5,996 research outputs found

    Emma Bell Miles journal, 1908-1911

    No full text
    Journal authored by Walden's Ridge naturalist, artist, and author Emma Bell Miles from 1908 May 24 to 1911 April 25

    Emma Bell Miles journal, 1911-1914

    No full text
    Journal authored by Walden's Ridge naturalist, artist, and author Emma Bell Miles from 1911 January 9 to 1914 May 3

    Emma Bell Miles journal, 1915-1918

    No full text
    Journal authored by Walden's Ridge naturalist, artist, and author Emma Bell Miles from 1915 November 11 to 1918 August 8

    Emma Bell Miles journal, 1915-1918

    No full text
    Journal authored by Walden's Ridge naturalist, artist, and author Emma Bell Miles from 1915 November 11 to 1918 August 8

    Emma Bell Miles journal, 1911-1914

    No full text
    Journal authored by Walden's Ridge naturalist, artist, and author Emma Bell Miles from 1911 January 9 to 1914 May 3

    Emma Bell Miles journal, 1908-1911

    No full text
    Journal authored by Walden's Ridge naturalist, artist, and author Emma Bell Miles from 1908 May 24 to 1911 April 25

    Emma Bell Miles journal, 1915

    No full text
    Journal authored by Walden's Ridge naturalist, artist, and author Emma Bell Miles from 1915 June 15 to 1915 September 22. The journal also includes newspaper clippings of Miles' Fountain Square Conversation column authored for the Chattanooga News

    Emma Bell Miles journal, 1915

    No full text
    Journal authored by Walden's Ridge naturalist, artist, and author Emma Bell Miles from 1915 June 15 to 1915 September 22. The journal also includes newspaper clippings of Miles' Fountain Square Conversation column authored for the Chattanooga News

    Pioneer personal history, Elizabeth Emma Brewer Barrows

    No full text
    Typescript of answers by Elizabeth Emma (Brewer) Barrows for a questionnaire filled out for Utah Works Progress Administration\u27s "Pioneer personal history" survey. Born in England in 1860, she came with her family to Utah in 1868, grew up in Salt Lake City, and married in Ogden. Typed by Alice G. Mitchell of Ogden in 193

    Particle Tracking Studies Using Dynamical Map Created from Finite Element Solution of the EMMA Cell

    No full text
    The un­con­ven­tion­al size and the pos­si­bil­i­ty of trans­verse dis­place­ment of the mag­nets in the EMMA non-scal­ing FFAG mo­ti­vates a care­ful study of par­ti­cle be­hav­ior with­in the EMMA ring. The mag­net­ic field map of the dou­blet cell is com­put­ed using a Fi­nite El­e­ment Method solver; par­ti­cle mo­tion through the field can then be found by nu­mer­i­cal in­te­gra­tion, using (for ex­am­ple) OPERA, or ZGOUBI. How­ev­er, by ob­tain­ing an an­a­lyt­i­cal de­scrip­tion of the mag­net­ic field (by fit­ting a Fouri­er-Bessel se­ries to the nu­mer­i­cal data) and using a dif­fer­en­tial al­ge­bra code, such as COSY, to in­te­grate the equa­tions of mo­tion, it is pos­si­ble to pro­duce a dy­nam­i­cal map in Tay­lor form. This has the ad­van­tage that, after once com­put­ing the dy­nam­i­cal map, mul­ti-turn track­ing is far more ef­fi­cient than re­peat­ed­ly per­form­ing nu­mer­i­cal in­te­gra­tions. Also, the dy­nam­i­cal map is small­er (in terms of com­put­er mem­o­ry) than the full mag­net­ic field map; this al­lows dif­fer­ent con­fig­u­ra­tions of the lat­tice, in terms of mag­net po­si­tions, to be rep­re­sent­ed very eas­i­ly using a set of dy­nam­i­cal maps, with in­ter­po­la­tion be­tween the co­ef­fi­cients in dif­fer­ent maps*
    corecore