1,721,112 research outputs found

    Diabetic nephropathy: challenges in pathologic classification.Nat Rev Nephrol (Prec Nat Clin Pract Nephrol), 6: 508-510, 2010

    Full text link
    This paper describes the problems associated with the current pathologic classifications of diabetic nephropathy, largely based on studies performed in patients with type 1 diabetes. Compared to type 1 diabetes, renal patholgy in type 2 diabetes is much more heterogeneous

    Histopathology of diabetic nephropathy.

    No full text
    The clinical manifestations of diabetic nephropathy, proteinuria, increased blood pressure, and decreased glomerular filtration rate, are similar in type 1 and type 2 diabetes; however, the renal lesions underlying renal dysfunction in the 2 conditions may differ. Indeed, although tubular, interstitial, and arteriolar lesions are ultimately present in type 1 diabetes, as the disease progresses, the most important structural changes involve the glomerulus. In contrast, a substantial subset of type 2 diabetic patients, despite the presence of microalbuminuria or proteinuria, have normal glomerular structure with or without tubulointerstitial and/or arteriolar abnormalities. The clinical manifestations of diabetic nephropathy are strongly related with the structural changes, especially with the degree of mesangial expansion in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. However, several other important structural changes are involved. Previous studies, using light and electron microscopic morphometric analysis, have described the renal structural changes and the structural-functional relationships of diabetic nephropathy. This review focuses on these topics, emphasizing the contribution of research kidney biopsy studies to the understanding of the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy and the identification of patients with a higher risk of progression to end-stage renal disease. Finally, evidence is presented that the reversal of established lesions of diabetic nephropathy is possible

    The kidney in diabetes: dynamic pathways of injury and repair.

    Full text link
    Diabetic nephropathy is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The natural history of diabetic nephropathy has changed over the last decades, as a consequence of better metabolic and blood pressure management. Thus, it may now be possible to delay or halt the progression towards ESRD in patients with overt diabetic nephropathy, and the decline of renal function is not always inexorable and unavoidable. Also, the rate of progression from microalbuminuria to overt nephropathy is much lower than originally estimated in the early 80s. Furthermore, there is now evidence that it is possible, in humans, to obtain reversal of the established lesions of diabetic nephropathy. This review focuses on the contribution of kidney biopsy studies to the understanding of the pathogenesis and natural history of diabetic nephropathy and the identification of patients at high risk of progression to ESRD. The classic lesions of diabetic nephropathy and the well-established structural-functional relationships in type 1 diabetes will be briefly summarised and the renal lesions leading to renal dysfunction in type 2 diabetes will be described. The relevance of these biopsy studies to diabetic nephropathy pathogenesis will be outlined. Finally, the evidence and the possible significance of reversibility of diabetic renal lesions will be discussed, as well as future directions for research in this field

    Glomerular structure in nonproteinuric IDDM patients with various levels of albuminuria

    Full text link
    Although microalbuminuria is known to foretell the later development of overt proteinuria in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), different investigators have reported different levels of albuminuria as being predictive. However, whether different levels of albuminuria reflect differences in glomerular structure is not well known. In this study, we divided a cohort of 66 nonproteinuric long-standing (duration 20 ± 7 years) IDDM patients, who had both renal functional and structural studies performed, into four groups according to their urinary albumin excretion rate (AER). The several different levels of microalbuminuria previously reported to be predictive served to demarcate these groups: group I, AER ≤22 mg/24 h (upper limit for normal in our laboratory) (33 patients); group II, AER 23- 45 mg/24 h (11 patients); group III, AER 46-100 mg/24 h (13 patients); and group IV, AER 101-220 mg/24 h (9 patients). Creatinine clearance was similarity in groups I, II, and III but was lower in group IV. Systemic hypertension was present in five patients in group I, one in group II, seven in group III, and five in group IV. Mean values for glomerular basement membrane (GBM) width and volume fraction of the mesangium [Vv(mes/glom)] were greater in all groups than in a group of 52 age-matched normal kidney donors (P 45 but 100) does not discriminate groups with different glomerular lesions. Therefore, albuminuria >45 mg/24 h indicates more advanced diabetic glomerulopathy and is frequently associated with other functional abnormalities such as reduced glomerular filtration rats and increasing blood pressure. These results are consistent with the majority of studies that have found the higher ranges of microalbuminuria to predict progression to overt nephropathy with greater specificity
    corecore