2 research outputs found
History of the Alaydrus Dynasty, Founder of the Kubu Sultanate in West Kalimantan in the XVIII-XIX centuries AD
No full textThis article aims to explain the history of the Alaydrus dynasty, founder of the Kubu Sultanate in West Kalimantan in the 18th-19th centuries AD. The method used is a historical method, while the sources used are a colonial article entitled Borneo's Wester Afdeeling which was published in 1854 AD by Pieter Johannes Veth, then Geneology and the Adventures of Syarif Idrus Alaydrus which was published by the Alaydrus family, and other secondary books. The result of the discussion in this article is that the Kubu Sultanate was founded by Syarif Idrus Alaydrus and had the title Tuan Besar Sultan Kubu. The Alaydrus dynasty itself is a family name in Hadramaut, Yemen. Alaydrus belonged to the Ba' Alawi tribe, descendants of Husein ra, in the 15th century AD. Sultans who once led the Kubu Sultanate included: Syarif Idrus bin Abdurrahman Alaydrus, Syarif Muhammad bin Idrus Alaydrus, Syarif Abdurrahman bin Muhammad Alaydrus, Syarif Ismail bin Abdurrahman Alaydrus, etc. In 1953 the Kubu Sultanate ended and became part of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia
PRAKTIK AUTOCRATIC LEGALISM DI INDONESIA DALAM PROSES PERUBAHAN KEDUA ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NO.30 TAHUN 2002 TENTANG KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI: Practice Of Autocratic Legalism In Indonesia In The Process Of The Second Amendment To Law No. 30 Of 2002 Concerning The Corruption Eradication Commision
No full textAutocratic legalism is the practice of privatizing power that uses law as a pretext for action. The symptom of autocratic legalism is a contemporary issue that occurs in several Latin American countries. This symptom is also suspected to occur in Indonesia. In order to further examine the existence or absence of this symptom, the researcher examined it against the process of the second revision of Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. For this reason, the author conducted a study based on the formulation of the following problems: 1. How is the practice of autocratic legalism in the second amendment to the Law on Corruption; 2. What is the impact of the practice of autocratic legalism on the institution of the KPK after the second amendment to Law No. 30 of 2002; This research is a normative legal research using secondary data as the main data analyzed qualitatively. The nature of the research is descriptive with deductive conclusions drawn. Based on the results of the study, the practice of autocratic legalism in the revision of the KPK Law includes: 1). The legislative process is fast and tends to be closed; 2). Collusion or conspiracy between the DPR and the President; 3). Manipulation of the law as a pretext for legitimacy; and 4). Co-optation of political parties. The impact is that the independence of the KPK is disrupted both institutionally and institutionally, thus significantly increasing the duties and functions of the KPK
