160,761 research outputs found

    Sorex ibarrai Matson and McCarthy 2005

    No full text
    Sorex ibarrai Matson and McCarthy, 2005 Ibarra’s Shrew Sorex veraepacis ibarrai Matson And McCarthy, 2005: 68. Type locality: “ Guatemala, Departamento de El Progreso, Municipio San Augustín Acasaguastlan [sic], Reserva de Biosfera Sierra de las Minas, Cerro Pinalón, Camino de las Torres, 2700 m; 15 ° 4'54" N, 89 ° 55'59" W. Holotype. Adult, female, skin, skull, and partial postcranial skeleton; CMNH No. 113283, collected 3 May 1998 by John O. Matson and field party (original number JOM 6823, M685), the animal was lactating. Distribution. Known from mountains south and southeast of Cobán, in Alta Verapaz, Baja Verapaz, and El Progreso, Guatemala. Diagnosis. Sorex ibarrai is a member of the Sorex veraepacis species group. It is the largest member of this species group (Table 1 and Figure 5) and one of the largest New World Sorex. U3 is usually <U4, but in some individuals U3 &Lacute; U4. Pelage color of the adult female holotype was reported as Clove Brown above, scarcely paler below, by Matson and McCarthy (2005). Upon reassessment, we now regard the color as being Chaetura Black. Specimens of S. ibarrai from the Sierra de las Minas are the darkest of the S. veraepacis species group. Some specimens have white tipped guard hairs on the dorsum. The tail is slightly bicolor. Specimens from other populations (Biotopo Quetzal, Chelemhá, Finca Chinaux, and El Limo) are essentially of the same coloration. Sorex ibarrai averages larger in all body and skull measurements than any Sorex southeast of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (Table 1 and Figure 5), except for length of unicuspid toothrow, which less than in S. chiapensis, S. veraepacis, and the new Sierra Madre species. Description. Sorex ibarrai differs from S. veraepacis by averaging larger in most measurements; it has a shorter mandible relative to skull length; and, its braincase is less inflated. Compared to S. chiapensis and the undescribed species from the Sierra Madre, it is absolutely larger in all measurements. It is the darkest of the S. veraepacis species group. Ecology. Found in cloud forests of the mountains south and southeast of Cobán, in Alta Verapaz, Baja Verapaz, and El Progreso, Guatemala (Matson & McCarthy 2005; Woodman 2011b; Matson et al. 2014). Dominant cloud forest trees that make up the habitat include Persea sessilis, Persea verticulata, Quercus sapoteifolia, tree ferns (Cyathea sp.), Podocarpus oleifolius, and various other conifers (Matson & McCarthy 2005; Woodman et al. 2012). Known altitudinal range is 1475 m to 2800 m. Woodman et al. (2012) summarized data on reproduction in S. ibarrai. Essentially, most reproduction (pregnant or lactating individuals) occurs in the wet season (April through July), with limited reproduction in the drier months. This same pattern has been found in many cloud forest small mammals (Rickart 1977; Vásquez et al. 2000; Matson et al. 2012). Small mammal associates include Cryptotis goodwini, Habromys lophurus, Handleyomys rhabdops, Heteromys desmarestianus, Marmosa mexicana, Microtus guatemalensis, Nyctomys sumichrasti, Peromyscus grandis, P. oaxacensis, Reithrodontomys microdon, R. sumichrasti, R. tenuirostris, and Microtus guatemalensis (Matson & McCarthy 2005; Matson et al. 2014). Specimens examined (146). Guatemala, Alta Verapaz, Chelemhá, 2100 m (CM 120111 120123; USNM 569840, 569841, 569855, 569860, 569892, 569907, 569908, 569923, 569929, 569942, 569950, 569973–569976); Alta Verapaz, Finca Chinaux, 2040–2190 m (CM 120125 – 120144); Baja Verapaz, Biotopo del Quetzal, (USAC 71–73, 75, 78, 79, 80, 4043); Baja Verapaz, Salamá, (USAC 70); El Progreso, Cerro Pinalón, 2560–2800 m (CM 113277 –113294; USAC 3735, 3736, uncatalogued USAC [NS 28; JOM 6860; TJM 9705, 9709; SGP 300, 400, 401, 426, 438, 714, 715, 724; M 708, 718]); El Progresso, 3 km W Pinalón Reserva de Biosfera Sierra de las Minas (MVZ 223391); Zacapa, 6 km NNW San Lorenzo, 2200 m (CM 113295 –113317; USAC 28–31, uncatalogued, USAC [JOM 6743, 6744, 6745, 6773, 6774; SGP 430, 477–480, 488, 499, 501–503, 508, 509, 684, 696]); Zacapa, El Limo, 1475 m (USNM 570021, 570026, 570027, 570050, 570051, 570069, 570070).Published as part of Matson, John O. & Ordóñez-Garza, Nicté, 2017, The taxonomic status of Long-tailed shrews (Mammalia: genus Sorex) from Nuclear Central America, pp. 461-483 in Zootaxa 4236 (3) on pages 478-479, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4236.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/32225

    Achagua velata Matson 2023, n. sp.

