8,084 research outputs found
Fernando Botero, Belisario Betancur y Rafael Moure
No full textFotografía de Fernando Botero (derecha) en compañía del fotógrafo Rafael Moure Ramírez (centro) y del entonces presidente Belisario Betancur Cuartas (izquierda), al interior de la cabina de la avioneta en la que viajaron a Inírida en 1985. Durante este viaje, el artista plástico plasmó en una pared de la ciudad la imagen conocida popularmente como "La princesa Inírida". La fotografía fue obturada por Díaz de forma espontánea mientras los tres hablaban, por lo que pueden verse expresiones naturales en cada uno de ellos. Betancur, que viste una guayabera blanca, enfoca su mirada en el lente del fotógrafo; Moure lleva una chaqueta de cuello alto y dirige su mirada hacia el artista plástico mientras sonríe; por su parte, Botero, que viste camisa a cuadros y chaqueta de cuero negra, dirige su mirada hacia el político conservador
Sobre as práticas e reflexões publicitárias de Fernando Pessoa
Get PDFNeste texto, a autora analisa alguns trabalhos publicitários de Fernando Pessoa, bem
como algumas das suas reflexões sobre esta actividade. É dada especial atenção ao slogan
“Primeiro estranha-se. Depois entranha-se”, analisado sobre a perspectiva das funções
e propriedades deste constituinte da mensagem publicitária. Por fim, recorda-se
um recente slogan que recupera o clássico de Fernando Pessoa.
On this article, the author analyses some advertising texts created by Fernando Pessoa and
some of his thoughts about this activity. The main attention goes to the famous slogan “Primeiro
estranha-se. Depois entranha-se”, analysed through the principles of the functions
and proprieties of this element of advertisements. Finally, the author presents a recent slogan, constructed through the slogan of the Portuguese writer
A synopsis of Actenosigynes Moure, Graf & Urban, 1999 (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) — new species, possible oligolecty and biogeographic comments
No full textSilveira, Fernando A. (2009): A synopsis of Actenosigynes Moure, Graf & Urban, 1999 (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) — new species, possible oligolecty and biogeographic comments. Zootaxa 2292: 15-24, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19145
FIGURE 1 in A synopsis of Actenosigynes Moure, Graf & Urban, 1999 (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) — new species, possible oligolecty and biogeographic comments
No full textFIGURE 1. Female of Actenosigynes fulvoniger (Michener, 1989)—a) habitus, dorsal view; b) head, frontal view; c) metasoma, ventral view (notice the dull integument of sternal discs); d) habitus, lateral view.Published as part of Silveira, Fernando A., 2009, A synopsis of Actenosigynes Moure, Graf & Urban, 1999 (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) — new species, possible oligolecty and biogeographic comments, pp. 15-24 in Zootaxa 2292 on page 18, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19145
Euplusia yepezi Moure 2000
No full text6. Euplusia yepezi Moure, 2000, nom. nud. Euplusia yepezi Moure, 2000: Errata et Addendum [inserted as a separate sheet in Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 17 (2)]. Moure (1999) published a note on the taxonomy of Eufriesea (as Euplusia), describing new species and taking nomenclatural acts. One of these acts was to consider Eulaema nigrita raymondi (Schrottky, 1907) as a valid species of Eufriesea (Moure 1999: 94–95 incorrectly spelled as “ raymoni ”). Following this, Moure (1999) provided a detailed description of the onomatophore [deposited at MPSP with label 102.942, lectotype of Centris nigrita (Lep.) var. raymondi Schrottky, 1907 (Eulaema nigrita raymondi)—photographs of this specimen and labels made available by Nemésio 2009 a: 39]. Nevertheless, Moure (2000) later corrected his interpretations concerning this species through a sheet inserted in the journal “Revista Brasileira de Zoologia”, volume 17, number 2 (no page number), titled “Errata et Addendum”, which was distributed on the 30 th of June, 2000. In this “Errata et Addendum”, Moure (2000) mentioned that a serious mistake had been made—he did not mention if this mistake was his or the printers’—and reinterpreted Centris nigrita (Lep.) var. raymondi Schrottky, 1907 as Eulaema (Apeulaema) nigrita Lepeletier de Saint Fargeau, 1841. Moure (2000) stated that the rest of the text below Euplusia raymondi on pages 94–96 of the original paper (Moure 1999) referred to the description of a new species, Euplusia yepezi. Moure (2000) also stated that the abstract should be corrected to include a paragraph stating that “one male specimen from Rancho Grande, Aragua, Venezuela, is described as Euplusia yepezi sp. n. …”. This “Errata et Addendum” by Moure (2000), however, was overlooked by many subsequent authors, as Nemésio & Silveira (2007: 886) pointed out, and Eufriesea yepezi (Moure, 2000) was listed neither by Ramírez et al. (2002) nor by Roubik & Hanson (2004) in their checklists. Moure et al. (2007), in turn, considered this species as a junior synonym of Eufriesea venezolana (Schrottky, 1913), a position followed by Nemésio (2009 a: 232) in his checklist. A re-study of the Code, its criteria for nomina availability and the dates of publication of Moure’s nomenclatural acts, however, show that this interpretation is incorrect and that Euplusia yepezi should be considered a nomen nudum. Article 21.6 of the Code, expressly states that if the date of publication specified in a work is a range of dates, the work is to be dated from the final day of the range...”. (our bold). It obviously means that the date of publication of Euplusia yepezi is 2000, not 1999, because the publication was interrupted and continued at a later date— and in particular the nomen of the species itself and a tentative onatomophore were only published in 2000. This date, however, introduces a new problem, as the following is mandatory for names published after 1999: “ Article 16.4. Species-group names: fixation of name-bearing types to be explicit. Every new specific and subspecific name published after 1999, except a new replacement name (a nomen novum), for which the name-bearing type of the nominal taxon it denotes is fixed automatically [Art. 72.7], must be accompanied in the original publication [Art. 16.4.1] by the explicit fixation of a holotype, or syntypes, for the nominal taxon…”. Moure (2000) did not fix a holotype. When Moure (2000) stated that “one male specimen from Rancho Grande, Aragua, Venezuela, is described as Euplusia yepezi sp. n. …” the assumption that this specimen is the holotype is implicit, not explicit. This assumption becomes confusing when Moure (2000, last line of the “Errata et Addendum”) textually stated that (translated from Portuguese) “page 95 [in Moure 1999] and subsequent ones remain as they are”. Moure (1999: 95) explicitly stated (translated from Portuguese) “a specimen from Rancho Grande, 1100 m, Aragua, Venezuela, [collected] on 21 -VIII- 1974, F. Fernando Y. and C. J. Rosales leg. Received from Dr. Yepes when of [my] visit to Maracay in 1980 and compared to the type at the Museu de Zoologia of the Universidade de São Paulo”. Therefore Moure (1999, 2000) did not explicitly consider the specimen from Venezuela as the onomatophore nor explicitly designated this specimen as onomatophore as mandatory by the Code for species described after 1999. By maintaining the original paper as it was, from page 95 onward, Moure (2000) contradicted Moure (1999) and did not explicitly designate an onomatophore, as the specimen implicitly regarded as the onomatophore in Moure (2000) was confusingly compared to a “ type ” at the MPSP. Given Moure’s (2000) changes, this MPSP type could not be interpreted as the type of Centris nigrita var. raymondi Schrottky, 1907 because Moure (2000) changed what was written at the end of page 94, removing the reference to the type specimen of C. nigrita var. raymondi. Thus, this “ type ” specimen compared to the specimen from Rancho Grande, Venezuela, is a non-explicit specimen under the new wording provided by Moure (2000). Our conclusion is that Euplusia yepezi is a nomen nudum and the specimen deposited at the DZUP should not be considered a primary onomatophore.Published as part of Nemésio, André & Rasmussen, Claus, 2011, Nomenclatural issues in the orchid bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossina) and an updated catalogue, pp. 1-42 in Zootaxa 3006 on pages 18-19, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20341
A new species of Centris (Xanthemisia) Moure, 1945 from South America with a synopsis of the known species of the subgenus in Colombia (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Centridini)
No full textVivallo, Felipe, Vélez, Danny, Fernández, Fernando (2013): A new species of Centris (Xanthemisia) Moure, 1945 from South America with a synopsis of the known species of the subgenus in Colombia (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Centridini). Zootaxa 3694 (1): 81-91, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3694.1.
