1,721,038 research outputs found
Pharmacogenetics of Cardiovascular Prevention in Diabetes: From Precision Medicine to Identification of Novel Targets
Full text linkPharmacogenetics-a branch of precision medicine-holds the promise of becoming a novel tool to reduce the social and healthcare burdens of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetes. The improvement in cardiovascular risk stratification resulting from adding genetic characteristics to clinical data has moved from the modest results obtained with genetic risk scores based on few genetic variants, to the progressively better performances of polygenic risk scores based on hundreds to millions of variants (CAD-PGRS). Similarly, over the past few years, the number of studies investigating the use of CAD-PGRS to identify different responses to cardio-preventive treatment has progressively increased, yielding striking results for lipid-lowering drugs such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and statins. The use of CAD-PGRS to stratify patients based on their likely response to diabetes-specific interventions has been less successful, but promising results have been obtained with regard to specific genetic variants modulating the effects of interventions such as intensive glycemic control and fenofibrate. The finding of diabetes-specific CAD-loci, such as GLUL, has also led to the identification of promising new targets that might hopefully result in the development of specific therapies to reduce CVD burden in patients with diabetes. As reported in consensus statements from international diabetes societies, some of these pharmacogenetic approaches are expected to be introduced in clinical practice over the next decade. For this to happen, in addition to continuing to improve and validate these tools, it will be necessary to educate physicians and patients about the opportunities and limits of pharmacogenetics, as summarized in this review
Combination Therapy with SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Diabetic Kidney Disease
No full textInsufficient Evidence for Interaction Between Haptoglobin Phenotypes and Intensive Glycemic Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes
No full textLong-acting injectable glp-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes: Perspectives from clinical practice
Full text linkRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) have consistently shown glycemic and extra-glycemic benefits of long-acting injectable glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs, liraglutide, albiglutide, exenatide once-weekly, dulaglutide, and semaglutide) in terms of reduction in the rates of cardiovascular events and mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes. Recently, the analyses of large datasets collecting routinely-accumulated data from clinical practice (ie, real-world studies, RWS) have provided new opportunities to complement the information obtained from RCTs. In this narrative review, we addressed clinically relevant questions that might be answered by well-conducted RWS: are subjects treated with GLP-1RAs in the “real-world” similar to those included in RCTs? Is the performance of GLP-1RA observed in the RWS (effectiveness) similar to that described in RCTs (efficacy)? Is the effectiveness similar in population of patients generally under-represented in RCTs? Are the cardiovascular benefits of GLP-1RAs confirmed in RWS? We also describe a few comparisons currently un-explored by specific RCTs, such as direct comparison between different administration strategies (eg, fixed-versus flexible-combination with basal-insulin) or between GLP-1RAs versus dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhi-bitor (DDP4i) or versus sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) on hard cardio-renal outcomes. Altogether, RWS provide highly informative information on treatment with GLP-1RAs. On the one side, RWS showed different clinical characteristics between subjects enrolled in RCTs versus those attending real-world clinics and receiving a GLP-1RA. On the other hand, RWS showed that GLP-1RA effectiveness is overall consistent in subgroups of patients less represented in RCTs. In addition, RWS allowed the identification of modifiable factors (eg, titration or adherence) that might guide physicians towards better GLP-1RAs use. Finally, multiple RWS reported better cardio-renal outcomes with GLP-1RAs than with DPP-4i, while initial findings from RWS described a weaker cardiovascular protection compared to SGLT-2i. Therefore, there is the need for further RWS and RCTs comparing these different classes of glucose lowering medications
Cholesterol lowering therapies and achievement of targets for primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention in type 2 diabetes: unmet needs in a large population of outpatients at specialist clinics
Full text linkBackground: The well-established benefit of Low-Dense-Lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) lowering treatments (LLTs) has led clinical guidelines to lower the cardiovascular prevention targets. Despite this, there is a surprising scarcity of real-world studies (RWS) evaluating whether recommendations are applied in the routine clinical management of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We therefore evaluated, in a large RWS, the pattern of LLTs use and the achievement of LDL-c targets in patients with T2D in Italian diabetes specialist clinics. Methods: We collected data from 46 diabetes outpatient clinics (following 281,381 subjects), including 104,726 T2D patients, for whom use of LLTs between 2015 and 2016 was ascertained. We used the 2016 and 2019 European Atherosclerosis Society and European Society of Cardiology (EAS-ESC) guidelines to define cardiovascular risk categories, LDL-c targets, and the expected LDL-c reduction and cardiovascular