162,699 research outputs found
Light-signalling pathways leading to the co-ordinated expression of HEMA1 and Lhcb during chloroplast development in Arabidopsis thaliana
No full textDuring de-etiolation, the co-ordinated synthesis of chlorophyll and the chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins is critical to the development of functional light-harvesting complexes. To understand how this co-ordination is achieved, we have made a detailed study of the light-regulated signalling pathways mediating the expression of the HEMA1 and Lhcb genes encoding glutamyl-tRNA reductase, the first committed enzyme of 5-aminolaevulinic acid formation, and chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins, respectively. To do this, we have screened 7 photoreceptor and 12 light-signalling mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana L. for induction of HEMA1 and Lhcb expression in continuous red, far-red and blue light and following a red pulse. We have categorised these mutants into two groups. The phyA, phyB, phyAphyB, cry1, cry2, cop1, det1, poc1, eid1, and far1 mutations lead to diverse effects on the light regulation of HEMA1, but affect Lhcb expression to a similar degree. The hy1, hy2, hy5, fin219, fhy1, fhy3, spa1, ndpk2, and pat1 mutants also affect light regulation of both HEMA1 and Lhcb expression, but with differences in the relative magnitude of the two responses. The fhy1 and fhy3 mutants show the most significant differences in light regulation between the two genes, with both showing a strong inhibition of HEMA1 expression under continuous red light. These results demonstrate that co-ordinated regulation of HEMA1 and Lhcb is largely achieved through parallel light regulation mediated by shared phytochrome- and crytochrome-signalling pathways. However, glutamyl-tRNA reductase is also required for the synthesis of other tetrapyrroles and this dual role may account for the observed differences in these light-signalling pathways
Loss of nuclear gene expression during the phytochrome A-mediated far-red block of greening response
No full textWe have examined the expression of the HEMA1 gene, which encodes the key chlorophyll synthesis enzyme glutamyl-tRNA reductase, during the phytochrome A-mediated far-red light (FR) block of greening response in Arabidopsis. Our results demonstrate that the FR block of greening comprises two separate responses: a white light (WL) intensity-independent response that requires 3 d of FR and is associated with a loss of expression of the nuclear genes HEMA1 and Lhcb following the transfer to WL (transcriptionally coupled response) and a WL intensity-dependent response that is induced by 1 d of FR and is transcriptionally uncoupled. Both responses required phytochrome A. The transcriptionally uncoupled response correlated with a deregulation of tetrapyrrole synthesis and potential photooxidative damage and was inhibited by cytokinin. The transcriptionally coupled FR response was additive with the loss of expression following Norflurazon-induced photobleaching and was absent in the presence of sucrose or after lower fluence rate (1 µmol m2 s1) FR treatments. Both pathways leading to the loss of nuclear gene expression were inhibited by overexpression of NADPH:protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase, indicating a role for plastid signaling in the FR-mediated pathway. The significance of identifying a distinct phytochrome A-mediated plastid signaling pathway is discussed
Sult Family Folder
No full text13 pages of family history documents containing and related to John Theodore Sult; Virginia Ann McCormac; J. T. Sult; Levi McCormac; Children: Charles A. ; Cora Belle; Dora D.; Laurance R.; Laura May; George F.; Elsie E. Sult - including: Typed account of Descendent
The nuclear genes Lhcb and HEMA1 are differentially sensitive to plastid signals and suggest distinct roles for the GUN1 and GUN5 plastid-signalling pathways during de-etiolation