    No full text
    &lt;i&gt;Achagua velata&lt;/i&gt; Matson, n. sp. &lt;p&gt;(Figs. 4, 8, 11, 12)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;LSID: 0E4A82F4-6BDF-43BE-86F8-572966809E46&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Diagnosis.&lt;/b&gt; The following diagnosis is based on information from a single individual of &lt;i&gt;A. velata&lt;/i&gt;, and caution should be exercised when interpreting it. As of now, &lt;i&gt;Achagua velata&lt;/i&gt; is currently the only member of the genus known to inhabit the Guianan moist forests of northeastern South America. This species bears a conspicuous antemedial black spot along the forewing inner margin and a weakly gray, discal, reniform spot that are absent in both &lt;i&gt;A. magna&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;A. obsoleta&lt;/i&gt;. The terminal band on both wings is thicker and more complete than in other congeners. The male genitalia of &lt;i&gt;A. velata&lt;/i&gt; lack a spatulate dorsal process of the uncus, a postmedial digitate protuberance on the costa, and cornuti on the vesica, all of which are found in &lt;i&gt;A. magna&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;A. obsoleta&lt;/i&gt;. While male &lt;i&gt;A. velata&lt;/i&gt; shares many genitalic similarities with &lt;i&gt;A. cooperae&lt;/i&gt;, the dorsal process of the uncus appears knob-like in &lt;i&gt;A. cooperae&lt;/i&gt; (Fig. 7a), whereas in &lt;i&gt;A. velata&lt;/i&gt; (Fig. 8a), it is more uniform in shape. &lt;i&gt;Achagua velata&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;A. cooperae&lt;/i&gt; may also be separated by their COI barcode (see Molecular characterization).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Description. MALE.&lt;/b&gt; Forewing length, 17 mm (n = 1).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Head.&lt;/b&gt; Antenna mostly bipectinate, but with gradually diminishing rami that are absent in distal third of antenna; scales above white and light gray, rami dark gray to black. Vertex white; frons mostly light gray. Labial palpus short, decumbent, 1.5x diameter of eye, light gray and white. Chaetosemata in transverse row.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Thorax.&lt;/b&gt; Patagium, tegula, and mesothorax admixture of gray and white scales. Legs mostly white and mottled with gray; epiphysis well-developed; hind tibia with hair pencil (not easily visualized in holotype); tibial spur formula 0&ndash;2&ndash;4.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Forewing.&lt;/b&gt; Pearly-white; widely scattered with inconspicuous light gray scales. Basal and costal areas lightly maculated with gray to brown scales. Subtle, light gray, transverse antemedial line, and weakly gray, discal, reniform spot. Inner margin with antemedial black spot. Terminal area broadly maculated with brown scales. Underside patterned as in upperside, but darkened areas more diffuse and given more toward black.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Hindwing.&lt;/b&gt; Pearly-white except for complete, broadly dark brown outer margin. Underside patterned as in upperside.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Abdomen.&lt;/b&gt; Admixture of gray and white. Third sternite of male abdomen with comb of setae.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Genitalia&lt;/b&gt; (Fig. 8). Uncus abruptly widened at base; dorsal and ventral processes thumb-like. Base of gnathos subquadrangular, with upcurved, heavily sclerotized, pointed apical projection; projection lightly papillated. Valve elongate and large with heavily sclerotized costa; apex strongly falcate. Anellar processes large and triangulate, directed inward, and with apical recurved hooks. Juxta with medial, long cylindrical process with acuminate apex. Vesica with small medial sclerotized patch; cornuti absent.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;FEMALE.&lt;/b&gt; Unknown.&lt;/p&gt; Type Material. Holotype &lt;p&gt;FRENCH GUIANA [FRANCE] &bull; ♁; R&eacute;gina, Nouragues Nature Reserve; (4.096&deg;, -52.683&deg;); elev. 419 m; 09 Jul. 2010; Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde leg.; Genitalia: TAM-2023-289; BOLD Process ID: LNOUD2050 -12; MNHN.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Distribution&lt;/b&gt; (Fig. 11). Presently, &lt;i&gt;A. velata&lt;/i&gt; is only known from the Guianan moist forests at the type locality in French Guiana.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Biology.&lt;/b&gt; Immature stages and host associations remain unknown. Adults are known to fly in July at the type locality.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Etymology.&lt;/b&gt; The specific epithet &lt;i&gt;velata&lt;/i&gt; is derived from the Latin &ldquo;velatus,&rdquo; meaning &ldquo;veiled.&rdquo; The name was chosen because of the rarely seen nature of this species&mdash;thus far only known from a single individual&mdash;and for its white, wedding-veil-like ground color.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Molecular characterization.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;Achagua velata&lt;/i&gt; is represented in BOLD by the BIN: BOLD:ABV2454 (n = 1). The pairwise distance to the nearest neighbor, &lt;i&gt;Achagua cooperae&lt;/i&gt; (n = 5, Costa Rica), is about 3.8%.&lt;/p&gt;Published as part of &lt;i&gt;Matson, Tanner A., 2023, The known species of the genus Achagua Rindge, 1983, with the description of three new species from the Neotropics (Geometridae: Ennominae), pp. 565-576 in Zootaxa 5352 (4)&lt;/i&gt; on pages 573-575, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5352.4.7, &lt;a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8426638"&gt;http://zenodo.org/record/8426638&lt;/a&gt