Fig. 2 in Relicthemisia, a new subgenus of the oil-collecting bee genus Centris Fabricius, 1804 with notes on distribution and host plants of C. xanthomelaena Moure & Castro, 2001 (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
No full textFig. 2. Morphological characteristics of Centris (Relicthemisia) xanthomelaena Moure & Castro, 2001. A. Female basitibial plate. B. Male S7. C. Male S8. D. Female pygidial plate. E. Genital capsule (dorsal view). F. Genital capsule (ventral view). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.Published as part of Vivallo, Felipe & Zanella, Fernando César Vieira, 2021, Relicthemisia, a new subgenus of the oil-collecting bee genus Centris Fabricius, 1804 with notes on distribution and host plants of C. xanthomelaena Moure & Castro, 2001 (Hymenoptera: Apidae), pp. 1-15 in European Journal of Taxonomy 760 on page 6, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.760.1435, http://zenodo.org/record/510173
Arhysosage flava Moure 1958
No full textArhysosage flava Moure, 1958 (Figure 5A–D) Comments In the couplet 7 of the key to Arhysosage species proposed by Engel (2000), the females of A. flava are described as having a black or brown labrum; however in this species the labrum is yellow (Figure 5A), as correctly indicated in the description of Moure (1958), and subsequent redescription of Engel (2000). A mostly black or brown labrum in females of Arhysosage is present in A. atronulata, A. bifasciata and A. ochracea. New distribution record Brazil: Mato Grosso do Sul. Floral records Opuntia sp. (Cactaceae). Material examined One male (MZSP), “ Brasil, Mato Grasso do\ Sul, Porto Murtinho,\ Fazenda São Fernando,\ 21 ◦ 33.116 ′ S, 57 ◦ 46.400 ′ W,\ 28.i.2008, F. A. Esteves leg.”; 1 male (MZSP), “ Brasil, Mato Grosso do Sul,\ Porto Murtinho 21–30.i.2008 \ S. Nihei and A.J.C. Aguiar leg”; 2 females (DZUP), “ Brasil, Mato Grosso do Sul,\ Porto Murtinho, estr. para\ Faz. Pirizal 10–11.xii.2008 \ K.S. Ramos & V.Kanamura”.Published as part of Ramos, Kelli S., 2013, The bee genus Arhysosage Brèthes (Apidae: Andreninae: Calliopsini): new species, taxonomic notes and new distribution records from Brazil, pp. 2735-2747 in Journal of Natural History (J. Nat. Hist.) (J. Nat. Hist.) 47 (43 - 44) on pages 2744-2745, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2013.791887, http://zenodo.org/record/519796
Centris (Relicthemisia) xanthomelaena Moure & Castro 2001
No full textCentris (Relicthemisia) xanthomelaena Moure & Castro, 2001 Figs 1–4 Centris ‘ xanthomelaena ’ Vogel & Machado, 1991: 163–175, figs 6a–b, 9a, h (distribution, floral records, pollination). Nomen nudum. Centris (Paracentris) xanthomelaena – Moure & Castro 2001: 330–332, figs 1–4 (original description). — Silveira et al. 2002: 98, 253 (distribution, list). — Urban 2003: 24, 43 (taxonomic note, cited). — Azevedo & Silveira 2005: 45 (cited). — Batalha Filho