15,855 research outputs found
William Mitchell Opinion – Volume 18, No. 1, September 1975
No full textSelected Table of Contents The Rise and Fall Bob Malone Mitchell, Sisters \u27pawns\u27 - but whose game? / Maury Landsman; Frank Gerval Supreme Court Strikes Lawyers\u27 Fee Schedules / Bruce Douglas Legal Research: Taking the pain away / Linda Jungers Gerval Survey Shows how to get money with what strings attached / Edward Lief Let\u27s kill all the lawyers! / Stephen Parrish Thompson: No excuse for not studying / Dianne Wright Hennepin County eases into new rules / Eric J. Magnuson
Editorial Board
Mindy Elledge, Frank Gerval, Edward Lief, Dan O\u27Leary, Roberta Kellerhttps://open.mitchellhamline.edu/the-opinion/1044/thumbnail.jp
The Opinion – Volume 21, No. 2, October 2007
No full textSelected Table of Contents College Names Vice Dean Eric Janus as New Interim President and Dean / Johansen, Kate The 35W Bridge Collapse: Asking the Right Questions / Crandall, Jake Mitchell Students Attend American Bar Associaton\u27s 2007 Annual Convention / Kringle, Britt; Wolf, Hanna Profiles in the Profession: Bankruptcy / Gruenhagen, Stephanie The Death of Free Speech? / Denis, Vanessa Iranian Women Outnumbering Men in Local Universities / Barouti, Nazanin
Editorial Board
Crandall, Allison; Johansen, Katehttps://open.mitchellhamline.edu/the-opinion/1181/thumbnail.jp
Eric Mitchell portrait
No full textStudio portrait of Eric Mitchell. Mitchell was a Board of Trustee student member from 1997-1999.The photographs in this collection were created or gathered by the CSU Public Affairs Office, which provides consultation and advice to the Trustees, Chancellor, and other staff. The Public Affairs Offices oversees publications and reproduction, responds to press and other media inquiries as well as to information requests by the general public, and works cooperatively with campus public affairs offices on areas of mutual interest
Eric Berndt and George Mitchell
No full textLeft to right, Eric Berndt and George Mitchell [one of the founders of the Mitchell Camera Corporation. The Mitchell 35mm cameras were popular in film production.]. “SMPTE” written on the envelope. They are standing by a part of the 103rd Technical Conference and Equipment Exhibit, Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers Spring Conference, May 5-10, 1968, Century Plaza Hotel, Los Angeles. Rollei size negatives. BW film negative; 2.25” x 2.25”https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/jonathan_silent_film/1701/thumbnail.jp
Eric Berndt and George Mitchell
No full textLeft to right, Eric Berndt and George Mitchell [one of the founders of the Mitchell Camera Corporation. The Mitchell 35mm cameras were popular in film production.]. “SMPTE” written on the envelope. They are standing by a part of the 103rd Technical Conference and Equipment Exhibit, Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers Spring Conference, May 5-10, 1968, Century Plaza Hotel, Los Angeles. Rollei size negatives. BW film negative; 2.25” x 2.25”https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/jonathan_silent_film/1702/thumbnail.jp
Eric von Stroheim with Mitchell Camera
No full textAdvertisement: Mitchell Motion Picture Camera, Mitchell Camera Corporation, 665 North Robertson Blvd., West Hollywood, California. Loose pages advertising camera with testimonials were included with Mitchell catalog. This is one featuring Eric von Stroheim, with Mitchell Camera used for the 1922 film “Greed.”https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/jonathan_silent_film/2500/thumbnail.jp
The Opinion – Volume 33, No. 3, November 1990
No full textTable of Contents Civility: The Greater Part of Valor / Linda Theis Thrasher SBA to Conduct Referendum: Should Student Activity Fund be Raised? / Deane M. Roe New Mitchell Trustee Debate / Michael Dees; Pamela Boney; William L. Dooley, Jr.; Hope Jensen; James F. Hogg Diversity Committee Seeks Input / Edie Michalski; Walter Lehman; Eric Janus What is This Federalist Society? An Introduction to the WMCL Federalist Society / Publius* Political Parties Need a Cable Station to Call Their Own / David Lillehaug; Ross Corson One Last Letter to the Editor / Lowell J. Satre, Jr.
