376 research outputs found
Supplemental Material - COVID-19 era- digital eye strain and the use of digital devices in online learning: A cross-sectional study of nursing students
No full textSupplemental Material for COVID-19 era- digital eye strain and the use of digital devices in online learning: A cross-sectional study of nursing students by Majd T Mrayyan, Marwan H Al-Shaikh Ali, Reem Al-Reyati, Myasar Abed Al-Rahman and Manar Mrayan in E-Learning and Digital Media.</p
sj-docx-2-son-10.1177_23779608231191883 - Supplemental material for Investigating the Prevalence of Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-2-son-10.1177_23779608231191883 for Investigating the Prevalence of Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study by Majd T. Mrayyan, Abdel Rahman Hasan Alseid, Tasneem Sameer Ghoolah, Marwan H. Al-Shaikh Ali and Manar Mrayan in SAGE Open Nursing</p
sj-docx-1-son-10.1177_23779608231191883 - Supplemental material for Investigating the Prevalence of Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-son-10.1177_23779608231191883 for Investigating the Prevalence of Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study by Majd T. Mrayyan, Abdel Rahman Hasan Alseid, Tasneem Sameer Ghoolah, Marwan H. Al-Shaikh Ali and Manar Mrayan in SAGE Open Nursing</p
The Use Of Physical Restraint: An Argumentative Essay
No full textThis study was conducted to review the literature about the use of physical restraints as an argumentative issue. The use of physical restraints has been reported with varying prevalence from 41% to 64% according to epidemiological studies. In this study, the author reviewed the opinions of the opponent and proponent viewpoints regarding physical restraints from legal and ethical perspectives. The ideas of proponents implied that the use of physical restraints offers protection for patients and others as well as ensures introducing good treatment. On the other hand, the opponents think that the use of physical restraints is not well safe and associated with legal and ethical issues. Furthermore, psychological injuries and mental problems have been reported to be associated with the use of physical restraints. The author agrees with the opponents and does not support the use of physical restraints because it involves ethical, legal and health impacts
Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Order among Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer: A Position Statement
No full textEnd-of-life (EOL) care takes an important place in critical care settings. Of it, one of the most serious and arguable decision is the Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order. The DNR is a legal order written by a licensed physician in consultation with the patients or their surrogate decision makers, in which the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is withhold at the time of cardiac or respiratory arrest. Many studies reported that many inpatient deaths had a DNR order. The purpose of this position statement paper is to present proponents and opponents’ viewpoints regarding the DNR orders for terminally ill patients with cancer. Proponents of the DNR order reported that it is a form of treatment that protects patients’ rights, and allows the terminally ill cancer patients to die peacefully without undergoing futile resuscitation attempts. Opponents of the DNR order are concerned with the protection and preservation of life of the terminally ill cancer patients. The current author is against the DNR order based on the patients’ right for sanctity of life, and the Islamic views of human life. Keywords: Do Not Resuscitate, Do Not Resuscitate Order, DNR, Cancer, Position Statement, Proponents, Opponents
Hospital organizational climates and nurses’ intent to stay: Differences between units and wards
No full text
Perceptions of Jordanian Head Nurses of Variables That Influence the Quality of Nursing Care
No full textGender Selection: A Position Statement
No full textGender selection is the ability to choose a girl or a boy before you get pregnant. Some methods are used to assist in changing the odds towards the gender being selected. Methods such as selective abortion and infanticide resulted in birth ratios as high as 130 males per 100 females in some countries. Gender selection is surrounded with many debates. The purpose of this position statement is to present opponents and proponents’ viewpoints regarding gender selection. More to be done in this regard such as: the decisiveness of couples and physicians in issues related to gender selection; centers providing gender selection must keep a balanced gender ratio within the center; gender selection should only be done after proper informative and implicative counseling about many issues such as how to use healthy embryos of the unwanted gender in research, or their donation to infertile couples, or their transfer to the genetic mother. Keywords: gender selection, position statement, proponents, opponent
- …