    Symposium: The Cedar Mesa Project Turns 40: new results from a long-lived study in SE Utah.

    No full text
    Includes list of program participants, maps of the area and photos of early area researchers.Society for American Archaeology; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada/Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada; University of British Columbia; Washington State University Department of Anthropology; Lipe-Matson Family Foundation for Archaeology; Crow Canyon Archaeological Center; University of Notre Dame.Matson, R. G. Symposium: The Cedar Mesa Project turns 40: new results from a long-lived study in SE Utah. Presented at the 76th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Sacramento, CA, March 31, 2011

    Damascus, Palmyra and Baalbek. Dan, Tel el-Kadi, a source of the Jordan

    No full text
    Title from: Matson color slides and filmstrips of Bible Lands ... , the Matson Photo Service.On slide mount: Dan. Tel el-Kadi. A source of the R. Jordan. Caesaria Philippi.On slide mount: Copyright Matson Photo Service.Color slide reproduced from black and white negative or print which was handcolored, and then photographed with color film.Slide made from image taken earlier by either the American Colony Photo Department or the Matson Photo Service.Gift; Episcopal Home; 1978

    Robert Matson

    No full text
    J. Markiewicz, W. R. Matson. Wake field of flow of a sphere falling in a finite duct. American Journal of Modern Physics. Vol. 2, No. 3, 2013, pp. 98-103. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20130203.11 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajmphttps://digitalcommons.morris.umn.edu/cosa2013/1027/thumbnail.jp

    Stamnodes fuego Matson 2023, sp. nov.