No full textFeedback mechanisms are critical to the regulation of chloroplast development and signals from functional plastids are required to maintain nuclear gene expression of chloroplast proteins. To understand the role of these signals in de-etiolating Arabidopsis thaliana L. seedlings, we followed the expression of three nuclear genes, Lhcb, HEMA1 and GSA, under a variety of treatments (Norflurazon, lincomycin and a far-red light pretreatment) leading to plastid damage in white light and in a range of genetic backgrounds known to modulate plastid signalling: the genomes uncoupled mutants, gun1, gun4, gun5 and the gun1,5 double mutant, and in a transgenic line over-expressing NADPH:protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase. The three nuclear genes were differentially sensitive to changes in plastid signalling, with Lhcb the most strongly repressed and GSA insensitive to all but the most severe treatments. Analysis of plastid morphology in seedlings grown under identical conditions demonstrated that these responses corresponded closely to the degree of plastid damage. Furthermore, although Lhcb and HEMA1 were responsive to both GUN1 and GUN5 signals, the relative inputs from these pathways differed for each transcript with GUN1 being dominant for HEMA1 regulation. Further analysis of HEMA1 expression in gun1 seedlings under non-photobleaching conditions indicates that GUN1 is an important suppressor of HEMA1 expression in the dark and under saturating white light. These results are consistent with plastid signals functioning in a feedback regulatory mechanism during chloroplast biogenesis, and suggest a key role for GUN1 during the early stages of chloroplast development
Calibration of the Radiocarbon Time Scale for the Southern Hemisphere: AD 1850-950
No full textWe have conducted a series of radiocarbon measurements on decadal samples of dendrochronologically dated wood from both hemispheres, spanning 1000 years (McCormac et al. 1998; Hogg et al. this issue). Using the data presented in Hogg et al., we show that during the period AD 950-1850 the 14C offset between the hemispheres is not constant, but varies periodically (~130 yr periodicity) with amplitudes varying between 1 and 10‰ (i.e. 8-80 yr), with a consequent effect on the 14C calibration of material from the Southern Hemisphere. A large increase in the offset occurs between AD 1245 and 1355. In this paper, we present a Southern Hemisphere high-precision calibration data set (SHCal02) that comprises measurements from New Zealand, Chile, and South Africa. This data, and a new value of 41 ± 14 yr for correction of the IntCal98 data for the period outside the range given here, is proposed for use in calibrating Southern Hemisphere 14C dates
[Report to Chief J. E. Curry, by an unknown author #1]
No full textReport to Chief J. E. Curry, by an unknown author. The report contains a list of officers who gave depositions to the United States Attorney
[Report to Chief J. E. Curry, by an unknown author #2]
No full textReport to Chief J. E. Curry, by an unknown author. The report contains a list of officers who gave depositions to the United States Attorney
BJC Men's quartet
No full textBJC Men's quartet includes Gary Gonser, Roger Peterson, Al Richter, J. Michael McCormac
Investigating the Interhemisphere 14C Offset in the 1st Millennium AD and Assessment of Laboratory Bias and Calibration Errors
No full textPast measurements of the radiocarbon interhemispheric offset have been restricted to relatively young samples because of a lack of older dendrochronologically secure Southern Hemisphere tree-ring chronologies. The Southern Hemisphere calibration data set SHCal04 earlier than AD 950 utilizes a variable interhemispheric offset derived from measured 2nd millennium AD Southern Hemisphere/Northern Hemisphere sample pairs with the assumption of stable Holocene ocean/ atmosphere interactions. This study extends the range of measured interhemispheric offset values with 20 decadal New Zealand kauri and Irish oak sample pairs from 3 selected time intervals in the 1st millennium AD and is part of a larger program to obtain high-precision Southern Hemisphere 14C data continuously back to 200 BC. We found an average interhemispheric offset of 35 ± 6 yr, which although consistent with previously published 2nd millennium AD measurements, is lower than the offset of 55–58 yr utilized in SHCal04. We concur with McCormac et al. (2008) that the IntCal04 measurement for AD 775 may indeed be slightly too old but also suggest the McCormac results appear excessively young for the interval AD 755–785. In addition, we raise the issue of laboratory bias and calibration errors, and encourage all laboratories to check their consistency with appropriate calibration curves and invest more effort into improving the accuracy of those curves
- …