et al. 2007: 25 (distribution record). — Moure et al. 2007: 120 (catalogue). — Azevedo et al. 2008: 143 (distribution record). — Machado & Sazima 2008: 488 (floral record). — Rodarte et al. 2008: 307 (distribution record). — Pigozzo & Viana 2010: 105 (distribution record). — Vivallo & Zanella 2012: 4, 6, 8–9, 13– 14, figs 37–38, 77–78 (distribution, key). — Giannini et al. 2013: 78 (list). — Silva 2014: 188 (distribution record). — Martins et al. 2018: 770, figs 1–2 (bionomy, nesting behavior, distribution record). — Barenbaum 2019: 222 (bionomy, sleeping behavior). — Carneiro et al. 2019: 219 (distribution and floral records). Centris xanthomelaena – Zanella 2002: 438, 444, 447, 451, 453, 455, 457, 459, 483, 485, 486, figs 26, 164–170 (diagnosis, male description, distribution map, morphological characters, phylogenetic relationships). — Aguiar 2003a: 42, 43 (distribution and floral records); 2003b: 464 (floral record). — Zanella 2003: 234 (list). — Aguiar et al. 2005: 249 (distribution record). — Aguiar & Zanella 2005: 17, 19 (distribution record). — Azevedo & Silveira 2005: 47 (cited). — Prevedello & Carvalho 2006: 45 (cited). — Zanella & Vivallo 2009: 68 (cited). — Martins & Melo 2015: 7–8, 10 (phylogenetic relationships). — Martins et al. 2018: 771, 772 (sleeping behavior). — Carneiro et al. 2019: 216, 220 (distribution and floral records, pollinator). Diagnosis Female Integument dark brown to black, except flagellum dark brown and tegula yellowish brown (Fig. 1A–B). Wings brown with veins dark brown (Fig. 1B). Head, mesosoma (except the ventral surface) and anterior half of T1 with intense yellow slightly greenish pilosity, lighter on labrum and gena (Fig. 1A–B). The rest of the body with blackish hairs, except posterior apex of the femur of forelegs with some yellowish hairs (Fig. 1A–B). Clypeus coriaceous with coarse and dense punctation (Fig. 1A). Clypeal disc with an unpunctated area on upper half, without smooth longitudinal band. Labrum with the same punctation, but denser, without smooth basal margin. Terga and sterna, except T6 and S6, with very narrow smooth distal margin, wider on T4. Mandible with four apically acute teeth (Fig. 1A). Fourth teeth slightly larger than the third (Fig. 1A). Maxillary palpus 4-segmented. Malar area very narrow (Fig. 1A). Labrum semicircular (Fig. 1A). Inner orbits of compound eyes converging downward (Fig. 1A). Elaiospathes normally developed. Basitibial plate elliptical, with S-like secondary plate (Fig. 2A). S2–S4 projected in the middle. Apex of primary pygidial plate slightly rounded with the apex of the secondary plate open and slightly projected towards the distal edge of the primary plate (Fig. 2D). Male Similar to the female, except for the following characters: integument dark brown to black, except basal segments of the flagellum brown and apical segments slightly orange (Fig. 1C–D). Supraclypeal area, discs