    No full text
    &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes fuego&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. &lt;p&gt;urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 02C87385-7562-42ED-9622-59B53B323687&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Figs 8, 47, 65, 78, 94&ndash;95&lt;/p&gt; Diagnosis &lt;p&gt; So far as known, this species, with its dark orange-red ground colour and mostly charcoal hindwings, cannot be confused with others. Unpublished preliminary phylogenetic analyses (Matson &amp; Wagner in prep.) show a close relationship with &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes favilla&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov.; however, the dark orange-red ground colour immediately sets this species apart from the latter, as well as from &lt;i&gt;S. carota&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. and &lt;i&gt;S. clara&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. &ndash; two other species that also appear to be closely related.&lt;/p&gt; Etymology &lt;p&gt; The specific epithet &lt;i&gt;fuego&lt;/i&gt;, meaning &lsquo;fire&rsquo; in Spanish, was inspired by the orange-red ground colour and charcoal-coloured patches that adorn the wings. The name is a noun in apposition.&lt;/p&gt; Material examined &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Holotype&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;MEXICO &bull; &male;; Sonora, Municipio de Bacadehuachi, Rinc&oacute;n de Guadalupe, 14.9 km (air) ENE of Bacadehuachi, Arroyo Campo Los Padres (R&iacute;o Riito drainage), Sierra de Bacadehuachi; 29&deg;50&prime;53&Prime; N, 108&deg;59&prime;39&Prime; W; elev. 1814 m; 2 Sep. 2011; J. Palting leg.; genetic voucher: TAM0075; BOLD Process ID: WAGL2449-20; GenBank: OP898448; USNMENT01771229.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Paratypes&lt;/b&gt; (13 &male;&male;, 3 &female;&female;)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; MEXICO &ndash; &lt;b&gt;Chihuahua&lt;/b&gt; &bull; 1 &male;; 3 mi. south of T&eacute;moris; [27.23&deg; N, 108.27&deg; W]; 28 Aug. 1969; T.A. Sears, R.C. Gardner, C.S. Glaser leg.; AMNH _ IZC 00352927 &bull; 1 &male;; same collection data as for preceding; elev. 4700 ft; 2 Sep. 1969; AMNH _ IZC 00352929 &bull; 1 &male;; same collection data as for preceding; 18 Aug. 1969; genitalia: TAM-2020-024 (USNM 154201); USNM01771231 &bull; 1 &female;; same collection data as for preceding; genitalia: TAM-2020-025 (USNM 154200); USNM01771230 &bull; 1 &female;; same collection data as for preceding; 16 Aug. 1969; USNM01771234 &bull; 1 &male;; same collection data as for preceding; 1 Aug. 1969; genitalia: TAM-2020-027 (USNM 154202); USNM01771232 &bull; 1 &male;; same collection data as for preceding; 2 Sep. 1969; USNM01771233 &bull; 1 &male;; same collection data as for preceding; CNIN &bull; 1 &male;; same collection data as for preceding; BMEC &bull; 1 &male;; same collection data as for preceding; 2 Aug. 1969; BMEC &bull; 1 &male;; 4 mi. SW of T&eacute;moris; [27.23&deg; N, 108.32&deg; W]; 7 Sep. 1969; T.A. Sears, R.C. Gardner, C.S. Glaser leg.; AMNH _ IZC 00352928 &bull; 1 &male;; same collection data as for preceding; elev. 4700 ft; 28 Aug. 1968; USNM01771239 &bull; 1 &female;; same collection data as for preceding; 22 Aug. 1968; BMEC &bull; 2 &male;&male;; same collection data as for preceding; 7 Sep. 1969; BMEC &bull; 1 &male;; same collection data as for preceding; 22 Aug. 1968; BMEC.&lt;/p&gt; Description &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Male&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;FOREWING LENGTH. 15&ndash;17 mm (n = 14).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;HEAD. Antenna filiform, fuscous. Vertex mostly pink; frons white at ventral margin, white and pink at dorsal margin, and broadly fuscous between. Labial palpus short, slightly porrect, subequal to diameter of eye, fuscous medially and white at apex and base.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;THORAX. Patagium mostly pink; tegula fuscous. Mesothorax fuscous above, white beneath. Legs banded with fuscous and white; tibial spur formula 0&ndash;2&ndash;4; epiphysis well developed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;FOREWING. Deep orange-red; costa charcoal, with three, small white patches. Apical area charcoal, rarely with small patch of ground colour. Underside concolourous with forewing except for wavy white patch bordered by red within charcoal apical area; white costal markings more pronounced. Fringe checkered.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;HINDWING. Mostly charcoal, but strongly blotched with orange-red in medial and costal areas. Underside also mostly charcoal, but with bright white reticulate patches outlined in red (see Fig. 8b), and veins faintly outlined with white. Fringe checkered.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;ABDOMEN. Charcoal to fuscous above, paler below, and with subtle banding from pale scales at posterior of segments.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; GENITALIA (Fig. 47). Uncus long, slender, and tapering. Subscaphium well developed. Juxta large, nearly as wide as vinculum, and U-shaped with posterolateral, long, curved, acuminate-conical processes (processes may be more curved and acuminate than in &lt;i&gt;S. favilla&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov.). Inner face of valva with two hair tufts: smaller tuft arising basally from digitate tubercle; second, larger, more laterally widened tuft residing in slight depression and extending to subapical area of valva. Costal sclerite terminating just short of apex. Vesica with eight or more clustered cornuti of varying size, smallest cornutus about one-third length of largest.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Female&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Outwardly undifferentiated from male.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;FOREWING LENGTH. 17&ndash;19 mm (n = 3).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;GENITALIA (Fig. 65). Anterior apophysis two-thirds length of posterior apophysis. Ductus bursae short and narrow with prominent sclerite flattened on ventral surface and dorsolaterally rolled toward median; longer than that of most congeners. Corpus bursae ovoid, laterally sclerotized near posterior base, and with circular and depressed signum bearing numerous minute papillae; signum situated at anterior of corpus bursae.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Distribution&lt;/b&gt; (Fig. 78)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Mexico: &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes fuego&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. is known from the northeastern Sierra Madre Occidental pine-oak forests. The only known collections of this species are from the type material in Sonora and Chihuahua.&lt;/p&gt; Biology &lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes fuego&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. is known to fly from August into September. The immature stages remain unknown, but from knowledge of visually similar &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes&lt;/i&gt;, it is predicted this species will be hosted by local mints (Lamiaceae).&lt;/p&gt; Molecular characterization &lt;p&gt; This species is represented in BOLD as BIN: BOLD:AEH2873 (n = 1). The distance to the nearest adjacent interspecific neighbour, &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes favilla&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. (n = 2), is around 5% (Fig. 94).&lt;/p&gt; Remarks &lt;p&gt;All but one paratype were obtained from the same U.S. led expeditions to Mexico in the late 1960&rsquo;s and held in the Bohart Museum of Entomology at the University of California, Davis. The holotype, collected by John Palting in 2011, is the only recent collection that I have examined.&lt;/p&gt;Published as part of &lt;i&gt;Matson, Tanner A., 2023, A review of Mexican Stamnodes (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) with the description of 16 new species, pp. 1-79 in European Journal of Taxonomy 911&lt;/i&gt; on pages 15-17, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.911.2371, &lt;a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10376790"&gt;http://zenodo.org/record/10376790&lt;/a&gt

    Stamnodes disrupta Matson 2023, sp. nov.

