2,515 research outputs found
Sustainable Development of the Nile River at Greater Khartoum
No full textSudan is the largest country in Africa, but there is poverty and a lack of infrastructure, skills and opportunity despite its substantial natural resources. The capital of Sudan is Khartoum City,
located at the confluence of the Blue and White Nile Rivers. Unfortunately development on Nile
River Front is limited due to the risk of flooding and erosion. There is a danger that rapid
economic development may take place in this unique area without sustainable development
planning. This research project aims to develop strategies to protect the Nile River banks by
suitable stabilization methods so that development can take place safely.
Data has been collected about hydrology, morphology, geotechnical factors, soil classifications, river pattern systems, driving forces, and the main problems restricting sustainable development and engineering works for the Nile River. In addition the following have been reviewed: historical background, existing land uses, current environmental situations, and the economic and social conditions of the study areas. Research identified Cairo, Egypt as a similar case study, where data collected by the author included historical background, current situations, strategic visions and development plan for Nile River Shores. Further information was collected about sustainable development from a general literature review.
From these collected data a set of guidelines and indicators for sustainable development was
established related to environmental, economic and social factors. Based on those guidelines and
indicators, methods of stabilization of the banks for each shore were specified and a proposed
development plan was established. Methods of stabilization of banks and the development plan
were refined and evaluated to establish a final version of the development plan: Sustainable
Development of the Nile River Front (SDNRF) at Greater Khartoum. From refinement and evaluations, barriers and constraints for implementation were specified with their suggested
solutions. Finally, conclusions and recommendations related to the SDNRF Manual about
development and regulations were established
Streets of Cairo
No full textbanjosColl. by Mitchell
Transcribed by Parler
The Streets of Cairo
(Solo on the little piccolo banjo)
Booth Campbell
Cane Hill, Ark.
March 30, 1950
Reel Item 11Funding for digitization provided by the Arkansas Humanities Council and the Happy Hollow Foundation
Timothy Mitchell, Colonizing Egypt. The American University in Cairo Press, Le Caire, 1989
No full textAlleaume Ghislaine. Timothy Mitchell, Colonizing Egypt. The American University in Cairo Press, Le Caire, 1989. In: Bulletin critique des annales islamologiques, n°9, 1992. pp. 168-171
Cairo: A Memoir
No full textComing of age as a Jew in Egypt, the author protested against the British occupation and, as a young journalist, interviewed Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan El-Banna. Amid the crackdown on suspected Zionists and communists, he emigrated to France. Years later he returned to Cairo, this time as a correspondent for Le Monde, to interview another important Egyptian—President Gamal Abdel Nasser
Adapting authoritarianism: institutions and co-optation in Egypt and Syria
No full textThis PhD thesis compares Egypt and Syria’s authoritarian political systems. While the tendency in social science political research treats Egypt and Syria as similarly authoritarian, this research emphasizes differences between the two systems with special reference to institutions and co-optation. Rather than reducibly understanding Egypt and Syria as sharing similar histories, institutional arrangements, or ascribing to the oft-repeated convention that “Syria is Egypt but 10 years behind,” this thesis focuses on how events and individual histories shaped each states current institutional strengthens and weaknesses. Specifically, it explains the how varying institutional politicization or de-politicization affects each state’s capabilities for co-opting elite and non-elite individuals.
Beginning with a theoretical framework that considers the limited utility of democratization and transition theoretical approaches, the work underscores the persistence and durability of authoritarianism. Chapter two details the politicized institutional divergence between Egypt and Syria that began in the 1970s. Chapter three and four examines how institutional politicization or de-politicization affects elite and non-elite individual co-optation in Egypt and Syria. Chapter five discusses the study’s general conclusions and theoretical implications.
This thesis’s argument is that Egypt and Syria co-opt elites and non-elites differently because of the varying degrees of institutional politicization in each governance system. Rather than view one country as more politically developed than the other, this work argues that Syria’s political institutions are more politicized than their Egyptian counterparts. Syria’s political arena is, thus, described as politicized-patrimonialism. Syria’s politicized-patrimonial arena produces uneven co-optation of elites and non-elites as they are diffused through competing institutions. Conversely, the Egyptian political arena remains highly personalized as weak institutions and individuals are manipulated and molded according to the president’s ruling clique. This is referred to as personalized-patrimonialism. As a consequence, Egypt’s political establishment demonstrates more flexibility in ad hoc altering and adapting its arena depending on the emergence of crises.
This study’s theoretical implications suggest that, contrary to modernization and democratization theory’s adage that institutions lead to a political development, politicized institutions within a patrimonial order actually hinder regime adaptation because consensus is harder to achieve and maintain. It is within this context that Egypt’s de-politicized institutional framework advantages its top political elite. In this reading of Egyptian and Syrian politics, Egypt’s personalized political arena is more adaptable than Syria’s. These conclusions do not indicate that political reform is a process underway in either state
Layered Library in Cairo
No full textBased on the mapping of spaces in Islamic Cairo where inhabitants continue to build within the rubble of destroyed buildings, the Layered Library proposes a spatial type based on gaps, glimpses, and wandering.ArchitectureArchitectur
Cairo Refracted Counter-Mapping on the move, from within
No full textCairo Refracted is an ongoing research project, initiated by designers and researchers at the Politecnico di Milano and Cairo University. In Cairo space is not a static concept: the city is shaped by constant fluxes, which produce alternative hierarchies. Space results from praxis, it is conceived and understood as something that can only be produced through social practices (Lefebvre; de Certeau). Almost all of today’s Greater Cairo is the product of informal processes (Sims), which lead to environments where the structure of the physical space might appear weak, while the space of the subjective and collective bodies is extremely intense (MerleauPonty, LeviStrauss). Moving from an urban design perspective, we tried to define a new landscape of observation on the periurban areas around Cairo, and a new ethic for urban regeneration, by investigating the inherent possibilities within the continuous process of mutual adaptation between urban project, the daily use of the spaces and peculiar sociopolitical and mediascapes
Cairo the city victorious
No full textIn his tale of Cairo, Egypt, the author fuses "the excitement of travel with the stimulation of history."--Jacket
SoundSpaces: A Bridge for Cairo
No full textMapping spatio-acoustics in Cairo, Egypt; and the design of a bridge based on the findings of the research.Studio Border ConditionsPublic BuildingsArchitectur
- …