of clypeus and labrum yellow (Fig. 1C–D). Tegula yellowish brown. Clypeal disc with small unpunctated area on upper half, without smooth longitudinal band. Terga and sterna, except T7 and S6, with relatively broad light brown smooth distal margin, wider on T4. Mandible with three apically acute teeth (Fig. 1C). Distance between clypeus and compound eyes shorter than half of the shortest diameter of F1 (Fig. 1C). Apical margin of the hind tibia without tooth-like projection. Apical half of fore and middle basitarsi without a row of long, erect, slightly spatulate and curved setae similar to an elaiospathe. Pygidial plate absent. Type material Holotype BRAZIL – Bahia State • ♀; Milagres; 28 Jan. 1998; 10h50; Marina Siqueira de Castro leg.; Chamaechrista amiciela (Caesalpiniaceae)\1070; LABE/EBDA (not examined). Paratypes BRAZIL – Bahia State • 1 ♀; Milagres; 12º88.280´S, 39º92.298´W; 28 Jan. 1998; 10h45; Marina Siqueira de Castro leg.; Chamaechrista amiciela (Caesalpiniaceae)\1069; LABE/EBDA (not examined) • 1 ♀; Milagres; 12º88.280´S, 39º92.298´W; 31 Mar. 1997; 10h30; Marina Siqueira de Castro leg.; in Stimaphyllom auriculatum (Malpighiaceae); DZUP (not examined). Material examined (specimens labeled as paratype or holotype below do not belong to the type series) BRAZIL – Alagoas State • 1 ♀; Piranhas, Poço da Ingazeira; 9º50.594´S, 37º88.113´W; 28 Oct. 2005; Debora Moura leg.; \ “ Centris xanthomelaena Moure & Castro 2001 Schlindwein Det. ” \ HYAP 4004; UNILA. – Bahia State • 1 ♀; Curaçá, Faz. Humaitá; 9º07´262˝ S, 39º42´859˝ W; 440 m a.s.l.; 4 May 2011; PPBIO Caatinga; F.C.V. Zanella leg.; \ HYAP 0582, UNILA • 1 ♀; Monte Santo; 10º43.958´S, 39º33.566´W; 3 Feb. 2000; w.c.; Malpighiaceae \ HYAP 9706, UNILA • 2 ♀♀; Camacari, Dunas de Tauá; 12º71.621´S, 38º36.842´W; 24 Nov. 1993; J. Becker leg. [†]; MNRJ • 1 ♂; Maracás; 13°26.467´S, 40°25.850´W; 20 Jan. 1963 \ “Coleção Campos Seabra” \ J. Becker leg. \ “ Centris Xanthemisia bicolor Lepeletier ” \ “ C. Paracentris xanthomelaena A.A. Azevedo Det. ” [†]; MNRJ • 1 ♀, 1 ♂; Dias D’Avila; 12º60.621´S, 38º34.028´W; 2 Dec. 1951; Luiz Carlos leg. [†]; MNRJ • 1 ♀, 2 ♂♂; Dias D’Avila; 12º60.621´S, 38º34.028´W; 16 Dec. 1951; Luiz Carlos leg. [†]; MNRJ • 2 ♀♀, 1 ♂; Ipirá, Santa Quitéria; 12º15.642´S, 39º76.319´W; 6 Jan. 2010; K. Ramos and V. Kanamura leg. [†]; MNRJ. – Minas Gerais State • 1 ♀; Conego Marinho; 15º18˝ S, 44º25˝ W; 1 Apr. 1988; Nereu leg. 880824 \ “ C. (Paracentris) sp. nov. Det. Moure, 1992” \ “Parátipo Centris xanthomelaena sp. nov. F. Zanella, 1999”; RPSP • 1 ♂; Conego Marinho; 15º18˝ S, 44º25˝ W; 29 Mar. 1988; Nereu leg. 880654\ “ex Penthemisia Moure, 1950 Det. Moure 1992” \ “ C. (Paracentris) sp. nov. Det. Moure, 1998” \ “Parátipo Centris xanthomelaena sp. nov. F. Zanella, 1999”; RPSP. – Paraíba State • 1 ♀; Patos; 7º03.860´S, 37º31.445´W; 16 Aug. 2002; Gisllyana leg.; HYAP 9300; UNILA. – Pernambuco