benefit achievable with LLT intensification. Results: 63,861 patients (61.0%) were on statin therapy, 9.2% of whom were also on ezetimibe. Almost all subjects were at high (29.3%) or very high (70.4%) cardiovascular risk, including 17% being in secondary prevention. Among very high-risk patients, 35% were not on statin despite half of them had LDL-c > 2.6 mmol/l, and only 15% of those on statins had LDL-c 1.8 mmol/l. Overall, 35% and 14% of subjects achieved the LDL-c targets as suggested by 2016 and 2019 EAS-ESC Guidelines, respectively. Based on anticipated response to treatment, we estimated that 38% of the entire population would require high-intensity-statin (HI-statin), 27% a combination of HI-statin plus ezetimibe, and 27% the addition of proprotein-convertase-subtilisin/kexin-9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. These LLT intensifications would reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events by 32%, from 23.511 to 16.022 events per 100.000 patients/10-years (incidence-rate-ratio 0.68; 95% C.I 0.67–0.70, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Despite the increase in use of LLT in T2D over the last decades, a large proportion of subjects with T2D did not achieve their LDL-c targets. Given the very high cardiovascular risk of these patients, improving LLT is expected to have a dramatic impact on cardiovascular event prevention
Early weight loss, diabetes remission and long-term trajectory after diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: a retrospective study
Full text linkAims/hypothesis: Weight loss can improve glycaemic management in individuals with type 2 diabetes, but its long-term effects on remission, cardiovascular risk factors and complications remain unclear. We investigated clinical outcomes following non-interventional ≥10% body weight loss in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in a routine care setting. Methods: We retrospectively analysed two cohorts of people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. After exclusions, cohort 1 included 1934 individuals followed for up to 25 years; cohort 2 comprised 13,277 individuals followed for up to 10 years. Participants were categorised into two groups based on whether or not they lost at least 10% body weight. In a sensitivity analysis, a group of participants with intermediate weight loss (5% to <10%) was also considered. Outcomes included HbA1c, diabetes remission, cardiovascular parameters and chronic complications. Results: Participants (58% male) had a mean age of 62 years and a mean diab..
Comparative effectiveness of dapagliflozin vs DPP-4 inhibitors on a composite endpoint of HbA1c, body weight and blood pressure reduction in the real world
Full text linkBackground: Treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) should aim at preventing or delaying complications through the control of glycaemia and cardiovascular risk factors. We herein compared the SGLT-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin vs DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) on a composite endpoint of glycaemic and extraglycaemic effectiveness. Methods: This was a multicentre, retrospective real-world study conducted at 56 outpatient clinics in Italy. We collected data on patients newly started on dapagliflozin or DPP-4i in 2015-2017. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients attaining a simultaneous reduction of HbA1c ≥0.5%, body weight ≥2 kg, systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥2 mmHg. Confounding by indication was addressed by propensity score matching (PSM) or multivariable adjustment (MVA). Results: Patients initiating dapagliflozin (n = 2091) or DPP-4i (n = 2144) differed for most clinical characteristics. After PSM, two well-balanced groups of 1149 patients each were compared. The primary endpoint was reached in a greater proportion of patients who received dapagliflozin (17.6%) compared to DPP-4i (11.7%), with a relative risk of 1.50 (1.21-1.86; P <.001). Similar results were obtained in the as-treated and intention-to-treat datasets or using MVA in place of PSM. The beneficial effect of dapagliflozin was mainly due to its greater effectiveness on body weight and, to a lesser extent, on SBP. The change in HbA1c did not differ between groups. Conclusions: T2D patients initiating the SGLT2i dapagliflozin had a greater probability of attaining a composite endpoint of clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c, body weight and SBP, compared to similar patients initiating a DPP-4i in the same period and healthcare setting
Impact of MASLD and MetALD on clinical outcomes: A meta-analysis of preliminary evidence
No full textA recent Delphi consensus proposed a new definition for metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and introduced a disease entity called MetALD, a condition in which steatotic liver disease (SLD), metabolic dysfunction and moderate alcohol intake coexist. Given the limited available data on the prognostic implications of these disease entities, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available cohort studies to evaluate the association of MASLD and MetALD with hard clinical outcomes. We included 5 studies for a total of 9 824 047 participants. Compared with participants without SLD, increased rates of all-cause mortality and incident cardiovascular disease were present for both MASLD and MetALD. Moreover, MetALD was also associated with significantly higher risks of cancer-related mortality (n = 2 studies, random-effects HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.35–3.28) and cardiovascular mortality (n = 3 studies, random-effects HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12–1.22). Although preliminary, available evidence indicates a more unfavourable prognosis for patients with MetALD compared with those with MASLD
- …
