses Machiavelli’s ideas on pre-modern democracy vis-à-vis books 3 and 4 of Aristotle’s Politics and book 6 of Polybius’ Histories. Situating Machiavelli
into earlier reflections on democracy shows that while Machiavelli’s thought provides crucial conceptual innovations, his debt to the classical sources on democracy is much deeper than a simple and unqualified rejection of the latter’s languages
Da Machiavelli a Aristotele : Donato Giannotti sul governo misto e il regime popolare nella Repubblica fiorentina
This article analyzes Donato Giannotti’s theories of the mixed constitution and the popular regime in his work The Florentine Republic in two different ways. First of all, it reconstructs the debt of Giannotti’s ideas with the thoughts of Polybius and Machiavelli. Second, it pays particular attention to Giannotti’s extensive engagement with Aristotle and Aristotelian language in his theory of the mixed regime. It is shown that, even if Giannotti at times draws on Machiavelli, he provides ideas that incorporate Aristotle and Aristotelian language in order to present a specific popular theory of republicanism
- …
