126,400 research outputs found
Handwritten letters from John Morgan, 1874-1888
No full textScans of letters written by John Morgan to Matthias F. Cowley, a Mormon missionary. John Morgan was the President of the Southern States Mission starting in 1878. Details: [1 - 2]: Letter dated 15 October 1879 at Dalton, Ga., from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Va.; [3 - 5]: Letter dated 8 June 1879 at Salt Lake City from John Morgan to Elders Barnett and Cowley, Virginia; [6 - 8]: Letter dated 26 July 1879 at Salt Lake City from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Va.; [9 - 10]: Letter dated 5 November 1879 at Columbia, Tennesee, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Va.; [11 - 13]: Letter dated 26 July 1879 at Salt Lake City from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Va. [Second scan]; [14 - 18]: Letter dated 30 September 1879 at Rome, Georgia, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Va.; [19 - 20]: Letter dated 9 November 1878 at Rome, Georgia, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley [21 - 23]: Letter dated 4 September 1879 at Manassa, Colorado, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Virginia; [24 - 26]: Letter dated 4 December 1879 at Stanford, Illinois, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Virginia; [27 - 28]: Letter dated 9 October 1879 at Dalton, Georgia, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Virginia; [29 - 31]: Letter dated 23 August 1878 at Rome, Georgia, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley. (Note: Images 30 and 31 out of order). [32 - 34]: Letter dated 27 August 1878 at Salt Lake City from John Morgan, addressed "Dear Bro"; [35 - 36]: Letter dated 21 October 1879 at Dalton, Georgia, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Virginia; [37 - 38]: Letter dated 9 February 1888 at Salt Lake City from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley; [39]: Letter dated 14 March 1888 at Chattanooga, Tennessee, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley; [40 - 41]: Postal card dated 19 October 1881 at Nashville, Tennessee, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at St. Louis, Missouri; [42 - 43]: Postal card dated 4 July 1881 at Travellers Rest, Alabama, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Janesborough, Georgia; [44 - 45]: Postal card dated 31 December 1881 at Salt Lake City, Utah, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at St. Louis, Missouri; [46 - 47]: Postal card dated 8 March 1881 from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Dawsen, Georgi
Morgan, F W, 412618
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/406031Surname: MORGAN. Given Name(s) or Initials: F W. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 412618. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 49256.246937
Item: [2016.0049.38308] "Morgan, F W, 412618
Morgan, F A, VX64191
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/406098Surname: MORGAN. Given Name(s) or Initials: F A. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: VX64191. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 22749.247004
Item: [2016.0049.38375] "Morgan, F A, VX64191
Morgan, F E, NX23384
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/406057Surname: MORGAN. Given Name(s) or Initials: F E. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX23384. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 3634.246963
Item: [2016.0049.38334] "Morgan, F E, NX23384
Proclamation of martial law in Mingo County by West Virginia Governor Ephraim F. Morgan, May 19, 1921
No full textThis document concerns the Mine Wars that occurred in West Virginia in the early part of the 20th century, when workers struggled against mine owners for the right to join labor unions. This document is an official typewritten document issued by Governor Ephraim F. Morgan on 19 May 1921, declaring a state of war in Mingo County and establishing martial law in that region. It discusses the circumstances under which people in Mingo County would be arrested or detained
Miscellaneous Typescript Letters from John Morgan, 1863-1886
No full textScans of typescripts of letters written by John Hamilton Morgan. Some are to his parents from when he was serving in the Civil War, some are letters to newspapers written during missions; and others were sent to LDS missionary Matthias F. Cowley. Detailed inventory: [1 - 2] Letter dated 28 January 1863 at "Camp near Murfreesboro, Tennessee, from John Morgan to his parents; [3] Letter dated 12 February 1863 at "Camp near Murfreesboro, Tennessee, from John Morgan to his father, Garrard Morgan; [4 - 5] Letter dated 21 December 1863 at Mayville, Alabama, from John Morgan to his mother; [6 - 7] Letter dated 21 December 1863 at Mayville, Alabama, from John Morgan to his mother (2nd copy); [8] Letter dated 20 June 1868 by John Morgan, describing his decision to propose marriage; [9 - 12] Letter to the editor of the Greensburg Standard dated 4 November 1870, from "our Utah