196,846 research outputs found

    Eddy, J M (John Morriss), VX59115

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/383369Surname: EDDY. Given Name(s) or Initials: J M (JOHN MORRISS). Military Service Number or Last Known Location: VX59115. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 20521.223016 Item: [2016.0049.15662] "Eddy, J M (John Morriss), VX59115

    Minutes of IBM-Lincoln concurrence meeting no. 17

    No full text
    Present: (IBM) D. C. Ross, H. J. White; (MIT) A. D. Hughes, B. E. Morriss, H. K. Rising, A. M. WerlinMinutes of an IBM-Lincoln concurrence meeting discussing long-range radar input word layout, input channel switching, crosstelling inputs, and outputs

    IBM engineering systems office concurrence meeting no.16

    No full text
    Present: A. D. Hughes, J. P. May, B. E. Morriss of MIT and D. C. Ross, C. E. Walston, H. J. White of IBM.Minutes of a meeting discussing the long-range radar and gap-filler radar input specifications, as well as minor modifications

    2 rare building blocks, Bar Beach [cartographic material] : for sale by auction on the land, Saturday, 17th December, 1949, at 3 p.m. /

    No full text
    Sales plan for land in the suburb of Cooks Hill in Newcastle, bounded by Parkway Avenue and Darby Street.; "Solicitor to the Estate, E. A. T. Armstrong, A. M. P. Chambers, Hunter Street."; "A.A. Co. Title."; Also available in an electronic version via the internet at: http://nla.gov.au/nla.map-lfsp1790.Two rare building blocks, Bar Beach2 rare building blocks 2, Bar Beac

    Private Amici Curiae and the Supreme Court\u27s 1997-1998 Term Employment Law Jurisprudence

    No full text
    The amicus curiae brief has become a common occurrence in today\u27s legal arena, especially with the proliferation of private interest groups that specialize in numerous topics of political and social interest. The substantial increase in the use of amici briefs, however, has sparked criticism concerning both the costs (in effort and resources) associated with filing these griefs and the persuasive effect (or lack thereof) the briefs have on the Court. Much of this criticism arises from the failure of many interest groups to posit legal arguments that apply the facts of a given case to the law. Instead, the amici briefs often present policy arguments or unusual factual theories, which ultimately renders them ineffective as useful legal tools. In this Article, Professor Morriss explores the role of the amici and the influence of the amicus curiae brief upon the Court in three recent Supreme Court Title VII cases: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, and Faragher v. City of Boca Raton. Morriss concludes that as more and more private interest groups endeavor to emphasize their own importance by filing amici briefs, the Court, rather than being enlightened, will be burdened by information which lacks legal substance

    I don’t know where to look: the impact of intolerance of uncertainty on saccades towards non-predictive emotional face distractors

    No full text
    Attentional bias to uncertain threat is associated with anxiety disorders. Here we examine the extent to which emotional face distractors (happy, angry and neutral) and individual differences in intolerance of uncertainty (IU), impact saccades in two versions of the “follow a cross” task. In both versions of the follow the cross task, the probability of receiving an emotional face distractor was 66.7%. To increase perceived uncertainty regarding the location of the face distractors, in one of the tasks additional non-predictive cues were presented before the onset of the face distractors and target. We did not find IU to impact saccades towards non-cued face distractors. However, we found IU, over Trait Anxiety, to impact saccades towards non-predictive cueing of face distractors. Under these conditions, IU individuals’ eyes were pulled towards angry face distractors and away from happy face distractors overall, and the speed of this deviation of the eyes was determined by the combination of the cue and emotion of the face. Overall, these results suggest a specific role of IU on attentional bias to threat during uncertainty. These findings highlight the potential of intolerance of uncertainty-based mechanisms to help understand anxiety disorder pathology and inform potential treatment targets
    corecore