196,028 research outputs found
Unusual inflow sources and device introduction sites in aortic arch debranching.
No full textUnusual inflow sources and device introduction sites in aortic arch debranching.
Deriu G, Grego F, Frigatti P, Gerosa G, Piazza M, Bonvini S, Maturi C, Antonello M, Menegolo M.
Source
Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Abstract
AIM:
Aim of the study was to evaluate a single center experience on hybrid treatment for thoracic aortic diseases, including aortic arch and ascending aorta endografting needing a total debranching from descending thoracic aorta and an antegrade endograft deployment from left ventricle.
METHODS:
Between January 2004 and December 2010 48 patients underwent thoracic aorta endografting, with coverage of at least one supra-aortic artery, because of atherosclerotic, dissecting and post-traumatic aneurysms or complications of previous aortic surgery. Supra-aortic trunks revascularization was obtained from ascending aorta, common carotid arteries and, in three cases, from descending thoracic aorta since the unavailability of common inflow sites. In three cases the antegrade endograft introduction through left ventricle (transapical approach, 2 cases) or ascending aorta (one case) was the only possibility for a safe deployment.
RESULTS:
Three groups have been identified on the basis of the proximal landing zone. Group A (27 patients): zone 2; Group B (9 patients): zone 1; Group C (12 patients): zone 0. The 30 days mortality was respectively 7.4%, 0% and 16%. Post operative paraplegia occurred in the 7.4% of group A, respiratory insufficiency and infections were the main post-operative complications with an incidence reaching 30% in each group.
CONCLUSION:
Hybrid procedures on aortic arch represent a possible treatment for cases unfit for open surgery despite the complication rates and mortality are not negligible. In selected cases, the endografting can be extended up to beyond the landing zone 0 where an antegrade transventricular endograft deployment and a supra-aortic perfusion from descending thoracic aorta represent a feasible option
Iliac Artery Stenting Combined with Ipsilateral Open Femoro-Popliteal Revascularization and Its Effect on Bypass Patency
No full textBackground In cases of multilevel obstructive atherosclerotic disease, hybrid procedures of concomitant iliac artery stenting and femoro-popliteal bypass (IS-FPB) may represent a valid approach, but results are still unclear. The aim was to evaluate early and long-term outcomes of concurrent IS-FPB. Methods This retrospective study included 75 patients (76 limbs) treated with concomitant IS-FPB between January 2010 and June 2016. All patients were prospectively enrolled in a dedicated database. Long-term patency and limb salvage rates were reported using Kaplan-Meier curves. Clinical presentation, lesion sites and extension, distal runoff, type of stent, and bypass were evaluated for their association with patency using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results Mean age was 72.2 ± 9.4 years; the Society for Vascular Surgery comorbidity score was 1.14 ± 0.61. A covered stent (CS) was implanted in 41 (54%) iliac arteries and a bare-metal stent in 35 (46%); a polytetrafluoroethylene graft was used for bypass in 44 limbs (58%) while 32 limbs (42%) had great saphenous vein bypass. Technical success was 99%; the 30-day cumulative surgical complications rate was 6%, mortality 2%, and morbidity 1%. At 42 months, primary patency of the entire ilio-femoral axis was 65.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53–86%). This finding was primarily related to femoro-popliteal bypass occlusion (primary patency, 69.5%), rather than iliac stent loss of patency (primary patency, 94.6%). Secondary patency was 77.6% and limb salvage 89.9%. Univariate analysis demonstrated that Rutherford category 5/6 was a negative predictor of FPB patency (P = 0.04), whereas common femoral artery endarterectomy (P = 0.03) and the use of a CS (P = 0.02) were positive predictors. Multivariate analysis finally indicated that the use of CS to treat iliac obstructive disease was an independent predictor of patency (hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03–0.64; P = 0.01). Conclusions Concurrent IS-FPB has acceptable early and long-term results. Even if further studies are needed, the use of a CS for the iliac obstruction seem to provide better outcomes in the hybrid treatment of these cases of multilevel disease
Parallel Endografts in the Treatment of Distal Aortic and Common Iliac Aneurysms.