Editorial Board
Richard J. Olsen; Bob Christensen; Karl Green; M O\u27Sullivan Kane; Eric Douglas Larson; Cathryn Saylor Peterson; Tony Schertler; Tamara Tegeler; Mike Brobackhttps://open.mitchellhamline.edu/the-opinion/1112/thumbnail.jp
Clinical Teaching at William Mitchell College of Law: Values, Pedagogy, and Perspective
No full textAs part of our celebration of thirty years of clinical education at William Mitchell College of Law, I want to describe three clinical courses that I\u27ve had a hand in developing and teaching. When I joined the William Mitchell faculty in 1984, the clinical program was in full bloom, vigorous, and diverse. The courses I discuss in this short essay have grown out of that fertile and energetic educational environment. While the main focus of my essay is to describe these courses, I also take the opportunity to reflect very briefly on the William Mitchell educational philosophy out of which they have grown, and of which they form a part. As I see it, William Mitchell\u27s approach to legal education flows from three main founts. First, there is an embrace of the profession, combined with the critical stance that should characterize higher education. William Mitchell is proud to be a professional school, helping students learn not just theory, but a practice--a complex, nuanced, and messy subset of real life. Second, William Mitchell\u27s education has incorporated a focus on values. In some ways, clinical education can take the lead in values education, but at William Mitchell, we\u27ve worked to include attention to values throughout our curriculum. But how one might teach about values is not self-evident, so our approaches to values-education have been diverse, and the courses I describe are part of an institutional ethos that encourages experimentation and initiative in developing approaches to teaching. The third characteristic is the school\u27s history of putting pedagogy on the same plane as scholarship. Teaching and writing are the two ways in which law school professors construct and disseminate knowledge. Our respect for teaching manifests the high regard we have for our students, for the profession they are learning, and for the clients they will eventually represent. Thinking about how to structure teaching to support our educational goals regarding the profession and values has led me to think a lot about the idea of perspective. Typical law school teaching shines a spotlight on a particular, analytically distinct area of legal doctrine or theory--for example, contracts or torts. This “content” is taught by studying pieces of judges\u27 (and lawyers\u27) work--often appellate opinions. Much clinical education--including the courses I am about to describe-- changes this typical pedagogical structure in two ways. First, it reverses foreground and background, so that the focus is now on what lawyers do rather than what law is. Second, clinical education shifts from the analytical stance to an approach that is integrative, which helps students connect the analytically separate pieces of their legal education together into a meaningful whole. As the reader will see, all three of the courses discussed below were developed collaboratively, are taught collaboratively, and use collaboration as a tool for learning. This, too, is a conscious choice about pedagogy, about values, and about lawyering. It represents an application of pedagogical knowledge about adult learning and models a way of approaching the practice of law and relationships with clients
The Opinion – Volume 33, No. 1, August 1990
No full textTable of Contents Nien Cheng to Kick Off Distinguished Speakers Series / Edie Michalski; Donn McLennen Love in the Law / Wiese/Olson Separate but Better Off? or is One Person, One Vote Still Valid? / Lowell J. Satre Jr. An Era of Strict Construction / Michael J. Varani A Proposal for More Effective Teaching at William Mitchell / Neil W. Hamilton Clinic Curriculum A Gold Mine of Opportunity / Resa Gilats One L; Who is This Cardozo Guy? / Mike Broback An Exclusive Interview with Chief Justice Warren E. Burger
Editorial Board
Richard J. Olsen (Editor in Chief); Karl Green; M. O\u27Sullivan Kane; Eric Douglas Larson; Tony Schertler; Tamara Tegeler; Robert Christensen; Tom Weiss; Richard K. Ellison; Mike Brobackhttps://open.mitchellhamline.edu/the-opinion/1113/thumbnail.jp
Compte rendu de la séance de séminaire consacrée à Timothy Mitchell, Carbon Democracy. Political Power in the Age of Oil
No full textStructure de la séance Présentation du livre, par Eric Verdeil Remarques sur l'intérêt de Mitchell pour les géographes, par Romain Garcier Questions diverses et discussion Ressources complémentaires Présentation du livre, par Eric Verdeil Au croisement des sciences politiques, de la sociologie d'inspiration latourienne (attention aux actants non humains) et callonienne (sociologie de la traduction) et de l'histoire du Moyen-Orient, l'œuvre de Timothy Mitchell intéresse également au premier ch..
- …