    No full text
    &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes disrupta&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. &lt;p&gt;urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 4F9AC763-7709-4260-877B-63C784314A85&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Figs 14, 49, 67, 80, 94&ndash;95&lt;/p&gt; Diagnosis &lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes disrupta&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. may be confused with &lt;i&gt;S. fervefactaria&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;S. fergusoni&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;S. mariachi&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. and &lt;i&gt;S. erupta&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. The bright, white reticulate pattern of the underside of the hindwing and apex of the forewing stand in contrast to the more off-white to cream colour of the same areas in &lt;i&gt;S. fervefactaria&lt;/i&gt;. Additionally, the lead grey patches on the hindwing underside are finely bounded by a thin dark grey edge in &lt;i&gt;S. fervefactaria&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;S. fergusoni&lt;/i&gt; that is mostly absent in &lt;i&gt;S. disrupta&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes disrupta&lt;/i&gt; is known from the northern Sierra Madre Occidental in the states of Sonora and Chihuahua, while visually similar sister species &lt;i&gt;S. erupta&lt;/i&gt; is known from the vicinity of Mexico City. While the hindwing underside of &lt;i&gt;S. disrupta&lt;/i&gt; bears a white, transverse medial band that gradually curves toward the tornus (see left arrow, Fig. 14b), the same band in &lt;i&gt;S. erupta&lt;/i&gt; is straighter as it angles toward the tornus (see left arrow, Fig. 16b). The angle of this band affects the shape of the large lead-coloured patch near the tornus; in &lt;i&gt;S. disrupta&lt;/i&gt;, this patch is more subovate, while in &lt;i&gt;S. erupta&lt;/i&gt;, it is more triangulate. The basal inner margin of &lt;i&gt;S. disrupta&lt;/i&gt; also appears to have more white scales along the inner edge of the large grey basal patch of the same area in &lt;i&gt;S. mariachi&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;S. erupta&lt;/i&gt; (see right arrows, Figs 14b, 15b, 16b). &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes disrupta&lt;/i&gt; may also be separated from &lt;i&gt;S. mariachi&lt;/i&gt; by the presence of a checkered forewing fringe and oblique white patch in apical area of forewing underside.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Male genitalia readily separate &lt;i&gt;S. disrupta&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. (Fig. 49) from &lt;i&gt;S. fergusoni&lt;/i&gt; (Matson &amp; Wagner 2020: fig. 7). &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes fergusoni&lt;/i&gt; has a juxta that bears posterolateral conical processes and its vesica has a large echinate patch of cornuti; these characters are absent in &lt;i&gt;S. disrupta&lt;/i&gt;. However, the male genitalia of &lt;i&gt;S. disrupta&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;S. fervefactaria&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;S. mariachi&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov., and &lt;i&gt;S&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;erupta&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. are exceedingly similar with only subtle differences. While the uncus of &lt;i&gt;S&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;disrupta&lt;/i&gt; (Fig. 49a) and &lt;i&gt;S. fervefactaria&lt;/i&gt; is broadly swollen medially, that of &lt;i&gt;S. mariachi&lt;/i&gt; (Fig. 50a) and &lt;i&gt;S. erupta&lt;/i&gt; (Fig. 51a) tapers only slightly along its length and lacks an apparent medial swelling. The shield-like juxta of &lt;i&gt;S. disrupta&lt;/i&gt; is larger, and more pronounced on its distal surface than in &lt;i&gt;S. mariachi&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; Etymology &lt;p&gt; The species name &lt;i&gt;disrupta&lt;/i&gt; is derived from the Latin word &lsquo; &lt;i&gt;disrumpere&lt;/i&gt; &rsquo;, meaning &lsquo;to shatter&rsquo; or &lsquo;to break apart&rsquo;. It alludes to the broken, white, hindwing underside pattern of this moth. The phonetic similarity with visually similar &lt;i&gt;S. erupta&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. is intentional to reinforce the close relationship between these two species.&lt;/p&gt; Material examined &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Holotype&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;MEXICO &bull; &male;; Chihuahua, 3 mi. S of Temoris; [27.23&deg; N, 108.25&deg; W]; 5 Sep. 1969; T.A. Sears, R.C. Gardner, C.S. Glaser leg.; BMEC.