correspondent," John Morgan, describing "Mormonism, its history"; [13] Letter dated 28 November 1875 at Normal, Illinois, from John Morgan to the editor of the Deseret News, Salt Lake City; [14] Letter dated 23 August 1878 at Rome, Georgia, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley; [15] Letter dated 9 November 1878 at Rome, Georgia, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley; [16] Letter dated 26 July 1879 at Salt Lake City from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Va.; [17 - 18] Letter dated 4 September 1879 at Manassa, Colorado, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Virginia; [19 - 20] Letter dated 30 September 1879 at Rome, Georgia, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Va.; [21] Letter dated 8 [actually 9] October 1879 at Dalton, Georgia, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Virginia; [22] Letter dated 15 October 1879 at Dalton, Ga., from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Va.; [23] Letter dated 21 October 1879 at Dalton, Georgia, from John Morgan to M. F. Cowley at Burks Garden, Virginia; [24] Letter dated 7 June 1886 at Chattanooga, Tennessee, from John Morgan to President John Taylor at Salt Lake City, Utah; [25] Letter (undated) from John Morgan at Manassa, Colorado, to Franklin D. Richards, Salt Lake City, Uta
Morgan, S F C, NX30742
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/406060Surname: MORGAN. Given Name(s) or Initials: S F C. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX30742. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 12296.246966
Item: [2016.0049.38337] "Morgan, S F C, NX30742
Twentieth-century poetry and science : science in the poetry of Hugh MacDiarmid, Judith Wright, Edwin Morgan, and Miroslav Holub
No full textThe aim of this thesis is to arrive at a characterisation of twentieth century poetry and science by means of a detailed study of the work of four poets who engaged extensively with science and whose writing lives spanned the greater part of the period. The study of science in the work of the four chosen poets, Hugh MacDiarmid (1892 – 1978), Judith Wright (1915 – 2000), Edwin Morgan (1920 – 2010), and Miroslav Holub (1923 – 1998), is preceded by a literature survey and an initial theoretical chapter. This initial part of the thesis outlines the interdisciplinary history of the academic subject of poetry and science, addressing, amongst other things, the challenges presented by the episodes known as the ‘two cultures’ and the ‘science wars’. Seeking to offer a perspective on poetry and science more aligned to scientific materialism than is typical in the interdiscipline, a systemic challenge to Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) is put forward in the first chapter. Additionally, the founding work of poetry and science, I. A. Richards’s Science and Poetry (1926), is assessed both in the context in which it was written, and from a contemporary viewpoint; and, as one way to understand science in poetry, a theory of the creative misreading of science is developed, loosely based on Harold Bloom’s The Anxiety of Influence (1973). The detailed study of science in poetry commences in Chapter II with Hugh MacDiarmid’s late work in English, dating from his period on the Shetland Island of Whalsay (1933 – 1941). The thesis in this chapter is that this work can be seen as a radical integration of poetry and science; this concept is considered in a variety of ways including through a computational model, originally suggested by Robert Crawford. The Australian poet Judith Wright, the subject of Chapter III, is less well known to poetry and science, but a detailed engagement with physics can be identified, including her use of four-dimensional imagery, which has considerable support from background evidence. Biology in her poetry is also studied in the light of recent work by John Holmes. In Chapter IV, science in the poetry of Edwin Morgan is discussed in terms of its origin and development, from the perspective of the mythologised science in his science fiction poetry, and from the ‘hard’ technological perspective of his computer poems. Morgan’s work is cast in relief by readings which are against the grain of some but not all of his published comments. The thesis rounds on its theme of materialism with the fifth and final chapter which studies the work of Miroslav Holub, a poet and practising scientist in communist-era Prague. Holub’s work, it is argued, represents a rare and important literary expression of scientific materialism. The focus on materialism in the thesis is not mechanistic, nor exclusive of the domain of the imagination; instead it frames the contrast between the original science and the transformed poetic version. The thesis is drawn together in a short conclusion
Data for 'High accuracy particle analysis using sheathless microfluidic impedance cytometry'
No full textData in matlab format for the article D. Spencer, F.
Caselli, P. Bisegna and H. Morgan, Lab Chip, 2016, DOI: 10.1039/C6LC00339G</span
- …