No full textObjectivesEndovascular treatment of distal abdominal aortic aneurysms (D-AAA) and bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms (BCIAA) may present technical challenges for standard EVAR. Parallel iliac leg endografts (ILEs) of standard aortic devices and covered stents have been successfully employed to treat patients with D-AAA and BCIAA. The perioperative and long-term results of this straightforward endovascular technique are presented.MethodsBeginning in 2009, patients deemed unfit for open surgery underwent parallel endografts D-AAA and BCIAA exclusion. Avoiding the use of a main body, ILEs are simultaneously delivered from both femoral arteries, landing parallel into the aortic neck (parallel grafts: PG). Distal landing zones including external iliac arteries (EIAs) are reached using appropriate ILEs. A third parallel covered stent graft (Viabahn, Gore) is delivered from a left brachial approach to maintain prograde blood flow to one internal iliac artery (IIA) when needed.ResultsEighteen patients were successfully treated using parallel endografts, nine for BCIAA and nine for D-AAA. All D-AAA presented an irregular saccular shape, including three penetrating aortic ulcers and two pseudoaneurysms of previous aortic grafts. Prograde flow to one IIA was successfully maintained using a Viabahn graft in five patients with BCIAA. Mean aneurysm size was 50 mm in D-AAA and 43 mm in BCIAA. One patient required a perioperative ILE extension to treat a type Ib endoleak. One patient suffered a minor stroke 24 hours after the procedure. Two type II endoleaks were observed postoperatively. Five patients died of non-aneurysm related causes during follow-up. No new endoleaks, graft displacements or occlusions were observed during follow-up (median: 26 months, range 12–42 months).ConclusionsSuccessful exclusion of D-AAA and BCIAA was achieved in high-risk patients using parallel endografts, allowing antegrade blood flow to one IIA when needed. Commercially available endografts were used in a simple and effective approach, with excellent follow-up results
A New Endovascular Approach to Exclude Isolated Bilateral Common Iliac Artery Aneurysms
No full textAbstractA new endovascular procedure is reported to treat bilateral common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms extending to both iliac bifurcations.The left internal iliac artery (IIA) was first embolised, two overlapped Viabahn endografts were delivered from the right IIA to the distal aorta and, finally, CIA aneurysms excluded using iliac contralateral leg and extension endografts from the distal aorta to both external iliac arteries, applying a combined ‘chimney-graft/double-barrel’ technique.This procedure may extend the limits of conventional iliac endografting by preserving blow flow to at least one IIA using off-label commercially available devices, avoiding associated open surgical procedures
Role of genetic study in the management of carotid body tumor in paraganglioma syndrome
No full textAbstract
Diagnosis of carotid body tumor (CBT) was made in a 36 years old woman. The pre-operative examination included genetic analysis of the succinate dehydrogenase that showed a mutation in his subunit D responsible of multiple paraganglioma at slow growth. Subsequently a thoraco-abdominal CT and indium(111) octreotide body scan were performed and another paraganglioma was detected in the anterior mediastinum. CBT was surgically removed; differently the thoracic lesion due to his benign genetic profile was not treated. During a 3-years follow-up the thoracic paraganglioma as expected, didn't increase. Genetic analysis of succinate dehydrogenase, should be performed in the management of CBT
Outcomes of Self Expanding PTFE Covered Stent Versus Bare Metal Stent for Chronic Iliac Artery Occlusion in Matched Cohorts Using Propensity Score Modelling
No full textOBJECTIVES: The aim was to compare outcomes of self expanding PTFE covered stents (CSs) with bare metal stents (BMSs) in the treatment of iliac artery occlusions (IAOs). METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2015, 128 iliac arteries were stented for IAO. A CS was implanted in 78 iliac arteries (61%) and a BMS in 50 (49%). After propensity score matching, 94 limbs were selected and underwent stenting (47 for each group). Thirty day outcomes and midterm patency were compared; follow-up results were analysed with Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Overall, iliac lesions were classified by limb as TASC B (19%), C (21%), and D (60%). Technical success was 98%. Comparing CS versus BMS, the early cumulative surgical complication rate (12% vs. 12%, p = 1.0) and 30 day mortality rate (2% vs. 2%, p = 1.0) were equivalent. At 36 months (average 23 ± 17), overall primary patency was similar between CS and BMS (87% vs. 66%, p = .06), and this finding was maintained after stratification by TASC B (p = .29) and C (p = .27), but for TASC D, CSs demonstrated a higher patency rate (CS, 88% vs. BMS, 54%; p = .03). In particular, patency was in favour of CSs for IAOs > 3.5 cm in length (p = .04), total lesion length > 6 cm (p = .04), and IAO with calcification > 75% of the arterial wall circumference (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the use of self expanding CS for IAOs has similar early and midterm outcomes compared with BMS. Even if further confirmatory studies are needed, CSs seem to have higher midterm patency rates than BMSs for TASC D lesions, IAOs with a total lesion length > 6 cm, occlusion length > 3.5 cm, and calcification involving > 75% of the arterial wall circumference. These specific anatomical parameters may be useful to the operator when deciding between CS and BMS during endovascular planning
Definition of Type II Endoleak Risk Based on Preoperative Anatomical Characteristics
No full textTo define the risk for type II endoleak (EII) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) based on preoperative anatomical characteristics
- …