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Paratypes&lt;/b&gt; (9 &male;&male;, 2 &female;&female;)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; MEXICO &ndash; &lt;b&gt;Chihuahua&lt;/b&gt; &bull; 1 &male;; 3 mi. S of Temoris; [27.23&deg; N, 108.25&deg; W]; 9 Sep. 1969; T.A. Sears, R.C. Gardner, C.S. Glaser leg. genitalia: TAM-2023-260 (USNM 154211); USNMENT01771237. &ndash; &lt;b&gt;Sonora&lt;/b&gt; &bull; 2 &male;&male;, 1 &female;; highway 16 K 260 in prominent canyon; [28.37&deg; N, 109.05&deg; W]; 10&ndash;12 Sep. 1992; R. Wells leg.; genitalia: TAM-2023-261; BMEC &bull; 1 &male;; same collection data as for preceding; AMNH _ IZC 00353029 &bull; 1 &male;; Rte. 16 R&iacute;o Maycoba, 17 mi. E of Y&eacute;cora; [28.43&deg; N, 109.19&deg; W]; 29 Sep. 1991; Jim P. Brock leg.; genitalia: TAM-2023-256; MGCL Accession #2016-49; E.C. Knudson Knudson / Bordelon leg.; MGCL &bull; 4 &male;&male;, 1 &female;; 20 mi. W of Y&eacute;cora, Mesa Companera, Mex Hwy 16; [28.46&deg; N, 109.26&deg; W]; 12 Sep. 2004; P. Opler leg.; Bold Process IDs: ABLCX271-10 to ABLCX275-10; GenBank: HQ543795 to HQ543799; CSU.&lt;/p&gt; Description &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Male&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;FOREWING LENGTH. 17&ndash;18 mm (n = 10).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;HEAD. Antenna filiform, fuscous to black. Vertex scarlet; frons mostly fuscous, with a few midsaggital white scales and white along ventral and lateral margins. Labial palpus short, slightly porrect, subequal to diameter of eye, fuscous and white. Cephalic collar mostly scarlet.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;THORAX. Patagium mostly scarlet; tegula scarlet at base but otherwise mostly fuscous transitioning to lighter grey distally. Mesothorax fuscous above, white and pink below. Legs mixture of white and fuscous; tibial spur formula 0&ndash;2&ndash;4; epiphysis well developed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;FOREWING. Scarlet near base, diffusing to light orange-yellow ground colour. Costa with small antemedial lead-black patch and much larger, trigonate to subquadrangular, costomedial, lead-black patch. Apical area broadly lead-black. Underside similar to upperside, but scarlet base more intense in costal area, and costal area given toward white between lead-black costomedial patch and apical area; apical area also with thin, oblique white patch. Fringe lightly checkered.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;HINDWING. Concolourous with forewing above, but ground colour mostly reduced to medial, longitudinal ray and branches between large, ill-defined, lead-black coloured patches (Fig. 14a). Underside sharing similar pattern elements, but much more starkly contrasted with white rays between large, lead-black coloured patches; patches along costal antemedian and postmedian, thinly along outer margin, along basal half of inner margin, and at tornus (Fig. 14b). Tornal patch subovate. Fringe as in forewing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;ABDOMEN. Fuscous.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;GENITALIA (Fig. 49). Uncus long, narrow, and medially swollen. Subscaphium well developed. Inner surface of valve with dense hair tuft arising from basal tubercle. Juxta shield-like, void of stiff setae or posterior processes. Vesica without large cornuti, but with extremely small rugose papillae at base of vesica and along ovoid lateral diverticulum.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Female&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Outwardly undifferentiated from male.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;FOREWING LENGTH. 17 mm (n = 2).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;GENITALIA (Fig. 67). Anterior apophysis two-thirds length of posterior apophysis. Ostium large, lamella antevaginalis strongly sclerotized and subcircular. Short and narrow ductus bursae with prominent anterior sclerite flattened on ventral surface and dorsolaterally rolled toward median. Corpus bursae spherical; bearing two signa, each with inward directed process; one signum situated near posterior base of corpus bursae (near ductus bursae) and one near anterior third, each covered with minute papillae.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Distribution&lt;/b&gt; (Fig. 80)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Mexico: &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes disrupta&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. is known from the Sierra Madre Occidental pine-oak forests of Sonora and Chihuahua.&lt;/p&gt; Biology &lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes disrupta&lt;/i&gt; sp. nov. flies in September. The immature stages remain unknown but are likely hosted by mints (Lamiaceae).&lt;/p&gt; Molecular characterization &lt;p&gt; This species is represented in BOLD as BOLD:AAM2600 (n = 5, Mexico: Sonora) At present, the average pairwise intraspecific distance is 0.22%, the maximum pairwise intraspecific distance is 0.48%, and the distance to the nearest neighbour, &lt;i&gt;Stamnodes fervefactaria&lt;/i&gt; (n = 9), is 2.86%.&lt;/p&gt;Published as part of &lt;i&gt;Matson, Tanner A., 2023, A review of Mexican Stamnodes (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) with the description of 16 new species, pp. 1-79 in European Journal of Taxonomy 911&lt;/i&gt; on pages 22-26, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2023.911.2371, &lt;a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10376790"&gt;http://zenodo.org/record/10376790&lt;/a&gt

