606 research outputs found
Rehabilitation interventions for improving physical and psychosocial functioning after hip fracture in older people
No full textCopyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
This review is made available in accordance with Cochrane
Database of Systematic Review's repositories policyBackground
Social and psychological factors such as fear of falling, self‐efficacy and coping strategies are thought to be important in the recovery from hip fracture in older people.
Objectives
To evaluate the effects of interventions aimed at improving physical and psychosocial functioning after hip fracture.
Search methods
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (September 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4), MEDLINE and EMBASE (to December 2008), other databases and reference lists of related articles.
Selection criteria
Randomised and quasi‐randomised trials of rehabilitation interventions applied in inpatient or ambulatory settings to improve physical or psychosocial functioning in older adults with hip fracture. Primary outcomes were physical and psychosocial function and 'poor outcome' (composite of mortality, failure to return to independent living and/or readmission).
Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently selected trials based on pre‐defined inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Disagreements were moderated by a third author.
Main results
Nine small heterogeneous trials (involving 1400 participants) were included. The trials had differing interventions, including 'usual care' comparators, providers, settings and outcome assessment. Although most trials appeared well conducted, poor reporting hindered assessment of their risk of bias.
Three trials testing interventions (reorientation measures, intensive occupational therapy, cognitive behavioural therapy) delivered in inpatient settings found no significant differences in outcomes. Two trials tested specialist‐nurse led care, which was predominantly post‐discharge but included discharge planning in one trial: this trial found some benefits at three months but the other trial found no differences at 12 months. Coaching (educational and motivational interventions) was examined in two very different trials: one trial found no effect on function at six months; and the other showed coaching improved self‐efficacy expectations at six months, although not when combined with exercise. Two trials testing interventions (home rehabilitation; group learning program) started several weeks after hip fracture found no significant differences in outcomes at 12 months.
Authors' conclusions
Some outcomes may be amenable to psychosocial treatments; however, there is insufficient evidence to recommend practice changes. Further research on interventions described in this review is required, including attention to timing, duration, setting and administering discipline(s), as well as treatment across care settings. To facilitate future evaluations, a core outcome set, including patient‐reported outcomes such as quality of life and compliance, should be established for hip fracture trials
Calais - seeing it all [Music video]
No full textThis music video was shot with an Arri Alexa Classic with Zeiss Compact Primes. Most of the effects (ghosting, overlay etc.) were accomplished in camera using mirrors, partial mirrors, broken glass, DVD/CDs and other optical distortion elements paired with specialised lighting.
Directed by Michael O'Halloran who Produced alongside Arika Crotty, the clip was shot by Cinematographer Daniel Maddock with Production Design by Claire Bryant. With thanks to our incredible Cast and Crew - Camera Operator Milan Holec, First Assistant Camera Dominic Burjak, Second Assistant Camera Connor Nierfeld, Michael Adams, Julian D'Arcy, Josh Tate, Jess Ritchie & Pia O'Connell as the girl in the glass
Expectation and Covert Exogenous Spatial Attention - V5
No full textAfter running the experiment preregistered in Grubb, M. A., Crotty, N., Massa, N., White, A. L., & Tellez, D. (2022, July 15). Expectation and Covert Exogenous Spatial Attention - V4. Retrieved from osf.io/cd92g, we will run a follow-up study that better enforces the response delay period. The trial will end if a response key is pressed during the delay period, and participants will receive visual feedback that they must wait for the go signal. See the Experimental Details attachment for more information
Expectation and Covert Exogenous Spatial Attention - V4
No full textAfter running the experiment preregistered in Grubb, M. A., Crotty, N., Massa, N., White, A. L., & Tellez, D. (2022, June 30). Expectation and Covert Exogenous Spatial Attention - V3. Retrieved from osf.io/yhm95, we will run a follow-up study that utilizes a forced response delay period of 1067ms (based on our lab-based SAT studies). This is the most important change in the experimental design. See the Experimental Details attachment for more information
Can the Global Neoliberal Regime Survive Victory in Asia? The Political Economy of the Asian Crisis
No full textExpectation and Covert Exogenous Spatial Attention - V3
No full textAfter running the experiment preregistered in Grubb, M. A., Crotty, N., Massa, N., White, A. L., & Tellez, D. (2022, June 17). Expectation and Covert Exogenous Spatial Attention - V2. Retrieved from osf.io/2rnbe, we will run a follow-up study that does not rely on implicit statistical regularities to manipulate expectations about the abrupt-onset cue. Instead, we will use explicit information on each trial to signal the likelihood that an abrupt-onset cue will appear or not appear on that trial. This is the most important change in the experimental design. See the Experimental Details attachment for more information and note that this new version is a multi-session experiment
1970 Jay-Cee-An BJC -- Page 73
No full textPhotographs of BJC sophomoressophomores
Ronald Benjamin
Mary Jane Benson
Robert Benson
Gary Bentley
Luenette Bieber
Gary Bitz
John Bitz
Jerome Boeshans
Charles Boldt
Susan Bovee
Marjorie Boyd
Jean Breene
Sharon Buchholtz
Michael Buckingham
Michael Bullinger
Terry Burke
Mary Busch
Rachelle Buttman
Lorraine Carlson
Mark Carman
Robert Cartledge
Jeffrey Case
Gerald Chalupsky
Charles Chapman
Corliss Ciavarella
Robert Coad
Susan Coad
Gary Cole
Mark Cole
Donna Collins
Nancy Craig
Julaine Crosby
Patrick Crotty
Leonard Crouse
Timothy Cumings
Carol Dawso
Crotty, Massa, Tellez, White, and Grubb - Confirmatory Study
No full textAfter using data from many different previous experiments to understand the interaction between expectation and covert exogenous spatial attention, we are pre-registering this confirmatory study
Student Comments
No full textComments on court cases by Charles R. Hood, Mark McLaughlin, Joseph F. Wintersheid, Frederick R. Daniel, Michael Craig Donovan, Kenneth R. Martin, Santo Bisignano, Jr., Kathryn Kelly, James M. Varga, Edward Charles DeVivo, Mary E. Schaffner, Patrick J. Crotty, and Kymson F. DesJardins
Expectation and Covert Exogenous Spatial Attention - V2
No full textAfter running the experiment preregistered in Crotty, N., Grubb, M. A., Massa, N., White, A. L., & Tellez, D. (2022, June 15). Expectation and Covert Exogenous Spatial Attention. Retrieved from osf.io/3fp2s, we will run a follow-up study in which the cues appear 4X as often on the most-cued-side, relative to the least-cued-side. This is the most important change in the experimental design.
Minor changes include:
- an additional 100 trials (for a total of 1000 trials) to make the new number of conditions appear the correct number of times.
- line tilt starts at 5 degrees instead of 10 to make the task slightly more difficult.
- updating the line tilt after every 50 trials (instead of 60 trials)
- 10 practice trials (instead of 12) to make the new number of conditions appear the correct number of times
- …