State • 1 ♀; Alagoinha; 8º46.622´S, 36º78.423´W; 18 Jun. 1987; I.C.S Machado leg.; in Ruellia sp. \ “ C. (Paracentris) sp. nov., Det. Moure 1992” \ “Holótipo Centris xanthomelaena sp. nov. F. Zanella, 1999”; RPSP • 1 ♀; Buique, Vale do Catimbau; 8º49.210´S, 37º50.180´W; 17 Mar. 2005; R. Pick leg. \ “ Centris xanthomelaena Moure & Castro 2001 Schlindwein Det. ” \; HYAP 4002; UNILA. – Rio Grande do Norte State • 1 ♂; Serra Negra do Norte, ESEC Seridó; 6º66.572´S, 37º40.515´W; 12 Aug. 1995; F. Zanella leg.\ 0938 10b03\ HYAP 9705; UNILA • 2 ♀♀; Serra Negra do Norte, ESEC; 6º66.572´S, 37º40.515´W; 13 Mar. 2005; F. Zanella leg.; em pl. 1 roxa 10h\ HYAP 4601; UNILA • 1 ♂; Serra Negra do Norte, ESEC Seridó; 6º66.572´S, 37º40.515´W; 5 Jul. 2005; F. Zanella leg.; pl. 27 Chamaechrista 13h \ HYAP 4598; UNILA • 1 ♀; Serra Negra do Norte, ESEC Seridó; 6º66.572´S, 37º40.515´W; 22 May 2005; F. Zanella leg. \ HYAP 4600; UNILA • 1 ♀; Serra Negra do Norte, ESEC Seridó; 6º66.572´S, 37º40.515´W; 12 Jun. 2005; F. Zanella leg.; Krameria sp. 14h \ HYAP 4853; UNILA • 1 ♂; Serra Negra do Norte, ESEC Seridó; 6º66.572´S, 37º40.515´W; 8 Apr. 2005; F. Zanella leg.; Voando sobre arbusto 17h [†]; MNRJ • 1 ♀; Santana do Seridó; 6º46˝ S, 36º44˝ W; 10 Aug. 2007; J.M.F. Camargo leg.; 07.1024; RPSP. Type locality Brazil: Bahia State: Milagres. Distribution Endemic to northeastern Brazil, being recorded mainly in the dry open Caatinga vegetation (Fig. 3). The only record in central Brazil, Mato Grosso State, needs confirmation. Brazil: Rio Grande do Norte State: Serra Negra do Norte (Zanella 2002, 2003; Aguiar et al. 2003; Silva 2014), *Santana do Seridó. Paraíba State: (Silveira et al. 2002). *Patos. Pernambuco State: Alagoinha (Vogel & Machado 1991; Machado & Sazima 2008). Petrolina (Xavier et al. 2016; Martins et al. 2018). Salgueiro (Xavier et al. 2016). *Buique. Alagoas State: *Piranhas. Bahia State: Canudos (Pigozzo & Viana 2010; Silva 2014). Ibiraba (Rodarte et al. 2008). Itatim (Aguiar 2003a, 2003b; Aguiar et al. 2003; Aguiar & Zanella 2005; Silva 2014). Jequié (Batalha Filho et al. 2007; Silva 2014). Juazeiro (Coelho et al. 2018). Milagres (Moure & Castro 2001; Silva 2014). Monte Santo (Zanella 2002; Aguiar et al. 2003). Xique-Xique (Carneiro et al. 2019). *Camacari (Dunas de Tauá), *Dias D’Ávila, *Ipirá (Santa Quitéria), *Maracás. Mato Grosso State: cf. Serra do Roncador (Zanella 2002). Minas Gerais State: Botumirim (Azevedo et al. 2008). Cônego Marinho (Zanella 2002).Published as part of Vivallo, Felipe & Zanella, Fernando César Vieira, 2021, Relicthemisia, a new subgenus of the oil-collecting bee genus Centris Fabricius, 1804 with notes on distribution and host plants of C. xanthomelaena Moure & Castro, 2001 (Hymenoptera: Apidae), pp. 1-15 in European Journal of Taxonomy 760 on pages 4-8, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.760.1435, http://zenodo.org/record/510173
- …