    Achagua cooperae Matson 2023, n. sp.

    No full text
    &lt;i&gt;Achagua cooperae&lt;/i&gt; Matson, n. sp. &lt;p&gt;(Figs. 3, 7, 10&ndash;12)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;LSID: 2053905A-C10D-464D-A68F-694BF3E7E038&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Diagnosis.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;Achagua cooperae&lt;/i&gt; is currently the only member of the genus known from Central America. This species bears a conspicuous antemedial black spot along the forewing inner margin and a weakly gray, discal, reniform spot that are absent in both &lt;i&gt;A. magna&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;A. obsoleta.&lt;/i&gt; The male genitalia of &lt;i&gt;A. cooperae&lt;/i&gt; lack a spatulate dorsal process of the uncus, a postmedial digitate protuberance on the costa, and cornuti on the vesica, all of which are found in &lt;i&gt;A. magna&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;A. obsoleta&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;Achagua cooperae&lt;/i&gt; is thought to be closely related to &lt;i&gt;A. velata&lt;/i&gt;. One noticeable distinction is the thickness of the black terminal band on the hindwing, which tends to be thinner in &lt;i&gt;A. cooperae&lt;/i&gt; compared to &lt;i&gt;A. velata&lt;/i&gt;. While male &lt;i&gt;A. cooperae&lt;/i&gt; share many genitalic similarities with &lt;i&gt;A. velata&lt;/i&gt;, the dorsal process of the uncus appears to be knob-like in &lt;i&gt;A. cooperae&lt;/i&gt;, whereas in &lt;i&gt;A. velata&lt;/i&gt;, it is more uniform in shape (Figs. 7a, 8a). &lt;i&gt;Achagua cooperae&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;A. velata&lt;/i&gt; may also be separated by their COI barcode (see Molecular characterization).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Description. MALE.&lt;/b&gt; Forewing length, 17&ndash;18 mm (n = 8).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Head.&lt;/b&gt; Antenna mostly bipectinate, but with gradually diminishing rami that are absent in distal third of antenna; scales above white and light gray, rami dark gray to black. Vertex white; frons mostly light gray. Labial palpus short, decumbent, 1.5x diameter of eye, light gray and white. Chaetosemata in transverse row; cephalic collar mostly white with few black scales.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Thorax.&lt;/b&gt; Patagium, tegula, and mesothorax admixture of gray and white scales. Legs mostly white and mottled with gray; epiphysis well-developed; hind tibia with large hair pencil; tibial spur formula 0&ndash;2&ndash;4.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Forewing.&lt;/b&gt; Pearly-white; widely scattered with inconspicuous light gray scales. Basal and costal areas lightly maculated with gray to brown scales. Subtle, light gray, transverse antemedial line, and weakly gray, discal, reniform spot. Inner margin with antemedial black spot. Terminal area broadly maculated with brown scales and bearing undulating, subterminal pale stripe within. Underside patterned as in upperside but darkened areas more diffuse.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Hindwing.&lt;/b&gt; Pearly-white except for blackened terminal area. Underside patterned as in upperside but darkened area more diffuse.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Abdomen.&lt;/b&gt; Admixture of gray and white. Third sternite of male abdomen with comb of setae.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Genitalia&lt;/b&gt; (Fig. 7). Uncus abruptly widened at base; dorsal process larger, gradually enlarging to pronounced swelling at distal third and with knob-like apex; ventral process large and thumb-like. Base of gnathos subquadrangular with upcurved, heavily sclerotized, and pointed apical projection; projection lightly papillated. Valve elongate, quadrate, and large with heavily sclerotized costa; apex strongly falcate. Anellar processes large and triangular, directed inward, and with apical recurved hooks. Juxta with medial, elongate cylindrical process with acuminate apex. Vesica with small medial sclerotized fold; cornuti absent.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;FEMALE.&lt;/b&gt; Forewing length, 19 mm (n = 2). Outwardly undifferentiated from male.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Genitalia&lt;/b&gt; (Fig. 10). Papillae anales rounded; posterior apophysis 2.5x longer than anterior apophysis. Lamella antevaginalis cordiform; ostium opening into short, lightly sclerotized ductus bursae. Corpus bursae posteriorly narrow, opening into ovoid anterior portion. Signum large and invaginated, appearing somewhat cone-like; surface lightly denticulate.&lt;/p&gt; Type Material. Holotype &lt;p&gt;COSTA RICA &bull; ♁; Alajuela, ACG [Area De Conservaci&oacute;n Guanacaste], Rincon Rain Forest, casa de Oscar Albergue; (10.866&deg;, -85.326&deg;); elev. 725 m; 14 Feb. 2010; R. Franco &amp; H. Cambronero leg. (light trap); Sample IDs: 10-SRNP-105189; Bold Process ID: BLPDQ563 -10; GenBank: HQ934011; USNMENT01771270; USNM.&lt;/p&gt; Paratypes (6♁, &female;) &lt;p&gt;COSTA RICA &bull; 2♁, &female;; same collection data as holotype; Sample IDs: 10-SRNP-105551, 10-SRNP-105757, 10-SRNP-105758; Bold Process IDs: BLPDQ925-10, BLPDR132-10, BLPDR133-10; GenBank: HQ934144, HQ934347, HQ934348; Genitalia: TAM-2023-289; USNMENT01771269, USNMENT01771271; USN- MENT01771272; USNM &bull; ♁; Alajuela, ACG [Area De Conservaci&oacute;n Guanacaste], Rincon Rain Forest, t&uacute;nel de Oscar Albergue; (10.868&deg;, -85.327&deg;); elev. 708 m; 14 Feb. 2010; S. Rios &amp; F. Quesada leg. (light trap); Sample ID: 10-SRNP-105667; Bold Process ID: BLPDR042-10; GenBank: HQ934257; USNMENT01771273; USNM &bull; 3♁; Puntarenas, 35 km NE of San Vito at Las Alturas Field Station; elev. 4800 ft; [27&ndash;29] Apr. 1992; C. Snyder leg. (at light); Genitalia: F.H.R. No. 21326 and TAM-2023-251; AMNH _IZC 00353026 to AMNH _IZC 00353028; AMNH.&lt;/p&gt; Other Material Examined. &lt;p&gt;MEXICO &bull; ♁; Veracruz, Los Tuxtlas, Sierra Sta. Martha, Arroyo Claro, Neck Point; 19 Mar. 1977; R. S&aacute;nchez S. leg.; Genitalia: TAM-2023-315; CNIN &bull; &female;; Veracruz, Est. Biol. de Los Tuxtlas; Alt. 170 m; 01 Apr. 1985; P. Sinaca leg.; Genitalia: TAM-2023-316; 10194; CNIN.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Distribution&lt;/b&gt; (Fig. 11). &lt;i&gt;Achagua cooperae&lt;/i&gt; is known to inhabit the Isthmian-Pacific and Atlantic moist forests of Costa Rica, but its distribution in other parts of Central America remains uncertain. Notably, two individuals were collected from the Sierra de los Tuxtlas, a remote volcanic range situated along the southeastern coast of the Veracruz Gulf in Mexico. These are tentatively regarded as conspecific (see Remarks).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Biology.&lt;/b&gt; The life history of &lt;i&gt;A. cooperae&lt;/i&gt; remains unknown. Adult are known to fly from February through April.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Etymology.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;Achagua cooperae&lt;/i&gt;, is named in honor of Loretta Faye Cooper, former Senior Development Officer, and Deputy Director for Advancement at the Smithsonian&rsquo;s National Museum of Natural History. Loretta&rsquo;s dedication to museum research is unparalleled, and her tireless efforts to raise awareness and secure funding for the conservation and study of the natural world make her a true champion for both people and the environment. Loretta&rsquo;s support for the Area de Conservaci&oacute;n Guanacaste is particularly noteworthy and greatly appreciated.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Molecular characterization.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;Achagua cooperae&lt;/i&gt; is represented in BOLD by the BIN: BOLD:AAM6724 (n = 5). The pairwise distance to the nearest neighbor, &lt;i&gt;Achagua velata&lt;/i&gt; (n = 1, French Guiana), is about 3.8%.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Remarks.&lt;/b&gt; I tentatively regard two individuals from the Sierra de los Tuxtlas of Veracruz, Mexico, as &lt;i&gt;A. cooperae&lt;/i&gt;. However, I have opted not to include these individuals in the type series. While the genitalia of both sexes in this Mexican population are consistent with those in Costa Rica, the Sierra de los Tuxtlas is a region characterized by biological endemism (S&aacute;nchez-Gonz&aacute;lez &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. 2008), and further, this population is disjunct from the remaining known distribution of &lt;i&gt;A. cooperae&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The male phallus depicted in Figure 7b may give the impression of a spinate cornutus. However, this is an artifact of the preparation and the structure in question is rather a sclerotized fold.&lt;/p&gt;Published as part of &lt;i&gt;Matson, Tanner A., 2023, The known species of the genus Achagua Rindge, 1983, with the description of three new species from the Neotropics (Geometridae: Ennominae), pp. 565-576 in Zootaxa 5352 (4)&lt;/i&gt; on pages 571-573, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5352.4.7, &lt;a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8426638"&gt;http://zenodo.org/record/8426638&lt;/a&gt

    A Conversation with Bill Lipe (interview format)

    No full text
    On April 7, 2006, at Washington State University, Tim Kohler and R. G. Matson interviewed Bill Lipe about the book Tracking Ancient Footsteps: William D. Lipe's Contributions to Southwestern Prehistory and Public Archaeology. A few days before the interview, they gave Lipe a list of a half-dozen possible topics. About 90 minutes of open-ended conversation then began, later transcribed by Diane Curewitz. What follows is a lightly edited version of that conversation, with inserts noted by square brackets.Lipe, William D. (with Timothy Kohler and R.G. Matson). 2006. A Conversation with Bill Lipe (interview format). In Tracking Ancient Footsteps: William D. Lipe's Contributions to Southwestern Prehistory and Public Archaeology, edited by R.G. Matson and Timothy A. Kohler, pp. 127-148. Washington State University Press, Pullma
    corecore